Akron Zips at Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 8:00 PM ETCajundome · at Louisiana

LineAKR -5.5no move

Total148.5no move

Season records: Akron and Louisiana
AKR	This season	UL
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects AKR 77–70 · win probability AKR 72%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

AKR -5.5

no move since the open

Total

148.5

model 146.5 · Under by 2

Model edge

AKR by 1.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

92% UL

91% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: AKR has more of the edges

AKR 6, UL 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

AKRBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: AKR 58.1 and allows 51.2; UL 47.1 and allows 52.6

AKRBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: AKR 29.2, UL 28.7. Allowed: AKR 30.4, UL 45.8

AKRBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: AKR 33.4%, UL 28.4%. Defensive: AKR 70.1%, UL 67.7%

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: AKR plays 71.1 a game (70th fastest), UL 64.1 (359th). Faster games mean more points

AKRBig

UL offense vs AKR defense

Offense 292nd of 366 against a defense 168th, on the model’s ratings

AKRSmall

Three-pointers

AKR hits 38.2% and allows 35.5%; UL hits 33.6% and allows 35.6%. Threes are 44.8% and 40.5% of their shots

Context

Schedule so far

AKR has played the 159th-hardest schedule, UL the 226th. A record against a soft schedule means less

ULSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: AKR 28%, UL 59%. Transfers in: AKR 5, UL 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

AKRSmall

AKR offense vs UL defense

Offense 101st of 366 against a defense 157th, on the model’s ratings

ULSmall

Home court

UL at home. This season: UL 0-0 at home, AKR 0-0 away

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: AKR 15.5%, UL 16.8%. Forced: AKR 18.3%, UL 18.3%

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Road favorites of 3 to 6.5	1543	67%	51%	50%
Non-conference games at this spread	1736	67%	50%	49%
Games with a total of 145 to 149.5	3547	74%	49%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenAKR -5.5

no move

NowAKR -5.5

No change since the open

Total

Open148.5

no move

Now148.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

AKR -235 · UL +190

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened AKR -5.5 · unchangedmodel AKR -7

model AKR -7

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

AKR -5.5Spread

UL +5.5

Bets

8%92%

Money

9%91%

Over 148.5TotalUnder 148.5

Bets

60%40%

Money

60%40%

AKRWinner

Bets

95%

Money

100%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	AKR	UL	Over	Under	AKR	UL
BetMGMMGM	+5.5-110	-5.5-110	149.5-105	149.5-115	-235	+190
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	+5-115	-5-105	149-115	149-105	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	+5.5-114	-5.5-112	149.5-106	149.5-121	-265	+195
BetUSBetUS	+5-115	-5-105	149-115	149-105	—	—
BovadaBovada	+5.5-105	-5.5-115	149-110	149-110	-225	+185
DraftKingsDK	+5.5-108	-5.5-112	148.5-115	148.5-105	-245	+200
FanDuelFD	+5.5-110	-5.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	-235	+190
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	+5-111	-5-101	149-113	149-103	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	AKR -5.5	AKR -6.8	AKR +1.3
Total	148.5	146.5	Under 2.0
Projected score	—	AKR 76.7 · UL 69.9

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	AKR -4.2	—
1H total	68.5	—
1H projected score	AKR 36.4 · UL 32.2	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
AKR WLWLL	17-16	52%	8-4	16-15
UL WLLWL	15-18	45%	8-7	11-16

Venue/role: AKR away, as favorite; UL home, as underdog. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
AKR UUUUO	15-18	45%	27-6
UL UOUOO	15-18	45%	11-22

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
AKR	9-1 90%	5-5 50%	3-7 30%
UL	4-6 40%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Akron

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 14	vs TULN	W88–71WU
Nov 17	@ BUCK	W97–77LO
Nov 23	vs WRST	W66–54WU

Louisiana

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs AMCC	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ UNCW	L63–70WO
Nov 18	@ SF	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Akron

33 games played

Straight up

27-6

82% wins

Against the spread

17-16

52% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-18

45% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total

Straight up

27-682%

W W L W W L W W W L W L W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-1652%

