Madison Square Garden · at St John's
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SJU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SJU 85–70 · win probability SJU 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SJU has more of the edges
SYR 0, SJU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SYR 29.2%, SJU 35.2%. Defensive: SYR 66.4%, SJU 70.1%
Three-pointers
SYR hits 32.9% and allows 34.1%; SJU hits 33.5% and allows 31.3%. Threes are 37.1% and 35.2% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SYR 15.9%, SJU 14.4%. Forced: SYR 17.4%, SJU 19.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: SYR 35.1, SJU 40.2. Allowed: SYR 32.6, SJU 31.8
SJU offense vs SYR defense
Offense 8th of 366 against a defense 67th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SYR has played the 67th-hardest schedule, SJU the 15th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
SJU at home. This season: SJU 0-0 at home, SYR 0-0 away
SYR offense vs SJU defense
Offense 60th of 366 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SYR plays 69.1 a game (173rd fastest), SJU 70.8 (82nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SYR 52.6 and allows 50.3; SJU 51.0 and allows 47.5
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SYR 19%, SJU 22%. Transfers in: SYR 6, SJU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SJU -15.7 | — |
| Total | — | 154.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | SYR 69.5 · SJU 85.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SJU -9.2 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | SYR 31.6 · SJU 40.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SYR 0–1 SJUSJU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SYR 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2022-23 | SYR 69 vs SJU 76 | SJU -3.5 | SJU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Syracuse
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -21.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-43 | -26.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 80-50 | -11.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 78-73 | -21.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-78 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-71 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-95 | +10.5 | L −20.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 62-60 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 71-63 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 69-70 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 76-62 | -24.5 | L −10.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 91-83 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 77-48 | -22.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 61-64 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 82-72 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 83-72 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 94-86 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 73-81 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 76-85 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 77-87 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-72 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 107-100 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 207 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-78 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 64-101 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 64-77 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 83-88 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 62-77 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 69-86 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BING
W 85-47
+16.5
8
vs
DSU
W 83-43
+13.5
15
vs
DREX
W 80-50
+18.5
18
vs
MONM
W 78-73
−16.5
24
vs
HOU
L 74-78
+10.5
25
vs
KU
L 60-71
−6.5
26
vs
ISU
L 64-95
−20.5
2
vs
TENN
W 62-60
+9.5
11
vs
JOES
W 71-63
−3.5
13
vs
HOF
L 69-70
−10.5
17
vs
MERC
W 76-62
−10.5
20
vs
NE
W 91-83
−6.5
22
vs
STO
W 77-48
+6.5
31
vs
CLEM
L 61-64
−1.5
6
@
GT
W 82-72
+7.5
10
@
PITT
W 83-72
+12.5
13
vs
FSU
W 94-86
+3.5
17
@
BC
L 73-81
−13.5
21
vs
VT
L 74-76
−5.5
24
vs
MIA
L 76-85
−7.5
27
@
NCSU
L 68-88
−9.5
31
vs
ND
W 86-72
+7.5
2
@
UNC
L 77-87
+1.5
7
@
UVA
L 59-72
+0.5
11
vs
CAL
W 107-100
+0.5
14
vs
SMU
W 79-78
+2.5
16
@
DUKE
L 64-101
−16.5
21
vs
UNC
L 64-77
−15.5
28
@
WAKE
L 83-88
−1.5
3
@
LOU
L 62-77
−0.5
7
vs
PITT
L 69-71
−7.5
10
vs
SMU
L 69-86
−13.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BING
W 85-47
−21.5
8
vs
DSU
W 83-43
−31.5
15
vs
DREX
W 80-50
−13.5
18
vs
MONM
W 78-73
+5.5
24
vs
HOU
L 74-78
+11.5
25
vs
KU
L 60-71
−13.5
26
vs
ISU
L 64-95
+13.5
2
vs
TENN
W 62-60
−25.5
11
vs
JOES
W 71-63
−12.5
13
vs
HOF
L 69-70
−0.5
17
vs
MERC
W 76-62
+6.5
20
vs
NE
W 91-83
+33.5
22
vs
STO
W 77-48
−15.5
31
vs
CLEM
L 61-64
−15.5
6
@
GT
W 82-72
+7.5
10
@
PITT
W 83-72
+12.5
13
vs
FSU
W 94-86
+19.5
17
@
BC
L 73-81
+12.5
21
vs
VT
L 74-76
−2.5
24
vs
MIA
L 76-85
+11.5
27
@
NCSU
L 68-88
+4.5
31
vs
ND
W 86-72
+10.5
2
@
UNC
L 77-87
+5.5
7
@
UVA
L 59-72
−16.5
11
vs
CAL
W 107-100
+58.5
14
vs
SMU
W 79-78
−0.5
16
@
DUKE
L 64-101
+20.5
21
vs
UNC
L 64-77
−13.5
28
@
WAKE
L 83-88
+18.5
3
@
LOU
L 62-77
−20.5
7
vs
PITT
L 69-71
−1.5
10
vs
SMU
L 69-86
+0.5
over 17under 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
St John's
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-23
38% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 108-74 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 96-103 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-60 | -28.5 | W +4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 97-49 | -28.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 82-83 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-81 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-85 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 63-58 | -13.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 91-64 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 79-66 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-59 | -26.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 95-83 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-77 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 84-70 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-73 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 92-68 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 86-79 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 65-60 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-83 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 92-70 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 68-56 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-72 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 87-82 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-69 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-70 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 81-52 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 40-72 | +5.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-57 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-69 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 72-65 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-72 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-68 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-52 | +2.5 | W +22.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 75-80 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+7.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
