Welsh-Ryan Arena · at Northwestern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NU 83–65 · win probability NU 95%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NU has more of the edges
COLU 2, NU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COLU 36.0%, NU 28.1%. Defensive: COLU 72.8%, NU 65.3%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COLU 19.3%, NU 13.1%. Forced: COLU 15.1%, NU 17.5%
Context
Schedule so far
COLU has played the 169th-hardest schedule, NU the 36th. A record against a soft schedule means less
NU offense vs COLU defense
Offense 67th of 366 against a defense 198th, on the model’s ratings
COLU offense vs NU defense
Offense 163rd of 366 against a defense 42nd, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COLU 61%, NU 24%. Transfers in: COLU 1, NU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
NU at home. This season: NU 0-0 at home, COLU 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: COLU 28.6, NU 33.9. Allowed: COLU 33.5, NU 34.8
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: COLU plays 67.8 a game (237th fastest), NU 65.5 (328th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: COLU 53.5 and allows 51.2; NU 51.7 and allows 51.0
Even
Three-pointers
COLU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%; NU hits 33.0% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 37.5% and 34.0% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NU -18.4 | — |
| Total | — | 148.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | COLU 65 · NU 83.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NU -10.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | COLU 29.3 · NU 40.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Columbia
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-53 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-89 | +32.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 54-49 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 82-67 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-70 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 106-77 | -3.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-65 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 73-77 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 104-99 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-79 | -5.5 | L −30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 74-91 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-69 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-80 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-88 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-65 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-64 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-62 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 54-60 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 71-81 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
+10.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
+5.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+0.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
+0.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+12.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+21.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+25.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−1.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+14.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
−8.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−9.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+8.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−30.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
−8.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
−7.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
+7.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
+0.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
−17.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−19.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−7.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+8.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−7.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+12.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
+0.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
−24.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
−4.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+1.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
−41.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+5.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+11.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+32.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−2.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+13.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
+3.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−23.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
+9.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+32.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−12.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
+22.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
+14.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
−8.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
−14.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
+8.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−16.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−5.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+2.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−23.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+1.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
−33.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
+15.5
over 14under 12avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Northwestern
34 games played
Straight up
15-19
44% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-19
44% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-47 | -26.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 76-52 | -17.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 110-63 | -23.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 81-79 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 79-77 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 81-86 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-85 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 82-86 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-53 | -30.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 86-70 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 58-61 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-60 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 78-84 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 66-76 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 75-77 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 68-79 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 58-77 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 74-68 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-71 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-73 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-76 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 44-84 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 75-87 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 49-68 | +13.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-74 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 72-68 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 63-62 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 66-70 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 66-67 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 76-66 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 74-61 | +6.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 68-81 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MERC
W 70-47
−3.5
7
vs
BU
W 76-52
+6.5
10
vs
CLE
W 110-63
+23.5
14
@
DEP
W 81-79
−3.5
21
vs
UVA
L 78-83
−0.5
23
vs
SC
W 79-77
−2.5
27
vs
OKST
L 81-86
−7.5
3
@
WIS
L 73-85
−1.5
6
vs
OSU
L 82-86
−2.5
13
vs
JKST
W 93-53
+9.5
16
vs
VAL
W 86-70
+1.5
20
vs
BTLR
L 58-61
+0.5
30
vs
HOW
W 80-60
+0.5
3
vs
MINN
L 78-84
−10.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-76
+3.5
11
@
RUTG
L 75-77
−6.5
14
vs
ILL
L 68-79
−1.5
17
vs
NEB
L 58-77
−14.5
21
@
USC
W 74-68
+12.5
24
@
UCLA
L 64-71
+0.5
29
vs
PSU
W 94-73
+13.5
31
vs
WASH
L 62-76
−15.5
4
@
ILL
L 44-84
−23.5
8
@
IOWA
L 70-76
+4.5
11
vs
MICH
L 75-87
+3.5
14
@
NEB
L 49-68
−5.5
18
vs
MD
W 78-74
−3.5
24
@
IU
W 72-68
+13.5
28
vs
ORE
W 63-62
−2.5
4
vs
PUR
L 66-70
+8.5
7
@
MINN
L 66-67
+3.5
10
vs
PSU
W 76-66
+5.5
11
vs
IU
W 74-61
+19.5
12
vs
PUR
L 68-81
+0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MERC
W 70-47
−23.5
7
vs
BU
W 76-52
−8.5
10
vs
CLE
W 110-63
+21.5
14
@
DEP
W 81-79
+14.5
21
vs
UVA
L 78-83
+11.5
23
vs
SC
W 79-77
+9.5
27
vs
OKST
L 81-86
+7.5
3
@
WIS
L 73-85
+2.5
6
vs
OSU
L 82-86
+12.5
13
vs
JKST
W 93-53
−0.5
16
vs
VAL
W 86-70
+10.5
20
vs
BTLR
L 58-61
−35.5
30
vs
HOW
W 80-60
−8.5
3
vs
MINN
L 78-84
+23.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-76
−1.5
11
@
RUTG
L 75-77
+7.5
14
vs
ILL
L 68-79
−4.5
17
vs
NEB
L 58-77
−14.5
21
@
USC
W 74-68
−7.5
24
@
UCLA
L 64-71
−8.5
29
vs
PSU
W 94-73
+18.5
31
vs
WASH
L 62-76
−8.5
4
@
ILL
L 44-84
−21.5
8
@
IOWA
L 70-76
+6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 75-87
+8.5
14
@
NEB
L 49-68
−29.5
18
vs
MD
W 78-74
+9.5
24
@
IU
W 72-68
−5.5
28
vs
ORE
W 63-62
−16.5
4
vs
PUR
L 66-70
−9.5
7
@
MINN
L 66-67
−0.5
10
vs
PSU
W 76-66
−1.5
11
vs
IU
W 74-61
−7.5
12
vs
PUR
L 68-81
+9.5
over 15under 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Northwestern has the better starters
Position by position: Columbia 0, Northwestern 2, even 3
ColumbiaBetterNorthwestern
G M. Franklin9.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 48
=No call
G L. Pratt TR17 pts · 1.7 reb · 3.3 ast
Not ranked
G G. O'Keefe7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 45
→NUBig
F J. Karasinski TR21.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 97
G H. Sanders4.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 38
=Even
F C. Smith TR11.9 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 48
F M. Ritter6.9 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 21
→NUBig
F L. McEldon TR11.7 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 82
F C. Igoe8.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 72
=Even
F O. Federiko TR8.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
ColumbiaBetterNorthwestern
COLU offense163rd of 366 · -4.9
→NUSmall
NU defense42nd of 366 · +2.7
COLU defense198th of 366 · -4.8
→NUBig
NU offense67th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
→NUBig
Backcourt+0.9 · 1 player
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
→NUBig
Frontcourt+7.1 · 4 players
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCOLU betterNU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Franklin24 minG. O'Keefe21 minH. Sanders15 minJ. Cunningham4 minD. VesseyNewN. RomanelliNew
Forwards
M. Ritter25 minC. Igoe20 minD. Langford11 min · TRR. Nweke8 minL. Coleman4 minN. ClarksonNew
Guards
L. Pratt33 min · TRA. Ciaravino22 minJ. West22 minA. Kostic12 min · TRD. Williams9 min · TRP. Gill4 min
Forwards
J. Karasinski30 min · TRC. Smith30 min · TRL. McEldon26 min · TRO. Federiko23 min · TRR. Soulis20 min · TRE. EschmeyerNew
Centers
S. GhaiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.9 #167 | Points per game | 73.2 #220 |
| 1.10 #130 | Points per possession | 1.12 #100 |
| 67.8 #237 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #328 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.5 #83 | Effective FG% | 51.7 #159 |
| 35.9 #61 | 3-point % | 33.0 #232 |
| 37.5 #221 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.0 #296 |
| 28.6 #337 | Free throw rate | 33.9 #213 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.3 #332 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #6 |
| 36.0 #23 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #260 |
| 15.0 #90 | Assists per game | 17.2 #18 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.5 #145 | Points allowed | 72.0 #106 |
| 1.09 #188 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #210 |
| 51.2 #168 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #157 |
| 35.2 #258 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #145 |
| 15.1 #282 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #120 |
| 72.8 #42 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.3 #332 |
| 5.7 #270 | Steals per game | 5.8 #256 |
| 3.0 #235 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #131 |
Columbia
14-12 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Harvard71–81
- Lvs Yale54–60
- Wvs Brown80–62
- Lvs Dartmouth63–64
- W@ Princeton75–65
A week or more of rest.
Northwestern
15-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-16 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue68–81
- Wvs Indiana74–61
- Wvs Penn State76–66
- L@ Minnesota66–67
- Lvs Purdue66–70
A week or more of rest.