W W W W W L W L W L W L L W L L W W L W L L L W L L W W W L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1845%

O O O U U O O O U O O U U U O O U U O U U U O O U O U U U U U U O

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsJMU	W 85-71	-8.5	W +5.5	153.5	O 156
Nov 8	vsPRIN	W 104-69	-13.5	W +21.5	156.5	O 173
Nov 16	@PUR	L 79-97	+18.5	W +0.5	163.5	O 176
Nov 21	vsIONA	W 96-75	-11.5	W +9.5	173.5	U 171
Nov 23	vsEVAN	W 97-59	-11.5	W +26.5	156.5	U 156
Nov 24	vsYALE	L 94-97	-1.5	L −4.5	156.5	O 191
Nov 29	vsMILW	W 105-81	-12.5	W +11.5	166.5	O 186
Dec 3	vsBUCK	W 97-77	-23.5	L −3.5	157.5	O 174
Dec 6	@TULN	W 88-71	-6.5	W +10.5	162.5	U 159
Dec 13	vsMUR	L 100-115	-4.5	L −19.5	168.5	O 215
Dec 19	vsEMU	W 93-72	-15.5	W +5.5	155.5	O 165
Jan 3	@M-OH	L 73-76	-4.5	L −7.5	177.5	U 149
Jan 6	vsCMU	W 82-69	-23.5	L −10.5	164.5	U 151
Jan 9	@BGSU	W 77-67	-4.5	W +5.5	163.5	U 144
Jan 13	vsBALL	W 87-77	-20.5	L −10.5	152.5	O 164
Jan 17	vsWMU	W 104-89	-21.5	L −6.5	163.5	O 193
Jan 20	@BUF	W 82-63	-8.5	W +10.5	166.5	U 145
Jan 23	@OHIO	W 86-65	-6.5	W +14.5	167.5	U 151
Jan 27	vsTOL	W 91-81	-12.5	L −2.5	168.5	O 172
Jan 30	vsKENT	W 69-52	-10.5	W +6.5	166.5	U 121
Feb 3	@EMU	W 66-64	-12.5	L −10.5	153.5	U 130
Feb 7	@TROY	L 69-79	-2.5	L −12.5	157.5	U 148
Feb 13	vsMASS	W 99-92	-12.5	L −5.5	163.5	O 191
Feb 17	@WMU	W 90-73	-14.5	W +2.5	160.5	O 163
Feb 20	@BALL	W 78-65	-13.5	L −0.5	147.5	U 143
Feb 24	vsBUF	W 99-85	-15.5	L −1.5	160.5	O 184
Feb 27	@KENT	W 92-70	-3.5	W +18.5	166.5	U 162
Mar 3	@CMU	W 77-64	-11.5	W +1.5	158.5	U 141
Mar 6	vsNIU	W 94-55	-23.5	W +15.5	155.5	U 149
Mar 12	vsBUF	W 73-70	-12.5	L −9.5	158.5	U 143
Mar 13	vsKENT	W 75-68	-6.5	W +0.5	163.5	U 143
Mar 14	vsTOL	W 79-76	-7.5	L −4.5	157.5	U 155
Mar 20	vsTTU	L 71-91	+6.5	L −13.5	154.5	O 162

