McLeod Center · at Northern Iowa
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNI 77–66 · win probability UNI 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNI has more of the edges
LIN 0, UNI 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
LIN has played the 357th-hardest schedule, UNI the 133rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: LIN plays 73.0 a game (18th fastest), UNI 63.9 (361st). Faster games mean more points
LIN offense vs UNI defense
Offense 250th of 366 against a defense 92nd, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
LIN hits 29.4% and allows 32.4%; UNI hits 34.7% and allows 29.1%. Threes are 30.7% and 39.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIN 48.0 and allows 49.1; UNI 53.8 and allows 47.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIN 18.7%, UNI 14.5%. Forced: LIN 18.4%, UNI 18.0%
UNI offense vs LIN defense
Offense 204th of 366 against a defense 261st, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UNI at home. This season: UNI 0-0 at home, LIN 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIN 38.6, UNI 25.6. Allowed: LIN 37.4, UNI 29.6
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIN 33.3%, UNI 21.8%. Defensive: LIN 68.3%, UNI 73.5%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIN 0%, UNI 10%. Transfers in: LIN 0, UNI 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNI -11.2 | — |
| Total | — | 142.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIN 65.8 · UNI 77 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNI -6.5 | — |
| 1H total | 66.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIN 30.1 · UNI 36.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lindenwood Lions
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 60-98 | +29.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 66-109 | +24.5 | L −18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 83-77 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 65-74 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 53-73 | +32.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 80-67 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 99-64 | +3.5 | W +38.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-74 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 92-76 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 65-70 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-64 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 62-66 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 74-82 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 88-76 | +6.5 | W +18.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 55-69 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 89-68 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-96 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-78 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 72-78 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 79-74 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 61-73 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 57-72 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 67-71 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 91-69 | -11.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 66-68 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
TTU
L 60-98
−8.5
10
@
SLU
L 66-109
−18.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 83-77
+3.5
16
@
AAMU
L 65-74
−5.5
20
@
IU
L 53-73
+12.5
24
vs
KC
W 80-67
+8.5
2
@
NIU
W 99-64
+38.5
6
@
EIU
W 82-74
−0.5
18
vs
WIU
W 92-76
+3.5
23
@
MOST
L 65-70
−1.5
1
vs
MORE
W 77-64
+6.5
3
vs
USI
W 83-80
−6.5
6
@
SIUE
L 62-66
−2.5
10
vs
LR
L 74-82
−14.5
15
@
SEMO
W 88-76
+18.5
17
@
UTM
L 55-69
−11.5
22
vs
TNTC
W 89-68
+12.5
24
vs
TNST
L 86-96
−14.5
29
@
USI
W 73-60
+8.5
31
@
MORE
W 79-78
−0.5
3
vs
SIUE
L 72-78
−10.5
5
@
LR
W 79-74
+3.5
12
vs
UTM
W 75-74
−0.5
14
vs
SEMO
L 61-73
−13.5
19
@
TNST
L 80-89
−5.5
21
@
TNTC
L 57-72
−16.5
26
vs
EIU
L 67-71
−11.5
28
@
WIU
W 91-69
+10.5
4
vs
LR
W 72-62
+4.5
5
vs
SEMO
L 66-68
+1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
TTU
L 60-98
+11.5
10
@
SLU
L 66-109
+9.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 83-77
+4.5
16
@
AAMU
L 65-74
−10.5
20
@
IU
L 53-73
−29.5
24
vs
KC
W 80-67
−5.5
2
@
NIU
W 99-64
+15.5
6
@
EIU
W 82-74
+10.5
18
vs
WIU
W 92-76
+21.5
23
@
MOST
L 65-70
−10.5
1
vs
MORE
W 77-64
−6.5
3
vs
USI
W 83-80
+15.5
6
@
SIUE
L 62-66
−14.5
10
vs
LR
L 74-82
+6.5
15
@
SEMO
W 88-76
+9.5
17
@
UTM
L 55-69
−23.5
22
vs
TNTC
W 89-68
+5.5
24
vs
TNST
L 86-96
+21.5
29
@
USI
W 73-60
−17.5
31
@
MORE
W 79-78
+8.5
3
vs
SIUE
L 72-78
+9.5
5
@
LR
W 79-74
+3.5
12
vs
UTM
W 75-74
+3.5
14
vs
SEMO
L 61-73
−20.5
19
@
TNST
L 80-89
+9.5
21
@
TNTC
L 57-72
−22.5
26
vs
EIU
L 67-71
−6.5
28
@
WIU
W 91-69
+10.5
4
vs
LR
W 72-62
−14.5
5
vs
SEMO
L 66-68
−14.5
over 17under 13avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Northern Iowa
35 games played
Straight up
22-13
63% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-21
40% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 86-57 | -9.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 65-58 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 70-54 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 70-57 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 70-69 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 72-51 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 60-63 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-63 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 60-54 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 58-63 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 58-48 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 75-66 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 62-48 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 65-78 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 61-69 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 128.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 44-54 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 130.5 | U 98 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 54-59 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-76 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 50-65 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 130.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-55 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 128.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 61-49 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 89-60 | +4.5 | W +33.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 86-91 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 86-62 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 81-60 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 57-59 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-71 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 75-53 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 68-59 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 74-52 | -1.5 | W +20.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-69 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 84-69 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 125.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
CSUN
W 86-57
+19.5
9
vs
SDST
W 65-58
−3.5
14
vs
FUR
W 70-54
+6.5
18
vs
NIU
W 70-57
−6.5
22
@
UCI
W 70-69
+3.5
25
vs
LUC
W 72-51
+12.5
26
vs
TLSA
L 60-63
−5.5
6
vs
WICH
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
OAK
W 75-63
+3.5
17
@
UIC
W 60-54
+0.5
22
@
SMC
L 58-63
+6.5
29
vs
VAL
W 58-48
+1.5
1
vs
INST
W 75-66
−1.5
4
@
EVAN
W 62-48
+9.5
7
vs
BEL
L 65-78
−15.5
10
@
BRAD
L 69-75
−1.5
13
vs
UIC
L 61-69
−14.5
17
@
VAL
L 44-54
−11.5
21
@
ILST
L 54-59
+1.5
24
vs
MUR
W 81-76
+6.5
28
@
SIU
L 50-65
−16.5
31
vs
EVAN
W 71-55
+4.5
6
vs
BRAD
W 61-49
+8.5
9
@
MUR
W 89-60
+33.5
12
@
BEL
L 86-91
−0.5
15
vs
DRKE
W 86-62
+15.5
18
@
INST
W 81-60
+15.5
21
vs
SIU
L 57-59
−8.5
25
vs
ILST
L 69-71
−6.5
1
@
DRKE
W 75-53
+17.5
5
vs
EVAN
W 68-59
−4.5
6
vs
ILST
W 74-52
+20.5
7
vs
BRAD
W 73-69
−0.5
8
vs
UIC
W 84-69
+12.5
20
vs
SJU
L 53-79
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
CSUN
W 86-57
−10.5
9
vs
SDST
W 65-58
−27.5
14
vs
FUR
W 70-54
−17.5
18
vs
NIU
W 70-57
−19.5
22
@
UCI
W 70-69
+0.5
25
vs
LUC
W 72-51
−11.5
26
vs
TLSA
L 60-63
−14.5
6
vs
WICH
L 69-74
+7.5
13
vs
OAK
W 75-63
−11.5
17
@
UIC
W 60-54
−19.5
22
@
SMC
L 58-63
−11.5
29
vs
VAL
W 58-48
−25.5
1
vs
INST
W 75-66
+5.5
4
@
EVAN
W 62-48
−21.5
7
vs
BEL
L 65-78
+5.5
10
@
BRAD
L 69-75
+12.5
13
vs
UIC
L 61-69
+1.5
17
@
VAL
L 44-54
−32.5
21
@
ILST
L 54-59
−19.5
24
vs
MUR
W 81-76
+11.5
28
@
SIU
L 50-65
−15.5
31
vs
EVAN
W 71-55
−2.5
6
vs
BRAD
W 61-49
−24.5
9
@
MUR
W 89-60
+3.5
12
@
BEL
L 86-91
+38.5
15
vs
DRKE
W 86-62
+9.5
18
@
INST
W 81-60
+4.5
21
vs
SIU
L 57-59
−18.5
25
vs
ILST
L 69-71
+7.5
1
@
DRKE
W 75-53
−9.5
5
vs
EVAN
W 68-59
−0.5
6
vs
ILST
W 74-52
−4.5
7
vs
BRAD
W 73-69
+14.5
8
vs
UIC
W 84-69
+27.5
20
vs
SJU
L 53-79
−1.5
over 14under 21avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #183 | Points per game | 68.6 #303 |
| 1.02 #307 | Points per possession | 1.08 #198 |
| 73.0 #18 | Pace (possessions) | 63.9 #361 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.0 #313 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #73 |
| 29.4 #347 | 3-point % | 34.7 #136 |
| 30.7 #346 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.1 #189 |
| 38.6 #88 | Free throw rate | 25.6 #362 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #307 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #41 |
| 33.3 #83 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.8 #357 |
| 13.0 #212 | Assists per game | 14.6 #114 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.0 #190 | Points allowed | 62.5 #2 |
| 1.03 #52 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #12 |
| 49.1 #72 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.5 #31 |
| 32.4 #84 | Opponent 3-point % | 29.1 #3 |
| 18.4 #78 | Turnovers forced | 18.0 #97 |
| 68.3 #244 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.5 #24 |
| 8.4 #24 | Steals per game | 6.2 #212 |
| 4.4 #46 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #211 |
Lindenwood Lions
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SE Missouri66–68
- Wvs Little Rock72–62
- W@ W Illinois91–69
- Lvs E Illinois67–71
- L@ Tennessee Tech57–72
A week or more of rest.
Northern Iowa
22-13 in 2025-26 overall · 15-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's53–79
- Wvs UIC84–69
- Wvs Bradley73–69
- Wvs Illinois St74–52
- Wvs Evansville68–59
A week or more of rest.