Resorts World Event Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OMA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects JXST 75–71 · win probability JXST 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JXST has more of the edges
JXST 3, OMA 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
JXST has played the 196th-hardest schedule, OMA the 287th. A record against a soft schedule means less
OMA offense vs JXST defense
Offense 247th of 366 against a defense 172nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JXST 29.8%, OMA 25.5%. Defensive: JXST 72.0%, OMA 71.3%
JXST offense vs OMA defense
Offense 245th of 366 against a defense 306th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: JXST plays 66.3 a game (302nd fastest), OMA 68.9 (184th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JXST 0%, OMA 23%. Transfers in: JXST 8, OMA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JXST 17.0%, OMA 16.1%. Forced: JXST 16.2%, OMA 14.1%
Even
Three-pointers
JXST hits 35.7% and allows 33.3%; OMA hits 34.0% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 38.1% and 40.9% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: JXST 49.7 and allows 49.6; OMA 52.2 and allows 52.7
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: JXST 43.1, OMA 34.5. Allowed: JXST 38.7, OMA 33.6
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | JXST -3.7 | — |
| Total | — | 145.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | JXST 74.8 · OMA 71.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JXST -2.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | JXST 35.3 · OMA 33 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jax State
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg +0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14 | vs | W 74-67 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 65-71 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 43-56 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 99 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 73-77 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 59-62 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 81-75 | +9.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 78-67 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 67-64 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 69-78 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 71-64 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-88 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 64-60 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 75-58 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 78-74 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-74 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 71-66 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-58 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-69 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 70-79 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-77 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 78-82 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 80-70 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 78-81 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 75-77 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 63-68 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
14
vs
CCU
W 74-67
−0.5
19
vs
USA
L 65-71
−8.5
24
@
ARST
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
NDSU
L 43-56
−9.5
1
vs
UNA
L 66-73
−13.5
13
@
GAST
L 73-77
−7.5
17
vs
EKU
L 59-62
−5.5
20
@
ETSU
W 81-75
+15.5
29
vs
WKU
W 78-67
+13.5
2
@
DEL
W 67-64
−1.5
4
@
LIB
L 69-78
+0.5
7
vs
FIU
W 71-64
+5.5
10
@
KENN
L 82-88
−0.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 62-77
−16.5
17
vs
LT
W 64-60
−0.5
23
vs
MTSU
W 75-58
+18.5
28
@
FIU
W 78-74
+7.5
31
@
MOST
L 67-74
−2.5
5
@
WKU
W 71-66
+9.5
7
vs
KENN
W 77-58
+20.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 64-69
−11.5
14
vs
NMSU
L 70-79
−10.5
18
@
LT
L 71-77
−3.5
21
@
SHSU
L 78-82
+2.5
26
vs
DEL
W 80-70
+2.5
28
vs
LIB
L 78-81
+0.5
5
@
NMSU
L 75-77
+4.5
7
@
UTEP
W 64-61
+1.5
10
vs
NMSU
L 63-68
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
14
vs
CCU
W 74-67
+1.5
19
vs
USA
L 65-71
+0.5
24
@
ARST
L 63-74
−18.5
26
vs
NDSU
L 43-56
−43.5
1
vs
UNA
L 66-73
+4.5
13
@
GAST
L 73-77
+10.5
17
vs
EKU
L 59-62
−21.5
20
@
ETSU
W 81-75
+21.5
29
vs
WKU
W 78-67
+2.5
2
@
DEL
W 67-64
+4.5
4
@
LIB
L 69-78
+12.5
7
vs
FIU
W 71-64
−15.5
10
@
KENN
L 82-88
+20.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 62-77
−11.5
17
vs
LT
W 64-60
−3.5
23
vs
MTSU
W 75-58
−0.5
28
@
FIU
W 78-74
+3.5
31
@
MOST
L 67-74
+5.5
5
@
WKU
W 71-66
−3.5
7
vs
KENN
W 77-58
−14.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 64-69
−1.5
14
vs
NMSU
L 70-79
+9.5
18
@
LT
L 71-77
+15.5
21
@
SHSU
L 78-82
+12.5
26
vs
DEL
W 80-70
+16.5
28
vs
LIB
L 78-81
+19.5
5
@
NMSU
L 75-77
+6.5
7
@
UTEP
W 64-61
−14.5
10
vs
NMSU
L 63-68
−10.5
over 17under 12avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Omaha