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

JMU

W 85-71

+5.5

PRIN

W 104-69

+21.5

PUR

L 79-97

+0.5

IONA

W 96-75

+9.5

EVAN

W 97-59

+26.5

YALE

L 94-97

−4.5

MILW

W 105-81

+11.5

BUCK

W 97-77

−3.5

TULN

W 88-71

+10.5

MUR

L 100-115

−19.5

EMU

W 93-72

+5.5

M-OH

L 73-76

−7.5

CMU

W 82-69

−10.5

BGSU

W 77-67

+5.5

BALL

W 87-77

−10.5

WMU

W 104-89

−6.5

BUF

W 82-63

+10.5

OHIO

W 86-65

+14.5

TOL

W 91-81

−2.5

KENT

W 69-52

+6.5

EMU

W 66-64

−10.5

TROY

L 69-79

−12.5

MASS

W 99-92

−5.5

WMU

W 90-73

+2.5

BALL

W 78-65

−0.5

BUF

W 99-85

−1.5

KENT

W 92-70

+18.5

CMU

W 77-64

+1.5

NIU

W 94-55

+15.5

BUF

W 73-70

−9.5

KENT

W 75-68

+0.5

TOL

W 79-76

−4.5

TTU

L 71-91

−13.5

covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

JMU

W 85-71

+2.5

PRIN

W 104-69

+16.5

PUR

L 79-97

+12.5

IONA

W 96-75

−2.5

EVAN

W 97-59

−0.5

YALE

L 94-97

+34.5

MILW

W 105-81

+19.5

BUCK

W 97-77

+16.5

TULN

W 88-71

−3.5

MUR

L 100-115

+46.5

EMU

W 93-72

+9.5

M-OH

L 73-76

−28.5

CMU

W 82-69

−13.5

BGSU

W 77-67

−19.5

BALL

W 87-77

+11.5

WMU

W 104-89

+29.5

BUF

W 82-63

−21.5

OHIO

W 86-65

−16.5

TOL

W 91-81

+3.5

KENT

W 69-52

−45.5

EMU

W 66-64

−23.5

TROY

L 69-79

−9.5

MASS

W 99-92

+27.5

WMU

W 90-73

+2.5

BALL

W 78-65

−4.5

BUF

W 99-85

+23.5

KENT

W 92-70

−4.5

CMU

W 77-64

−17.5

NIU

W 94-55

−6.5

BUF

W 73-70

−15.5

KENT

W 75-68

−20.5

TOL

W 79-76

−2.5

TTU

L 71-91

+7.5

over 15under 18avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Louisiana

33 games played

Straight up

11-22

33% wins

Against the spread

15-18

45% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-18

45% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total

Straight up

11-2233%

L W L L L L L L L L L L W W L L W L L W L W W W W L L L W L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

15-1845%

L W W L L L L L W W L W W W L L L L W W L W W W W L L L W L L W L

1 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

15-1845%

U U U O O U U U U O U U O U U O O O U U O O U U O O O U U O U O O

2 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@BALL	L 64-75	+4.5	L −6.5	141.5	U 139
Nov 7	vsSELA	W 58-52	-3.5	W +2.5	135.5	U 110
Nov 11	vsTULN	L 62-66	+5.5	W +1.5	135.5	U 128
Nov 14	@MCN	L 62-88	+15.5	L −10.5	134.5	O 150
Nov 18	@STAN	L 66-93	+20.5	L −6.5	139.5	O 159
Nov 21	@SCU	L 43-80	+19.5	L −17.5	140.5	U 123
Nov 24	@UCD	L 56-77	+9.5	L −11.5	136.5	U 133
Nov 28	vsJKST	L 45-51	-5.5	L −11.5	136.5	U 96
Dec 3	@LAM	L 55-65	+10.5	W +0.5	129.5	U 120
Dec 6	vsUNCW	L 63-70	+12.5	W +5.5	130.5	O 133
Dec 13	@LT	L 44-65	+9.5	L −11.5	126.5	U 109
Dec 18	@USM	L 54-62	+11.5	W +3.5	132.5	U 116
Dec 20	@ULM	W 76-62	-1.5	W +12.5	136.5	O 138
Dec 28	vsNORF	W 63-54	-3.5	W +5.5	126.5	U 117
Dec 31	vsUSA	L 58-63	+3.5	L −1.5	127.5	U 121
Jan 3	vsUSM	L 67-74	+3.5	L −3.5	129.5	O 141
Jan 8	vsULM	W 85-79	-7.5	L −1.5	139.5	O 164
Jan 10	vsTROY	L 70-90	+9.5	L −10.5	136.5	O 160
Jan 14	@TXST	L 54-59	+8.5	W +3.5	133.5	U 113
Jan 17	@USA	W 59-56	+9.5	W +12.5	129.5	U 115
Jan 22	@APP	L 58-72	+9.5	L −4.5	124.5	O 130
Jan 29	vsGAST	W 82-72	+1.5	W +11.5	129.5	O 154
Jan 31	vsGASO	W 69-60	+2.5	W +11.5	144.5	U 129
Feb 4	@JMU	W 64-61	+9.5	W +12.5	132.5	U 125
Feb 7	vsCMU	W 85-80	-2.5	W +2.5	134.5	O 165
Feb 12	vsCCU	L 65-69	+1.5	L −2.5	132.5	O 134
Feb 16	@ODU	L 72-83	+6.5	L −4.5	135.5	O 155
Feb 19	vsARST	L 62-79	+8.5	L −8.5	144.5	U 141
Feb 21	vsTXST	W 67-54	+3.5	W +16.5	134.5	U 121
Feb 24	@TROY	L 59-78	+11.5	L −7.5	134.5	O 137
Feb 27	@ARST	L 58-81	+13.5	L −9.5	146.5	U 139
Mar 3	vsGAST	W 84-75	+1.5	W +10.5	134.5	O 159
Mar 4	vsJMU	L 72-87	+6.5	L −8.5	134.5	O 159

