Freedom Hall (TN) · at ETSU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ETSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ETSU 79–64 · win probability ETSU 89%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ETSU has more of the edges
MORE 1, ETSU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MORE offense vs ETSU defense
Offense 349th of 366 against a defense 140th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MORE 18.1%, ETSU 15.2%. Forced: MORE 15.4%, ETSU 18.4%
Three-pointers
MORE hits 32.0% and allows 34.5%; ETSU hits 34.7% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 30.5% and 37.8% of their shots
ETSU offense vs MORE defense
Offense 224th of 366 against a defense 333rd, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MORE 49.1 and allows 50.2; ETSU 55.3 and allows 51.0
Home court
ETSU at home. This season: ETSU 0-0 at home, MORE 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: MORE 37.7, ETSU 35.0. Allowed: MORE 35.6, ETSU 36.4
Context
Schedule so far
MORE has played the 346th-hardest schedule, ETSU the 309th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MORE 35.8%, ETSU 28.3%. Defensive: MORE 64.2%, ETSU 72.1%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: MORE plays 67.4 a game (262nd fastest), ETSU 67.0 (279th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MORE 29%, ETSU 29%. Transfers in: MORE 0, ETSU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ETSU -14.2 | — |
| Total | — | 143.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | MORE 64.4 · ETSU 78.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ETSU -8.3 | — |
| 1H total | 66.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | MORE 29.3 · ETSU 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MORE 1–2 ETSUETSU leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · MORE 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | MORE 62 @ ETSU 77 | ETSU -10.5 | ETSU W |
| Dec 11, 2022-23 | ETSU 57 @ MORE 61 | MORE -1.5 | MORE W |
| Dec 11, 2021-22 | MORE 75 @ ETSU 82 | ETSU -2.5 | ETSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Morehead St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-81 | +22.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 81-120 | +28.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-83 | +29.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 62-77 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-80 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-84 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-80 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 78-64 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 64-60 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-72 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 100-105 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 205 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-66 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-68 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-79 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 61-55 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 94-86 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-59 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 64-63 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 66-61 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 67-93 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
+6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
−10.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
+2.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
−3.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−1.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−15.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
−0.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+11.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
+2.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+5.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
−5.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
+7.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+2.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+7.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−3.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+0.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+0.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+0.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
−4.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
+14.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
+2.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+9.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
+13.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−6.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+8.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
+8.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
−20.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
−6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
+50.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
−12.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−5.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
+17.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−16.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−22.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
+17.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+5.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
−21.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+13.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
+8.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
−4.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+56.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+4.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−1.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+6.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+1.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+8.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
+7.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
−20.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
−4.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+31.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+5.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
−3.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−15.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+7.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
−12.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
ETSU
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 64-68 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 75-63 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-62 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-55 | -19.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-57 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-88 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 91-65 | -7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 75-76 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 58-77 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 75-81 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 74-49 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-67 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-60 | -11.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-72 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-75 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 84-55 | -17.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 88-90 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 86-72 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 75-71 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 87-70 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 73-61 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 72-82 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 78-69 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 87-75 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-82 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 83-76 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 69-67 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−10.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
+5.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+5.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
+4.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+22.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
+10.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
−5.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+18.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
−4.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−1.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
−15.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
+12.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−1.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
−2.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
+14.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−10.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
−2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−3.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
+11.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
−11.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+12.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
−1.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+2.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
−17.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+10.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+5.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−9.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
−4.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
−7.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−0.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−16.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−9.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
−4.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+6.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
−5.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+5.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
−7.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
+18.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+12.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
+7.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−15.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
+21.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
−17.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−0.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
+1.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
−2.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−7.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
+2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−10.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
−2.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
+32.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+11.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
+4.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+13.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
−11.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
+8.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+6.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+13.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−8.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
+8.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
+19.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−9.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−2.5
over 17under 15avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
ETSU has the better starters
Position by position: Morehead St 0, ETSU 2, even 3
Morehead StBetterETSU
G C. Dawson8.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 22
=Even
G B. Ward TR11.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 29
G V. Dawson3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 7
→ETSUSmall
G J. Cooper TR11.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 34
G J. Winkleman1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Hennig TR9.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 24
G I. Day NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Johnson5.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 28
F C. Parker2.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 1
→ETSUBig
F J. McCullum7.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 49
Morehead StBetterETSU
MORE offense349th of 366 · -12.3
→ETSUBig
ETSU defense140th of 366 · -2.9
MORE defense333rd of 366 · -8.7
→ETSUSmall
ETSU offense224th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
←MOREBig
Backcourt-7.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.7 · 1 player
→ETSUSmall
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestMORE betterETSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Dawson26 minV. Dawson16 minJ. Winkleman1 minI. DayNewK. CarbonNewK. ShawNew
Forwards
C. Parker16 minD. AlexanderNewL. BassNewT. TangioraNewJ. PriesterNew
Guards
B. Ward31 min · TRJ. Cooper31 min · TRT. Hennig25 min · TRM. Johnson22 minT. Mason17 min · TRD. PayneNew
Forwards
J. McCullum22 minB. Crump15 minM. Marion12 min · TRK. CampbellNewE. SmithNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #243 | Points per game | 76.8 #121 |
| 1.07 #202 | Points per possession | 1.15 #59 |
| 67.4 #262 | Pace (possessions) | 67.0 #279 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #285 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #33 |
| 32.0 #281 | 3-point % | 34.7 #132 |
| 30.5 #349 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.8 #216 |
| 37.7 #109 | Free throw rate | 35.0 #180 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #275 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #79 |
| 35.8 #27 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #252 |
| 12.0 #285 | Assists per game | 13.9 #154 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.5 #205 | Points allowed | 70.1 #61 |
| 1.12 #264 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #77 |
| 50.2 #109 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #161 |
| 34.5 #221 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #110 |
| 15.4 #259 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #79 |
| 64.2 #351 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.1 #64 |
| 6.0 #234 | Steals per game | 8.6 #16 |
| 3.0 #213 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #180 |
Morehead St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee St67–93
- Wvs SE Missouri66–61
- W@ Little Rock76–70
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles64–63
- W@ W Illinois81–59
A week or more of rest.
ETSU
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman61–76
- Wvs W Carolina69–67
- Wvs The Citadel83–76
- L@ Mercer76–82
- Lvs Wofford69–72
A week or more of rest.