Lafayette Leopards at Butler Bulldogs: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:00 PM ETHinkle Fieldhouse · at Butler

LineBTLR -20.5moved 1 toward LAF

Total149.5no move

Season records: Lafayette and Butler
LAF	This season	BTLR
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects BTLR 88–63 · win probability BTLR 98%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

BTLR -20.5

moved 1 toward LAF

Total

149.5

model 150.8 · Over by 1.5

Model edge

BTLR by 4

model vs market

Public on the spread

89% LAF

87% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: BTLR has more of the edges

LAF 0, BTLR 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

BTLRBig

LAF offense vs BTLR defense

Offense 331st of 366 against a defense 107th, on the model’s ratings

BTLRBig

BTLR offense vs LAF defense

Offense 56th of 366 against a defense 245th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

LAF has played the 230th-hardest schedule, BTLR the 56th. A record against a soft schedule means less

BTLRBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: LAF 32.5, BTLR 42.1. Allowed: LAF 30.6, BTLR 24.9

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: LAF plays 67.2 a game (274th fastest), BTLR 71.1 (69th). Faster games mean more points

BTLRSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: LAF 25.8%, BTLR 34.5%. Defensive: LAF 71.4%, BTLR 70.0%

BTLRSmall

Three-pointers

LAF hits 32.1% and allows 36.0%; BTLR hits 32.7% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 39.8% and 35.0% of their shots

BTLRSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: LAF 49.3 and allows 53.6; BTLR 50.9 and allows 51.9

BTLRSmall

Home court

BTLR at home. This season: BTLR 0-0 at home, LAF 0-0 away

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: LAF 34%, BTLR 22%. Transfers in: LAF 1, BTLR 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: LAF 15.3%, BTLR 15.9%. Forced: LAF 15.1%, BTLR 15.1%

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 145 to 149.5	3547	74%	49%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenBTLR -21.5

1 → LAF

NowBTLR -20.5

1 pt toward LAF

Total

Open149.5

no move

Now149.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

LAF +1800 · BTLR -5000

Line movement

Median of 6 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened BTLR -21.5 · now BTLR -20.5 · moved 1 toward LAFmodel BTLR -24.5

model BTLR -24.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

LAF +20.5Spread

BTLR -20.5

Bets

89%11%

Money

87%13%

Over 149.5TotalUnder 149.5

Bets

75%25%

Money

76%24%

LAFWinner

BTLR

Bets

8%92%

Money

41%59%

Money is 33 pts ahead of bets on LAF

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

6 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	LAF	BTLR	Over	Under	LAF	BTLR
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-20.5-105	+20.5-115	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-21.5-114	+21.5-112	149.5-122	149.5-104	—	—
BovadaBovada	-20.5-105	+20.5-115	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-20.5-110	+20.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	+2000	-6500
FanDuelFD	-20.5-110	+20.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	+2000	-7000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-20.5-101	+20.5-111	149.5-108	149.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	BTLR -20.5	BTLR -24.3	BTLR +3.8
Total	149.5	150.8	Over 1.3
Projected score	—	LAF 63.3 · BTLR 87.6

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	BTLR -14.3	—
1H total	70.5	—
1H projected score	LAF 28.1 · BTLR 42.4	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
LAF WLWWL	13-17	43%	10-6	9-11
BTLR WWLWL	16-16	50%	8-9	8-9

Venue/role: LAF away, as underdog; BTLR home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
LAF OUUOO	17-13	57%	10-21
BTLR UOUOO	18-14	56%	16-16

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
LAF	5-5 50%	5-5 50%	4-6 40%
BTLR	3-7 30%	5-5 50%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Lafayette

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	@ JOES	L76–85WO
Nov 14	@ SBU	No recent meeting
Nov 18	vs BING	L81–82LO

Butler

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 4	vs FDU	No recent meeting
Nov 8	@ BOIS	L68–77LU
Nov 13	vs PITT	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Lafayette

