JMA Wireless Dome · at Syracuse
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SYR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SYR 90–72 · win probability SYR 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 161.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SYR has more of the edges
COR 2, SYR 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SYR offense vs COR defense
Offense 60th of 366 against a defense 319th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: COR 30.2, SYR 35.1. Allowed: COR 37.2, SYR 32.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COR 16.1%, SYR 15.9%. Forced: COR 15.0%, SYR 17.4%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COR 30.2%, SYR 29.2%. Defensive: COR 69.4%, SYR 66.4%
Context
Schedule so far
COR has played the 144th-hardest schedule, SYR the 67th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: COR plays 72.0 a game (36th fastest), SYR 69.1 (173rd). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COR 53%, SYR 19%. Transfers in: COR 0, SYR 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: COR 58.5 and allows 55.9; SYR 52.6 and allows 50.3
Home court
SYR at home. This season: SYR 0-0 at home, COR 0-0 away
COR offense vs SYR defense
Offense 111th of 366 against a defense 67th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
COR hits 38.3% and allows 37.5%; SYR hits 32.9% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 51.6% and 37.1% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SYR -17.7 | — |
| Total | — | 161.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | COR 71.8 · SYR 89.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SYR -10.4 | — |
| 1H total | 75.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | COR 32.4 · SYR 42.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COR 0–4 SYRSYR leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · SYR has won the last 4 meetings · COR 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2024-25 | COR 72 @ SYR 82 | SYR -9.5 | SYR W |
| Dec 5, 2023-24 | COR 70 @ SYR 81 | SYR -4.5 | SYR W |
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | COR 63 @ SYR 78 | SYR -8.5 | SYR W |
| Dec 29, 2021-22 | COR 68 @ SYR 80 | SYR -16 | COR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cornell
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 102-110 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 65-76 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 97-78 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-94 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 101-72 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 81-99 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-93 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-75 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 97-114 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 99-104 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 91-102 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-102 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 89-67 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-79 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-64 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 81-91 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-67 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 89-65 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-82 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-73 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-69 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-80 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 111-90 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
−1.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−4.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−4.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
−4.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+23.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
−7.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
−6.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
+1.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+6.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
−8.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
−20.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−24.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
+19.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+8.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
+15.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−17.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
+19.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
+20.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−8.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−23.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
+7.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
−3.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+16.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
+47.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−23.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−5.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
+27.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+13.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
+24.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
+18.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
+16.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
−9.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+50.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
+32.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
+17.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−4.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
−7.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+4.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
−7.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−1.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
−16.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
−1.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−11.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−28.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
−23.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
+9.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+34.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Syracuse
