Betty Engelstad Sioux Center · at North Dakota
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UND | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SIUE 72–69 · win probability SIUE 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SIUE has more of the edges
SIUE 5, UND 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
SIUE hits 35.0% and allows 30.2%; UND hits 32.7% and allows 37.1%. Threes are 36.2% and 40.6% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: SIUE 49.5 and allows 45.6; UND 49.5 and allows 56.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SIUE 17.9%, UND 14.1%. Forced: SIUE 17.1%, UND 19.3%
UND offense vs SIUE defense
Offense 304th of 366 against a defense 161st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: SIUE plays 66.1 a game (306th fastest), UND 69.7 (133rd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
SIUE has played the 365th-hardest schedule, UND the 293rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SIUE 30.1%, UND 27.4%. Defensive: SIUE 68.4%, UND 67.6%
Home court
UND at home. This season: UND 0-0 at home, SIUE 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SIUE 52%, UND 24%. Transfers in: SIUE 2, UND 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
SIUE offense vs UND defense
Offense 329th of 366 against a defense 353rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SIUE 30.6, UND 37.9. Allowed: SIUE 34.3, UND 43.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SIUE -2.4 | — |
| Total | — | 141.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | SIUE 71.8 · UND 69.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SIUE -1.6 | — |
| 1H total | 66.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | SIUE 33.8 · UND 32.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SIUE
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-18
38% overs · avg −4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 77-60 | +6.5 | W +23.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 55-64 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 61-59 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 69-94 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-77 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 130.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 83-68 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 72-63 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 73-83 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-76 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 66-61 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 59-55 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 72-73 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 66-62 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 70-73 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 59-65 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 68-55 | +9.5 | W +22.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 74-66 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 62-58 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-67 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 58-46 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 130.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 78-72 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 71-61 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 74-56 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 137.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 129.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 52-62 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 53-80 | +2.5 | L −24.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 67-47 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 77-50 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 71-77 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
UTSA
W 77-60
+23.5
10
vs
INST
L 55-64
−11.5
14
@
DRKE
W 61-59
+9.5
17
@
WIS
L 69-94
+0.5
21
@
AF
L 63-77
−16.5
23
vs
ALST
W 83-68
+13.5
2
@
UNF
W 72-63
+1.5
6
vs
WMU
L 73-83
−15.5
18
@
EIU
L 72-76
−10.5
22
@
WIU
W 66-61
−1.5
1
vs
USI
W 59-55
−6.5
3
vs
MORE
L 72-73
−5.5
6
vs
LIN
W 66-62
+2.5
8
vs
LR
L 70-73
−6.5
15
@
UTM
L 59-65
+1.5
17
@
SEMO
W 68-55
+22.5
22
vs
TNST
W 74-66
+6.5
24
vs
TNTC
W 62-58
−3.5
29
@
MORE
L 65-67
−0.5
31
@
USI
W 58-46
+10.5
3
@
LIN
W 78-72
+10.5
7
@
LR
W 71-61
+11.5
12
vs
SEMO
W 74-56
+19.5
14
vs
UTM
L 76-81
−3.5
19
@
TNTC
L 52-62
−11.5
21
@
TNST
L 53-80
−24.5
26
vs
WIU
W 67-47
+6.5
28
vs
EIU
W 77-50
+21.5
4
vs
EIU
L 71-77
−9.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
UTSA
W 77-60
−16.5
10
vs
INST
L 55-64
−40.5
14
@
DRKE
W 61-59
−22.5
17
@
WIS
L 69-94
+16.5
21
@
AF
L 63-77
+9.5
23
vs
ALST
W 83-68
+8.5
2
@
UNF
W 72-63
−18.5
6
vs
WMU
L 73-83
+16.5
18
@
EIU
L 72-76
+13.5
22
@
WIU
W 66-61
−11.5
1
vs
USI
W 59-55
−22.5
3
vs
MORE
L 72-73
+13.5
6
vs
LIN
W 66-62
−14.5
8
vs
LR
L 70-73
+11.5
15
@
UTM
L 59-65
−7.5
17
@
SEMO
W 68-55
−16.5
22
vs
TNST
W 74-66
−2.5
24
vs
TNTC
W 62-58
−15.5
29
@
MORE
L 65-67
+1.5
31
@
USI
W 58-46
−26.5
3
@
LIN
W 78-72
+9.5
7
@
LR
W 71-61
−0.5
12
vs
SEMO
W 74-56
−7.5
14
vs
UTM
L 76-81
+27.5
19
@
TNTC
L 52-62
−20.5
21
@
TNST
L 53-80
−10.5
26
vs
WIU
W 67-47
−21.5
28
vs
EIU
W 77-50
−2.5
4
vs
EIU
L 71-77
+19.5
over 11under 18avg −4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Dakota
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
21-11
66% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-91 | +36.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 85-93 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-75 | +29.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 58-75 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 78-69 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 55-92 | +18.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-90 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 75-79 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-88 | +12.5 | W +14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 55-78 | +29.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 72-61 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 90-87 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-90 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-79 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 80-91 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 96-80 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 79-62 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-86 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-80 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-73 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-98 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 72-71 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-83 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 85-70 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-91 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-96 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 83-67 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 67-66 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 62-70 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ALA
L 62-91
+7.5
6
vs
UCR
L 70-74
−5.5
9
vs
CSUN
L 85-93
−1.5
15
@
UCR
W 76-74
+5.5
19
@
CREI
L 60-75
+14.5
22
vs
CCU
L 58-75
−13.5
23
@
WIU
W 78-69
+6.5
28
@
HAW
L 55-92
−18.5
3
@
IDHO
L 58-90
−20.5
6
vs
MONT
L 75-79
+1.5
13
vs
WIU
L 66-69
−10.5
18
vs
WIN
W 90-88
+14.5
21
@
NEB
L 55-78
+6.5
1
vs
ORU
W 72-61
+9.5
3
vs
SDST
W 90-87
+10.5
8
@
OMA
L 79-90
−5.5
10
@
KC
W 81-79
+3.5
15
vs
STMN
L 80-91
−0.5
17
vs
SDAK
W 96-80
+14.5
22
@
ORU
W 79-62
+18.5
24
@
DEN
W 93-86
+12.5
29
@
STMN
W 81-80
+12.5
5
vs
OMA
W 76-73
+1.5
7
vs
DEN
L 79-98
−22.5
11
@
SDAK
W 72-71
+3.5
14
vs
NDSU
L 66-83
−11.5
19
vs
KC
W 85-70
+5.5
21
@
SDST
L 83-91
+1.5
28
@
NDSU
L 63-96
−21.5
6
vs
DEN
W 83-67
+18.5
7
vs
STMN
W 67-66
+12.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 62-70
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 11avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ALA
L 62-91
−17.5
6
vs
UCR
L 70-74
−2.5
9
vs
CSUN
L 85-93
+19.5
15
@
UCR
W 76-74
+1.5
19
@
CREI
L 60-75
−20.5
22
vs
CCU
L 58-75
−14.5
23
@
WIU
W 78-69
+0.5
28
@
HAW
L 55-92
−2.5
3
@
IDHO
L 58-90
−3.5
6
vs
MONT
L 75-79
−0.5
13
vs
WIU
L 66-69
−10.5
18
vs
WIN
W 90-88
+20.5
21
@
NEB
L 55-78
−18.5
1
vs
ORU
W 72-61
−15.5
3
vs
SDST
W 90-87
+24.5
8
@
OMA
L 79-90
+22.5
10
@
KC
W 81-79
+13.5
15
vs
STMN
L 80-91
+19.5
17
vs
SDAK
W 96-80
+15.5
22
@
ORU
W 79-62
−8.5
24
@
DEN
W 93-86
+16.5
29
@
STMN
W 81-80
+8.5
5
vs
OMA
W 76-73
−1.5
7
vs
DEN
L 79-98
+15.5
11
@
SDAK
W 72-71
−13.5
14
vs
NDSU
L 66-83
−0.5
19
vs
KC
W 85-70
+4.5
21
@
SDST
L 83-91
+22.5
28
@
NDSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
DEN
W 83-67
−10.5
7
vs
STMN
W 67-66
−20.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 62-70
−15.5
over 15under 17avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SIUE has the better starters
Position by position: SIUE 3, North Dakota 0, even 2
SIUEBetterNorth Dakota
G G. Cobb TR9.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 40
←SIUESmall
G Z. Kraft7.7 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 23
G T. King10.1 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 66
←SIUEBig
G S. Hincapie TR4.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 11
G J. Pickett4.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 7
=No call
G T. Wagner TR1.7 pts · 1.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F G. Liberis7 pts · 4.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 9
=No call
F K. Ouse0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F D. Baker7.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 40
←SIUEBig
C J. Jones2.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 1
SIUEBetterNorth Dakota
SIUE offense329th of 366 · -10.6
=Even
UND defense353rd of 366 · -9.9
SIUE defense161st of 366 · -3.6
←SIUEBig
UND offense304th of 366 · -9.5
Backcourt-3.6 · 3 players
←SIUESmall
Backcourt-4.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
←SIUESmall
Frontcourt-4.5 · 2 players
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestSIUE betterUND betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
G. Cobb29 min · TRT. King22 minJ. Pickett20 minC. Efono9 minH. Alexander7 minD. McCaskillNew
Forwards
G. Liberis24 minD. Baker21 minI. Baganc2 minD. WilsonNewB. SohaibNewB. MillerNew
Centers
J. Martin1 min · TR
Guards
Z. Kraft25 minS. Hincapie16 min · TRT. Wagner7 min · TRL. WinkelNewZ. ParksNewJ. MooreNew
Forwards
K. Ouse6 minA. RadojevicNewJ. ThomasNewD. ElyNew
Centers
J. Jones19 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.7 #321 | Points per game | 74.2 #187 |
| 1.02 #304 | Points per possession | 1.07 #214 |
| 66.1 #306 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #133 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #266 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #272 |
| 35.0 #123 | 3-point % | 32.7 #246 |
| 36.2 #246 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.6 #155 |
| 30.6 #294 | Free throw rate | 37.9 #106 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.9 #266 | Turnover rate | 14.1 #27 |
| 30.1 #195 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.4 #284 |
| 12.4 #255 | Assists per game | 10.8 #343 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.9 #13 | Points allowed | 79.6 #310 |
| 1.00 #26 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #306 |
| 45.6 #6 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.5 #353 |
| 30.2 #10 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.1 #345 |
| 17.1 #143 | Turnovers forced | 19.3 #36 |
| 68.4 #235 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.6 #276 |
| 6.9 #138 | Steals per game | 7.9 #49 |
| 4.0 #70 | Blocks per game | 2.5 #307 |
SIUE
16-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs E Illinois71–77
- Wvs E Illinois77–50
- Wvs W Illinois67–47
- L@ Tennessee St53–80
- L@ Tennessee Tech52–62
A week or more of rest.
North Dakota
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St62–70
- Wvs St Thomas67–66
- Wvs Denver83–67
- L@ N Dakota St63–96
- L@ S Dakota St83–91
A week or more of rest.