31 games played

Straight up

10-21

32% wins

Against the spread

13-17

43% covers · avg −2.6 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-13

57% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

10-2132%

L L L L L L W L W L L L L W L L L W L L W W L W L L W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

13-1743%

W L L W L L W L–W L W L W L L L W W L L W L W L L W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

17-1357%

O O O O O U U O–U O O O U O U O U O U O U U U U O O U U O O

2 straight overs2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@JOES	L 76-85	+13.5	W +4.5	138.5	O 161
Nov 8	@TEX	L 60-97	+25.5	L −11.5	153.5	O 157
Nov 13	vsCOR	L 78-97	+4.5	L −14.5	160.5	O 175
Nov 17	@WVU	L 59-81	+24.5	W +2.5	135.5	O 140
Nov 21	@STO	L 70-74	-1.5	L −5.5	141.5	O 144
Nov 28	vsLEM	L 63-76	-4.5	L −17.5	151.5	U 139
Nov 29	vsBALL	W 55-37	+1.5	W +19.5	140.5	U 92
Nov 30	vsMONM	L 74-88	+1.5	L −12.5	141.5	O 162
Dec 5	vsMERC	W 79-71	—	—	—	—
Dec 8	@PENN	L 72-74	+7.5	W +5.5	150.5	U 146
Dec 18	@CLT	L 67-81	+11.5	L −2.5	137.5	O 148
Dec 20	@GT	L 81-95	+16.5	W +2.5	147.5	O 176
Dec 31	vsCOLG	L 77-85	+6.5	L −1.5	146.5	O 162
Jan 3	@L-MD	W 79-64	-1.5	W +13.5	152.5	U 143
Jan 7	vsBU	L 67-83	+1.5	L −14.5	142.5	O 150
Jan 10	@NAVY	L 50-76	+8.5	L −17.5	141.5	U 126
Jan 14	@BUCK	L 69-76	+2.5	L −4.5	137.5	O 145
Jan 17	vsHC	W 74-55	-2.5	W +16.5	138.5	U 129
Jan 21	@BU	L 73-77	+4.5	W +0.5	145.5	O 150
Jan 24	@LEH	L 59-64	+2.5	L −2.5	143.5	U 123
Jan 28	vsBUCK	W 81-79	-4.5	L −2.5	138.5	O 160
Jan 31	@AMER	W 67-65	+5.5	W +7.5	142.5	U 132
Feb 4	vsNAVY	L 50-65	+3.5	L −11.5	139.5	U 115
Feb 7	@ARMY	W 63-60	-1.5	W +1.5	142.5	U 123
Feb 11	vsL-MD	L 54-68	-3.5	L −17.5	147.5	U 122
Feb 14	vsLEH	L 69-78	-2.5	L −11.5	140.5	O 147
Feb 18	@HC	W 86-83	+1.5	W +4.5	139.5	O 169
Feb 22	vsAMER	L 61-75	+3.5	L −10.5	141.5	U 136
Feb 25	@COLG	W 70-69	+8.5	W +9.5	148.5	U 139
Feb 28	vsARMY	W 83-77	-3.5	W +2.5	144.5	O 160
Mar 3	vsHC	L 77-82	-4.5	L −9.5	141.5	O 159

