Colonial Life Arena · at South Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SC 82–66 · win probability SC 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SC has more of the edges
ELON 1, SC 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ELON offense vs SC defense
Offense 225th of 366 against a defense 53rd, on the model’s ratings
SC offense vs ELON defense
Offense 98th of 366 against a defense 235th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
ELON has played the 186th-hardest schedule, SC the 54th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ELON 32.3%, SC 27.2%. Defensive: ELON 66.5%, SC 67.9%
Three-pointers
ELON hits 34.3% and allows 36.5%; SC hits 31.1% and allows 31.8%. Threes are 43.2% and 44.4% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: ELON 33.5, SC 36.7. Allowed: ELON 34.6, SC 34.0
Home court
SC at home. This season: SC 0-0 at home, ELON 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ELON 30%, SC 13%. Transfers in: ELON 5, SC 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: ELON 52.2 and allows 54.0; SC 50.3 and allows 51.6
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ELON 16.0%, SC 14.4%. Forced: ELON 16.4%, SC 14.6%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: ELON plays 69.0 a game (178th fastest), SC 68.8 (195th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SC -16.7 | — |
| Total | — | 148.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ELON 65.7 · SC 82.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SC -9.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | ELON 29.7 · SC 39.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ELON 0–1 SCSC leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ELON 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2023-24 | ELON 43 @ SC 70 | SC -16 | SC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Elon
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-90 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 89-96 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 95-84 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 72-99 | +19.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 88-53 | +5.5 | W +40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 84-91 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-52 | +4.5 | W +25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-82 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-91 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 81-85 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 78-85 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-85 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 59-72 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 79-76 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 79-87 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 77-82 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 54-65 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 82-102 | -7.5 | L −27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-58 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-73 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+6.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+1.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
−2.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
−7.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
+40.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
−9.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
−7.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
+25.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
−5.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
+6.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+11.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+7.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
−6.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−1.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
−3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
−10.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+9.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−6.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
+4.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
−9.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
−9.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−2.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
+11.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
−27.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
+3.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−12.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−14.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+39.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+29.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
+24.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
+6.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
−2.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
+15.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
+31.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
−36.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
+7.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
−18.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+4.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+40.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
+10.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−25.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
+3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
+5.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+24.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−9.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
−14.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
+23.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
+22.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−30.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
−6.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
+32.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
−30.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−20.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−12.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−29.5
over 16under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Carolina
