Convocation Center (OH) · at Ohio
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OHIO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OHIO 86–69 · win probability OHIO 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OHIO has more of the edges
MORE 3, OHIO 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
OHIO offense vs MORE defense
Offense 81st of 366 against a defense 333rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MORE has played the 346th-hardest schedule, OHIO the 162nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MORE 18.1%, OHIO 15.4%. Forced: MORE 15.4%, OHIO 16.2%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: MORE plays 67.4 a game (262nd fastest), OHIO 71.0 (78th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
MORE hits 32.0% and allows 34.5%; OHIO hits 30.1% and allows 36.8%. Threes are 30.5% and 38.1% of their shots
MORE offense vs OHIO defense
Offense 349th of 366 against a defense 260th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MORE 35.8%, OHIO 28.4%. Defensive: MORE 64.2%, OHIO 67.2%
Home court
OHIO at home. This season: OHIO 0-0 at home, MORE 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: MORE 37.7, OHIO 36.9. Allowed: MORE 35.6, OHIO 38.2
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MORE 49.1 and allows 50.2; OHIO 51.0 and allows 53.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MORE 29%, OHIO 41%. Transfers in: MORE 0, OHIO 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OHIO -16.8 | — |
| Total | — | 155.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | MORE 69.1 · OHIO 85.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OHIO -9.9 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MORE 31.3 · OHIO 41.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MORE 0–1 OHIOOHIO leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MORE 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | MORE 76 @ OHIO 88 | OHIO -13.5 | MORE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Morehead St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-81 | +22.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 81-120 | +28.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-83 | +29.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 62-77 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-80 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-84 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-80 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 78-64 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 64-60 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-72 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 100-105 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 205 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-66 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-68 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-79 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 61-55 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 94-86 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-59 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 64-63 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 66-61 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 67-93 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
+6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
−10.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
+2.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
−3.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−1.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−15.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
−0.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+11.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
+2.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+5.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
−5.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
+7.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+2.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+7.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−3.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+0.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+0.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+0.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
−4.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
+14.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
+2.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+9.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
+13.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−6.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+8.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
+8.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
−20.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
−6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
+50.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
−12.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−5.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
+17.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−16.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−22.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
+17.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+5.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
−21.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+13.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
+8.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
−4.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+56.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+4.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−1.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+6.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+1.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+8.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
+7.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
−20.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
−4.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+31.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+5.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
−3.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−15.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+7.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
−12.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ohio
30 games played
Straight up
13-17
43% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −3.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 85-89 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 72-68 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 60-90 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 81-106 | +31.5 | W +6.5 | 174.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 73-76 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 69-92 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-70 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 79-57 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-81 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-83 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 58-68 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 80-64 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 68-67 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 86-83 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-80 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-101 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 80-77 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 65-86 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 167.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 57-72 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 95-83 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-71 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-78 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 74-90 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 74-66 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-79 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 82-94 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 108-110 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 218 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 75-86 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ARST
L 85-89
−7.5
6
vs
ILST
W 72-68
+2.5
11
@
SMC
L 60-90
−12.5
15
@
LOU
L 81-106
+6.5
19
vs
BCU
L 73-76
−9.5
24
vs
GMU
L 69-92
−15.5
25
vs
LMU
L 58-70
−8.5
3
vs
ME
W 79-57
+9.5
6
vs
MRSH
W 88-81
+3.5
13
vs
SBU
W 88-83
+11.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 58-68
−8.5
30
@
CMU
W 80-64
+9.5
3
@
EMU
W 68-67
−1.5
6
vs
MASS
W 86-83
−1.5
10
vs
BUF
W 91-80
+6.5
13
@
TOL
L 85-101
−13.5
16
@
BALL
L 71-76
−10.5
20
vs
NIU
W 80-77
−8.5
23
vs
AKR
L 65-86
−14.5
27
@
KENT
L 57-72
−9.5
31
@
BUF
W 95-83
+14.5
3
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+9.5
7
@
ODU
L 72-78
−9.5
13
@
M-OH
L 74-90
−8.5
17
vs
BALL
W 69-57
+2.5
21
@
NIU
W 74-66
+1.5
28
vs
TOL
L 67-79
−13.5
3
@
MASS
L 82-94
−10.5
6
vs
M-OH
L 108-110
+1.5
12
vs
KENT
L 75-86
−7.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ARST
L 85-89
+14.5
6
vs
ILST
W 72-68
−21.5
11
@
SMC
L 60-90
+5.5
15
@
LOU
L 81-106
+12.5
19
vs
BCU
L 73-76
−8.5
24
vs
GMU
L 69-92
+18.5
25
vs
LMU
L 58-70
−16.5
3
vs
ME
W 79-57
−2.5
6
vs
MRSH
W 88-81
+11.5
13
vs
SBU
W 88-83
+20.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 58-68
−27.5
30
@
CMU
W 80-64
−7.5
3
@
EMU
W 68-67
−15.5
6
vs
MASS
W 86-83
+8.5
10
vs
BUF
W 91-80
+14.5
13
@
TOL
L 85-101
+24.5
16
@
BALL
L 71-76
−0.5
20
vs
NIU
W 80-77
+2.5
23
vs
AKR
L 65-86
−16.5
27
@
KENT
L 57-72
−33.5
31
@
BUF
W 95-83
+21.5
3
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+6.5
7
@
ODU
L 72-78
−6.5
13
@
M-OH
L 74-90
+0.5
17
vs
BALL
W 69-57
−19.5
21
@
NIU
W 74-66
−8.5
28
vs
TOL
L 67-79
−12.5
3
@
MASS
L 82-94
+19.5
6
vs
M-OH
L 108-110
+58.5
12
vs
KENT
L 75-86
−0.5
over 15under 15avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ohio has the better starters
Position by position: Morehead St 0, Ohio 3, even 2
Morehead StBetterOhio
G C. Dawson8.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 22
→OHIOBig
G J. Paveletzke17.8 pts · 3 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 89
G V. Dawson3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 7
→OHIOBig
G K. D'Augustino TR19.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 79
G J. Winkleman1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Mitchell TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 76
G I. Day NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Burris3.1 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 11
F C. Parker2.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 1
→OHIOBig
F J. Simmons15.4 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
Morehead StBetterOhio
MORE offense349th of 366 · -12.3
→OHIOSmall
OHIO defense260th of 366 · -6.7
MORE defense333rd of 366 · -8.7
→OHIOBig
OHIO offense81st of 366 · +0.5
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
→OHIOBig
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.7 · 1 player
→OHIOBig
Frontcourt+3.0 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.4 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestMORE betterOHIO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Dawson26 minV. Dawson16 minJ. Winkleman1 minI. DayNewK. CarbonNewK. ShawNew
Forwards
C. Parker16 minD. AlexanderNewL. BassNewT. TangioraNewJ. PriesterNew
Guards
J. Paveletzke37 minK. D'Augustino33 min · TRK. Mitchell31 min · TRJ. Burris10 minC. ReeseNewS. LedegenNew
Forwards
J. Simmons28 minK. Kuany8 minZ. MosleyNewC. TrudicNewJ. BowensNewD. MakitanNew
Centers
M. IckeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #243 | Points per game | 76.7 #126 |
| 1.07 #202 | Points per possession | 1.08 #194 |
| 67.4 #262 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #78 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #285 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #197 |
| 32.0 #281 | 3-point % | 30.1 #341 |
| 30.5 #349 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.1 #211 |
| 37.7 #109 | Free throw rate | 36.9 #132 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #275 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #97 |
| 35.8 #27 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.4 #248 |
| 12.0 #285 | Assists per game | 12.6 #242 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.5 #205 | Points allowed | 80.0 #319 |
| 1.12 #264 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #295 |
| 50.2 #109 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #269 |
| 34.5 #221 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.8 #340 |
| 15.4 #259 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #213 |
| 64.2 #351 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #289 |
| 6.0 #234 | Steals per game | 5.7 #267 |
| 3.0 #213 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #163 |
Morehead St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee St67–93
- Wvs SE Missouri66–61
- W@ Little Rock76–70
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles64–63
- W@ W Illinois81–59
A week or more of rest.
Ohio
13-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kent State75–86
- Lvs Miami OH108–110
- L@ UMass82–94
- Lvs Toledo67–79
- W@ N Illinois74–66
A week or more of rest.