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

BALL

L 64-75

−6.5

SELA

W 58-52

+2.5

TULN

L 62-66

+1.5

MCN

L 62-88

−10.5

STAN

L 66-93

−6.5

SCU

L 43-80

−17.5

UCD

L 56-77

−11.5

JKST

L 45-51

−11.5

LAM

L 55-65

+0.5

UNCW

L 63-70

+5.5

L 44-65

−11.5

USM

L 54-62

+3.5

ULM

W 76-62

+12.5

NORF

W 63-54

+5.5

USA

L 58-63

−1.5

USM

L 67-74

−3.5

ULM

W 85-79

−1.5

TROY

L 70-90

−10.5

TXST

L 54-59

+3.5

USA

W 59-56

+12.5

APP

L 58-72

−4.5

GAST

W 82-72

+11.5

GASO

W 69-60

+11.5

JMU

W 64-61

+12.5

CMU

W 85-80

+2.5

CCU

L 65-69

−2.5

ODU

L 72-83

−4.5

ARST

L 62-79

−8.5

TXST

W 67-54

+16.5

TROY

L 59-78

−7.5

ARST

L 58-81

−9.5

GAST

W 84-75

+10.5

JMU

L 72-87

−8.5

covered 15didn’t cover 18avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

BALL

L 64-75

−2.5

SELA

W 58-52

−25.5

TULN

L 62-66

−7.5

MCN

L 62-88

+15.5

STAN

L 66-93

+19.5

SCU

L 43-80

−17.5

UCD

L 56-77

−3.5

JKST

L 45-51

−40.5

LAM

L 55-65

−9.5

UNCW

L 63-70

+2.5

L 44-65

−17.5

USM

L 54-62

−16.5

ULM

W 76-62

+1.5

NORF

W 63-54

−9.5

USA

L 58-63

−6.5

USM

L 67-74

+11.5

ULM

W 85-79

+24.5

TROY

L 70-90

+23.5

TXST

L 54-59

−20.5

USA

W 59-56

−14.5

APP

L 58-72

+5.5

GAST

W 82-72

+24.5

GASO

W 69-60

−15.5

JMU

W 64-61

−7.5

CMU

W 85-80

+30.5

CCU

L 65-69

+1.5

ODU

L 72-83

+19.5

ARST

L 62-79

−3.5

TXST

W 67-54

−13.5

TROY

L 59-78

+2.5

ARST

L 58-81

−7.5

GAST

W 84-75

+24.5

JMU

L 72-87

+24.5

over 15under 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Akron has the better starters

Position by position: Akron 4, Louisiana 0, even 1

AkronBetterLouisiana

G T. Staveskie TR17.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.9 ast Score 74

AKRSmall

G D. Lavergne9.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast Score 40

G T. Pence TR9.5 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.6 ast Score 86

AKRBig

G M. Cooper5.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 3.5 ast Score 1

F E. Mahaffey9.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 3.4 ast Score 69

AKRSmall

G T. Middleton TR12.4 pts · 3.5 reb · 3 ast Score 49

F M. Burton TR5.5 pts · 5 reb · 1.8 ast Score 14

No call

G J. Keller17 pts · 2 reb · 3 ast Not ranked

F B. Hammer TR4.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.4 ast Score 55

