Cam Henderson Center · at Marshall
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TOL 79–77 · win probability TOL 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
TOL 3, MRSH 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: TOL 30.5, MRSH 29.2. Allowed: TOL 26.6, MRSH 41.1
TOL offense vs MRSH defense
Offense 121st of 366 against a defense 277th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TOL 14.7%, MRSH 16.6%. Forced: TOL 17.9%, MRSH 16.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: TOL 54.5 and allows 54.3; MRSH 54.8 and allows 50.3
Context
Schedule so far
TOL has played the 172nd-hardest schedule, MRSH the 234th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MRSH at home. This season: MRSH 0-0 at home, TOL 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TOL 29.5%, MRSH 31.9%. Defensive: TOL 66.3%, MRSH 66.2%
Even
MRSH offense vs TOL defense
Offense 198th of 366 against a defense 234th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: TOL plays 69.5 a game (146th fastest), MRSH 70.7 (86th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TOL 43%, MRSH 27%. Transfers in: TOL 2, MRSH 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
TOL hits 37.0% and allows 34.4%; MRSH hits 36.8% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 32.5% and 44.3% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TOL -2.1 | — |
| Total | — | 155.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | TOL 78.8 · MRSH 76.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TOL -1.4 | — |
| 1H total | 72.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | TOL 37 · MRSH 35.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% | 9-1 90% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TOL 3–2 MRSHTOL leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · TOL 2-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2025-26 | MRSH 85 @ TOL 73 | TOL -2.5 | MRSH W |
| Nov 9, 2024-25 | TOL 90 @ MRSH 80 | MRSH +0.5 | TOL W |
| Dec 13, 2023-24 | MRSH 87 @ TOL 88 | TOL -8.5 | MRSH W |
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | TOL 85 @ MRSH 100 | MRSH -3.5 | MRSH W |
| Dec 21, 2021-22 | MRSH 63 @ TOL 95 | TOL -3.5 | TOL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Toledo
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-19
41% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 74-76 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 73-85 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-71 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-83 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-75 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 75-68 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-87 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 97-98 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-75 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-92 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-75 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 75-61 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 101-85 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 82-84 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-72 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-91 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-55 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-73 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 90-79 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-75 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 79-69 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-67 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 99-78 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 77-76 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 77-67 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-79 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−4.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−14.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
+15.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
−3.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+15.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
+9.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−10.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+3.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−6.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+0.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
−5.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−4.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
+6.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−15.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+13.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+0.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
+2.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+2.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
+9.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−1.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−3.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+4.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−6.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+10.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
+13.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
+5.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+15.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
−0.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
+7.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
+4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−0.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−2.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
−7.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
+13.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+6.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
−16.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−4.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+28.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−9.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+10.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
+2.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−5.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
−25.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−6.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+24.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+1.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
−10.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+3.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
−18.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−14.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−9.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+14.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−0.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+23.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
−12.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
−16.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+21.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
