Pechanga Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLO 78–76 · win probability COLO 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SDSU has more of the edges
SDSU 2, COLO 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: SDSU 52.7 and allows 48.2; COLO 52.9 and allows 52.6
Three-pointers
SDSU hits 34.5% and allows 33.6%; COLO hits 35.1% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 33.8% and 35.2% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SDSU 20%, COLO 40%. Transfers in: SDSU 4, COLO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SDSU 17.2%, COLO 14.7%. Forced: SDSU 20.2%, COLO 15.2%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SDSU 29.5%, COLO 29.0%. Defensive: SDSU 68.9%, COLO 70.4%
Context
Schedule so far
SDSU has played the 80th-hardest schedule, COLO the 58th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
COLO offense vs SDSU defense
Offense 54th of 366 against a defense 70th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SDSU 39.0, COLO 36.6. Allowed: SDSU 38.5, COLO 36.6
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: SDSU plays 70.6 a game (89th fastest), COLO 71.0 (76th). Faster games mean more points
Even
SDSU offense vs COLO defense
Offense 86th of 366 against a defense 80th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLO -1.7 | — |
| Total | — | 154.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | SDSU 76.1 · COLO 77.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLO -0.9 | — |
| 1H total | 72.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | SDSU 35.5 · COLO 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
San Diego St
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-45 | -25.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 73-57 | -21.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 107-108 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 215 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 54-94 | +6.5 | L −33.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 97-80 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 81-91 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-66 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-71 | -17.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 81-58 | -24.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 45-68 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 81-68 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 110-107 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 73-68 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-52 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-57 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 83-79 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 82-71 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 73-50 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-54 | -22.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 71-57 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 63-73 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-83 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-72 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 89-86 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 71-62 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 64-62 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 62-73 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LBSU
W 77-45
+6.5
9
vs
IDST
W 73-57
−5.5
18
vs
TROY
L 107-108
−15.5
24
vs
MICH
L 54-94
−33.5
25
vs
ORE
W 97-80
+19.5
26
vs
BAY
L 81-91
−7.5
3
vs
UVU
W 77-66
+2.5
10
vs
LAM
W 89-71
+0.5
17
vs
AF
W 81-58
−1.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 45-68
−9.5
30
@
SJSU
W 81-68
+1.5
3
vs
BOIS
W 110-107
−1.5
6
@
NEV
W 73-68
+6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 71-52
+4.5
14
@
WYO
W 74-57
+15.5
17
vs
UNM
W 83-79
−1.5
21
@
GCU
L 69-70
−2.5
24
@
UNLV
W 82-71
+7.5
28
vs
CSU
W 73-50
+13.5
31
@
USU
L 66-71
+1.5
3
vs
WYO
W 72-63
−3.5
7
@
AF
W 88-54
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-57
+6.5
17
vs
GCU
L 63-73
−17.5
21
@
CSU
L 74-83
−12.5
25
vs
USU
W 89-72
+18.5
28
@
UNM
L 76-81
−3.5
3
@
BOIS
L 77-86
−7.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 89-86
−6.5
12
vs
CSU
W 71-62
+2.5
13
vs
UNM
W 64-62
−0.5
14
vs
USU
L 62-73
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LBSU
W 77-45
−13.5
9
vs
IDST
W 73-57
−5.5
18
vs
TROY
L 107-108
+77.5
24
vs
MICH
L 54-94
−0.5
25
vs
ORE
W 97-80
+35.5
26
vs
BAY
L 81-91
+23.5
3
vs
UVU
W 77-66
−1.5
10
vs
LAM
W 89-71
+24.5
17
vs
AF
W 81-58
+3.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 45-68
−40.5
30
@
SJSU
W 81-68
+7.5
3
vs
BOIS
W 110-107
+78.5
6
@
NEV
W 73-68
−0.5
10
vs
FRES
W 71-52
−23.5
14
@
WYO
W 74-57
−17.5
17
vs
UNM
W 83-79
+13.5
21
@
GCU
L 69-70
−6.5
24
@
UNLV
W 82-71
+3.5
28
vs
CSU
W 73-50
−16.5
31
@
USU
L 66-71
−10.5
3
vs
WYO
W 72-63
−6.5
7
@
AF
W 88-54
+2.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-57
−11.5
17
vs
GCU
L 63-73
−3.5
21
@
CSU
L 74-83
+17.5
25
vs
USU
W 89-72
+14.5
28
@
UNM
L 76-81
+6.5
3
@
BOIS
L 77-86
+19.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 89-86
+21.5
12
vs
CSU
W 71-62
−9.5
13
vs
UNM
W 64-62
−24.5
14
vs
USU
L 62-73
−10.5
over 15under 17avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Colorado
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 102-97 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-88 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-66 | -22.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 95-79 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-68 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 78-70 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-91 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-64 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 84-73 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 81-86 | -15.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-89 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 85-73 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-73 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-77 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 61-72 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-95 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 67-97 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 87-61 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-86 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 44-78 | +13.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 86-90 | +15.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-69 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-102 | +20.5 | L −19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 92-78 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 79-89 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 83-92 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