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 91-72 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 83-79 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 81-61 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-58 | -10.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 72-79 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 77-79 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-62 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 83-86 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-51 | -22.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 71-55 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 61-68 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 95-70 | -31.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 96-67 | -19.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-83 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 78-68 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-75 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 74-108 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-71 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 85-76 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-92 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 48-95 | +13.5 | L −33.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 87-92 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 75-84 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 59-78 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-89 | +17.5 | W +3.5 | 170.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 62-76 | +23.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 97-89 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-87 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 59-78 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-61 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 74-86 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NCAT
W 91-72
−3.5
9
vs
USM
W 83-79
−13.5
12
vs
PRES
W 81-61
+3.5
18
vs
RAD
W 87-58
+18.5
21
vs
BTLR
L 72-79
−3.5
23
vs
NU
L 77-79
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
W 74-62
−5.5
2
vs
VT
L 83-86
−5.5
6
vs
STET
W 82-51
+8.5
13
vs
CIT
W 71-55
−6.5
16
@
CLEM
L 61-68
+5.5
22
vs
SCST
W 95-70
−6.5
30
vs
UALB
W 96-67
+9.5
3
vs
VAN
L 71-83
−2.5
6
@
LSU
W 78-68
+17.5
10
vs
UGA
L 70-75
−0.5
14
@
ARK
L 74-108
−21.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-71
+9.5
20
vs
OU
W 85-76
+11.5
24
@
TA&M
L 69-92
−12.5
28
vs
FLA
L 48-95
−33.5
31
vs
LSU
L 87-92
−2.5
3
@
TEX
L 75-84
+4.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 59-78
−15.5
14
@
ALA
L 75-89
+3.5
17
@
FLA
L 62-76
+9.5
21
vs
MSST
W 97-89
+9.5
24
vs
UK
L 63-72
−1.5
28
@
UGA
L 68-87
−6.5
3
vs
TENN
L 59-78
−8.5
7
@
MISS
W 64-61
+10.5
11
vs
OU
L 74-86
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NCAT
W 91-72
+19.5
9
vs
USM
W 83-79
+14.5
12
vs
PRES
W 81-61
+4.5
18
vs
RAD
W 87-58
−8.5
21
vs
BTLR
L 72-79
+0.5
23
vs
NU
L 77-79
+9.5
28
vs
CHSO
W 74-62
−14.5
2
vs
VT
L 83-86
+19.5
6
vs
STET
W 82-51
−9.5
13
vs
CIT
W 71-55
−15.5
16
@
CLEM
L 61-68
−13.5
22
vs
SCST
W 95-70
+15.5
30
vs
UALB
W 96-67
+14.5
3
vs
VAN
L 71-83
−1.5
6
@
LSU
W 78-68
+0.5
10
vs
UGA
L 70-75
−18.5
14
@
ARK
L 74-108
+26.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-71
−14.5
20
vs
OU
W 85-76
+10.5
24
@
TA&M
L 69-92
+5.5
28
vs
FLA
L 48-95
−8.5
31
vs
LSU
L 87-92
+31.5
3
@
TEX
L 75-84
+9.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 59-78
−10.5
14
@
ALA
L 75-89
−6.5
17
@
FLA
L 62-76
−18.5
21
vs
MSST
W 97-89
+34.5
24
vs
UK
L 63-72
−16.5
28
@
UGA
L 68-87
−3.5
3
vs
TENN
L 59-78
−4.5
7
@
MISS
W 64-61
−22.5
11
vs
OU
L 74-86
+10.5
over 16under 16avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Elon 0, South Carolina 3, even 2
ElonBetterSouth Carolina
G R. Pettus11 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
→SCBig
G S. Blakeney TR14.3 pts · 5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
G B. Cokley12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 60
→SCSmall
G K. Mincy TR14.2 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 81
G I. Mbeng TR4.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 12
→SCSmall
F J. Necas TR6.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 46
G C. Thrower TR5.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
=Even
F C. Heide TR5.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
F J. Dalton TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
=Even
F A. Bieliauskas TR4.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 36
ElonBetterSouth Carolina
ELON offense225th of 366 · -6.9
→SCBig
SC defense53rd of 366 · +1.6
ELON defense235th of 366 · -6.2
→SCBig
SC offense98th of 366 · -0.8
Backcourt-5.7 · 4 players
→SCBig
Backcourt+2.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
←ELONSmall
Frontcourt-2.0 · 3 players
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestELON betterSC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Pettus28 minB. Cokley27 minI. Mbeng23 min · TRC. Thrower17 min · TRR. Villar12 min · TRK. DixonNew
Forwards
J. Dalton13 min · TRI. Garmendia3 minA. Olander1 minM. ŠarenacNewB. SehlhorstNewC. ZhuNew
Centers
H. Harding7 min · TR
Guards
S. Blakeney34 min · TRK. Mincy34 min · TRG. Polk13 minD. Hannah13 min · TRE. Sparkman4 minM. JohnsonNew
Forwards
J. Necas25 min · TRC. Heide23 min · TRA. Bieliauskas20 min · TRH. Assemian10 minH. LopezNewJ. FernandezNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #123 | Points per game | 74.9 #165 |
| 1.12 #111 | Points per possession | 1.09 #161 |
| 69.0 #178 | Pace (possessions) | 68.8 #195 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #137 | Effective FG% | 50.3 #226 |
| 34.3 #154 | 3-point % | 31.1 #317 |
| 43.2 #107 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.4 #80 |
| 33.5 #222 | Free throw rate | 36.7 #137 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #136 | Turnover rate | 14.4 #39 |
| 32.3 #116 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.2 #289 |
| 14.6 #108 | Assists per game | 13.3 #190 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.3 #307 | Points allowed | 76.5 #228 |
| 1.14 #316 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #252 |
| 54.0 #300 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.6 #188 |
| 36.5 #328 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.8 #56 |
| 16.4 #196 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #314 |
| 66.5 #307 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #263 |
| 6.6 #157 | Steals per game | 5.5 #295 |
| 3.0 #231 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #317 |
Elon
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs William & Mary62–72
- Lvs UNC Wilmington57–76
- L@ Monmouth57–73
- L@ Towson56–58
- Lvs NC A&T82–102
A week or more of rest.
South Carolina
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma74–86
- W@ Ole Miss64–61
- Lvs Tennessee59–78
- L@ Georgia68–87
- Lvs Kentucky63–72
A week or more of rest.