Joan Perry Brock Center · at Longwood
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LONG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LONG 82–68 · win probability LONG 90%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LONG has more of the edges
NCCU 0, LONG 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NCCU 30.0%, LONG 34.6%. Defensive: NCCU 60.6%, LONG 72.3%
LONG offense vs NCCU defense
Offense 182nd of 366 against a defense 352nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NCCU plays 66.9 a game (282nd fastest), LONG 71.5 (54th). Faster games mean more points
NCCU offense vs LONG defense
Offense 345th of 366 against a defense 242nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
LONG at home. This season: LONG 0-0 at home, NCCU 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: NCCU 47.5 and allows 54.5; LONG 49.7 and allows 53.8
Three-pointers
NCCU hits 32.6% and allows 36.4%; LONG hits 31.4% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 33.9% and 34.8% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NCCU 4%, LONG 28%. Transfers in: NCCU 4, LONG 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NCCU 39.3, LONG 41.4. Allowed: NCCU 36.9, LONG 42.1
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NCCU 18.2%, LONG 19.2%. Forced: NCCU 19.8%, LONG 19.7%
Context
Schedule so far
NCCU has played the 310th-hardest schedule, LONG the 330th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LONG -14.4 | — |
| Total | — | 149.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | NCCU 67.6 · LONG 82 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LONG -8.4 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NCCU 30.8 · LONG 39.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NCCU 2–3 LONGLONG leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · LONG has won the last 2 meetings · NCCU 4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2025-26 | LONG 74 @ NCCU 72 | NCCU +3.5 | NCCU W |
| Dec 20, 2024-25 | LONG 82 @ NCCU 67 | NCCU +3.5 | LONG W |
| Dec 14, 2024-25 | NCCU 77 @ LONG 70 | LONG -8.5 | NCCU W |
| Dec 20, 2023-24 | LONG 70 @ NCCU 79 | NCCU +5.5 | NCCU W |
| Nov 18, 2023-24 | NCCU 66 @ LONG 73 | LONG -10.5 | NCCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
NC Central
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-114 | +31.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 62-81 | +34.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 54-76 | +10.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 53-97 | +34.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 55-74 | +29.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 67-82 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 62-67 | +14.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 54-69 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 67-103 | +42.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 72-74 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 67-90 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 69-67 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 88-77 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 89-78 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 69-83 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 65-63 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 72-63 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 56-58 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 80-76 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-85 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 67-100 | +12.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 74-60 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 77-73 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 64-80 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 131.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 59-53 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 131.5 | U 112 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 63-70 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NCSU
L 66-114
−16.5
7
@
UVA
L 62-81
+15.5
9
@
APP
L 54-76
−11.5
14
@
UNC
L 53-97
−9.5
22
@
DAY
L 55-74
+10.5
25
@
UPST
L 67-82
−7.5
3
@
JMU
L 62-67
+9.5
6
vs
NCAT
L 54-69
−12.5
9
@
UK
L 67-103
+6.5
20
vs
LONG
L 72-74
+1.5
29
@
PSU
L 67-90
+0.5
3
vs
NORF
W 69-67
+3.5
10
@
COPP
W 88-77
+4.5
12
@
MORG
W 89-78
+7.5
17
vs
HOW
L 69-83
−11.5
2
vs
UMES
W 65-63
−0.5
7
@
NORF
L 68-75
−2.5
9
vs
DSU
W 72-63
+1.5
14
vs
COPP
L 56-58
−12.5
16
vs
MORG
W 80-76
−1.5
18
@
SCST
L 72-85
−15.5
21
@
HOW
L 67-100
−20.5
28
@
DSU
W 74-60
+11.5
2
@
UMES
W 77-73
+6.5
5
vs
SCST
L 64-80
−23.5
12
vs
UMES
W 83-76
+8.5
13
vs
DSU
W 59-53
+2.5
14
vs
HOW
L 63-70
+4.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NCSU
L 66-114
+34.5
7
@
UVA
L 62-81
−8.5
9
@
APP
L 54-76
−6.5
14
@
UNC
L 53-97
−9.5
22
@
DAY
L 55-74
−17.5
25
@
UPST
L 67-82
+0.5
3
@
JMU
L 62-67
−14.5
6
vs
NCAT
L 54-69
−19.5
9
@
UK
L 67-103
+21.5
20
vs
LONG
L 72-74
−0.5
29
@
PSU
L 67-90
+6.5
3
vs
NORF
W 69-67
−5.5
10
@
COPP
W 88-77
+21.5
12
@
MORG
W 89-78
+25.5
17
vs
HOW
L 69-83
+10.5
2
vs
UMES
W 65-63
−6.5
7
@
NORF
L 68-75
−5.5
9
vs
DSU
W 72-63
+0.5
14
vs
COPP
L 56-58
−29.5
16
vs
MORG
W 80-76
+9.5
18
@
SCST
L 72-85
+20.5
21
@
HOW
L 67-100
+23.5
28
@
DSU
W 74-60
−1.5
2
@
UMES
W 77-73
+16.5
5
vs
SCST
L 64-80
+3.5
12
vs
UMES
W 83-76
+27.5
13
vs
DSU
W 59-53
−19.5
14
vs
HOW
L 63-70
−9.5
over 14under 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Longwood
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-78 | +14.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-82 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 82-83 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-95 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-70 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 66-92 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-80 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-81 | -13.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-71 | +24.5 | W +21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 82-70 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-80 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-85 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-56 | -16.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 81-79 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-65 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-71 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 74-79 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-75 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 65-72 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 107-96 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 203 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 82-85 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−3.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
