Convocation Center (OH) · at Ohio
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OHIO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OHIO 86–74 · win probability OHIO 85%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OHIO has more of the edges
NCAT 2, OHIO 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
OHIO offense vs NCAT defense
Offense 81st of 366 against a defense 311th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NCAT 18.6%, OHIO 15.4%. Forced: NCAT 14.1%, OHIO 16.2%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NCAT 31.7%, OHIO 28.4%. Defensive: NCAT 71.4%, OHIO 67.2%
Context
Schedule so far
NCAT has played the 238th-hardest schedule, OHIO the 162nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: NCAT 42.3, OHIO 36.9. Allowed: NCAT 37.5, OHIO 38.2
Home court
OHIO at home. This season: OHIO 0-0 at home, NCAT 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NCAT 16%, OHIO 41%. Transfers in: NCAT 2, OHIO 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: NCAT plays 69.4 a game (150th fastest), OHIO 71.0 (78th). Faster games mean more points
Even
NCAT offense vs OHIO defense
Offense 234th of 366 against a defense 260th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
NCAT hits 31.6% and allows 36.6%; OHIO hits 30.1% and allows 36.8%. Threes are 32.6% and 38.1% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NCAT 50.7 and allows 52.9; OHIO 51.0 and allows 53.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OHIO -11.7 | — |
| Total | — | 159.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | NCAT 73.9 · OHIO 85.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OHIO -6.8 | — |
| 1H total | 74.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | NCAT 33.8 · OHIO 40.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
NC A&T
28 games played
Straight up
9-19
32% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg +1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 72-91 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 85-62 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 74-90 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 57-74 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 69-54 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 69-73 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 82-79 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 130.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 71-65 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 78-87 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 74-85 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-81 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 89-97 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-82 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-78 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-73 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-83 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-61 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-78 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 71-79 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 71-70 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 102-82 | +7.5 | W +27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 65-88 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 88-91 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-90 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 72-88 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
SC
L 72-91
+3.5
10
vs
SCST
W 85-62
+20.5
18
@
MORG
W 79-73
+3.5
28
@
DAV
L 74-90
−2.5
2
@
CLT
L 57-74
−9.5
6
@
NCCU
W 69-54
+12.5
9
vs
HOW
L 69-73
−6.5
12
vs
UMES
W 82-79
−4.5
16
@
UNCG
W 71-65
+12.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+1.5
31
vs
NE
L 74-85
−7.5
3
@
STBK
L 80-81
+3.5
8
vs
ELON
L 64-69
+1.5
15
@
W&M
L 89-97
+5.5
19
@
HAMP
L 61-82
−14.5
22
vs
HOF
W 79-78
+10.5
24
vs
TOW
W 80-73
+14.5
29
@
MONM
L 81-83
+7.5
31
@
DREX
L 60-61
+6.5
5
@
COFC
L 62-78
−4.5
7
vs
CAM
L 71-79
−4.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 71-70
+4.5
19
vs
COFC
L 61-74
−8.5
21
@
ELON
W 102-82
+27.5
26
@
UNCW
L 65-88
−9.5
28
vs
W&M
L 88-91
+5.5
3
@
CAM
L 72-90
−9.5
6
vs
NE
L 72-88
−13.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
SC
L 72-91
+19.5
10
vs
SCST
W 85-62
−12.5
18
@
MORG
W 79-73
−9.5
28
@
DAV
L 74-90
+18.5
2
@
CLT
L 57-74
−13.5
6
@
NCCU
W 69-54
−19.5
9
vs
HOW
L 69-73
−7.5
12
vs
UMES
W 82-79
+30.5
16
@
UNCG
W 71-65
−11.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+18.5
31
vs
NE
L 74-85
+7.5
3
@
STBK
L 80-81
+19.5
8
vs
ELON
L 64-69
−25.5
15
@
W&M
L 89-97
+23.5
19
@
HAMP
L 61-82
−0.5
22
vs
HOF
W 79-78
+10.5
24
vs
TOW
W 80-73
+13.5
29
@
MONM
L 81-83
+19.5
31
@
DREX
L 60-61
−17.5
5
@
COFC
L 62-78
−15.5
7
vs
CAM
L 71-79
−6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 71-70
+3.5
19
vs
COFC
L 61-74
−12.5
21
@
ELON
W 102-82
+32.5
26
@
UNCW
L 65-88
+6.5
28
vs
W&M
L 88-91
+15.5
3
@
CAM
L 72-90
+7.5
6
vs
NE
L 72-88
+8.5
over 16under 12avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ohio
30 games played
Straight up
13-17
43% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −3.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 85-89 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 72-68 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 60-90 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 81-106 | +31.5 | W +6.5 | 174.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 73-76 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 69-92 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-70 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 79-57 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-81 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-83 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 58-68 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 80-64 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 68-67 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 86-83 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-80 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-101 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 80-77 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 65-86 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 167.