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

JOES

L 76-85

+4.5

TEX

L 60-97

−11.5

COR

L 78-97

−14.5

WVU

L 59-81

+2.5

STO

L 70-74

−5.5

LEM

L 63-76

−17.5

BALL

W 55-37

+19.5

MONM

L 74-88

−12.5

PENN

L 72-74

+5.5

CLT

L 67-81

−2.5

L 81-95

+2.5

COLG

L 77-85

−1.5

L-MD

W 79-64

+13.5

L 67-83

−14.5

NAVY

L 50-76

−17.5

BUCK

L 69-76

−4.5

W 74-55

+16.5

L 73-77

+0.5

LEH

L 59-64

−2.5

BUCK

W 81-79

−2.5

AMER

W 67-65

+7.5

NAVY

L 50-65

−11.5

ARMY

W 63-60

+1.5

L-MD

L 54-68

−17.5

LEH

L 69-78

−11.5

W 86-83

+4.5

AMER

L 61-75

−10.5

COLG

W 70-69

+9.5

ARMY

W 83-77

+2.5

L 77-82

−9.5

covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

JOES

L 76-85

+22.5

TEX

L 60-97

+3.5

COR

L 78-97

+14.5

WVU

L 59-81

+4.5

STO

L 70-74

+2.5

LEM

L 63-76

−12.5

BALL

W 55-37

−48.5

MONM

L 74-88

+20.5

PENN

L 72-74

−4.5

CLT

L 67-81

+10.5

L 81-95

+28.5

COLG

L 77-85

+15.5

L-MD

W 79-64

−9.5

L 67-83

+7.5

NAVY

L 50-76

−15.5

BUCK

L 69-76

+7.5

W 74-55

−9.5

L 73-77

+4.5

LEH

L 59-64

−20.5

BUCK

W 81-79

+21.5

AMER

W 67-65

−10.5

NAVY

L 50-65

−24.5

ARMY

W 63-60

−19.5

L-MD

L 54-68

−25.5

LEH

L 69-78

+6.5

W 86-83

+29.5

AMER

L 61-75

−5.5

COLG

W 70-69

−9.5

ARMY

W 83-77

+15.5

L 77-82

+17.5

over 17under 13avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Butler

32 games played

Straight up

16-16

50% wins

Against the spread

16-16

50% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

18-14

56% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

16-1650%

W W W L W W W W L W L W W L L L L W W W L L L L L L W W L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

16-1650%

W W W W W W W L L L L L W W L L L W L W L L L L W L W W W L W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

18-1456%

U U O O O U O U U O U U O O O U O U O O O U O U O U O U O U O O

2 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 5	vsUSI	W 88-58	-22.5	W +7.5	156.5	U 146
Nov 8	vsIUIN	W 112-80	-20.5	W +11.5	192.5	U 192
Nov 11	vsCHST	W 98-66	-26.5	W +5.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 15	@SMU	L 85-87	+7.5	W +5.5	163.5	O 172
Nov 21	vsSC	W 79-72	-3.5	W +3.5	150.5	O 151
Nov 23	vsUVA	W 80-73	+6.5	W +13.5	155.5	U 153
Nov 28	vsWRST	W 94-69	-14.5	W +10.5	150.5	O 163
Dec 2	vsEMU	W 84-68	-17.5	L −1.5	153.5	U 152
Dec 6	vsBOIS	L 68-77	-2.5	L −11.5	148.5	U 145
Dec 13	vsPROV	W 113-110	-3.5	L −0.5	164.5	O 223
Dec 16	@CONN	L 60-79	+15.5	L −3.5	144.5	U 139
Dec 20	vsNU	W 61-58	-3.5	L −0.5	154.5	U 119
Dec 22	vsNJIT	W 101-52	-32.5	W +16.5	149.5	O 153
Dec 30	@CREI	L 85-89	+5.5	W +1.5	156.5	O 174
Jan 3	vsVILL	L 67-85	-2.5	L −20.5	149.5	O 152
Jan 6	vsSJU	L 70-84	+4.5	L −9.5	162.5	U 154
Jan 14	@XAV	L 75-89	-1.5	L −15.5	161.5	O 164
Jan 17	@HALL	W 77-66	+6.5	W +17.5	144.5	U 143
Jan 20	vsDEP	W 87-80	-7.5	L −0.5	147.5	O 167
Jan 23	vsMARQ	W 87-76	-5.5	W +5.5	161.5	O 163
Jan 28	@SJU	L 70-92	+12.5	L −9.5	158.5	O 162
Jan 31	vsGTWN	L 64-77	-5.5	L −18.5	149.5	U 141
Feb 4	@PROV	L 87-97	+2.5	L −7.5	168.5	O 184
Feb 7	@MARQ	L 55-70	+3.5	L −11.5	155.5	U 125
Feb 11	vsCONN	L 70-80	+11.5	W +1.5	143.5	O 150
Feb 15	vsHALL	L 56-63	+5.5	L −1.5	138.5	U 119
Feb 18	@GTWN	W 93-89	+6.5	W +10.5	147.5	O 182
Feb 21	vsXAV	W 80-75	-4.5	W +0.5	159.5	U 155
Feb 25	@VILL	L 73-82	+10.5	W +1.5	147.5	O 155
Mar 4	vsCREI	L 59-76	-2.5	L −19.5	155.5	U 135
Mar 7	@DEP	W 81-71	+4.5	W +14.5	142.5	O 152
Mar 11	vsPROV	L 81-91	+1.5	L −8.5	162.5	O 172

