Timmons Arena · at Furman
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FUR 78–70 · win probability FUR 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FUR has more of the edges
ELON 1, FUR 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: ELON 52.2 and allows 54.0; FUR 54.8 and allows 50.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ELON 16.0%, FUR 17.8%. Forced: ELON 16.4%, FUR 13.7%
Three-pointers
ELON hits 34.3% and allows 36.5%; FUR hits 33.4% and allows 32.3%. Threes are 43.2% and 46.5% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ELON 32.3%, FUR 30.5%. Defensive: ELON 66.5%, FUR 71.8%
ELON offense vs FUR defense
Offense 225th of 366 against a defense 146th, on the model’s ratings
FUR offense vs ELON defense
Offense 166th of 366 against a defense 235th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
FUR at home. This season: FUR 0-0 at home, ELON 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: ELON 33.5, FUR 32.7. Allowed: ELON 34.6, FUR 28.9
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: ELON plays 69.0 a game (178th fastest), FUR 67.2 (273rd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
ELON has played the 186th-hardest schedule, FUR the 224th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ELON 30%, FUR 46%. Transfers in: ELON 5, FUR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FUR -7.7 | — |
| Total | — | 148.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | ELON 70.1 · FUR 77.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FUR -4.5 | — |
| 1H total | 69.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | ELON 32.4 · FUR 36.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ELON 0–1 FURFUR leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ELON 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | FUR 97 @ ELON 88 | ELON +1.5 | FUR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Elon
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-90 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 89-96 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 95-84 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 72-99 | +19.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 88-53 | +5.5 | W +40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 84-91 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-52 | +4.5 | W +25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-82 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-91 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 81-85 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 78-85 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-85 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 59-72 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 79-76 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 79-87 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 77-82 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 54-65 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 82-102 | -7.5 | L −27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-58 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-73 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+6.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+1.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
−2.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
−7.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
+40.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
−9.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
−7.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
+25.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
−5.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
+6.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+11.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+7.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
−6.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−1.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
−3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
−10.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+9.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−6.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
+4.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
−9.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
−9.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−2.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
+11.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
−27.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
+3.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−12.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−14.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+39.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+29.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
+24.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
+6.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
−2.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
+15.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
+31.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
−36.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
+7.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
−18.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+4.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+40.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
+10.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−25.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
+3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
+5.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+24.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−9.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
−14.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
+23.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
+22.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−30.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
−6.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
+32.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
−30.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−20.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−12.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−29.5
over 16under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Furman