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -21.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-43 | -26.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 80-50 | -11.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 78-73 | -21.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-78 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-71 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-95 | +10.5 | L −20.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 62-60 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 71-63 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 69-70 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 76-62 | -24.5 | L −10.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 91-83 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 77-48 | -22.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 61-64 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 82-72 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 83-72 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 94-86 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 73-81 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 76-85 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 77-87 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-72 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 107-100 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 207 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-78 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 64-101 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 64-77 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 83-88 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 62-77 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 69-86 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BING
W 85-47
+16.5
8
vs
DSU
W 83-43
+13.5
15
vs
DREX
W 80-50
+18.5
18
vs
MONM
W 78-73
−16.5
24
vs
HOU
L 74-78
+10.5
25
vs
KU
L 60-71
−6.5
26
vs
ISU
L 64-95
−20.5
2
vs
TENN
W 62-60
+9.5
11
vs
JOES
W 71-63
−3.5
13
vs
HOF
L 69-70
−10.5
17
vs
MERC
W 76-62
−10.5
20
vs
NE
W 91-83
−6.5
22
vs
STO
W 77-48
+6.5
31
vs
CLEM
L 61-64
−1.5
6
@
GT
W 82-72
+7.5
10
@
PITT
W 83-72
+12.5
13
vs
FSU
W 94-86
+3.5
17
@
BC
L 73-81
−13.5
21
vs
VT
L 74-76
−5.5
24
vs
MIA
L 76-85
−7.5
27
@
NCSU
L 68-88
−9.5
31
vs
ND
W 86-72
+7.5
2
@
UNC
L 77-87
+1.5
7
@
UVA
L 59-72
+0.5
11
vs
CAL
W 107-100
+0.5
14
vs
SMU
W 79-78
+2.5
16
@
DUKE
L 64-101
−16.5
21
vs
UNC
L 64-77
−15.5
28
@
WAKE
L 83-88
−1.5
3
@
LOU
L 62-77
−0.5
7
vs
PITT
L 69-71
−7.5
10
vs
SMU
L 69-86
−13.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BING
W 85-47
−21.5
8
vs
DSU
W 83-43
−31.5
15
vs
DREX
W 80-50
−13.5
18
vs
MONM
W 78-73
+5.5
24
vs
HOU
L 74-78
+11.5
25
vs
KU
L 60-71
−13.5
26
vs
ISU
L 64-95
+13.5
2
vs
TENN
W 62-60
−25.5
11
vs
JOES
W 71-63
−12.5
13
vs
HOF
L 69-70
−0.5
17
vs
MERC
W 76-62
+6.5
20
vs
NE
W 91-83
+33.5
22
vs
STO
W 77-48
−15.5
31
vs
CLEM
L 61-64
−15.5
6
@
GT
W 82-72
+7.5
10
@
PITT
W 83-72
+12.5
13
vs
FSU
W 94-86
+19.5
17
@
BC
L 73-81
+12.5
21
vs
VT
L 74-76
−2.5
24
vs
MIA
L 76-85
+11.5
27
@
NCSU
L 68-88
+4.5
31
vs
ND
W 86-72
+10.5
2
@
UNC
L 77-87
+5.5
7
@
UVA
L 59-72
−16.5
11
vs
CAL
W 107-100
+58.5
14
vs
SMU
W 79-78
−0.5
16
@
DUKE
L 64-101
+20.5
21
vs
UNC
L 64-77
−13.5
28
@
WAKE
L 83-88
+18.5
3
@
LOU
L 62-77
−20.5
7
vs
PITT
L 69-71
−1.5
10
vs
SMU
L 69-86
+0.5
over 17under 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Syracuse has the better starters
Position by position: Cornell 0, Syracuse 4, even 1
CornellBetterSyracuse
G J. Beccles7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 37
→SYRBig
G G. Doty TR18 pts · 6.9 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 94
G A. Nimani5.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 30
→SYRBig
G A. Tobiason TR15.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 82
G M. Rafiq4.2 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G G. Dual TR8.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 66
F K. Sepp4.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 28
→SYRBig
F F. Folefac TR11.3 pts · 5.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 73
F G. Panzini2.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
→SYRBig
C L. Wilson TR10.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 75
CornellBetterSyracuse
COR offense111th of 366 · -1.8
=Even
SYR defense67th of 366 · +0.9
COR defense319th of 366 · -8.3
→SYRBig
SYR offense60th of 366 · +2.7
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
→SYRBig
Backcourt+6.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
→SYRBig
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
Bench-1.3 · 5 players
→SYRBig
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCOR betterSYR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Beccles24 minA. Nimani18 minM. Rafiq8 minD. Fishburn8 minR. Burbach8 minE. GriffinNew
Forwards
K. Sepp19 minG. Panzini10 minI. Imegwu5 minJ. Abalos5 minT. Iwanonkiw3 minB. LecklitnerNew
Guards
G. Doty37 min · TRA. Tobiason36 min · TRG. Dual27 min · TRK. Anthony19 minC. Russell2 minN. Lobdell1 min
Forwards
F. Folefac28 min · TRT. Goodrick23 min · TRS. White15 minM. MoranoNew
Centers
L. Wilson29 min · TRI. MartinezNewA. SibyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85.8 #13 | Points per game | 75.0 #163 |
| 1.20 #17 | Points per possession | 1.08 #174 |
| 72.0 #36 | Pace (possessions) | 69.1 #173 |
| Shooting | ||
| 58.5 #7 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #122 |
| 38.3 #14 | 3-point % | 32.9 #239 |
| 51.6 #8 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.1 #226 |
| 30.2 #304 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #171 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.1 #144 | Turnover rate | 15.9 #134 |
| 30.2 #193 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #228 |
| 20.0 #1 | Assists per game | 12.8 #225 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.6 #358 | Points allowed | 74.3 #163 |
| 1.17 #343 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #144 |
| 55.9 #343 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #116 |
| 37.5 #349 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #186 |
| 15.0 #287 | Turnovers forced | 17.4 #125 |
| 69.4 #187 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.4 #310 |
| 5.8 #263 | Steals per game | 6.2 #214 |
| 2.8 #267 | Blocks per game | 5.9 #4 |
Cornell
13-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Yale76–88
- W@ Dartmouth111–90
- Wvs Brown86–80
- Wvs Yale72–69
- Lvs Harvard54–73
A week or more of rest.
Syracuse
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SMU69–86
- Lvs Pitt69–71
- L@ Louisville62–77
- L@ Wake Forest83–88
- Lvs North Carolina64–77
A week or more of rest.