−5.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
−11.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+7.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+5.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+1.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
+11.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
+15.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−5.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
−3.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
+1.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
−5.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−11.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
−20.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+7.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
+2.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
+3.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−4.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−1.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
−12.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
−12.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
+27.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−11.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
+4.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−20.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+11.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
+10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
+3.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
−19.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+12.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+3.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
−10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
+13.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
+46.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+21.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+3.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+21.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
−2.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
−2.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−2.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
+27.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
−2.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
+6.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
+8.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+27.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
−4.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
−17.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−8.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−11.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
+21.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
+11.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
−5.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
−10.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−33.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+14.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
−10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
−14.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
+24.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+21.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+11.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
+10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+13.5
over 17under 16avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: San Diego St 1, Colorado 1, even 3
San Diego StBetterColorado
G C. Gladden TR14.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 67
→COLOSmall
G B. Hargress14.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 93
G N. Anderson TR16 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 95
=Even
F J. Neely TR17.7 pts · 11.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 96
G I. Sy TR10 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 57
←SDSUSmall
F I. Niagu TR4.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
G E. Harrington7.9 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 63
=No call
F D. Gomez TR5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
F B. Cherry TR15.3 pts · 6.8 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C N. Feddersen TR9 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 59
San Diego StBetterColorado
SDSU offense86th of 366 · +0.3
=Even
COLO defense80th of 366 · +0.3
SDSU defense70th of 366 · +0.8
=Even
COLO offense54th of 366 · +3.2
Backcourt+3.9 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt+3.6 · 1 player
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
→COLOBig
Frontcourt+5.3 · 4 players
Bench+0.9 · 3 players
←SDSUBig
Bench-2.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSDSU betterCOLO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Gladden34 min · TRN. Anderson30 min · TRI. Sy28 min · TRE. Harrington21 minR. Gonzales2 minL. DavisNew
Forwards
B. Cherry29 min · TRT. Simmons14 minT. Majak3 minS. MashebinuNewL. SkoricNewL. VinciniNew
Guards
B. Hargress33 minJ. Sanders18 minJ. Holland18 minI. Inman10 minA. JonesNewR. PortelaNew
Forwards
J. Neely33 min · TRI. Niagu21 min · TRD. Gomez20 min · TRN. Randall1 minG. MalualNewC. HillNew
Centers
N. Feddersen21 min · TRE. JacobsenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #120 | Points per game | 80.2 #63 |
| 1.09 #159 | Points per possession | 1.13 #80 |
| 70.6 #89 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #76 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.7 #116 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #108 |
| 34.5 #144 | 3-point % | 35.1 #104 |
| 33.8 #301 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #267 |
| 39.0 #81 | Free throw rate | 36.6 #139 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #224 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #46 |
| 29.5 #222 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.0 #235 |
| 14.6 #110 | Assists per game | 15.4 #67 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.3 #84 | Points allowed | 79.8 #313 |
| 1.01 #31 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #272 |
| 48.2 #41 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #243 |
| 33.6 #164 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #319 |
| 20.2 #19 | Turnovers forced | 15.2 #267 |
| 68.9 #208 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.4 #144 |
| 7.7 #62 | Steals per game | 6.3 #196 |
| 4.6 #27 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #170 |
San Diego St
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State62–73
- Wvs New Mexico64–62
- Wvs Colorado St71–62
- Wvs UNLV89–86
- L@ Boise St77–86
A week or more of rest.
Colorado
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma86–90
- Lvs Oklahoma St83–92
- Lvs Arizona79–89
- W@ Utah92–78
- L@ Houston62–102
A week or more of rest.