Hulman Center · at Indiana St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | INST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects INST 74–69 · win probability INST 67%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SIUE has more of the edges
SIUE 4, INST 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
SIUE has played the 365th-hardest schedule, INST the 149th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SIUE 17.9%, INST 19.5%. Forced: SIUE 17.1%, INST 14.9%
Three-pointers
SIUE hits 35.0% and allows 30.2%; INST hits 31.6% and allows 31.2%. Threes are 36.2% and 45.2% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SIUE 52%, INST 0%. Transfers in: SIUE 2, INST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: SIUE plays 66.1 a game (306th fastest), INST 69.7 (131st). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SIUE 30.1%, INST 26.2%. Defensive: SIUE 68.4%, INST 68.2%
SIUE offense vs INST defense
Offense 329th of 366 against a defense 267th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
INST at home. This season: INST 0-0 at home, SIUE 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SIUE 30.6, INST 27.4. Allowed: SIUE 34.3, INST 28.7
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SIUE 49.5 and allows 45.6; INST 52.8 and allows 50.2
Even
INST offense vs SIUE defense
Offense 162nd of 366 against a defense 161st, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | INST -5.1 | — |
| Total | — | 142.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | SIUE 68.8 · INST 73.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | INST -2.9 | — |
| 1H total | 66.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | SIUE 31.9 · INST 34.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SIUE 1–1 INSTSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · SIUE 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2025-26 | INST 64 @ SIUE 55 | SIUE -2.5 | INST W |
| Nov 12, 2024-25 | SIUE 77 @ INST 72 | INST -6.5 | SIUE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SIUE
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-18
38% overs · avg −4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 77-60 | +6.5 | W +23.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 55-64 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 61-59 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 69-94 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-77 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 130.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 83-68 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 72-63 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 73-83 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-76 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 66-61 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 59-55 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 72-73 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 66-62 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 70-73 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 59-65 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 68-55 | +9.5 | W +22.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 74-66 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 62-58 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-67 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 58-46 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 130.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 78-72 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 71-61 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 74-56 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 137.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 129.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 52-62 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 53-80 | +2.5 | L −24.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 67-47 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 77-50 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 71-77 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
UTSA
W 77-60
+23.5
10
vs
INST
L 55-64
−11.5
14
@
DRKE
W 61-59
+9.5
17
@
WIS
L 69-94
+0.5
21
@
AF
L 63-77
−16.5
23
vs
ALST
W 83-68
+13.5
2
@
UNF
W 72-63
+1.5
6
vs
WMU
L 73-83
−15.5
18
@
EIU
L 72-76
−10.5
22
@
WIU
W 66-61
−1.5
1
vs
USI
W 59-55
−6.5
3
vs
MORE
L 72-73
−5.5
6
vs
LIN
W 66-62
+2.5
8
vs
LR
L 70-73
−6.5
15
@
UTM
L 59-65
+1.5
17
@
SEMO
W 68-55
+22.5
22
vs
TNST
W 74-66
+6.5
24
vs
TNTC
W 62-58
−3.5
29
@
MORE
L 65-67
−0.5
31
@
USI
W 58-46
+10.5
3
@
LIN
W 78-72
+10.5
7
@
LR
W 71-61
+11.5
12
vs
SEMO
W 74-56
+19.5
14
vs
UTM
L 76-81
−3.5
19
@
TNTC
L 52-62
−11.5
21
@
TNST
L 53-80
−24.5
26
vs
WIU
W 67-47
+6.5
28
vs
EIU
W 77-50
+21.5
4
vs
EIU
L 71-77
−9.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
UTSA
W 77-60
−16.5
10
vs
INST
L 55-64
−40.5
14
@
DRKE
W 61-59
−22.5
17
@
WIS
L 69-94
+16.5
21
@
AF
L 63-77
+9.5
23
vs
ALST
W 83-68
+8.5
2
@
UNF
W 72-63
−18.5
6
vs
WMU
L 73-83
+16.5
18
@
EIU
L 72-76
+13.5
22
@
WIU
W 66-61
−11.5
1
vs
USI
W 59-55
−22.5
3
vs
MORE
L 72-73
+13.5
6
vs
LIN
W 66-62
−14.5
8
vs
LR
L 70-73
+11.5
15
@
UTM
L 59-65
−7.5
17
@
SEMO
W 68-55
−16.5
22
vs
TNST
W 74-66
−2.5
24
vs
TNTC
W 62-58
−15.5
29
@
MORE
L 65-67
+1.5
31
@
USI
W 58-46
−26.5
3
@
LIN
W 78-72
+9.5
7
@
LR
W 71-61
−0.5
12
vs
SEMO
W 74-56
−7.5
14
vs
UTM
L 76-81
+27.5
19
@
TNTC
L 52-62
−20.5
21
@
TNST
L 53-80
−10.5
26
vs
WIU
W 67-47
−21.5
28
vs
EIU
W 77-50
−2.5
4
vs
EIU
L 71-77
+19.5
over 11under 18avg −4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Indiana St
30 games played
Straight up
9-21
30% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 76-92 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 64-55 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 62-100 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 60-51 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 70-52 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 73-75 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 74-81 | -12.5 | L −19.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 77-55 | -11.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 70-68 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 99-108 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 207 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 65-85 | +13.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 81-80 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 66-75 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 72-74 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-72 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 94-89 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 81-85 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 167.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 68-75 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 62-76 | -3.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 74-76 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 72-76 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-63 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 65-80 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 72-74 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 75-76 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 60-81 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-87 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 55-66 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 79-63 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 62-63 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CLT
L 76-92
−11.5
10
@
SIUE
W 64-55
+11.5
14
@
DUKE
L 62-100
−0.5
19
vs
LT
W 60-51
+5.5
22
vs
BALL
W 70-52
+10.5
26
@
LT
L 73-75
+0.5
28
vs
ALCN
L 74-81
−19.5
7
vs
USI
W 77-55
+10.5
14
@
MILW
W 70-68
+4.5
18
vs
BRAD
L 99-108
−3.5
21
@
ILST
L 65-85
−6.5
29
vs
BEL
W 81-80
+8.5
1
@
UNI
L 66-75
+1.5
4
@
DRKE
L 72-74
+4.5
10
vs
EVAN
L 69-72
−10.5
14
vs
ILST
W 94-89
+11.5
17
@
MUR
L 81-85
+7.5
21
@
BRAD
L 68-75
+1.5
24
vs
DRKE
L 62-76
−17.5
27
@
UIC
L 74-76
+3.5
31
vs
VAL
L 72-76
−6.5
3
@
EVAN
W 84-63
+19.5
9
vs
SIU
L 65-80
−13.5
12
vs
MUR
L 72-74
+1.5
15
@
VAL
L 75-76
+3.5
18
vs
UNI
L 60-81
−15.5
21
@
BEL
L 70-87
−4.5
25
@
SIU
L 55-66
−2.5
1
vs
UIC
W 79-63
+19.5
5
vs
VAL
L 62-63
+1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CLT
L 76-92
+15.5
10
@
SIUE
W 64-55
−40.5
14
@
DUKE
L 62-100
−1.5
19
vs
LT
W 60-51
−36.5
22
vs
BALL
W 70-52
−32.5
26
@
LT
L 73-75
+6.5
28
vs
ALCN
L 74-81
+2.5
7
vs
USI
W 77-55
−26.5
14
@
MILW
W 70-68
−21.5
18
vs
BRAD
L 99-108
+56.5
21
@
ILST
L 65-85
−2.5
29
vs
BEL
W 81-80
+1.5
1
@
UNI
L 66-75
+5.5
4
@
DRKE
L 72-74
−3.5
10
vs
EVAN
L 69-72
−4.5
14
vs
ILST
W 94-89
+34.5
17
@
MUR
L 81-85
−1.5
21
@
BRAD
L 68-75
−12.5
24
vs
DRKE
L 62-76
−13.5
27
@
UIC
L 74-76
+2.5
31
vs
VAL
L 72-76
+2.5
3
@
EVAN
W 84-63
+1.5
9
vs
SIU
L 65-80
−1.5
12
vs
MUR
L 72-74
−17.5
15
@
VAL
L 75-76
+5.5
18
vs
UNI
L 60-81
+4.5
21
@
BEL
L 70-87
+0.5
25
@
SIU
L 55-66
−26.5
1
vs
UIC
W 79-63
−2.5
5
vs
VAL
L 62-63
−15.5
over 13under 17avg −4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Indiana St has the better starters
Position by position: SIUE 0, Indiana St 2, even 3
SIUEBetterIndiana St
G G. Cobb TR9.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 40
→INSTSmall
G K. Gregory TR16.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 70
G T. King10.1 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 66
=Even
G M. White TR10.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 58
G J. Pickett4.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 7
→INSTSmall
G M. Mitchell TR11.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 28
F G. Liberis7 pts · 4.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 9
=Even
G D. Paschal TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 16
F D. Baker7.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 40
=No call
G C. Puryear TR0.4 pts · 0.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
SIUEBetterIndiana St
SIUE offense329th of 366 · -10.6
→INSTSmall
INST defense267th of 366 · -6.8
SIUE defense161st of 366 · -3.6
=Even
INST offense162nd of 366 · -4.8
Backcourt-3.6 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.1 · 5 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
→INSTSmall
Bench-0.1 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestSIUE betterINST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
G. Cobb29 min · TRT. King22 minJ. Pickett20 minC. Efono9 minH. Alexander7 minD. McCaskillNew
Forwards
G. Liberis24 minD. Baker21 minI. Baganc2 minD. WilsonNewB. SohaibNewB. MillerNew
Centers
J. Martin1 min · TR
Guards
K. Gregory32 min · TRM. White31 min · TRM. Mitchell27 min · TRD. Paschal12 min · TRC. Puryear3 min · TRE. McQuillanNew
Forwards
A. Vlajic1 min · TRJ. CooperNewA. CalamitaNewK. LandNewK. SpeckmanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.7 #321 | Points per game | 71.7 #254 |
| 1.02 #304 | Points per possession | 1.03 #295 |
| 66.1 #306 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #131 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #266 | Effective FG% | 52.8 #110 |
| 35.0 #123 | 3-point % | 31.6 #305 |
| 36.2 #246 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.2 #62 |
| 30.6 #294 | Free throw rate | 27.4 #349 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.9 #266 | Turnover rate | 19.5 #338 |
| 30.1 #195 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.2 #317 |
| 12.4 #255 | Assists per game | 17.1 #22 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.9 #13 | Points allowed | 75.1 #193 |
| 1.00 #26 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #161 |
| 45.6 #6 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #110 |
| 30.2 #10 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.2 #37 |
| 17.1 #143 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #299 |
| 68.4 #235 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #245 |
| 6.9 #138 | Steals per game | 6.0 #242 |
| 4.0 #70 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #176 |
SIUE
16-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs E Illinois71–77
- Wvs E Illinois77–50
- Wvs W Illinois67–47
- L@ Tennessee St53–80
- L@ Tennessee Tech52–62
A week or more of rest.
Indiana St
9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 4-17 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Valparaiso62–63
- Wvs UIC79–63
- L@ S Illinois55–66
- L@ Belmont70–87
- Lvs Northern Iowa60–81
A week or more of rest.