Schar Center · at Elon
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ELON | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ELON 74–74 · win probability ELON 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JMU has more of the edges
JMU 5, ELON 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
JMU hits 35.4% and allows 32.7%; ELON hits 34.3% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 42.5% and 43.2% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: JMU 53.1 and allows 49.0; ELON 52.2 and allows 54.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JMU 17.3%, ELON 16.0%. Forced: JMU 12.8%, ELON 16.4%
Context
Schedule so far
JMU has played the 257th-hardest schedule, ELON the 186th. A record against a soft schedule means less
ELON offense vs JMU defense
Offense 225th of 366 against a defense 154th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JMU 30.6%, ELON 32.3%. Defensive: JMU 70.5%, ELON 66.5%
JMU offense vs ELON defense
Offense 181st of 366 against a defense 235th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
ELON at home. This season: ELON 0-0 at home, JMU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: JMU plays 67.5 a game (253rd fastest), ELON 69.0 (178th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: JMU 35.9, ELON 33.5. Allowed: JMU 40.8, ELON 34.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JMU 17%, ELON 30%. Transfers in: JMU 8, ELON 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ELON -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 148.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | JMU 74.1 · ELON 74.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JMU -0.1 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | JMU 34.7 · ELON 34.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
JMU 0–2 ELONELON leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · ELON has won the last 2 meetings · JMU 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2021-22 | ELON 70 @ JMU 66 | JMU -5.5 | ELON W |
| Jan 17, 2021-22 | JMU 67 @ ELON 90 | ELON +3 | ELON W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
James Madison
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-85 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 84-70 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-88 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-75 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 80-72 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 88-77 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 66-82 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 67-62 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 68-67 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 92-96 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 74-103 | +23.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-74 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-69 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 65-80 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-77 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 83-90 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-57 | -5.5 | W +19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 73-64 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-71 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 81-79 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-58 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-65 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-66 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 68-69 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
AKR
L 71-85
−5.5
9
vs
COPP
W 84-70
−4.5
12
@
LONG
L 72-82
−11.5
15
@
LIU
L 79-88
−5.5
18
vs
TOW
W 81-75
+9.5
24
@
FIU
W 80-72
+10.5
25
vs
OMA
W 88-77
+9.5
29
@
GMU
L 66-82
−3.5
3
vs
NCCU
W 67-62
−9.5
6
vs
NORF
W 68-67
−9.5
17
@
ODU
L 68-77
−11.5
20
@
GASO
L 92-96
−1.5
29
@
ARK
L 74-103
−5.5
3
@
ARST
W 78-74
+14.5
7
vs
MRSH
L 64-66
−3.5
10
vs
ODU
W 70-69
−5.5
15
@
APP
L 65-80
−12.5
17
@
MRSH
L 72-77
+1.5
22
vs
USA
L 83-90
−11.5
24
vs
TXST
W 82-57
+19.5
29
@
TROY
W 73-64
+18.5
31
@
USM
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
UL
L 61-64
−12.5
7
vs
TOL
W 73-71
+3.5
12
vs
GAST
W 81-79
−3.5
14
vs
APP
W 69-58
+12.5
18
@
CCU
W 67-65
+0.5
21
@
GAST
W 80-65
+12.5
25
vs
GASO
W 82-66
+10.5
27
vs
CCU
L 68-69
−7.5
4
vs
UL
W 87-72
+8.5
5
vs
USM
L 80-86
−8.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
AKR
L 71-85
+2.5
9
vs
COPP
W 84-70
+12.5
12
@
LONG
L 72-82
+4.5
15
@
LIU
L 79-88
+19.5
18
vs
TOW
W 81-75
+15.5
24
@
FIU
W 80-72
−3.5
25
vs
OMA
W 88-77
+12.5
29
@
GMU
L 66-82
+6.5
3
vs
NCCU
W 67-62
−14.5
6
vs
NORF
W 68-67
−3.5
17
@
ODU
L 68-77
−3.5
20
@
GASO
L 92-96
+34.5
29
@
ARK
L 74-103
+17.5
3
@
ARST
W 78-74
−6.5
7
vs
MRSH
L 64-66
−22.5
10
vs
ODU
W 70-69
−8.5
15
@
APP
L 65-80
+11.5
17
@
MRSH
L 72-77
−0.5
22
vs
USA
L 83-90
+34.5
24
vs
TXST
W 82-57
−4.5
29
@
TROY
W 73-64
−10.5
31
@
USM
L 65-73
−5.5
4
vs
UL
L 61-64
−7.5
7
vs
TOL
W 73-71
−9.5
12
vs
GAST
W 81-79
+15.5
14
vs
APP
W 69-58
−7.5
18
@
CCU
W 67-65
−8.5
21
@
GAST
W 80-65
+2.5
25
vs
GASO
W 82-66
−5.5
27
vs
CCU
L 68-69
−4.5
4
vs
UL
W 87-72
+24.5
5
vs
USM
L 80-86
+22.5
over 15under 17avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Elon
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-90 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 89-96 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 95-84 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 72-99 | +19.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 88-53 | +5.5 | W +40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 84-91 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-52 | +4.5 | W +25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-82 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-91 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 81-85 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 78-85 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-85 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 59-72 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 79-76 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 79-87 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 77-82 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 54-65 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 82-102 | -7.5 | L −27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-58 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-73 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+6.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+1.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