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 57-72 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 95-83 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-71 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-78 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 74-90 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 74-66 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-79 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 82-94 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 108-110 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 218 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 75-86 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ARST
L 85-89
−7.5
6
vs
ILST
W 72-68
+2.5
11
@
SMC
L 60-90
−12.5
15
@
LOU
L 81-106
+6.5
19
vs
BCU
L 73-76
−9.5
24
vs
GMU
L 69-92
−15.5
25
vs
LMU
L 58-70
−8.5
3
vs
ME
W 79-57
+9.5
6
vs
MRSH
W 88-81
+3.5
13
vs
SBU
W 88-83
+11.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 58-68
−8.5
30
@
CMU
W 80-64
+9.5
3
@
EMU
W 68-67
−1.5
6
vs
MASS
W 86-83
−1.5
10
vs
BUF
W 91-80
+6.5
13
@
TOL
L 85-101
−13.5
16
@
BALL
L 71-76
−10.5
20
vs
NIU
W 80-77
−8.5
23
vs
AKR
L 65-86
−14.5
27
@
KENT
L 57-72
−9.5
31
@
BUF
W 95-83
+14.5
3
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+9.5
7
@
ODU
L 72-78
−9.5
13
@
M-OH
L 74-90
−8.5
17
vs
BALL
W 69-57
+2.5
21
@
NIU
W 74-66
+1.5
28
vs
TOL
L 67-79
−13.5
3
@
MASS
L 82-94
−10.5
6
vs
M-OH
L 108-110
+1.5
12
vs
KENT
L 75-86
−7.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ARST
L 85-89
+14.5
6
vs
ILST
W 72-68
−21.5
11
@
SMC
L 60-90
+5.5
15
@
LOU
L 81-106
+12.5
19
vs
BCU
L 73-76
−8.5
24
vs
GMU
L 69-92
+18.5
25
vs
LMU
L 58-70
−16.5
3
vs
ME
W 79-57
−2.5
6
vs
MRSH
W 88-81
+11.5
13
vs
SBU
W 88-83
+20.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 58-68
−27.5
30
@
CMU
W 80-64
−7.5
3
@
EMU
W 68-67
−15.5
6
vs
MASS
W 86-83
+8.5
10
vs
BUF
W 91-80
+14.5
13
@
TOL
L 85-101
+24.5
16
@
BALL
L 71-76
−0.5
20
vs
NIU
W 80-77
+2.5
23
vs
AKR
L 65-86
−16.5
27
@
KENT
L 57-72
−33.5
31
@
BUF
W 95-83
+21.5
3
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+6.5
7
@
ODU
L 72-78
−6.5
13
@
M-OH
L 74-90
+0.5
17
vs
BALL
W 69-57
−19.5
21
@
NIU
W 74-66
−8.5
28
vs
TOL
L 67-79
−12.5
3
@
MASS
L 82-94
+19.5
6
vs
M-OH
L 108-110
+58.5
12
vs
KENT
L 75-86
−0.5
over 15under 15avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ohio has the better starters
Position by position: NC A&T 0, Ohio 4, even 1
NC A&TBetterOhio
G P. James TR13.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 66
→OHIOSmall
G J. Paveletzke17.8 pts · 3 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 89
G S. Lancaster TR10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 50
→OHIOSmall
G K. D'Augustino TR19.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 79
G M. Burton5.2 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 13
→OHIOBig
G K. Mitchell TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 76
F M. Webster NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Burris3.1 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 11
C W. Felton6.7 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 65
→OHIOSmall
F J. Simmons15.4 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
NC A&TBetterOhio
NCAT offense234th of 366 · -7.2
=Even
OHIO defense260th of 366 · -6.7
NCAT defense311th of 366 · -8.1
→OHIOBig
OHIO offense81st of 366 · +0.5
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
→OHIOBig
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.8 · 2 players
→OHIOSmall
Frontcourt+3.0 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.4 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestNCAT betterOHIO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
P. James33 min · TRS. Lancaster29 min · TRM. Burton17 minJ. McKieNewU. Kellman-NicholesNewB. IveryNew
Forwards
M. WebsterNewS. SimleyNew
Centers
W. Felton16 minE. KalliontzisNew
Guards
J. Paveletzke37 minK. D'Augustino33 min · TRK. Mitchell31 min · TRJ. Burris10 minC. ReeseNewS. LedegenNew
Forwards
J. Simmons28 minK. Kuany8 minZ. MosleyNewC. TrudicNewJ. BowensNewD. MakitanNew
Centers
M. IckeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #205 | Points per game | 76.7 #126 |
| 1.07 #213 | Points per possession | 1.08 #194 |
| 69.4 #150 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #78 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.7 #201 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #197 |
| 31.6 #304 | 3-point % | 30.1 #341 |
| 32.6 #322 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.1 #211 |
| 42.3 #26 | Free throw rate | 36.9 #132 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.6 #304 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #97 |
| 31.7 #136 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.4 #248 |
| 11.5 #311 | Assists per game | 12.6 #242 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.5 #278 | Points allowed | 80.0 #319 |
| 1.13 #285 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #295 |
| 52.9 #266 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #269 |
| 36.6 #331 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.8 #340 |
| 14.1 #332 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #213 |
| 71.4 #89 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #289 |
| 5.1 #323 | Steals per game | 5.7 #267 |
| 3.8 #107 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #163 |
NC A&T
9-19 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Northeastern72–88
- L@ Campbell72–90
- Lvs William & Mary88–91
- L@ UNC Wilmington65–88
- W@ Elon102–82
A week or more of rest.
Ohio
13-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kent State75–86
- Lvs Miami OH108–110
- L@ UMass82–94
- Lvs Toledo67–79
- W@ N Illinois74–66
A week or more of rest.