Viejas Arena · at San Diego St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SDSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SDSU 84–66 · win probability SDSU 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SDSU has more of the edges
BCU 0, SDSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
BCU has played the 244th-hardest schedule, SDSU the 80th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BCU 19.2%, SDSU 17.2%. Forced: BCU 15.8%, SDSU 20.2%
SDSU offense vs BCU defense
Offense 86th of 366 against a defense 218th, on the model’s ratings
BCU offense vs SDSU defense
Offense 188th of 366 against a defense 70th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: BCU 51.0 and allows 49.7; SDSU 52.7 and allows 48.2
Home court
SDSU at home. This season: SDSU 0-0 at home, BCU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: BCU plays 71.8 a game (43rd fastest), SDSU 70.6 (89th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
BCU hits 33.0% and allows 32.9%; SDSU hits 34.5% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 29.7% and 33.8% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BCU 40.9, SDSU 39.0. Allowed: BCU 38.6, SDSU 38.5
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BCU 25%, SDSU 20%. Transfers in: BCU 9, SDSU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BCU 30.1%, SDSU 29.5%. Defensive: BCU 68.3%, SDSU 68.9%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SDSU -17.7 | — |
| Total | — | 150.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | BCU 66.3 · SDSU 84 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SDSU -10.4 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | BCU 29.9 · SDSU 40.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bethune
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 90-95 | +24.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 61-101 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-91 | +21.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 76-73 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-69 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 54-61 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 56-100 | +29.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 80-59 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 60-82 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-112 | +26.5 | L −32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 71-107 | +39.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 77-103 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 87-83 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 74-65 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 73-77 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 79-63 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 87-82 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-48 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 82-73 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 69-54 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 80-62 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-76 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 55-57 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 86-91 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 82-71 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-71 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 82-79 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-81 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 67-71 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
AUB
L 90-95
+19.5
6
@
MIA
L 61-101
−23.5
15
@
DAY
L 82-91
+12.5
19
@
OHIO
W 76-73
+9.5
24
vs
JAX
L 64-69
−8.5
25
vs
STBK
L 54-61
−11.5
29
@
IU
L 56-100
−14.5
5
vs
SCST
W 80-59
+7.5
14
@
MIZ
L 60-82
−1.5
17
@
SLU
L 53-112
−32.5
22
@
ARIZ
L 71-107
+3.5
29
@
OKST
L 77-103
−5.5
3
vs
FAMU
W 87-83
−3.5
10
vs
GRAM
W 74-65
+5.5
12
vs
SOU
L 73-77
−7.5
17
@
MVSU
W 79-63
−0.5
19
@
UAPB
W 87-82
+2.5
24
vs
JKST
W 85-48
+28.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 82-73
−4.5
31
@
ALST
W 69-54
+13.5
2
@
AAMU
W 80-62
+15.5
7
vs
PV
W 82-76
−4.5
9
vs
TXSO
W 79-69
+2.5
14
@
ALCN
L 55-57
−10.5
16
@
JKST
L 86-91
−9.5
19
vs
ALST
W 82-71
+5.5
21
vs
AAMU
W 85-76
+2.5
26
@
GRAM
W 76-71
+6.5
28
@
SOU
W 82-79
+5.5
5
@
FAMU
L 77-81
−6.5
11
vs
PV
L 67-71
−9.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
AUB
L 90-95
+31.5
6
@
MIA
L 61-101
+7.5
15
@
DAY
L 82-91
+24.5
19
@
OHIO
W 76-73
−8.5
24
vs
JAX
L 64-69
−10.5
25
vs
STBK
L 54-61
−30.5
29
@
IU
L 56-100
+7.5
5
vs
SCST
W 80-59
−9.5
14
@
MIZ
L 60-82
−4.5
17
@
SLU
L 53-112
+7.5
22
@
ARIZ
L 71-107
+23.5
29
@
OKST
L 77-103
+15.5
3
vs
FAMU
W 87-83
+24.5
10
vs
GRAM
W 74-65
−5.5
12
vs
SOU
L 73-77
−1.5
17
@
MVSU
W 79-63
−2.5
19
@
UAPB
W 87-82
+13.5
24
vs
JKST
W 85-48
−23.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 82-73
+7.5
31
@
ALST
W 69-54
−29.5
2
@
AAMU
W 80-62
+0.5
7
vs
PV
W 82-76
+0.5
9
vs
TXSO
W 79-69
−4.5
14
@
ALCN
L 55-57
−32.5
16
@
JKST
L 86-91
+26.5
19
vs
ALST
W 82-71
+5.5
21
vs
AAMU
W 85-76
+18.5
26
@
GRAM
W 76-71
+2.5
28
@
SOU
W 82-79
+7.5
5
@
FAMU
L 77-81
+12.5
11
vs
PV
L 67-71
−9.5
over 18under 13avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
San Diego St
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-45 | -25.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 73-57 | -21.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 107-108 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 215 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 54-94 | +6.5 | L −33.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 97-80 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 81-91 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-66 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-71 | -17.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 81-58 | -24.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 45-68 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 81-68 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 110-107 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 73-68 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-52 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-57 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 83-79 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 82-71 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 73-50 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-54 | -22.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 71-57 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 63-73 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-83 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-72 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 89-86 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 71-62 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 64-62 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 62-73 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LBSU