−2.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
−7.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
+40.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
−9.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
−7.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
+25.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
−5.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
+6.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+11.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+7.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
−6.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−1.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
−3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
−10.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+9.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−6.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
+4.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
−9.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
−9.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−2.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
+11.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
−27.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
+3.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−12.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−14.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+39.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+29.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
+24.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
+6.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
−2.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
+15.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
+31.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
−36.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
+7.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
−18.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+4.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+40.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
+10.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−25.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
+3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
+5.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+24.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−9.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
−14.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
+23.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
+22.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−30.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
−6.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
+32.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
−30.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−20.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−12.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−29.5
over 16under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
James Madison has the better starters
Position by position: James Madison 2, Elon 0, even 3
James MadisonBetterElon
G G. Lattimore TR15.5 pts · 4.4 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 48
←JMUSmall
G R. Pettus11 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
G A. Myers TR11.1 pts · 4.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 73
=Even
G B. Cokley12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 60
G C. Reilly TR3 pts · 1 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G I. Mbeng TR4.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 12
F J. Hogarth TR10.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
←JMUSmall
G C. Thrower TR5.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
F P. Fowler6.3 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 25
=Even
F J. Dalton TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
James MadisonBetterElon
JMU offense181st of 366 · -5.7
←JMUSmall
ELON defense235th of 366 · -6.2
JMU defense154th of 366 · -3.4
←JMUSmall
ELON offense225th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-2.0 · 3 players
←JMUBig
Backcourt-5.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.3 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
Bench-3.8 · 5 players
→ELONBig
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestJMU betterELON betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
G. Lattimore37 min · TRA. Myers29 min · TRC. Reilly23 min · TRK. Windham13 min · TRP. Jones11 minB. Lee5 min · TR
Forwards
J. Hogarth25 min · TRP. Fowler23 minG. Sundra18 min · TRM. Curtis16 min · TRJ. BrownNewA. EvansNew
Guards
R. Pettus28 minB. Cokley27 minI. Mbeng23 min · TRC. Thrower17 min · TRR. Villar12 min · TRK. DixonNew
Forwards
J. Dalton13 min · TRI. Garmendia3 minA. Olander1 minM. ŠarenacNewB. SehlhorstNewC. ZhuNew
Centers
H. Harding7 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.7 #172 | Points per game | 76.8 #123 |
| 1.10 #128 | Points per possession | 1.12 #111 |
| 67.5 #253 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #178 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #97 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #137 |
| 35.4 #94 | 3-point % | 34.3 #154 |
| 42.5 #128 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.2 #107 |
| 35.9 #153 | Free throw rate | 33.5 #222 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.3 #225 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #136 |
| 30.6 #175 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.3 #116 |
| 12.5 #252 | Assists per game | 14.6 #108 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.4 #170 | Points allowed | 79.3 #307 |
| 1.10 #226 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #316 |
| 49.0 #66 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.0 #300 |
| 32.7 #101 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.5 #328 |
| 12.8 #359 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #196 |
| 70.5 #134 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.5 #307 |
| 5.1 #327 | Steals per game | 6.6 #157 |
| 4.1 #68 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #231 |
James Madison
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss80–86
- Wvs Louisiana87–72
- Lvs Coastal68–69
- Wvs GA Southern82–66
- W@ Georgia St80–65
A week or more of rest.
Elon
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs William & Mary62–72
- Lvs UNC Wilmington57–76
- L@ Monmouth57–73
- L@ Towson56–58
- Lvs NC A&T82–102
A week or more of rest.