Schottenstein Center · at Ohio State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OSU 78–78 · win probability OSU 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OSU has more of the edges
VAN 1, OSU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VAN 13.5%, OSU 15.3%. Forced: VAN 17.7%, OSU 15.6%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: VAN plays 70.9 a game (80th fastest), OSU 67.2 (275th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: VAN 38.1, OSU 37.2. Allowed: VAN 39.5, OSU 34.7
Home court
OSU at home. This season: OSU 0-0 at home, VAN 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
VAN hits 35.6% and allows 32.6%; OSU hits 35.7% and allows 31.9%. Threes are 44.2% and 40.1% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VAN 31.2%, OSU 30.4%. Defensive: VAN 68.5%, OSU 70.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VAN 26%, OSU 37%. Transfers in: VAN 5, OSU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VAN 55.3 and allows 49.0; OSU 56.2 and allows 50.2
Even
VAN offense vs OSU defense
Offense 22nd of 366 against a defense 35th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
VAN has played the 21st-hardest schedule, OSU the 33rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
OSU offense vs VAN defense
Offense 36th of 366 against a defense 29th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VAN -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 156.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | VAN 78.2 · OSU 78.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VAN -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | VAN 36.6 · OSU 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Vanderbilt
36 games played
Straight up
27-9
75% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-19
47% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1850%
3 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 105-61 | -26.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 105-93 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 166.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 92-62 | -28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 104-75 | -41.5 | L −12.5 | 172.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 109-74 | -36.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 83-78 | -18.5 | L −13.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 89-74 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 96-71 | -4.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 88-69 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-72 | -36.5 | L −25.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 77-70 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 98-67 | -5.5 | W +25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 96-53 | -39.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 83-71 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 96-90 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 176.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 84-73 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 64-80 | -3.5 | L −19.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 94-98 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 68-93 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 173.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-56 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 80-55 | -5.5 | W +19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-68 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 91-92 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 84-76 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-69 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 80-81 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-69 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 88-80 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-91 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 89-86 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 86-82 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 75-68 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 91-74 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 75-86 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 78-68 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LIP
W 105-61
+17.5
8
@
UCF
W 105-93
+1.5
12
vs
EKU
W 92-62
+1.5
15
vs
UAPB
W 104-75
−12.5
20
vs
TXSO
W 109-74
−1.5
26
vs
WKU
W 83-78
−13.5
27
vs
VCU
W 89-74
+8.5
28
vs
SMC
W 96-71
+20.5
3
vs
SMU
W 88-69
+8.5
13
vs
CARK
W 83-72
−25.5
17
@
MEM
W 77-70
−2.5
21
@
WAKE
W 98-67
+25.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 96-53
+3.5
3
@
SC
W 83-71
+2.5
7
vs
ALA
W 96-90
+2.5
10
vs
LSU
W 84-73
−2.5
14
@
TEX
L 64-80
−19.5
17
vs
FLA
L 94-98
−2.5
20
@
ARK
L 68-93
−23.5
24
@
MSST
W 88-56
+24.5
27
vs
UK
W 80-55
+19.5
31
vs
MISS
W 71-68
−7.5
7
vs
OU
L 91-92
−12.5
10
@
AUB
W 84-76
+11.5
14
vs
TA&M
W 82-69
+5.5
18
@
MIZ
L 80-81
−4.5
21
vs
TENN
L 65-69
−6.5
25
vs
UGA
W 88-80
+0.5
28
@
UK
L 77-91
−12.5
3
@
MISS
W 89-86
−4.5
7
@
TENN
W 86-82
+6.5
13
vs
TENN
W 75-68
+8.5
14
vs
FLA
W 91-74
+24.5
15
vs
ARK
L 75-86
−13.5
19
vs
MCN
W 78-68
−2.5
21
vs
NEB
L 72-74
−3.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LIP
W 105-61
+11.5
8
@
UCF
W 105-93
+31.5
12
vs
EKU
W 92-62
−14.5
15
vs
UAPB
W 104-75
+6.5
20
vs
TXSO
W 109-74
+18.5
26
vs
WKU
W 83-78
−7.5
27
vs
VCU
W 89-74
+1.5
28
vs
SMC
W 96-71
+17.5
3
vs
SMU
W 88-69
−8.5
13
vs
CARK
W 83-72
−3.5
17
@
MEM
W 77-70
−12.5
21
@
WAKE
W 98-67
+0.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 96-53
+3.5
3
@
SC
W 83-71
−1.5
7
vs
ALA
W 96-90
+9.5
10
vs
LSU
W 84-73
−2.5
14
@
TEX
L 64-80
−19.5
17
vs
FLA
L 94-98
+27.5
20
@
ARK
L 68-93
−12.5
24
@
MSST
W 88-56
−15.5
27
vs
UK
W 80-55
−20.5
31
vs
MISS
W 71-68
−10.5
7
vs
OU
L 91-92
+23.5
10
@
AUB
W 84-76
−1.5
14
vs
TA&M
W 82-69
−14.5
18
@
MIZ
L 80-81
+6.5
21
vs
TENN
L 65-69
−16.5
25
vs
UGA
W 88-80
+4.5
28
@
UK
L 77-91
+10.5
3
@
MISS
W 89-86
+19.5
7
@
TENN
W 86-82
+21.5
13
vs
TENN
W 75-68
−4.5
14
vs
FLA
W 91-74
+3.5
15
vs
ARK
L 75-86
−4.5
19
vs
MCN
W 78-68
−2.5
21
vs
NEB
L 72-74
−0.5
over 17under 19avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ohio State
34 games played
Straight up
21-13
62% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 118-102 | -33.5 | L −17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-68 | -24.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 75-53 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 64-63 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-58 | -26.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 113-60 | -30.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 66-67 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 86-82 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 80-88 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 89-88 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 89-63 | -28.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 80-73 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 69-72 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 72-62 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 74-81 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-74 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 82-74 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 62-74 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-92 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 61-82 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 86-69 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 60-66 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 57-74 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 94-62 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-69 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-66 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
