Corbett Sports Center · at NC A&T
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NCAT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NCAT 82–72 · win probability NCAT 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCAT has more of the edges
MORG 2, NCAT 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
MORG hits 31.7% and allows 31.5%; NCAT hits 31.6% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 35.2% and 32.6% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MORG 30.7%, NCAT 31.7%. Defensive: MORG 64.8%, NCAT 71.4%
NCAT offense vs MORG defense
Offense 234th of 366 against a defense 360th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MORG has played the 360th-hardest schedule, NCAT the 238th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MORG 17.8%, NCAT 18.6%. Forced: MORG 16.5%, NCAT 14.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MORG 42.7, NCAT 42.3. Allowed: MORG 50.9, NCAT 37.5
Home court
NCAT at home. This season: NCAT 0-0 at home, MORG 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MORG 45.8 and allows 51.7; NCAT 50.7 and allows 52.9
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MORG plays 71.1 a game (73rd fastest), NCAT 69.4 (150th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MORG 36%, NCAT 16%. Transfers in: MORG 3, NCAT 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
MORG offense vs NCAT defense
Offense 293rd of 366 against a defense 311th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NCAT -10.0 | — |
| Total | — | 154.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | MORG 72.2 · NCAT 82.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NCAT -5.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | MORG 33.2 · NCAT 39 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MORG 0–2 NCATNCAT leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · NCAT has won the last 2 meetings · MORG 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025-26 | NCAT 79 @ MORG 73 | MORG +2.5 | NCAT W |
| Nov 20, 2024-25 | MORG 83 @ NCAT 86 | NCAT -6.5 | MORG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Morgan St
27 games played
Straight up
11-16
41% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-87 | +27.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 73-79 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-88 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 66-71 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 80-84 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 49-92 | +21.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 50-97 | +26.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 64-94 | +25.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 56-83 | +23.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 49-66 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 78-89 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-79 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 78-77 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 79-78 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-80 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-71 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 76-80 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-83 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 59-84 | +8.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-84 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+10.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
+2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
−7.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−3.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−20.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
+0.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+1.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−21.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+6.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−20.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
−4.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−3.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−10.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
+0.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
−7.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+4.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+15.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+8.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+5.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+1.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+8.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+5.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−16.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+9.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−1.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+2.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
−2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
+11.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−9.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−12.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
−6.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+9.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−9.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+13.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−4.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
+12.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−5.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−23.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
−8.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
+25.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+22.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+6.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+4.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+13.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+9.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+6.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+19.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−15.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+17.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−13.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
+2.5
over 16under 11avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
NC A&T
28 games played
Straight up
9-19
32% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg +1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 72-91 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 85-62 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 74-90 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 57-74 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 69-54 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 69-73 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 82-79 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 130.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 71-65 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 78-87 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 74-85 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-81 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 89-97 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-82 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-78 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-73 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-83 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-61 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-78 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 71-79 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 71-70 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 102-82 | +7.5 | W +27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 65-88 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 88-91 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-90 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 72-88 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
SC
L 72-91
+3.5
10
vs
SCST
W 85-62
+20.5
18
@
MORG
W 79-73
+3.5
28
@
DAV
L 74-90
−2.5
2
@
CLT
L 57-74
−9.5
6
@
NCCU
W 69-54
+12.5
9
vs
HOW
L 69-73
−6.5
12
vs
UMES
W 82-79
−4.5
16
@
UNCG
W 71-65
+12.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+1.5
31
vs
NE
L 74-85
−7.5
3
@
STBK
L 80-81
+3.5
8
vs
ELON
L 64-69
+1.5
15
@
W&M
L 89-97
+5.5
19
@
HAMP
L 61-82
−14.5
22
vs
HOF
W 79-78
+10.5
24
vs
TOW
W 80-73
+14.5
29
@
MONM
L 81-83
+7.5
31
@
DREX
L 60-61
+6.5
5
@
COFC
L 62-78
−4.5
7
vs
CAM
L 71-79
−4.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 71-70
+4.5
19
vs
COFC
L 61-74
−8.5
21
@
ELON
W 102-82
+27.5
26
@
UNCW
L 65-88
−9.5
28
vs
W&M
L 88-91
+5.5
3
@
CAM
L 72-90
−9.5
6
vs
NE
L 72-88
−13.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
SC
L 72-91
+19.5
10
vs
SCST
W 85-62
−12.5
18
@
MORG
W 79-73
−9.5
28
@
DAV
L 74-90
+18.5
2
@
CLT
L 57-74
−13.5
6
@
NCCU
W 69-54
−19.5
9
vs
HOW
L 69-73
−7.5
12
vs
UMES
W 82-79
+30.5
16
@
UNCG
W 71-65
−11.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+18.5
31
vs
NE
L 74-85
+7.5
3
@
STBK
L 80-81
+19.5
8
vs
ELON
L 64-69
−25.5
15
@
W&M
L 89-97
+23.5
19
@
HAMP
L 61-82
−0.5
22
vs
HOF
W 79-78
+10.5
24
vs
TOW
W 80-73
+13.5
29
@
MONM
L 81-83
+19.5
31
@
DREX
L 60-61
−17.5
5
@
COFC
L 62-78
−15.5
7
vs
CAM
L 71-79
−6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 71-70
+3.5
19
vs
COFC
L 61-74
−12.5
21
@
ELON
W 102-82
+32.5
26
@
UNCW
L 65-88
+6.5
28
vs
W&M
L 88-91
+15.5
3
@
CAM
L 72-90
+7.5
6
vs
NE
L 72-88
+8.5
over 16under 12avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC A&T has the better starters
Position by position: Morgan St 0, NC A&T 1, even 4
Morgan StBetterNC A&T
G A. Worrell16.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 70
=Even
G P. James TR13.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 66
G J. Awoke TR6.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 12
→NCATBig
G S. Lancaster TR10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 50
G D. Bumpass2.7 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Burton5.2 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 13
F K. Horton TR7.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
=No call
F M. Webster NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F T. Edwards3.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C W. Felton6.7 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 65
Morgan StBetterNC A&T
MORG offense293rd of 366 · -9.1
=Even
NCAT defense311th of 366 · -8.1
MORG defense360th of 366 · -11.0
→NCATSmall
NCAT offense234th of 366 · -7.2
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
→NCATSmall
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.7 · 2 players
→NCATBig
Frontcourt+0.8 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestMORG betterNCAT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Worrell30 minJ. Awoke25 min · TRD. Bumpass9 minB. Barnett2 minJ. KwartengNewK. RichardNew
Forwards
K. Horton20 min · TRT. Edwards17 minM. Wade8 minM. Lual7 minI. Traore6 min · TRT. PettigrewNew
Guards
P. James33 min · TRS. Lancaster29 min · TRM. Burton17 minJ. McKieNewU. Kellman-NicholesNewB. IveryNew
Forwards
M. WebsterNewS. SimleyNew
Centers
W. Felton16 minE. KalliontzisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.7 #252 | Points per game | 73.9 #205 |
| 1.01 #316 | Points per possession | 1.07 #213 |
| 71.1 #73 | Pace (possessions) | 69.4 #150 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.8 #351 | Effective FG% | 50.7 #201 |
| 31.7 #295 | 3-point % | 31.6 #304 |
| 35.2 #274 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.6 #322 |
| 42.7 #22 | Free throw rate | 42.3 #26 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.8 #262 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #304 |
| 30.7 #172 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.7 #136 |
| 12.2 #269 | Assists per game | 11.5 #311 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.1 #321 | Points allowed | 78.5 #278 |
| 1.13 #288 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #285 |
| 51.7 #194 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #266 |
| 31.5 #43 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #331 |
| 16.5 #186 | Turnovers forced | 14.1 #332 |
| 64.8 #341 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #89 |
| 4.3 #359 | Steals per game | 5.1 #323 |
| 3.3 #172 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #107 |
Morgan St
11-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-5 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Delaware St70–75
- Wvs Coppin St70–66
- Wvs Norfolk St90–84
- Lvs Howard59–84
- W@ SC State90–83
A week or more of rest.
NC A&T
9-19 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Northeastern72–88
- L@ Campbell72–90
- Lvs William & Mary88–91
- L@ UNC Wilmington65–88
- W@ Elon102–82
A week or more of rest.