Chartway Arena · at Old Dominion
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ODU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HAMP 74–72 · win probability HAMP 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ODU has more of the edges
HAMP 2, ODU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
HAMP hits 28.8% and allows 32.1%; ODU hits 36.0% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 37.0% and 36.2% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HAMP 32.9%, ODU 26.0%. Defensive: HAMP 70.0%, ODU 69.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: HAMP 45.7 and allows 52.0; ODU 50.6 and allows 50.8
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: HAMP plays 66.5 a game (295th fastest), ODU 70.8 (81st). Faster games mean more points
ODU offense vs HAMP defense
Offense 240th of 366 against a defense 153rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
ODU at home. This season: ODU 0-0 at home, HAMP 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: HAMP 39.2, ODU 34.7. Allowed: HAMP 46.5, ODU 42.0
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HAMP 17.1%, ODU 15.4%. Forced: HAMP 17.2%, ODU 14.5%
Even
HAMP offense vs ODU defense
Offense 186th of 366 against a defense 222nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HAMP 18%, ODU 34%. Transfers in: HAMP 6, ODU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
HAMP has played the 217th-hardest schedule, ODU the 188th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HAMP -1.6 | — |
| Total | — | 146.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | HAMP 73.9 · ODU 72.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HAMP -1.1 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | HAMP 34.7 · ODU 33.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Hampton
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 86-90 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 53-91 | +24.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 61-67 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 52-63 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 60-62 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 74-68 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-71 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 57-61 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 84-77 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 72-81 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 62-59 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-62 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 45-49 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 51-58 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 50-82 | +8.5 | L −23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 87-79 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-74 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-71 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 43-79 | +11.5 | L −24.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-79 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-85 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 85-94 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 68-74 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+1.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−13.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
+10.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−10.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
+1.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
+0.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
−0.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+15.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−6.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
−1.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
−10.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
+0.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
+7.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
+8.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
−7.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
+5.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
+14.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
+0.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
−3.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−4.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
−23.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+9.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
+8.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
−4.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−24.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
−1.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
−8.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
+7.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+2.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+29.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−4.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
−4.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−20.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
−20.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
−11.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
+17.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+21.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−24.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
+25.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
+15.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
−19.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
−11.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
−46.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
+12.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
−1.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
−0.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
−7.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
+5.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−18.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
+0.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+23.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
−1.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
+3.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−11.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
+15.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
+16.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
−4.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+15.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+9.5
over 14under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Old Dominion
32 games played
Straight up
11-21
34% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-87 | +16.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 60-57 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 73-96 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-99 | +10.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-56 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 75-88 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-86 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 58-73 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 77-83 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 75-71 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 79-85 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-72 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-55 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 81-86 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 88-97 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 87-80 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 84-88 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+1.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−5.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
−7.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
−19.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
+20.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
−0.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+8.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−4.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+3.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
+4.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
+11.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
−5.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−0.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
−9.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
−5.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
+8.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
+5.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+2.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+9.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
−0.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
+13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
−14.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
−20.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
+9.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+1.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
+19.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+4.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
−0.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
−1.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+6.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
−2.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+5.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−32.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
+13.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
+17.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
−12.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
+3.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+16.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−0.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+9.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
−10.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
−3.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
+2.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−23.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
+17.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
+17.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
−8.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+8.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+7.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
+7.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
−13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
+1.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
+9.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
−6.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+4.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
−14.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+19.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
+19.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
+25.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+4.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
+9.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+14.5
over 21under 11avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Hampton has the better starters
Position by position: Hampton 4, Old Dominion 0, even 1
HamptonBetterOld Dominion
G J. Mitchell TR14.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 56
←HAMPSmall
G B. Benjamin TR5.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
G S. Hubbard TR16.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 70
←HAMPSmall
G Z. Wiggins6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 46
G A. Davis TR9.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
←HAMPBig
G S. Hubbard3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 10
F M. Frazier TR12 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
←HAMPBig
F Z. Weluche-Ume TR11.1 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
F C. Robinson TR8.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 25
=Even
F J. Turner6.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 30
HamptonBetterOld Dominion
HAMP offense186th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
ODU defense222nd of 366 · -5.8
HAMP defense153rd of 366 · -3.4
←HAMPSmall
ODU offense240th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt+0.1 · 3 players
←HAMPBig
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
←HAMPSmall
Frontcourt-2.9 · 2 players
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
←HAMPSmall
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestHAMP betterODU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Mitchell33 min · TRS. Hubbard31 min · TRA. Davis24 min · TRE. Strothers19 minT. Jackson17 min · TRA. Haskins10 min
Forwards
M. Frazier29 min · TRC. Robinson26 min · TRP. Da CruzNewW. PrestonNewZ. IbekweNewS. TabeNew
Guards
B. Benjamin20 min · TRZ. Wiggins18 minS. Hubbard16 minK. Thurmon11 min · TRC. Parker3 minR. Hellams2 min
Forwards
Z. Weluche-Ume31 min · TRJ. Turner21 minK. Howze10 min · TRB. Nacey8 minJ. NwekeNewL. MartiniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.0 #312 | Points per game | 75.7 #150 |
| 1.02 #301 | Points per possession | 1.06 #217 |
| 66.5 #295 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #81 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.7 #356 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #203 |
| 28.8 #357 | 3-point % | 36.0 #60 |
| 37.0 #229 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.2 #245 |
| 39.2 #73 | Free throw rate | 34.7 #189 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #205 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #95 |
| 32.9 #90 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.0 #323 |
| 11.2 #329 | Assists per game | 12.9 #218 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.1 #108 | Points allowed | 78.7 #283 |
| 1.08 #176 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #263 |
| 52.0 #212 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.8 #145 |
| 32.1 #65 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.0 #62 |
| 17.2 #137 | Turnovers forced | 14.5 #321 |
| 70.0 #165 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #176 |
| 6.3 #207 | Steals per game | 5.7 #275 |
| 3.0 #232 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #208 |
Hampton
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Towson68–74
- L@ William & Mary85–94
- Wvs Northeastern76–65
- Lvs Charleston71–85
- L@ Stony Brook72–79
A week or more of rest.
Old Dominion
11-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern84–88
- Wvs UL Monroe87–80
- W@ Georgia St81–73
- L@ Marshall88–97
- L@ Southern Miss81–86
A week or more of rest.