Dee Glen Smith Spectrum · at Utah State
#279OMAOmaha
@
#58USUUtah State
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Omaha and Utah State
OMAThis seasonUSU
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects USU 88–64 · win probability USU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: USU has more of the edges

OMA 1, USU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
USUBig
USU offense vs OMA defense
Offense 53rd of 366 against a defense 306th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
OMA has played the 287th-hardest schedule, USU the 83rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
USUBig
Turnovers
Turnover rate: OMA 16.1%, USU 15.1%. Forced: OMA 14.1%, USU 20.2%
USUBig
OMA offense vs USU defense
Offense 247th of 366 against a defense 56th, on the model’s ratings
USUBig
Shooting
Effective FG%: OMA 52.2 and allows 52.7; USU 56.3 and allows 49.7
USUSmall
Home court
USU at home. This season: USU 0-0 at home, OMA 0-0 away
OMASmall
Three-pointers
OMA hits 34.0% and allows 32.9%; USU hits 34.3% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 40.9% and 40.8% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: OMA 34.5, USU 38.8. Allowed: OMA 33.6, USU 39.2
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: OMA 25.5%, USU 32.7%. Defensive: OMA 71.3%, USU 67.2%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: OMA plays 68.9 a game (184th fastest), USU 68.5 (207th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: OMA 23%, USU 26%. Transfers in: OMA 4, USU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—USU -25.0—
Total—151.9—
Projected score—OMA 63.5 · USU 88.4

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadUSU -14.7—
1H total71.0—
1H projected scoreOMA 28.1 · USU 42.9—

Utah State has the better starters

Position by position: Omaha 0, Utah State 2, even 3
OmahaBetterUtah State
G G. Stubblefield9.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 3.3 ast Score 64
Even
G A. Bates TR12.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.8 ast Score 62
G C. Crosby TR2.5 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.3 ast Score 24
USUBig
G M. Falslev16.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 3.1 ast Score 98
G A. Skradis0.4 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast Not ranked
No call
G D. Hall TR5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast Score 49
F C. Dockery TR7.3 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.8 ast Score 41
Even
G S. Callaghan TR10.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.1 ast Score 33
F B. Scholl3.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.3 ast Score 26
USUBig
F W. Hornseth TR11.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.3 ast Score 88
OmahaBetterUtah State
OMA offense247th of 366 · -7.5
USUBig
USU defense56th of 366 · +1.4
OMA defense306th of 366 · -7.8
USUBig
USU offense53rd of 366 · +3.3
Backcourt-0.7 · 3 players
USUBig
Backcourt+2.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
USUBig
Frontcourt+2.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.0 · 2 players
USUBig
Bench+3.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestOMA betterUSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Omaha
Guards
G. Stubblefield29 minC. Crosby9 min · TRA. Skradis2 minD. Thompson1 min · TRB. OrgilboldNewC. CurtisNew
Forwards
C. Dockery22 min · TRB. Scholl14 minJ. Bolis2 min · TRD. PleasantNewE. SheatsNewG. BakerNew
Centers
I. OndekaneNewH. BukingaNew
Utah State
Guards
A. Bates34 min · TRM. Falslev33 minD. Hall28 min · TRS. Callaghan28 min · TRB. BoeNewA. ReiserNew
Forwards
W. Hornseth27 min · TRC. Turnbull21 min · TRK. Templin19 minC. Mulholland17 min · TRK. TosiNew
Centers
S. FeltsNewB. RobertsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
OMAUSU
Scoring
73.9 #202Points per game81.3 #43
1.07 #201Points per possession1.19 #24
68.9 #184Pace (possessions)68.5 #207
Shooting
52.2 #139Effective FG%56.3 #18
34.0 #1693-point %34.3 #155
40.9 #1503-point attempt rate40.8 #152
34.5 #196Free throw rate38.8 #83
Possessions
16.1 #146Turnover rate15.1 #72
25.5 #331Offensive rebound rate32.7 #97
12.1 #276Assists per game17.1 #21
Defense
77.7 #259Points allowed71.2 #78
1.13 #278Points allowed per possession1.04 #72
52.7 #258Opponent effective FG%49.7 #87
32.9 #114Opponent 3-point %34.5 #222
14.1 #333Turnovers forced20.2 #18
71.3 #90Defensive rebound rate67.2 #290
5.7 #277Steals per game8.5 #17
3.0 #234Blocks per game2.9 #252

Omaha

12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Summit League

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs N Dakota St50–74
  • Wvs South Dakota76–62
  • L@ St Thomas53–68
  • L@ South Dakota72–89
  • Wvs Oral Roberts80–71

A week or more of rest.

Utah State

28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Pac-12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Arizona66–78
  • Wvs Villanova86–76
  • Wvs San Diego St73–62
  • Wvs Nevada79–66
  • Wvs UNLV80–60

A week or more of rest.