Montagne Center · at Lamar · Conference game
Closing line
LAM -4.5✓ NOLA covered by 10.5
LAM -4.5✓ NOLA covered by 10.5Closing total146.5Over by 1.5
 NOLA | This season | LAM |
|---|---|---|
| 12-15 | Record | 10-15 |
| 15-12 | ATS | 12-13 |
| 17-10 | O/U | 13-12 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: NOLA 73–77 LAM · ✗ LAM (62%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOLA | 32 | 45 | 77 |
| LAM | 29 | 42 | 71 |
1st half: NOLA 32, LAM 29 (NOLA by 3). The model had LAM by 2.0 and a total of 70.3 (actual 61).
Team stats
| NOLA | LAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 25-55 45% | Field goals | 24-66 36% |
| 6-20 30% | 3-pointers | 9-31 29% |
| 21-27 78% | Free throws | 14-24 58% |
| 43 14 off | Rebounds | 39 20 off |
| 19 | Assists | 19 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 22 | Fouls | 20 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 22 |
| 20 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| NOLA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakevion Buckley G | 32 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 2-12 | 1-4 |
| Coleton Benson G | 30 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
| TJ Cope G | 28 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-1 |
| MJ Thomas F | 27 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 |
| Churchill Abass F | 22 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Panagiotis Pagonis F | 18 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Enzo Boudouma F | 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Kedrick Osby F | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Irish Coquia G | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Hercy Miller G | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Grant Kemp, Jamal Chretien II, Vieux Sanneh, Eze Nwakamma, William Patterson Jr., Mathok Majok
| LAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Holifield F | 34 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 4-14 | 2-11 |
| Rob Lee Jr. G | 33 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3-11 | 0-5 |
| Eian Lowe G | 33 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 4-11 | 3-7 |
| Cody Pennebaker G | 30 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-2 |
| Janko Bulajic C | 24 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Errol White F | 19 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-0 |
| Jayden Gambrell G | 14 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 4-6 |
| Spencer Ezewiro F | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: B.B. Knight, Izuchukwu Emelife, Jayden Barrs, Christian Thomas, King-Njhsanni Wilhite, Quinton Sanders, Braden East
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLAM -3.5
1 → LAM
CloseLAM -4.5
1 pt toward LAM
Total
Open146.5
no move
Close146.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
NOLA +170 · LAM -205
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LAM -3.5 · closed LAM -4.5 · moved 1 toward LAMmodel LAM -3.5
model LAM -3.5
Opened 146.5 · unchangedmodel 150
model 150
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | LAM -4.5 | LAM -3.5 | NOLA +1.0 | W NOLA covered |
| Total | 146.5 | 150.2 | Over 3.7 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | NOLA 73.3 · LAM 76.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LAM -2.0 | NOLA -3.0 |
| 1H total | 70.3 | 61 |
| 1H projected score | NOLA 34.2 · LAM 36.1 | NOLA 32 · LAM 29 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOLA | 6-4 60% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% |
| LAM | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
NOLA 4–3 LAMNOLA leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · NOLA has won the last 2 meetings · NOLA 4-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025-26 | LAM 76 @ NOLA 89 | NOLA +1.5 | NOLA W |
| Jan 13, 2024-25 | NOLA 68 @ LAM 62 | LAM -12.5 | NOLA W |