+2.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
−14.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
−2.5
over 13under 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Marshall
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
10-21
32% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +4.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 78-72 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 85-73 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 96-89 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 78-104 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-70 | -20.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 69-60 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 67-90 | -7.5 | L −30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-70 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 81-88 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 77-61 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 76-74 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-80 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-81 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 66-64 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 83-85 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-72 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 115-60 | -18.5 | W +36.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-72 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 70-61 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 165.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-77 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 74-90 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 81-79 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 87-101 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 94-93 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-79 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 97-88 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 82-99 | -7.5 | L −24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MASS
W 78-72
+10.5
8
@
TOL
W 85-73
+14.5
12
vs
ELON
W 96-89
−1.5
15
@
UVA
L 78-104
−5.5
20
vs
UAPB
W 98-70
+7.5
23
vs
MERC
W 69-60
−2.5
26
vs
LIP
L 67-90
−30.5
3
@
UNCW
L 69-70
+7.5
6
@
OHIO
L 81-88
−3.5
10
vs
WKU
W 77-61
+14.5
13
vs
WRST
W 76-74
−1.5
20
@
TROY
L 63-70
−2.5
31
vs
GAST
W 84-80
−9.5
3
vs
APP
W 88-81
−0.5
7
@
JMU
W 66-64
+3.5
10
@
GAST
L 73-81
−12.5
14
vs
CCU
L 83-85
−11.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-72
−1.5
22
vs
ULM
W 115-60
+36.5
28
@
TXST
L 68-72
−7.5
31
@
ARST
W 70-61
+12.5
4
vs
USM
W 81-77
−6.5
7
vs
M-OH
L 74-90
−14.5
11
@
ODU
W 81-79
−1.5
14
@
GASO
L 87-101
−16.5
16
vs
USA
W 84-80
−2.5
19
@
APP
W 94-93
+4.5
21
@
CCU
L 75-79
−6.5
24
vs
ODU
W 97-88
+1.5
27
vs
GASO
L 82-99
−24.5
8
vs
GASO
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 10didn’t cover 21avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MASS
W 78-72
−2.5
8
@
TOL
W 85-73
−2.5
12
vs
ELON
W 96-89
+29.5
15
@
UVA
L 78-104
+26.5
20
vs
UAPB
W 98-70
+3.5
23
vs
MERC
W 69-60
−18.5
26
vs
LIP
L 67-90
−0.5
3
@
UNCW
L 69-70
−11.5
6
@
OHIO
L 81-88
+11.5
10
vs
WKU
W 77-61
−21.5
13
vs
WRST
W 76-74
+0.5
20
@
TROY
L 63-70
−22.5
31
vs
GAST
W 84-80
+12.5
3
vs
APP
W 88-81
+27.5
7
@
JMU
W 66-64
−22.5
10
@
GAST
L 73-81
+0.5
14
vs
CCU
L 83-85
+16.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-72
−0.5
22
vs
ULM
W 115-60
+14.5
28
@
TXST
L 68-72
−7.5
31
@
ARST
W 70-61
−34.5
4
vs
USM
W 81-77
+9.5
7
vs
M-OH
L 74-90
+1.5
11
@
ODU
W 81-79
+4.5
14
@
GASO
L 87-101
+25.5
16
vs
USA
W 84-80
+13.5
19
@
APP
W 94-93
+43.5
21
@
CCU
L 75-79
+0.5
24
vs
ODU
W 97-88
+25.5
27
vs
GASO
L 82-99
+12.5
8
vs
GASO
L 78-82
−6.5
over 19under 12avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Toledo has the better starters
Position by position: Toledo 2, Marshall 0, even 3
ToledoBetterMarshall
G A. Montas TR16.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 89
←TOLBig
G N. Otshudi14.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 45
G S. Jones TR6.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 3.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G F. Oshodi TR8.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 47
G M. Strong5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 19
=Even
G L. Rasmussen TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 15
F J. Ouwinga6.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
=Even
G D. Johnson TR2.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 17
C A. Parks10.3 pts · 5.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 54
←TOLBig
F E. Harding3.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 11
ToledoBetterMarshall
TOL offense121st of 366 · -2.8
←TOLBig
MRSH defense277th of 366 · -7.0
TOL defense234th of 366 · -6.2
=Even
MRSH offense198th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
←TOLBig
Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-1.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTOL betterMRSH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Montas31 min · TRS. Jones21 min · TRM. Strong18 minW. James9 minM. JohnsonNewM. MattucciNew
Forwards
J. Ouwinga19 minC. Riddle13 minT. Nwokolo2 minR. BarronNewR. PorterNew
Centers
A. Parks25 min
Guards
N. Otshudi32 minF. Oshodi20 min · TRL. Rasmussen15 min · TRD. Johnson15 min · TRB. Slay8 minE. Manyuon2 min · TR
Forwards
E. Harding14 minC. Langdon3 min · TRV. Kuridza2 min · TRB. DjigoNew
Centers
K. Maker6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.8 #71 | Points per game | 80.5 #56 |
| 1.15 #62 | Points per possession | 1.14 #71 |
| 69.5 #146 | Pace (possessions) | 70.7 #86 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.5 #50 | Effective FG% | 54.8 #42 |
| 37.0 #29 | 3-point % | 36.8 #34 |
| 32.5 #323 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #82 |
| 30.5 #298 | Free throw rate | 29.2 #328 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #51 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #172 |
| 29.5 #220 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #127 |
| 15.6 #61 | Assists per game | 16.2 #43 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.4 #250 | Points allowed | 78.9 #292 |
| 1.11 #257 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #253 |
| 54.3 #308 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #118 |
| 34.4 #215 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.6 #162 |
| 17.9 #104 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #206 |
| 66.3 #313 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.2 #316 |
| 7.7 #67 | Steals per game | 6.1 #225 |
| 2.9 #247 | Blocks per game | 4.8 #23 |
Toledo
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Akron76–79
- Wvs UMass77–67
- Wvs Bowling Green77–76
- Wvs Buffalo99–78
- L@ Miami OH72–74
A week or more of rest.
Marshall
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern78–82
- Lvs GA Southern82–99
- Wvs Old Dominion97–88
- L@ Coastal75–79
- W@ App State94–93
A week or more of rest.