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 71-97 | +3.5 | L −22.5 | 153.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 61-64 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 54-70 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 90-79 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 73-72 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-72 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 97-88 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 79-69 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 75-68 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 84-76 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 74-72 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 77-80 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 78-67 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 69-48 | -12.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 70-74 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 75-77 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 89-66 | -4.5 | W +18.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 78-73 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 75-70 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 71-75 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 64-67 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 90-72 | -11.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 69-78 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 72-51 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-86 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-81 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 81-75 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 76-61 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-82 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HPU
L 71-97
−22.5
7
vs
TROY
L 61-64
−5.5
14
@
UNI
L 54-70
−6.5
23
vs
QUC
W 90-79
+2.5
27
vs
RICH
W 73-72
+4.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-72
−3.5
3
@
ELON
W 97-88
+7.5
6
vs
HARV
W 79-69
+5.5
18
@
MAN
W 75-68
−3.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 84-76
−2.5
31
vs
MER
W 74-72
−0.5
3
vs
WCU
L 77-80
−11.5
7
@
UTC
W 78-67
+8.5
10
vs
VMI
W 69-48
+8.5
14
@
SAM
W 77-73
+2.5
17
vs
WOF
L 70-74
−8.5
21
@
CIT
L 75-77
−13.5
23
@
UNCG
W 89-66
+18.5
29
vs
SAM
W 78-73
−0.5
1
vs
UTC
W 75-70
−2.5
4
@
ETSU
L 71-75
+1.5
8
vs
UNCG
L 64-67
−13.5
11
@
MER
L 64-69
−1.5
14
@
VMI
W 90-72
+6.5
18
vs
ETSU
L 69-78
−10.5
21
@
WOF
W 76-67
+7.5
25
vs
CIT
W 72-51
+5.5
28
@
WCU
L 67-86
−20.5
7
vs
SAM
W 86-81
+6.5
8
vs
UNCG
W 81-75
+0.5
9
vs
ETSU
W 76-61
+16.5
20
vs
CONN
L 71-82
+9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HPU
L 71-97
+14.5
7
vs
TROY
L 61-64
−27.5
14
@
UNI
L 54-70
−17.5
23
vs
QUC
W 90-79
+15.5
27
vs
RICH
W 73-72
−2.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-72
−8.5
3
@
ELON
W 97-88
+31.5
6
vs
HARV
W 79-69
+6.5
18
@
MAN
W 75-68
−11.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 84-76
+4.5
31
vs
MER
W 74-72
−8.5
3
vs
WCU
L 77-80
−0.5
7
@
UTC
W 78-67
−1.5
10
vs
VMI
W 69-48
−32.5
14
@
SAM
W 77-73
+0.5
17
vs
WOF
L 70-74
−5.5
21
@
CIT
L 75-77
+9.5
23
@
UNCG
W 89-66
+4.5
29
vs
SAM
W 78-73
+1.5
1
vs
UTC
W 75-70
−1.5
4
@
ETSU
L 71-75
+4.5
8
vs
UNCG
L 64-67
−18.5
11
@
MER
L 64-69
−18.5
14
@
VMI
W 90-72
+13.5
18
vs
ETSU
L 69-78
+6.5
21
@
WOF
W 76-67
−10.5
25
vs
CIT
W 72-51
−20.5
28
@
WCU
L 67-86
+5.5
7
vs
SAM
W 86-81
+19.5
8
vs
UNCG
W 81-75
+8.5
9
vs
ETSU
W 76-61
−2.5
20
vs
CONN
L 71-82
+19.5
over 16under 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Furman has the better starters
Position by position: Elon 1, Furman 4, even 0
ElonBetterFurman
G R. Pettus11 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
→FURBig
G J. Bell TR12.3 pts · 5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 76
G B. Cokley12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 60
←ELONSmall
G C. Bowser5.2 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
G I. Mbeng TR4.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 12
→FURSmall
G L. Toews TR6.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 45
G C. Thrower TR5.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
→FURSmall
F M. Kell TR13.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 59
F J. Dalton TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
→FURSmall
F C. Johnston9.6 pts · 8.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 66
ElonBetterFurman
ELON offense225th of 366 · -6.9
→FURSmall
FUR defense146th of 366 · -3.2
ELON defense235th of 366 · -6.2
→FURSmall
FUR offense166th of 366 · -5.1
Backcourt-5.7 · 4 players
→FURBig
Backcourt-1.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→FURSmall
Frontcourt+0.9 · 2 players
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
←ELONSmall
Bench-2.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestELON betterFUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Pettus28 minB. Cokley27 minI. Mbeng23 min · TRC. Thrower17 min · TRR. Villar12 min · TRK. DixonNew
Forwards
J. Dalton13 min · TRI. Garmendia3 minA. Olander1 minM. ŠarenacNewB. SehlhorstNewC. ZhuNew
Centers
H. Harding7 min · TR
Guards
J. Bell26 min · TRC. Bowser23 minL. Toews21 min · TRA. Franklin11 minC. O'Neal11 minG. LewisNew
Forwards
M. Kell30 min · TRC. Johnston29 minM. Smith12 minJ. Butler9 min · TRO. Ritger7 minD. MolnarNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #123 | Points per game | 74.9 #164 |
| 1.12 #111 | Points per possession | 1.11 #114 |
| 69.0 #178 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #273 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #137 | Effective FG% | 54.8 #43 |
| 34.3 #154 | 3-point % | 33.4 #204 |
| 43.2 #107 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.5 #40 |
| 33.5 #222 | Free throw rate | 32.7 #246 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #136 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #260 |
| 32.3 #116 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.5 #180 |
| 14.6 #108 | Assists per game | 14.9 #91 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.3 #307 | Points allowed | 72.5 #116 |
| 1.14 #316 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #163 |
| 54.0 #300 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #112 |
| 36.5 #328 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.3 #75 |
| 16.4 #196 | Turnovers forced | 13.7 #342 |
| 66.5 #307 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #72 |
| 6.6 #157 | Steals per game | 4.4 #357 |
| 3.0 #231 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #183 |
Elon
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs William & Mary62–72
- Lvs UNC Wilmington57–76
- L@ Monmouth57–73
- L@ Towson56–58
- Lvs NC A&T82–102
A week or more of rest.
Furman
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn71–82
- Wvs ETSU76–61
- Wvs UNC Greensboro81–75
- Wvs Samford86–81
- L@ W Carolina67–86
A week or more of rest.