Robins Center · at Richmond
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | RICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects RICH 81–69 · win probability RICH 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: RICH has more of the edges
ELON 1, RICH 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
ELON hits 34.3% and allows 36.5%; RICH hits 37.1% and allows 32.7%. Threes are 43.2% and 42.6% of their shots
RICH offense vs ELON defense
Offense 113th of 366 against a defense 235th, on the model’s ratings
ELON offense vs RICH defense
Offense 225th of 366 against a defense 105th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ELON 16.0%, RICH 14.3%. Forced: ELON 16.4%, RICH 17.8%
Context
Schedule so far
ELON has played the 186th-hardest schedule, RICH the 125th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ELON 32.3%, RICH 25.0%. Defensive: ELON 66.5%, RICH 69.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ELON 52.2 and allows 54.0; RICH 52.7 and allows 52.0
Home court
RICH at home. This season: RICH 0-0 at home, ELON 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ELON 33.5, RICH 36.9. Allowed: ELON 34.6, RICH 35.1
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: ELON plays 69.0 a game (178th fastest), RICH 68.8 (194th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ELON 30%, RICH 29%. Transfers in: ELON 5, RICH 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | RICH -12.3 | — |
| Total | — | 149.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | ELON 68.7 · RICH 81 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | RICH -7.2 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | ELON 31.4 · RICH 38.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ELON 1–0 RICHELON leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ELON 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025-26 | RICH 70 @ ELON 73 | ELON +3.5 | ELON W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Elon
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-90 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 89-96 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 95-84 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 72-99 | +19.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 88-53 | +5.5 | W +40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 84-91 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-52 | +4.5 | W +25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-82 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-91 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 81-85 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 78-85 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-85 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 59-72 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 79-76 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 79-87 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 77-82 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 54-65 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 82-102 | -7.5 | L −27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-58 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-73 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+6.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+1.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
−2.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
−7.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
+40.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
−9.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
−7.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
+25.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
−5.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
+6.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+11.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+7.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
−6.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−1.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
−3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
−10.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+9.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−6.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
+4.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
−9.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
−9.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−2.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
+11.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
−27.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
+3.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−12.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−14.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+39.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+29.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
+24.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
+6.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
−2.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
+15.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
+31.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
−36.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
+7.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
−18.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+4.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+40.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
+10.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−25.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
+3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
+5.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+24.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−9.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
−14.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
+23.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
+22.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−30.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
−6.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
+32.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
−30.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−20.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−12.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−29.5
over 16under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Richmond
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
16-15