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 77-85 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 74-97 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-85 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 73-99 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-88 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 70-75 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 60-55 | +12.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 85-82 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 57-80 | +21.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 69-84 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 66-73 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 90-79 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 73-62 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 64-68 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-71 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 84-82 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 73-76 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 84-92 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 98-94 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 192 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-76 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 72-89 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 53-68 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 76-62 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 50-74 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MUR
L 77-85
−2.5
6
@
ACU
L 71-73
+2.5
9
@
CSU
L 74-97
−8.5
15
vs
SUU
W 90-85
−3.5
21
@
LSU
L 73-99
−5.5
25
vs
JMU
L 77-88
−9.5
26
@
FIU
L 61-74
−8.5
3
vs
UNCO
L 70-75
−1.5
6
@
PRST
W 60-55
+17.5
20
@
LAM
W 85-82
+8.5
28
@
ORE
L 57-80
−1.5
1
@
SDST
L 69-84
−5.5
3
vs
KC
L 66-73
−15.5
8
vs
UND
W 90-79
+5.5
10
vs
NDSU
L 76-78
+3.5
17
@
ORU
W 73-62
+12.5
21
vs
SDAK
L 64-68
−10.5
24
@
KC
W 77-60
+12.5
28
vs
SDST
W 80-71
+10.5
31
@
DEN
W 84-82
+3.5
5
@
UND
L 73-76
−1.5
7
@
NDSU
L 84-92
+1.5
12
vs
STMN
W 98-94
+8.5
15
vs
DEN
W 83-76
+4.5
18
vs
ORU
W 80-71
+2.5
25
@
SDAK
L 72-89
−15.5
28
@
STMN
L 53-68
−3.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 76-62
+12.5
7
vs
NDSU
L 50-74
−15.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MUR
L 77-85
+8.5
6
@
ACU
L 71-73
−6.5
9
@
CSU
L 74-97
+17.5
15
vs
SUU
W 90-85
+21.5
21
@
LSU
L 73-99
+8.5
25
vs
JMU
L 77-88
+12.5
26
@
FIU
L 61-74
−22.5
3
vs
UNCO
L 70-75
−12.5
6
@
PRST
W 60-55
−29.5
20
@
LAM
W 85-82
+25.5
28
@
ORE
L 57-80
−14.5
1
@
SDST
L 69-84
+0.5
3
vs
KC
L 66-73
−9.5
8
vs
UND
W 90-79
+22.5
10
vs
NDSU
L 76-78
+6.5
17
@
ORU
W 73-62
−14.5
21
vs
SDAK
L 64-68
−28.5
24
@
KC
W 77-60
−11.5
28
vs
SDST
W 80-71
+0.5
31
@
DEN
W 84-82
+7.5
5
@
UND
L 73-76
−1.5
7
@
NDSU
L 84-92
+29.5
12
vs
STMN
W 98-94
+35.5
15
vs
DEN
W 83-76
−1.5
18
vs
ORU
W 80-71
−0.5
25
@
SDAK
L 72-89
+8.5
28
@
STMN
L 53-68
−37.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 76-62
−12.5
7
vs
NDSU
L 50-74
−22.5
over 14under 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Omaha has the better starters
Position by position: Jax State 1, Omaha 2, even 2
Jax StateBetterOmaha
G J. Stiemke TR9.7 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
→OMABig
G G. Stubblefield9.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 64
G C. Lockett TR9.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
←JXSTSmall
G C. Crosby TR2.5 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 24
F N. Cunningham TR5.1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 38
=No call
G A. Skradis0.4 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F M. Hill TR2.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 7
→OMASmall
F C. Dockery TR7.3 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 41
F B. Walker TR4.7 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F B. Scholl3.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 26
Jax StateBetterOmaha
JXST offense245th of 366 · -7.4
←JXSTSmall
OMA defense306th of 366 · -7.8
JXST defense172nd of 366 · -3.9
←JXSTSmall
OMA offense247th of 366 · -7.5
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→OMASmall
Backcourt-0.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.9 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Bench+0.3 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestJXST betterOMA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Stiemke28 min · TRC. Lockett25 min · TRL. Horner9 min · TRG. GondrezickNewJ. VickNewN. HernandezNew
Forwards
N. Cunningham13 min · TRM. Hill10 min · TRB. Walker9 min · TRE. Croley5 min · TRK. Polk1 min · TRA. CurryNew
Guards
G. Stubblefield29 minC. Crosby9 min · TRA. Skradis2 minD. Thompson1 min · TRB. OrgilboldNewC. CurtisNew
Forwards
C. Dockery22 min · TRB. Scholl14 minJ. Bolis2 min · TRD. PleasantNewE. SheatsNewG. BakerNew
Centers
I. OndekaneNewH. BukingaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.9 #287 | Points per game | 73.9 #202 |
| 1.05 #241 | Points per possession | 1.07 #201 |
| 66.3 #302 | Pace (possessions) | 68.9 #184 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.7 #253 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #139 |
| 35.7 #76 | 3-point % | 34.0 #169 |
| 38.1 #209 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #150 |
| 43.1 #21 | Free throw rate | 34.5 #196 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #204 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #146 |
| 29.8 #208 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.5 #331 |
| 11.6 #310 | Assists per game | 12.1 #276 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.6 #66 | Points allowed | 77.7 #259 |
| 1.06 #120 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #278 |
| 49.6 #85 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #258 |
| 33.3 #141 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #114 |
| 16.2 #208 | Turnovers forced | 14.1 #333 |
| 72.0 #67 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.3 #90 |
| 5.8 #252 | Steals per game | 5.7 #277 |
| 3.0 #233 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #234 |
Jax State
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs New Mexico St63–68
- W@ UTEP64–61
- L@ New Mexico St75–77
- Lvs Liberty78–81
- Wvs Delaware80–70
A week or more of rest.
Omaha
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St50–74
- Wvs South Dakota76–62
- L@ St Thomas53–68
- L@ South Dakota72–89
- Wvs Oral Roberts80–71
A week or more of rest.