Jack and Ruth Ann Hill Convocation Center · at GA Southern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GASO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MER 78–77 · win probability MER 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MER has more of the edges
MER 3, GASO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: MER 39.2, GASO 39.6. Allowed: MER 29.7, GASO 41.4
MER offense vs GASO defense
Offense 223rd of 366 against a defense 347th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MER 32.6%, GASO 28.8%. Defensive: MER 66.8%, GASO 64.8%
Context
Schedule so far
MER has played the 193rd-hardest schedule, GASO the 279th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MER 15.0%, GASO 14.7%. Forced: MER 17.0%, GASO 18.7%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: MER plays 69.5 a game (148th fastest), GASO 71.8 (42nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
GASO at home. This season: GASO 0-0 at home, MER 0-0 away
Even
GASO offense vs MER defense
Offense 233rd of 366 against a defense 268th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MER 53.1 and allows 52.5; GASO 51.4 and allows 52.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MER 28%, GASO 16%. Transfers in: MER 2, GASO 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
MER hits 35.6% and allows 36.2%; GASO hits 33.4% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 39.2% and 48.9% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MER -0.8 | — |
| Total | — | 155.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | MER 77.9 · GASO 77.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MER -0.6 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MER 36.5 · GASO 35.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MER 1–0 GASOMER leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MER 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2021-22 | GASO 68 @ MER 77 | MER -5 | MER W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mercer
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
19-10
66% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-76 | +28.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 92-77 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 69-105 | +2.5 | L −33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 95-83 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-67 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 91-84 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 78-67 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 63-70 | +22.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-81 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-84 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 72-74 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-77 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-63 | -16.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 109-97 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 77-67 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 102-92 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-80 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 95-77 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-81 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-79 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-69 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-54 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 90-94 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-86 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-76 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 73-77 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
+13.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
−33.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+16.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
+1.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+9.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
+0.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
+15.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−1.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+1.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
+0.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
+1.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+21.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+8.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
+1.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+4.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+3.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−5.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+7.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
−4.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−8.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−21.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
+1.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
+4.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
−14.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
−0.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−5.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+4.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−5.5
covered 19didn’t cover 10avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
−6.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
+11.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+14.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
−0.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+15.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
−10.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
−19.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−16.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+10.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
−8.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
−0.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+16.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+49.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
−9.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+38.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+5.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−0.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+13.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
+22.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−1.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−42.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
−18.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
−23.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
+32.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
+18.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−4.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+8.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−4.5
over 14under 15avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
GA Southern
35 games played
Straight up
19-16
54% wins
Against the spread
17-17
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 89-92 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-90 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 95-94 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-68 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-98 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 64-77 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-69 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 91-85 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-67 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 96-92 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 82-81 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-87 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 87-84 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 75-79 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 68-85 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 172.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 79-76 | — | — | — | — |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-69 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 71-77 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 101-87 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-89 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-82 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 99-82 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 88-84 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 80-77 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-72 | +1.5 | W +25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-77 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+2.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
−2.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+4.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
+8.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−7.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−4.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−16.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
+10.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+6.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
−6.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+2.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
+13.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+1.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+2.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+5.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
−13.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
−2.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−10.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−15.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
−0.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−11.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−10.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
−14.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+16.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−3.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
−7.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−10.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+24.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+1.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
+10.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+13.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+25.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
+6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+29.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
+20.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+25.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
−30.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−5.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−35.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−19.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
−6.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+0.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+21.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
−2.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+34.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+5.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+17.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
+9.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
+8.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−3.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−19.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
+1.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−15.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−3.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
+2.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+25.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−24.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
+15.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−5.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+12.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+14.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
−8.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+29.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+16.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
−6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−14.5
over 19under 15avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Mercer 0, GA Southern 0, even 5
MercerBetterGA Southern
G B. Shoulders9.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 41
=Even
G J. Dixon TR9 pts · 1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 39
G Q. Perkins8.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 22
=Even
G D. Williams3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 10
F K. Steele TR8 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 62
=No call
G J. Williams1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
F M. Mabor Makoi TR1.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 10
=Even
F T. Claytor TR6.5 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
F P. Padegimas NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F T. Sotirov2.5 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 1
MercerBetterGA Southern
MER offense223rd of 366 · -6.8
←MERSmall
GASO defense347th of 366 · -9.4
MER defense268th of 366 · -6.8
=Even
GASO offense233rd of 366 · -7.2
Backcourt-3.4 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
←MERBig
Frontcourt-3.7 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.8 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestMER betterGASO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Shoulders32 minQ. Perkins24 minM. KoveosNewD. BarrNewH. LyttleNewK. LamonteNew
Forwards
K. Steele21 min · TRM. Mabor Makoi8 min · TRP. PadegimasNewS. MayhughNewD. KovacevicNew
Guards
J. Dixon19 min · TRD. Williams12 minJ. Williams8 minD. GardnerNewA. HendersonNewR. WilliamsNew
Forwards
T. Claytor17 min · TRT. Sotirov11 minE. Smith6 min · TRC. CrissmanNewE. SavaneNewE. JamesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #65 | Points per game | 79.9 #69 |
| 1.15 #55 | Points per possession | 1.12 #109 |
| 69.5 #148 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #42 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #98 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #176 |
| 35.6 #87 | 3-point % | 33.4 #207 |
| 39.2 #188 | 3-point attempt rate | 48.9 #20 |
| 39.2 #74 | Free throw rate | 39.6 #62 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #67 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #49 |
| 32.6 #102 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.8 #238 |
| 12.7 #240 | Assists per game | 10.7 #344 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.8 #263 | Points allowed | 80.3 #325 |
| 1.12 #273 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #259 |
| 52.5 #242 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.3 #230 |
| 36.2 #311 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #208 |
| 17.0 #155 | Turnovers forced | 18.7 #65 |
| 66.8 #303 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.8 #342 |
| 7.1 #115 | Steals per game | 8.1 #36 |
| 3.2 #186 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #128 |
Mercer
16-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs W Carolina73–77
- Wvs ETSU82–76
- L@ W Carolina74–78
- Wvs Samford89–86
- Lvs Chattanooga90–94
A week or more of rest.
GA Southern
19-16 in 2025-26 overall · 13-11 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Troy61–77
- Wvs Marshall82–78
- Wvs Coastal96–72
- Wvs South Alabama94–85
- Wvs Arkansas St80–77
A week or more of rest.