Alumni Hall (Navy) · at Navy
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NAVY | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PENN 73–71 · win probability PENN 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NAVY has more of the edges
PENN 2, NAVY 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
PENN has played the 126th-hardest schedule, NAVY the 311th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: PENN 50.4 and allows 52.1; NAVY 53.1 and allows 48.3
NAVY offense vs PENN defense
Offense 270th of 366 against a defense 142nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PENN 30.0%, NAVY 31.9%. Defensive: PENN 68.7%, NAVY 72.6%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: PENN plays 69.3 a game (158th fastest), NAVY 66.0 (316th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: PENN 33.9, NAVY 38.8. Allowed: PENN 27.5, NAVY 26.0
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PENN 83%, NAVY 46%. Transfers in: PENN 1, NAVY 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
NAVY at home. This season: NAVY 0-0 at home, PENN 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PENN 15.4%, NAVY 16.8%. Forced: PENN 17.3%, NAVY 18.3%
Even
Three-pointers
PENN hits 38.3% and allows 32.2%; NAVY hits 35.9% and allows 30.0%. Threes are 35.4% and 33.1% of their shots
Even
PENN offense vs NAVY defense
Offense 138th of 366 against a defense 145th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PENN -2.5 | — |
| Total | — | 144.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | PENN 73.3 · NAVY 70.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PENN -1.6 | — |
| 1H total | 67.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | PENN 34.5 · NAVY 32.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 2-8 20% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PENN 0–1 NAVYNAVY leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · PENN 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2024-25 | NAVY 86 @ PENN 78 | PENN -3.5 | NAVY W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Penn
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
20-9
69% covers · avg +3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-21
28% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-106 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 83-74 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 77-65 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-77 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-90 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 69-70 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 79-83 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 80-61 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-74 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-64 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-81 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 61-60 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-76 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 82-61 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 62-60 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 88-84 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 70-105 | +25.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
−7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
−5.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
+14.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
+20.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
+9.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
+0.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−15.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
−8.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−5.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
+10.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+12.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
+4.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+1.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+2.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
+12.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
+4.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−10.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−0.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
+17.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−2.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
+7.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
+8.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
+5.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
+2.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
+1.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
+22.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
+5.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+13.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
−9.5
covered 20didn’t cover 9avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
+7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
+14.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
−6.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
−0.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
−10.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
−5.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−12.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
+2.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−4.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
−11.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+15.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
−10.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+8.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+8.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
−5.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
−23.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−20.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−14.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
−1.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−23.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
−5.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
−11.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
−6.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
−3.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
−13.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
−3.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
−17.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+27.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
+24.5
over 8under 21avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Navy
32 games played
Straight up
24-8
75% wins
Against the spread
21-11
66% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-55 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 68-97 | +5.5 | L −23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 71-80 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 61-73 | +26.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 86-70 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 84-51 | -10.5 | W +22.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 57-87 | +8.5 | L −21.5 | 138.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 65-69 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 66-59 | -15.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 61-56 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-55 | -20.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 65-58 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 76-55 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-50 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 51-65 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 82-79 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 85-68 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 84-56 | -10.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 58-50 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 87-71 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 65-50 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 76-60 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 84-80 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 72-49 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-63 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 78-51 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 85-69 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 74-69 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 72-73 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 72-82 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PRES
W 76-55
+17.5
7
vs
YALE
L 68-97
−23.5
11
@
PSU
L 71-80
+2.5
18
@
UNC
L 61-73
+14.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 86-70
−1.5
26
vs
GWEB
W 84-51
+22.5
28
@
UNCW
L 57-87
−21.5
29
vs
SELA
L 65-69
−7.5
3
@
DSU
W 66-59
−8.5
7
vs
AF
W 61-56
−4.5
19
vs
COPP
W 88-55
+12.5
31
vs
BU
W 82-77
+0.5
3
@
HC
W 65-58
+1.5
7
vs
BUCK
W 76-55
+12.5
10
vs
LAF
W 76-50
+17.5
12
@
AMER
L 51-65
−16.5
17
@
LEH
W 82-79
−0.5
21
vs
HC
W 85-68
+5.5
24
vs
ARMY
W 84-56
+17.5
28
@
BU
W 58-50
+6.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 87-71
+6.5
4
@
LAF
W 65-50
+11.5
7
vs
AMER
W 82-73
+4.5
9
@
BUCK
W 76-60
+9.5
14
@
COLG
W 84-80
+5.5
18
vs
LEH
W 72-49
+13.5
21
@
ARMY
W 81-63
+9.5
25
@
L-MD
W 78-51
+20.5
28
vs
COLG
W 85-69
+9.5
5
vs
BUCK
W 74-69
−10.5
8
vs
BU
L 72-73
−7.5
18
@
WAKE
L 72-82
−0.5
covered 21didn’t cover 11avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PRES
W 76-55
−10.5
7
vs
YALE
L 68-97
+17.5
11
@
PSU
L 71-80
−4.5
18
@
UNC
L 61-73
−26.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 86-70
+15.5
26
vs
GWEB
W 84-51
−18.5
28
@
UNCW
L 57-87
+5.5
29
vs
SELA
L 65-69
−2.5
3
@
DSU
W 66-59
−7.5
7
vs
AF
W 61-56
−16.5
19
vs
COPP
W 88-55
−2.5
31
vs
BU
W 82-77
+21.5
3
@
HC
W 65-58
−14.5
7
vs
BUCK
W 76-55
−6.5
10
vs
LAF
W 76-50
−15.5
12
@
AMER
L 51-65
−23.5
17
@
LEH
W 82-79
+23.5
21
vs
HC
W 85-68
+18.5
24
vs
ARMY
W 84-56
−3.5
28
@
BU
W 58-50
−30.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 87-71
+14.5
4
@
LAF
W 65-50
−24.5
7
vs
AMER
W 82-73
+20.5
9
@
BUCK
W 76-60
+0.5
14
@
COLG
W 84-80
+24.5
18
vs
LEH
W 72-49
−18.5
21
@
ARMY
W 81-63
+4.5
25
@
L-MD
W 78-51
−18.5
28
vs
COLG
W 85-69
+12.5
5
vs
BUCK
W 74-69
+9.5
8
vs
BU
L 72-73
+8.5
18
@
WAKE
L 72-82
+5.5
over 15under 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Penn has the better starters
Position by position: Penn 2, Navy 0, even 3
PennBetterNavy
G M. Zanoni12.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 48
=Even
G J. Kim10 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
G A. Levine8.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 61
←PENNBig
G J. Pennick7.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 12
F T. Power16.8 pts · 7.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 81
←PENNBig
G C. Cole6 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 41
F A. Gerhart5.2 pts · 4.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 36
=No call
G D. Burnett1.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
F L. Lueth3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
=No call
G N. Howard1.6 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
PennBetterNavy
PENN offense138th of 366 · -4.1
=Even
NAVY defense145th of 366 · -3.1
PENN defense142nd of 366 · -3.1
←PENNBig
NAVY offense270th of 366 · -8.2
Backcourt-0.8 · 2 players
←PENNBig
Backcourt-5.8 · 5 players
Frontcourt-0.4 · 3 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-1.5 · 5 players
→NAVYSmall
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPENN betterNAVY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Zanoni29 minA. Levine25 minS. Mohammed16 min · TRJ. Jones14 minN. Polonowski6 minP. Kamin3 min
Forwards
T. Power36 minA. Gerhart20 minL. Lueth17 minD. Scantlebury15 minW. Kruse3 minF. BillyNew
Centers
M. PereiraNew
Guards
J. Kim31 minJ. Pennick25 minC. Cole19 minD. Burnett6 minN. Howard3 minJ. Gabbidon1 min
Forwards
C. Jackson2 minJ. Ashley2 minO. Gray2 minT. RajiNewC. PollockNewS. GriffinNew
Centers
C. CraneNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #181 | Points per game | 74.1 #194 |
| 1.08 #196 | Points per possession | 1.12 #97 |
| 69.3 #158 | Pace (possessions) | 66.0 #316 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #223 | Effective FG% | 53.1 #100 |
| 38.3 #13 | 3-point % | 35.9 #64 |
| 35.4 #264 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.1 #314 |
| 33.9 #212 | Free throw rate | 38.8 #82 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #93 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #190 |
| 30.0 #200 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #126 |
| 13.7 #171 | Assists per game | 15.8 #52 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #173 | Points allowed | 65.6 #10 |
| 1.07 #137 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #23 |
| 52.1 #218 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.3 #42 |
| 32.2 #73 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.0 #7 |
| 17.3 #132 | Turnovers forced | 18.3 #84 |
| 68.7 #220 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.6 #49 |
| 6.5 #184 | Steals per game | 7.5 #84 |
| 3.1 #199 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #185 |
Penn
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-5 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois70–105
- Wvs Yale88–84
- Wvs Harvard62–60
- W@ Brown82–61
- Wvs Harvard64–61
A week or more of rest.
Navy
24-8 in 2025-26 overall · 18-2 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Wake Forest72–82
- Lvs Boston U72–73
- Wvs Bucknell74–69
- Wvs Colgate85–69
- W@ Loyola MD78–51
A week or more of rest.