AKRSmall

F J. Harris TR9.3 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.9 ast Score 34

AkronBetterLouisiana

AKR offense101st of 366 · -1.1

AKRSmall

UL defense157th of 366 · -3.4

AKR defense168th of 366 · -3.7

AKRSmall

UL offense292nd of 366 · -9.0

Backcourt+2.7 · 2 players

AKRBig

Backcourt-6.4 · 4 players

Frontcourt-1.4 · 3 players

Even

Frontcourt-1.2 · 1 player

Bench-2.6 · 4 players

ULSmall

Bench-0.5 · 4 players

Score, worst to bestAKR betterUL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Akron

Guards

T. Staveskie36 min · TRT. Pence24 min · TRC. HeadNewT. PerkinsNewJ. HendersonNewE. WilsonNew

Forwards

E. Mahaffey29 minM. Burton25 min · TRB. Hammer14 min · TRZ. Halligan12 minC. White9 min · TRM. Musiime-Kamali9 min

Louisiana

Guards

D. Lavergne30 minM. Cooper30 minT. Middleton30 min · TRJ. Keller30 minL. Myers2 minD. WareNew

Forwards

J. Harris27 min · TRD. Pounds18 min · TRT. Jones17 minJ. Evans11 minR. OlajuwonNewT. DuncanNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

AKR86.4 #8

UL63.7 #354

Points per possession

AKR1.22 #6

UL0.99 #333

Pace (possessions)

AKR71.1 #70

UL64.1 #359

Shooting

Effective FG%

AKR58.1 #9

UL47.1 #334

3-point %

AKR38.2 #15

UL33.6 #189

3-point attempt rate

AKR44.8 #74

UL40.5 #160

Free throw rate

AKR29.2 #327

UL28.7 #334

Possessions

Turnover rate

AKR15.5 #104

UL16.8 #185

Offensive rebound rate

AKR33.4 #78

UL28.4 #251

Assists per game

AKR17.7 #12

UL10.3 #354

Defense

Points allowed

AKR75.0 #188

UL70.7 #69

Points allowed per possession

AKR1.06 #98

UL1.10 #227

Opponent effective FG%

AKR51.2 #173

UL52.6 #247

Opponent 3-point %

AKR35.5 #284

UL35.6 #286

Turnovers forced

AKR18.3 #86

UL18.3 #85

Defensive rebound rate

AKR70.1 #156

UL67.7 #272

Steals per game

AKR7.2 #108

UL5.8 #257

Blocks per game

AKR2.9 #240

UL3.5 #141

AKR		UL
Scoring
86.4 #8	Points per game	63.7 #354
1.22 #6	Points per possession	0.99 #333
71.1 #70	Pace (possessions)	64.1 #359
Shooting
58.1 #9	Effective FG%	47.1 #334
38.2 #15	3-point %	33.6 #189
44.8 #74	3-point attempt rate	40.5 #160
29.2 #327	Free throw rate	28.7 #334
Possessions
15.5 #104	Turnover rate	16.8 #185
33.4 #78	Offensive rebound rate	28.4 #251
17.7 #12	Assists per game	10.3 #354
Defense
75.0 #188	Points allowed	70.7 #69
1.06 #98	Points allowed per possession	1.10 #227
51.2 #173	Opponent effective FG%	52.6 #247
35.5 #284	Opponent 3-point %	35.6 #286
18.3 #86	Turnovers forced	18.3 #85
70.1 #156	Defensive rebound rate	67.7 #272
7.2 #108	Steals per game	5.8 #257
2.9 #240	Blocks per game	3.5 #141

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Akron

27-6 in 2025-26 overall · 20-1 in conference · Mid-American Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Texas Tech71–91
Wvs Toledo79–76
Wvs Kent State75–68
Wvs Buffalo73–70
Wvs N Illinois94–55

A week or more of rest.

Louisiana

11-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs James Madison72–87
Wvs Georgia St84–75
L@ Arkansas St58–81
L@ Troy59–78
Wvs Texas St67–54

A week or more of rest.