−7.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
−18.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
−21.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−1.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−1.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
−20.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
−1.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
−18.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
+21.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−1.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
+19.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
+3.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−8.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+3.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+2.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
+18.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+0.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−6.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−2.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+7.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
+5.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
−7.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+0.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−4.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+13.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+14.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−7.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+4.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
+24.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
+26.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
+11.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−12.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−12.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
+9.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
+9.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
+17.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
−24.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−0.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
−9.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
−13.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−15.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+7.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+10.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
−8.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+3.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−22.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−26.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+4.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
−0.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
+11.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+9.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−2.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+48.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+9.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
+26.5
over 16under 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Longwood has the better starters
Position by position: NC Central 0, Longwood 3, even 2
NC CentralBetterLongwood
G T. Brown TR3.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 11
→LONGBig
G M. Williams TR9.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 65
G R. Archey3.1 pts · 1 reb · 0.7 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G A. Billups7.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 47
F C. Meeks TR5.7 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 6
→LONGBig
G J. Benard7.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 44
F T. Mason TR5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 32
→LONGSmall
G T. Robinson TR9.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 64
F M. Vassel TR1.7 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Kelly2.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
NC CentralBetterLongwood
NCCU offense345th of 366 · -11.9
→LONGSmall
LONG defense242nd of 366 · -6.4
NCCU defense352nd of 366 · -9.9
→LONGBig
LONG offense182nd of 366 · -5.7
Backcourt-2.4 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.7 · 5 players
Frontcourt-5.2 · 3 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNCCU betterLONG betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Brown14 min · TRR. Archey8 minD. KaneNewC. SanonNewI. BuckleyNewA. BowserNew
Forwards
C. Meeks29 min · TRT. Mason12 min · TRM. Vassel8 min · TRJ. PriceNewD. DuorNew
Centers
D. MbaetekaNew
Guards
M. Williams24 min · TRA. Billups23 minJ. Benard20 minT. Robinson19 min · TRE. Kelly11 minB. Wesson2 min · TR
Forwards
D. Kauzonas10 min · TRL. Milosevic8 min · TRK. Musungay4 min · TRI. Kalala3 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.6 #322 | Points per game | 75.9 #143 |
| 1.02 #308 | Points per possession | 1.07 #215 |
| 66.9 #282 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #54 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.5 #328 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #254 |
| 32.6 #247 | 3-point % | 31.4 #309 |
| 33.9 #299 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.8 #279 |
| 39.3 #72 | Free throw rate | 41.4 #40 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #285 | Turnover rate | 19.2 #327 |
| 30.0 #201 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.6 #57 |
| 12.1 #279 | Assists per game | 12.2 #270 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.3 #246 | Points allowed | 76.2 #223 |
| 1.15 #322 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #113 |
| 54.5 #317 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.8 #293 |
| 36.4 #321 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #171 |
| 19.8 #27 | Turnovers forced | 19.7 #31 |
| 60.6 #364 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #58 |
| 7.7 #60 | Steals per game | 8.3 #28 |
| 3.4 #165 | Blocks per game | 2.0 #347 |
NC Central
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Howard63–70
- Wvs Delaware St59–53
- Wvs MD Eastern83–76
- Lvs SC State64–80
- W@ MD Eastern77–73
A week or more of rest.
Longwood
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Asheville82–85
- Wvs Radford90–74
- W@ Charleston So107–96
- L@ Presbyterian65–72
- Wvs SC Upstate82–75
A week or more of rest.