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 87-72 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-86 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-54 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 102-67 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 72-73 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 84-76 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-77 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-84 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-73 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-56 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 72-77 | -11.5 | L −16.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 85-99 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 83-75 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 89-80 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 65-67 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 74-53 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 63-88 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-85 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 69-77 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 54-79 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-82 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 82-70 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-78 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 63-65 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 99-94 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 66-69 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 60-65 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 77-79 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 67-75 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
ECU
W 87-72
+9.5
11
vs
W&M
W 90-86
−5.5
19
vs
VMI
W 87-54
+18.5
22
vs
GWEB
W 102-67
+15.5
27
vs
FUR
L 72-73
−4.5
28
vs
CLT
W 71-66
−1.5
3
@
BEL
W 84-76
+14.5
6
vs
ODU
W 86-77
−3.5
13
vs
SIU
W 93-84
+5.5
17
@
ELON
L 70-73
−6.5
20
vs
CIT
W 80-56
+5.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 72-77
−16.5
31
vs
GW
L 85-99
−11.5
4
@
FOR
W 83-75
+5.5
7
@
SBU
W 89-80
+15.5
11
vs
JOES
L 65-67
−9.5
14
vs
LAS
W 74-53
+12.5
17
@
SLU
L 63-88
−10.5
21
vs
URI
L 68-69
−4.5
24
@
GW
L 69-85
−5.5
27
@
VCU
L 69-77
+4.5
31
vs
DAV
L 54-79
−26.5
7
@
URI
L 77-82
+0.5
10
vs
GMU
W 82-70
+15.5
14
vs
VCU
L 67-78
−3.5
18
@
DAV
L 63-65
+3.5
21
vs
SBU
W 99-94
+3.5
28
@
LUC
L 66-69
−5.5
3
vs
DAY
L 60-65
+0.5
7
@
DUQ
L 77-79
+2.5
11
vs
LUC
L 67-75
−12.5
covered 16didn’t cover 15avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
ECU
W 87-72
+15.5
11
vs
W&M
W 90-86
+11.5
19
vs
VMI
W 87-54
−11.5
22
vs
GWEB
W 102-67
+14.5
27
vs
FUR
L 72-73
−2.5
28
vs
CLT
W 71-66
−4.5
3
@
BEL
W 84-76
+3.5
6
vs
ODU
W 86-77
+9.5
13
vs
SIU
W 93-84
+23.5
17
@
ELON
L 70-73
−18.5
20
vs
CIT
W 80-56
−10.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 72-77
−10.5
31
vs
GW
L 85-99
+21.5
4
@
FOR
W 83-75
+15.5
7
@
SBU
W 89-80
+15.5
11
vs
JOES
L 65-67
−18.5
14
vs
LAS
W 74-53
−20.5
17
@
SLU
L 63-88
−11.5
21
vs
URI
L 68-69
−7.5
24
@
GW
L 69-85
−5.5
27
@
VCU
L 69-77
−9.5
31
vs
DAV
L 54-79
−7.5
7
@
URI
L 77-82
+16.5
10
vs
GMU
W 82-70
+12.5
14
vs
VCU
L 67-78
−9.5
18
@
DAV
L 63-65
−13.5
21
vs
SBU
W 99-94
+45.5
28
@
LUC
L 66-69
−11.5
3
vs
DAY
L 60-65
−19.5
7
@
DUQ
L 77-79
+8.5
11
vs
LUC
L 67-75
+0.5
over 14under 17avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Richmond has the better starters
Position by position: Elon 0, Richmond 5, even 0
ElonBetterRichmond
G R. Pettus11 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
→RICHSmall
G D. Saran TR11.3 pts · 5 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 52
G B. Cokley12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 60
→RICHSmall
G A. Argabright10.8 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
Score 87
G I. Mbeng TR4.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 12
→RICHSmall
G D. Stewart TR6.6 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 44
G C. Thrower TR5.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
→RICHSmall
F J. Kaiser TR9.5 pts · 4.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 60
F J. Dalton TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
→RICHSmall
C A. Dorries TR16.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 62
ElonBetterRichmond
ELON offense225th of 366 · -6.9
→RICHSmall
RICH defense105th of 366 · -1.0
ELON defense235th of 366 · -6.2
→RICHSmall
RICH offense113th of 366 · -2.0
Backcourt-5.7 · 4 players
→RICHBig
Backcourt+0.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→RICHSmall
Frontcourt+1.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestELON betterRICH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Pettus28 minB. Cokley27 minI. Mbeng23 min · TRC. Thrower17 min · TRR. Villar12 min · TRK. DixonNew
Forwards
J. Dalton13 min · TRI. Garmendia3 minA. Olander1 minM. ŠarenacNewB. SehlhorstNewC. ZhuNew
Centers
H. Harding7 min · TR
Guards
D. Saran30 min · TRA. Argabright24 minD. Stewart23 min · TRC. Tanner18 minW. Harper11 minK. Mooney5 min
Forwards
J. Kaiser29 min · TRA. Ball21 min · TRJ. McCaffery10 min · TRC. CookNewD. CaldwellNew
Centers
A. Dorries33 min · TRD. HomenickNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #123 | Points per game | 76.5 #132 |
| 1.12 #111 | Points per possession | 1.11 #119 |
| 69.0 #178 | Pace (possessions) | 68.8 #194 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #137 | Effective FG% | 52.7 #115 |
| 34.3 #154 | 3-point % | 37.1 #28 |
| 43.2 #107 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.6 #126 |
| 33.5 #222 | Free throw rate | 36.9 #133 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #136 | Turnover rate | 14.3 #32 |
| 32.3 #116 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.0 #340 |
| 14.6 #108 | Assists per game | 14.0 #145 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.3 #307 | Points allowed | 74.5 #175 |
| 1.14 #316 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #183 |
| 54.0 #300 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #216 |
| 36.5 #328 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.7 #103 |
| 16.4 #196 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #111 |
| 66.5 #307 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #200 |
| 6.6 #157 | Steals per game | 6.8 #139 |
| 3.0 #231 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #323 |
Elon
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs William & Mary62–72
- Lvs UNC Wilmington57–76
- L@ Monmouth57–73
- L@ Towson56–58
- Lvs NC A&T82–102
A week or more of rest.
Richmond
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Loyola Chicago67–75
- L@ Duquesne77–79
- Lvs Dayton60–65
- L@ Loyola Chicago66–69
- Wvs St Bonaventure99–94
A week or more of rest.