| Mar 11, 2023-24 | NOLA 57 vs LAM 71 | LAM -11.5 | LAM W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | LAM 94 @ NOLA 72 | NOLA +5.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 29, 2023-24 | NOLA 73 @ LAM 98 | LAM -9.5 | LAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
LSU N Orleans
27 games played
Straight up
12-15
44% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg +3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-10
63% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ TCU | W 78-74 | +21.5 | W +25.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 10 | @ LSU | L 58-93 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 14 | @ TULN | W 85-63 | +11.5 | W +33.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 18 | @ PEPP | L 79-90 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 21 | @ FRES | L 76-85 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 24 | @ MSST | L 78-81 | +23.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 26 | @ TTU | L 50-82 | +29.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | @ MEM | L 70-86 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs HCU | L 76-85 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 8 | vs UIW | W 84-83 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | @ HOU | L 57-99 | +32.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 29 | @ RGV | W 85-69 | +6.5 | W +22.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 31 | @ AMCC | L 69-83 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ NWST | L 68-74 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 5 | vs ETAM | W 83-73 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs NICH | L 77-90 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 12 | @ SELA | W 79-76 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs SFA | L 79-84 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | vsLAM | W 89-76 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ MCN | L 63-82 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | @NICH | W 80-62 | +4.5 | W +22.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 31 | vsNWST | W 75-64 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 2 | @ETAM | W 94-85 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 7 | vsRGV | L 76-95 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 9 | vsAMCC | W 84-78 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | @HCU | L 60-61 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 16 | @UIW | W 78-64 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@TCU
TCUW 78-74
+25.5
10
@LSU
LSUL 58-93
−15.5
14
@TULN
TULNW 85-63
+33.5
18
@PEPP
PEPPL 79-90
−5.5
21
@FRES
FRESL 76-85
−2.5
24
@MSST
MSSTL 78-81
+20.5
26
@TTU
TTUL 50-82
−2.5
3
@MEM
MEML 70-86
−1.5
6
vsHCU
HCUL 76-85
−13.5
8
vsUIW
UIWW 84-83
+2.5
13
@HOU
HOUL 57-99
−9.5
29
@RGV
RGVW 85-69
+22.5
31
@AMCC
AMCCL 69-83
−9.5
3
@NWST
NWSTL 68-74
−7.5
5
vsETAM
ETAMW 83-73
+3.5
10
vsNICH
NICHL 77-90
−9.5
12
@SELA
SELAW 79-76
+5.5
17
vsSFA
SFAL 79-84
+1.5
19
vsLAM
LAMW 89-76
+14.5
24
@MCN
MCNL 63-82
−0.5
27
@NICH
NICHW 80-62
+22.5
31
vsNWST
NWSTW 75-64
+6.5
2
@ETAM
ETAMW 94-85
+7.5
7
vsRGV
RGVL 76-95
−17.5
9
vsAMCC
AMCCW 84-78
+7.5
14
@HCU
HCUL 60-61
+0.5
16
@UIW
UIWW 78-64
+16.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@TCU
TCUW 78-74
+2.5
10
@LSU
LSUL 58-93
−11.5
14
@TULN
TULNW 85-63
−5.5
18
@PEPP
PEPPL 79-90
+11.5
21
@FRES
FRESL 76-85
+6.5
24
@MSST
MSSTL 78-81
−1.5
26
@TTU
TTUL 50-82
−25.5
3
@MEM
MEML 70-86
+6.5
6
vsHCU
HCUL 76-85
+20.5
8
vsUIW
UIWW 84-83
+18.5
13
@HOU
HOUL 57-99
+17.5
29
@RGV
RGVW 85-69
+1.5
31
@AMCC
AMCCL 69-83
+9.5
3
@NWST
NWSTL 68-74
−7.5
5
vsETAM
ETAMW 83-73
+5.5
10
vsNICH
NICHL 77-90
+12.5
12
@SELA
SELAW 79-76
+12.5
17
vsSFA
SFAL 79-84
+15.5
19
vsLAM
LAMW 89-76
+20.5
24
@MCN
MCNL 63-82
−11.5
27
@NICH
NICHW 80-62
−15.5
31
vsNWST
NWSTW 75-64
−14.5
2
@ETAM
ETAMW 94-85
+27.5
7
vsRGV
RGVL 76-95
+19.5
9
vsAMCC
AMCCW 84-78
+15.5
14
@HCU
HCUL 60-61
−27.5
16
@UIW