−17.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+1.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−1.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−8.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
+6.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+22.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−6.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+2.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
−4.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
−2.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
+1.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−2.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
−2.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−5.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
+11.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−5.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+7.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+0.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
+4.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
−5.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
−5.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
+13.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−12.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
−0.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
+15.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
+4.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+14.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+24.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+9.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+4.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
+8.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
+47.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+2.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−19.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−29.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
−10.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+21.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−15.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+12.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
+5.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
+31.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
−16.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−1.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
+1.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−14.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
−18.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+13.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+12.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
−29.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
+8.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
+18.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
−6.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−18.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
+18.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
−10.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
−2.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
−20.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+6.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+3.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+20.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+0.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
−17.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−15.5
over 16under 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Vanderbilt 1, Ohio State 1, even 3
VanderbiltBetterOhio State
G T. Tanner19.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 100
=Even
G J. Mobley15.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 93
G A. Glass TR16.1 pts · 3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 86
=Even
G J. Pippen TR13.9 pts · 4 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 90
F S. Williams-Adams TR7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 55
→OSUBig
G J. Williams TR14.9 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 92
F B. Dak TR11.5 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 90
←VANSmall
G C. Givens TR9.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 65
C B. Buyuktuncel TR6.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 61
=Even
F A. Bynum9.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
VanderbiltBetterOhio State
VAN offense22nd of 366 · +7.6
=Even
OSU defense35th of 366 · +3.3
VAN defense29th of 366 · +3.7
=Even
OSU offense36th of 366 · +5.2
Backcourt+10.2 · 2 players
←VANSmall
Backcourt+9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt+3.7 · 3 players
←VANSmall
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 3 players
→OSUSmall
Bench+1.0 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestVAN betterOSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Tanner34 minA. Glass29 min · TRA. BrownNewM. HawkinsNewB. AllenNewC. ByingtonNew
Forwards
S. Williams-Adams27 min · TRB. Dak26 min · TRT. Barrett23 min · TRC. Bing15 minE. MgbakoNewG. NesmithNew
Centers
B. Buyuktuncel24 min · TRJ. Leverett4 min
Guards
J. Mobley32 minJ. Pippen31 min · TRJ. Williams30 min · TRC. Givens26 min · TRB. Nash2 minM. HerroNew
Forwards
A. Bynum29 minA. Jelavic16 min · TRJ. OjianwunaNewA. ThompsonNewA. SmithNewV. LazarevicNew
Centers
I. Njegovan11 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85.7 #14 | Points per game | 79.3 #76 |
| 1.21 #9 | Points per possession | 1.18 #31 |
| 70.9 #80 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #275 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.3 #31 | Effective FG% | 56.2 #19 |
| 35.6 #86 | 3-point % | 35.7 #72 |
| 44.2 #85 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.1 #170 |
| 38.1 #101 | Free throw rate | 37.2 #122 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.5 #15 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #91 |
| 31.2 #158 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.4 #185 |
| 16.3 #40 | Assists per game | 14.5 #117 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.0 #187 | Points allowed | 72.6 #120 |
| 1.06 #99 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #164 |
| 49.0 #67 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #114 |
| 32.6 #96 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.9 #57 |
| 17.7 #112 | Turnovers forced | 15.6 #243 |
| 68.5 #231 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #160 |
| 7.9 #40 | Steals per game | 4.8 #340 |
| 4.5 #36 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #311 |
Vanderbilt
27-9 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nebraska72–74
- Wvs McNeese78–68
- Lvs Arkansas75–86
- Wvs Florida91–74
- Wvs Tennessee75–68
A week or more of rest.
Ohio State
21-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs TCU64–66
- Lvs Michigan67–71
- Wvs Iowa72–69
- Wvs Indiana91–78
- W@ Penn State94–62
A week or more of rest.