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

USI

W 88-58

+7.5

IUIN

W 112-80

+11.5

CHST

W 98-66

+5.5

SMU

L 85-87

+5.5

W 79-72

+3.5

UVA

W 80-73

+13.5

WRST

W 94-69

+10.5

EMU

W 84-68

−1.5

BOIS

L 68-77

−11.5

PROV

W 113-110

−0.5

CONN

L 60-79

−3.5

W 61-58

−0.5

NJIT

W 101-52

+16.5

CREI

L 85-89

+1.5

VILL

L 67-85

−20.5

SJU

L 70-84

−9.5

XAV

L 75-89

−15.5

HALL

W 77-66

+17.5

DEP

W 87-80

−0.5

MARQ

W 87-76

+5.5

SJU

L 70-92

−9.5

GTWN

L 64-77

−18.5

PROV

L 87-97

−7.5

MARQ

L 55-70

−11.5

CONN

L 70-80

+1.5

HALL

L 56-63

−1.5

GTWN

W 93-89

+10.5

XAV

W 80-75

+0.5

VILL

L 73-82

+1.5

CREI

L 59-76

−19.5

DEP

W 81-71

+14.5

PROV

L 81-91

−8.5

covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

USI

W 88-58

−10.5

IUIN

W 112-80

−0.5

CHST

W 98-66

+5.5

SMU

L 85-87

+8.5

W 79-72

+0.5

UVA

W 80-73

−2.5

WRST

W 94-69

+12.5

EMU

W 84-68

−1.5

BOIS

L 68-77

−3.5

PROV

W 113-110

+58.5

CONN

L 60-79

−5.5

W 61-58

−35.5

NJIT

W 101-52

+3.5

CREI

L 85-89

+17.5

VILL

L 67-85

+2.5

SJU

L 70-84

−8.5

XAV

L 75-89

+2.5

HALL

W 77-66

−1.5

DEP

W 87-80

+19.5

MARQ

W 87-76

+1.5

SJU

L 70-92

+3.5

GTWN

L 64-77

−8.5

PROV

L 87-97

+15.5

MARQ

L 55-70

−30.5

CONN

L 70-80

+6.5

HALL

L 56-63

−19.5

GTWN

W 93-89

+34.5

XAV

W 80-75

−4.5

VILL

L 73-82

+7.5

CREI

L 59-76

−20.5

DEP

W 81-71

+9.5

PROV

L 81-91

+9.5

over 18under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Butler has the better starters

Position by position: Lafayette 0, Butler 3, even 2

LafayetteBetterButler

G P. D'Arcy TR1.1 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.2 ast Not ranked

No call

G J. Ellerbee TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast Score 66

F S. Jackson10.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.6 ast Score 67

No call

G J. Jackson9.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.8 ast Not ranked

F K. Murdock2.7 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast Score 16

BTLRSmall

F C. Moore TR11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1 ast Score 46

F L. Bevilacqua2.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast Score 13

BTLRBig

F T. Anderson TR10.8 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.8 ast Score 92