−11.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
+19.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+1.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+9.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−15.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−8.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−1.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−6.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−0.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+3.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−20.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
+9.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+14.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+8.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+4.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−6.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
−3.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+9.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
+2.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+10.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
−11.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
+3.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−2.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
+16.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−26.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
+24.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−12.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
+1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
+1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+1.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
+22.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
+15.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−1.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+1.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+25.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
+26.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
−26.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
−12.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+6.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+17.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−7.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−30.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−4.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−2.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−1.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+25.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−18.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
−8.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+10.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+4.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+17.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−20.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
+11.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+3.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
−21.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+9.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
+9.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
−19.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−11.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
−23.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−33.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
−1.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−7.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
−1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
−1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+10.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
−15.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
−1.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−12.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+14.5
over 14under 23avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
St John's has the better starters
Position by position: Syracuse 0, St John's 3, even 2
SyracuseBetterSt John's
G G. Doty TR18 pts · 6.9 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 94
=Even
G T. Yessoufou TR17.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
G A. Tobiason TR15.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 82
=Even
G I. Jackson9.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 93
G G. Dual TR8.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 66
→SJUSmall
F K. Hall TR19.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 98
F F. Folefac TR11.3 pts · 5.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 73
→SJUSmall
F D. Freeman TR16.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 92
C L. Wilson TR10.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 75
→SJUSmall
F R. Bailey TR8.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
SyracuseBetterSt John's
SYR offense60th of 366 · +2.7
=Even
SJU defense11th of 366 · +7.0
SYR defense67th of 366 · +0.9
→SJUSmall
SJU offense8th of 366 · +10.5
Backcourt+6.3 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt+6.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→SJUBig
Frontcourt+12.5 · 3 players
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
←SYRBig
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSYR betterSJU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
G. Doty37 min · TRA. Tobiason36 min · TRG. Dual27 min · TRK. Anthony19 minC. Russell2 minN. Lobdell1 min
Forwards
F. Folefac28 min · TRT. Goodrick23 min · TRS. White15 minM. MoranoNew
Centers
L. Wilson29 min · TRI. MartinezNewA. SibyNew
Guards
T. Yessoufou33 min · TRI. Jackson18 minK. Cuffe16 min · TRA. Brown15 min · TRL. Liotopoulos8 minC. Pohto5 min
Forwards
K. Hall34 min · TRD. Freeman31 min · TRR. Bailey19 min · TRR. Prey11 minZ. MaronkaNewB. SaneNew
Centers
T. EdemaNewL. StojkovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.0 #163 | Points per game | 80.9 #45 |
| 1.08 #174 | Points per possession | 1.14 #68 |
| 69.1 #173 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #82 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.6 #122 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #192 |
| 32.9 #239 | 3-point % | 33.5 #197 |
| 37.1 #226 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #272 |
| 35.1 #171 | Free throw rate | 40.2 #57 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #134 | Turnover rate | 14.4 #38 |
| 29.2 #228 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.2 #43 |
| 12.8 #225 | Assists per game | 16.1 #44 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.3 #163 | Points allowed | 69.7 #59 |
| 1.07 #144 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #15 |
| 50.3 #116 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.5 #32 |
| 34.1 #186 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.3 #39 |
| 17.4 #125 | Turnovers forced | 19.1 #46 |
| 66.4 #310 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #154 |
| 6.2 #214 | Steals per game | 7.7 #58 |
| 5.9 #4 | Blocks per game | 4.8 #22 |
Syracuse
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SMU69–86
- Lvs Pitt69–71
- L@ Louisville62–77
- L@ Wake Forest83–88
- Lvs North Carolina64–77
A week or more of rest.
St John's
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke75–80
- Wvs Kansas67–65
- Wvs Northern Iowa79–53
- Wvs UConn72–52
- Wvs Seton Hall78–68
A week or more of rest.