Baxter Arena · at Omaha
#293LAMLamar
@
#279OMAOmaha
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Lamar and Omaha
LAMThis seasonOMA
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects OMA 73–71 · win probability OMA 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: OMA has more of the edges

LAM 1, OMA 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
OMABig
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAM 27.9, OMA 34.5. Allowed: LAM 44.4, OMA 33.6
LAMBig
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAM 35.7%, OMA 25.5%. Defensive: LAM 70.6%, OMA 71.3%
OMABig
Three-pointers
LAM hits 32.9% and allows 35.3%; OMA hits 34.0% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 33.9% and 40.9% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: LAM plays 66.1 a game (311th fastest), OMA 68.9 (184th). Faster games mean more points
OMASmall
Home court
OMA at home. This season: OMA 0-0 at home, LAM 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAM 0%, OMA 23%. Transfers in: LAM 6, OMA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
LAM has played the 328th-hardest schedule, OMA the 287th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAM 18.1%, OMA 16.1%. Forced: LAM 17.3%, OMA 14.1%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAM 47.8 and allows 50.9; OMA 52.2 and allows 52.7
Even
OMA offense vs LAM defense
Offense 247th of 366 against a defense 213th, on the model’s ratings
Even
LAM offense vs OMA defense
Offense 334th of 366 against a defense 306th, on the model’s ratings

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—OMA -2.7—
Total—144.1—
Projected score—LAM 70.7 · OMA 73.4

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadOMA -1.5—
1H total67.4—
1H projected scoreLAM 33 · OMA 34.4—

Omaha has the better starters

Position by position: Lamar 0, Omaha 3, even 2
LamarBetterOmaha
G F. Radakovic TR9.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 2.5 ast Score 38
OMASmall
G G. Stubblefield9.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 3.3 ast Score 64
G N. Moretti TR5.9 pts · 2 reb · 3.2 ast Score 24
Even
G C. Crosby TR2.5 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.3 ast Score 24
G Q. Berry TR6.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast Score 61
No call
G A. Skradis0.4 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast Not ranked
G M. Collins TR1.4 pts · 0.7 reb · 1 ast Score 12
OMASmall
F C. Dockery TR7.3 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.8 ast Score 41
F M. Ljubicic TR5.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.6 ast Score 7
OMASmall
F B. Scholl3.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.3 ast Score 26
LamarBetterOmaha
LAM offense334th of 366 · -10.9
Even
OMA defense306th of 366 · -7.8
LAM defense213th of 366 · -5.4
Even
OMA offense247th of 366 · -7.5
Backcourt-4.6 · 4 players
OMABig
Backcourt-0.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.4 · 1 player
Even
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Bench-0.8 · 1 player
Even
Bench-0.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestLAM betterOMA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Lamar
Guards
F. Radakovic27 min · TRN. Moretti27 min · TRQ. Berry18 min · TRM. Collins9 min · TRJ. JonesNewS. LynchNew
Forwards
M. Ljubicic20 min · TRM. Reed7 min · TRC. HinkerNewA. AgotNewD. EasonNew
Omaha
Guards
G. Stubblefield29 minC. Crosby9 min · TRA. Skradis2 minD. Thompson1 min · TRB. OrgilboldNewC. CurtisNew
Forwards
C. Dockery22 min · TRB. Scholl14 minJ. Bolis2 min · TRD. PleasantNewE. SheatsNewG. BakerNew
Centers
I. OndekaneNewH. BukingaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
LAMOMA
Scoring
68.4 #308Points per game73.9 #202
1.04 #279Points per possession1.07 #201
66.1 #311Pace (possessions)68.9 #184
Shooting
47.8 #318Effective FG%52.2 #139
32.9 #2383-point %34.0 #169
33.9 #2973-point attempt rate40.9 #150
27.9 #344Free throw rate34.5 #196
Possessions
18.1 #273Turnover rate16.1 #146
35.7 #31Offensive rebound rate25.5 #331
13.9 #157Assists per game12.1 #276
Defense
70.5 #64Points allowed77.7 #259
1.07 #122Points allowed per possession1.13 #278
50.9 #153Opponent effective FG%52.7 #258
35.3 #266Opponent 3-point %32.9 #114
17.3 #130Turnovers forced14.1 #333
70.6 #130Defensive rebound rate71.3 #90
6.1 #227Steals per game5.7 #277
4.2 #54Blocks per game3.0 #234

Lamar

10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Southland Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • L@ Hou Christian53–75
  • L@ Incarnate Word60–72
  • Lvs Nicholls52–53
  • Lvs LSU N Orleans71–77
  • L@ UT Rio Grande65–70

A week or more of rest.

Omaha

12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Summit League

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs N Dakota St50–74
  • Wvs South Dakota76–62
  • L@ St Thomas53–68
  • L@ South Dakota72–89
  • Wvs Oral Roberts80–71

A week or more of rest.