C M. Bednostin1.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast Score 8

BTLRBig

C D. Jones6.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast Score 76

LafayetteBetterButler

LAF offense331st of 366 · -10.8

BTLRBig

BTLR defense107th of 366 · -1.1

LAF defense245th of 366 · -6.5

BTLRBig

BTLR offense56th of 366 · +3.1

Backcourt-0.7 · 1 player

BTLRSmall

Backcourt+1.3 · 2 players

Frontcourt-2.4 · 4 players

BTLRBig

Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players

Bench-1.4 · 4 players

BTLRSmall

Bench+0.9 · 3 players

Score, worst to bestLAF betterBTLR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Lafayette

Guards

P. D'Arcy7 min · TRF. Fayemi6 minA. Wallace4 minB. CurrieNewC. KeslerNewS. HentonNew

Forwards

S. Jackson22 minK. Murdock10 minL. Bevilacqua9 minM. Rasul4 minL. Azzinaro2 minJ. GillNew

Centers

M. Bednostin10 min

Butler

Guards

J. Ellerbee28 min · TRJ. Jackson23 minE. Klafke15 min · TRE. McComb1 minB. WalkerNewS. AdlerNew

Forwards

C. Moore26 min · TRT. Anderson19 min · TRS. Calderon4 min · TRH. BrutusNewB. CardinalNewM. MaricNew

Centers

D. Jones20 minK. NdzieNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

LAF69.1 #297

BTLR79.4 #75

Points per possession

LAF1.03 #289

BTLR1.12 #106

Pace (possessions)

LAF67.2 #274

BTLR71.1 #69

Shooting

Effective FG%

LAF49.3 #278

BTLR50.9 #199

3-point %

LAF32.1 #273

BTLR32.7 #242

3-point attempt rate

LAF39.8 #173

BTLR35.0 #276

Free throw rate

LAF32.5 #249

BTLR42.1 #29

Possessions

Turnover rate

LAF15.3 #89

BTLR15.9 #131

Offensive rebound rate

LAF25.8 #326

BTLR34.5 #58

Assists per game

LAF13.6 #175

BTLR15.5 #64

Defense

Points allowed

LAF75.4 #200

BTLR77.5 #252

Points allowed per possession

LAF1.12 #275

BTLR1.09 #195

Opponent effective FG%

LAF53.6 #286

BTLR51.9 #208

Opponent 3-point %

LAF36.0 #298

BTLR33.3 #142

Turnovers forced

LAF15.1 #273

BTLR15.1 #272

Defensive rebound rate

LAF71.4 #88

BTLR70.0 #163

Steals per game

LAF5.3 #316

BTLR6.5 #178

Blocks per game

LAF2.3 #324

BTLR3.2 #191

LAF		BTLR
Scoring
69.1 #297	Points per game	79.4 #75
1.03 #289	Points per possession	1.12 #106
67.2 #274	Pace (possessions)	71.1 #69
Shooting
49.3 #278	Effective FG%	50.9 #199
32.1 #273	3-point %	32.7 #242
39.8 #173	3-point attempt rate	35.0 #276
32.5 #249	Free throw rate	42.1 #29
Possessions
15.3 #89	Turnover rate	15.9 #131
25.8 #326	Offensive rebound rate	34.5 #58
13.6 #175	Assists per game	15.5 #64
Defense
75.4 #200	Points allowed	77.5 #252
1.12 #275	Points allowed per possession	1.09 #195
53.6 #286	Opponent effective FG%	51.9 #208
36.0 #298	Opponent 3-point %	33.3 #142
15.1 #273	Turnovers forced	15.1 #272
71.4 #88	Defensive rebound rate	70.0 #163
5.3 #316	Steals per game	6.5 #178
2.3 #324	Blocks per game	3.2 #191

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Lafayette

10-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Patriot League

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Holy Cross77–82
Wvs Army83–77
W@ Colgate70–69
Lvs American61–75
W@ Holy Cross86–83

A week or more of rest.

Butler

16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Big East Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Providence81–91
W@ DePaul81–71
Lvs Creighton59–76
L@ Villanova73–82
Wvs Xavier80–75

A week or more of rest.