UIWW 78-64
−12.5
over 17under 10avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lamar
25 games played
Straight up
10-15
40% wins
Against the spread
12-13
48% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-12
52% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @TCU | L 65-78 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 17 | @ ULM | W 79-66 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 23 | @ MONT | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 24 | vs OAK | L 68-83 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs UL | W 65-55 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 6 | vsAMCC | L 49-57 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 10 | @ SDSU | L 71-89 | +17.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | vsRGV | L 72-83 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs OMA | L 82-85 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 29 | @NWST | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 31 | @ETAM | W 69-62 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | @MCN | L 70-82 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 5 | @SELA | L 52-60 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | vsUIW | W 63-51 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 12 | vsHCU | W 64-56 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | @NICH | W 90-80 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 19 | @NOLA | L 76-89 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vsSFA | L 81-88 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 27 | vsETAM | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 31 | vsMCN | L 63-64 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 2 | vsSELA | W 73-54 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @SFA | L 74-84 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vsNWST | L 68-70 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | @AMCC | L 63-76 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 16 | @RGV | L 65-70 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@TCU
TCUL 65-78
+5.5
17
@ULM
ULMW 79-66
+1.5
23
@MONT
MONTW 68-63
+9.5
24
vsOAK
OAKL 68-83
−11.5
3
vsUL
ULW 65-55
−0.5
6
vsAMCC
AMCCL 49-57
−11.5
10
@SDSU
SDSUL 71-89
−0.5
16
vsRGV
RGVL 72-83
−14.5
20
vsOMA
OMAL 82-85
−8.5
29
@NWST
NWSTW 76-61
+11.5
31
@ETAM
ETAMW 69-62
+1.5
2
@MCN
MCNL 70-82
+4.5
5
@SELA
SELAL 52-60
−9.5
10
vsUIW
UIWW 63-51
+10.5
12
vsHCU
HCUW 64-56
−0.5
17
@NICH
NICHW 90-80
+13.5
19
@NOLA
NOLAL 76-89
−14.5
24
vsSFA
SFAL 81-88
−2.5
27
vsETAM
ETAMW 82-61
+14.5
31
vsMCN
MCNL 63-64
+9.5
2
vsSELA
SELAW 73-54
+13.5
7
@SFA
SFAL 74-84
−1.5
9
vsNWST
NWSTL 68-70
−8.5
14
@AMCC
AMCCL 63-76
−10.5
16
@RGV
RGVL 65-70
+1.5
covered 12didn’t cover 13avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@TCU
TCUL 65-78
−4.5
17
@ULM
ULMW 79-66
+4.5
23
@MONT
MONTW 68-63
−17.5
24
vsOAK
OAKL 68-83
+2.5
3
vsUL
ULW 65-55
−9.5
6
vsAMCC
AMCCL 49-57
−30.5
10
@SDSU
SDSUL 71-89
+24.5
16
vsRGV
RGVL 72-83
+15.5
20
vsOMA
OMAL 82-85
+25.5
29
@NWST
NWSTW 76-61
−1.5
31
@ETAM
ETAMW 69-62
−12.5
2
@MCN
MCNL 70-82
+6.5
5
@SELA
SELAL 52-60
−23.5
10
vsUIW
UIWW 63-51
−26.5
12
vsHCU
HCUW 64-56
−14.5
17
@NICH
NICHW 90-80
+30.5
19
@NOLA
NOLAL 76-89
+20.5
24
vsSFA
SFAL 81-88
+32.5
27
vsETAM
ETAMW 82-61
+2.5
31
vsMCN
MCNL 63-64
−17.5
2
vsSELA
SELAW 73-54
−5.5
7
@SFA
SFAL 74-84
+19.5
9
vsNWST
NWSTL 68-70
+2.5
14
@AMCC
AMCCL 63-76
+3.5
16
@RGV
RGVL 65-70
−6.5
over 13under 12avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
LSU N Orleans
12-15 overall · 10-8 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Incarnate Word78–64
- L@ Hou Christian60–61
- Wvs Texas A&M-CC84–78
- Lvs UT Rio Grande76–95
- W@ East Texas A&M94–85
5 days since their last game.
Lamar
10-15 overall · 7-11 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UT Rio Grande65–70
- L@ Texas A&M-CC63–76
- Lvs N'Western St68–70
- L@ SF Austin74–84
- Wvs SE Louisiana73–54
5 days since their last game.