W 77-45
+6.5
9
vs
IDST
W 73-57
−5.5
18
vs
TROY
L 107-108
−15.5
24
vs
MICH
L 54-94
−33.5
25
vs
ORE
W 97-80
+19.5
26
vs
BAY
L 81-91
−7.5
3
vs
UVU
W 77-66
+2.5
10
vs
LAM
W 89-71
+0.5
17
vs
AF
W 81-58
−1.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 45-68
−9.5
30
@
SJSU
W 81-68
+1.5
3
vs
BOIS
W 110-107
−1.5
6
@
NEV
W 73-68
+6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 71-52
+4.5
14
@
WYO
W 74-57
+15.5
17
vs
UNM
W 83-79
−1.5
21
@
GCU
L 69-70
−2.5
24
@
UNLV
W 82-71
+7.5
28
vs
CSU
W 73-50
+13.5
31
@
USU
L 66-71
+1.5
3
vs
WYO
W 72-63
−3.5
7
@
AF
W 88-54
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-57
+6.5
17
vs
GCU
L 63-73
−17.5
21
@
CSU
L 74-83
−12.5
25
vs
USU
W 89-72
+18.5
28
@
UNM
L 76-81
−3.5
3
@
BOIS
L 77-86
−7.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 89-86
−6.5
12
vs
CSU
W 71-62
+2.5
13
vs
UNM
W 64-62
−0.5
14
vs
USU
L 62-73
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LBSU
W 77-45
−13.5
9
vs
IDST
W 73-57
−5.5
18
vs
TROY
L 107-108
+77.5
24
vs
MICH
L 54-94
−0.5
25
vs
ORE
W 97-80
+35.5
26
vs
BAY
L 81-91
+23.5
3
vs
UVU
W 77-66
−1.5
10
vs
LAM
W 89-71
+24.5
17
vs
AF
W 81-58
+3.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 45-68
−40.5
30
@
SJSU
W 81-68
+7.5
3
vs
BOIS
W 110-107
+78.5
6
@
NEV
W 73-68
−0.5
10
vs
FRES
W 71-52
−23.5
14
@
WYO
W 74-57
−17.5
17
vs
UNM
W 83-79
+13.5
21
@
GCU
L 69-70
−6.5
24
@
UNLV
W 82-71
+3.5
28
vs
CSU
W 73-50
−16.5
31
@
USU
L 66-71
−10.5
3
vs
WYO
W 72-63
−6.5
7
@
AF
W 88-54
+2.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-57
−11.5
17
vs
GCU
L 63-73
−3.5
21
@
CSU
L 74-83
+17.5
25
vs
USU
W 89-72
+14.5
28
@
UNM
L 76-81
+6.5
3
@
BOIS
L 77-86
+19.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 89-86
+21.5
12
vs
CSU
W 71-62
−9.5
13
vs
UNM
W 64-62
−24.5
14
vs
USU
L 62-73
−10.5
over 15under 17avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
San Diego St has the better starters
Position by position: Bethune 0, San Diego St 2, even 3
BethuneBetterSan Diego St
G K. Branch TR11.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 24
→SDSUBig
G C. Gladden TR14.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 67
G J. Morris TR11.2 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 49
→SDSUBig
G N. Anderson TR16 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 95
G J. Jones TR9.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 43
=Even
G I. Sy TR10 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 57
F Q. Heady10.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 55
=Even
G E. Harrington7.9 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 63
F D. Johnson TR10 pts · 5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 52
=No call
F B. Cherry TR15.3 pts · 6.8 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
BethuneBetterSan Diego St
BCU offense188th of 366 · -5.8
→SDSUSmall
SDSU defense70th of 366 · +0.8
BCU defense218th of 366 · -5.7
→SDSUBig
SDSU offense86th of 366 · +0.3
Backcourt-4.2 · 3 players
→SDSUBig
Backcourt+3.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.3 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
→SDSUSmall
Bench+0.9 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestBCU betterSDSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Branch30 min · TRJ. Morris30 min · TRJ. Jones28 min · TRM. Jordan13 min · TRK. Patton8 min · TRK. MurphyNew
Forwards
Q. Heady26 minD. Johnson26 min · TRD. Perez-Rouzan24 minV. Boskovic21 min · TRI. Ezuma8 min · TRJ. SmithNew
Centers
M. Martinez16 min · TR
Guards
C. Gladden34 min · TRN. Anderson30 min · TRI. Sy28 min · TRE. Harrington21 minR. Gonzales2 minL. DavisNew
Forwards
B. Cherry29 min · TRT. Simmons14 minT. Majak3 minS. MashebinuNewL. SkoricNewL. VinciniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.5 #175 | Points per game | 76.8 #120 |
| 1.04 #273 | Points per possession | 1.09 #159 |
| 71.8 #43 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #89 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #195 | Effective FG% | 52.7 #116 |
| 33.0 #230 | 3-point % | 34.5 #144 |
| 29.7 #353 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.8 #301 |
| 40.9 #48 | Free throw rate | 39.0 #81 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.2 #329 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #224 |
| 30.1 #194 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.5 #222 |
| 13.3 #195 | Assists per game | 14.6 #110 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.5 #251 | Points allowed | 71.3 #84 |
| 1.08 #157 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #31 |
| 49.7 #88 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.2 #41 |
| 32.9 #112 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.6 #164 |
| 15.8 #229 | Turnovers forced | 20.2 #19 |
| 68.3 #242 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #208 |
| 6.8 #147 | Steals per game | 7.7 #62 |
| 4.5 #34 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #27 |
Bethune
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 14-5 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View67–71
- L@ Florida A&M77–81
- W@ Southern82–79
- W@ Grambling76–71
- Wvs Alabama A&M85–76
A week or more of rest.
San Diego St
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State62–73
- Wvs New Mexico64–62
- Wvs Colorado St71–62
- Wvs UNLV89–86
- L@ Boise St77–86
A week or more of rest.