Michael J. Hagan '85 Arena · at Saint Joseph's
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | JOES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects JOES 80–62 · win probability JOES 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JOES has more of the edges
LAF 1, JOES 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LAF offense vs JOES defense
Offense 331st of 366 against a defense 91st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LAF has played the 230th-hardest schedule, JOES the 102nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAF 49.3 and allows 53.6; JOES 49.2 and allows 47.6
JOES offense vs LAF defense
Offense 134th of 366 against a defense 245th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
LAF hits 32.1% and allows 36.0%; JOES hits 30.8% and allows 31.7%. Threes are 39.8% and 45.1% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAF 15.3%, JOES 16.8%. Forced: LAF 15.1%, JOES 15.0%
Home court
JOES at home. This season: JOES 0-0 at home, LAF 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAF 25.8%, JOES 31.4%. Defensive: LAF 71.4%, JOES 69.4%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: LAF plays 67.2 a game (274th fastest), JOES 68.4 (208th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAF 34%, JOES 40%. Transfers in: LAF 1, JOES 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAF 32.5, JOES 29.7. Allowed: LAF 30.6, JOES 26.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | JOES -17.9 | — |
| Total | — | 142.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | LAF 62.4 · JOES 80.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JOES -10.5 | — |
| 1H total | 66.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | LAF 28.1 · JOES 38.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LAF 0–3 JOESJOES leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · JOES has won the last 3 meetings · LAF 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2025-26 | LAF 76 @ JOES 85 | JOES -13.5 | LAF W |
| Nov 6, 2023-24 | LAF 60 @ JOES 81 | JOES -13.5 | JOES W |
| Nov 14, 2022-23 | LAF 59 @ JOES 63 | JOES -10.5 | LAF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lafayette
31 games played
Straight up
10-21
32% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −2.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 76-85 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-97 | +25.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 13 | vs | L 78-97 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 59-81 | +24.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-76 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 55-37 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 74-88 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 79-71 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 67-81 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-95 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 77-85 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 79-64 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 67-83 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 50-76 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 69-76 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-55 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 73-77 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-64 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 81-79 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 67-65 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 50-65 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 63-60 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 54-68 | -3.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-78 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 86-83 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 61-75 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 70-69 | +8.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 83-77 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 77-82 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
JOES
L 76-85
+4.5
8
@
TEX
L 60-97
−11.5
13
vs
COR
L 78-97
−14.5
17
@
WVU
L 59-81
+2.5
21
@
STO
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
LEM
L 63-76
−17.5
29
vs
BALL
W 55-37
+19.5
30
vs
MONM
L 74-88
−12.5
8
@
PENN
L 72-74
+5.5
18
@
CLT
L 67-81
−2.5
20
@
GT
L 81-95
+2.5
31
vs
COLG
L 77-85
−1.5
3
@
L-MD
W 79-64
+13.5
7
vs
BU
L 67-83
−14.5
10
@
NAVY
L 50-76
−17.5
14
@
BUCK
L 69-76
−4.5
17
vs
HC
W 74-55
+16.5
21
@
BU
L 73-77
+0.5
24
@
LEH
L 59-64
−2.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 81-79
−2.5
31
@
AMER
W 67-65
+7.5
4
vs
NAVY
L 50-65
−11.5
7
@
ARMY
W 63-60
+1.5
11
vs
L-MD
L 54-68
−17.5
14
vs
LEH
L 69-78
−11.5
18
@
HC
W 86-83
+4.5
22
vs
AMER
L 61-75
−10.5
25
@
COLG
W 70-69
+9.5
28
vs
ARMY
W 83-77
+2.5
3
vs
HC
L 77-82
−9.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
JOES
L 76-85
+22.5
8
@
TEX
L 60-97
+3.5
13
vs
COR
L 78-97
+14.5
17
@
WVU
L 59-81
+4.5
21
@
STO
L 70-74
+2.5
28
vs
LEM
L 63-76
−12.5
29
vs
BALL
W 55-37
−48.5
30
vs
MONM
L 74-88
+20.5
8
@
PENN
L 72-74
−4.5
18
@
CLT
L 67-81
+10.5
20
@
GT
L 81-95
+28.5
31
vs
COLG
L 77-85
+15.5
3
@
L-MD
W 79-64
−9.5
7
vs
BU
L 67-83
+7.5
10
@
NAVY
L 50-76
−15.5
14
@
BUCK
L 69-76
+7.5
17
vs
HC
W 74-55
−9.5
21
@
BU
L 73-77
+4.5
24
@
LEH
L 59-64
−20.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 81-79
+21.5
31
@
AMER
W 67-65
−10.5
4
vs
NAVY
L 50-65
−24.5
7
@
ARMY
W 63-60
−19.5
11
vs
L-MD
L 54-68
−25.5
14
vs
LEH
L 69-78
+6.5
18
@
HC
W 86-83
+29.5
22
vs
AMER
L 61-75
−5.5
25
@
COLG
W 70-69
−9.5
28
vs
ARMY
W 83-77
+15.5
3
vs
HC
L 77-82
+17.5
over 17under 13avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Joseph's
34 games played
Straight up
22-12
65% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-23
32% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-76 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 76-65 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 59-94 | +12.5 | L −22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 74-83 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 85-99 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 60-58 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 87-65 | -22.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 63-71 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 67-51 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 62-68 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 79-102 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 56-62 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 97-90 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-65 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 68-64 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 72-79 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-74 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 85-64 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 67-58 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-73 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 64-68 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 71-65 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-61 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 81-63 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 61-55 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 70-67 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 88-76 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 70-58 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 69-64 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 76-75 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 24 | @ | L 69-84 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LAF
W 85-76
−4.5
8
vs
DREX
W 76-65
+1.5
12
@
VT
L 59-94
−22.5
17
@
PENN
L 74-83
−14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 85-99
−3.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 60-58
−3.5
6
vs
TEM
W 70-69
+2.5
9
vs
COPP
W 87-65
−0.5
11
@
SYR
L 63-71
+3.5
18
vs
DSU
W 67-51
−1.5
22
vs
CCU
L 62-68
−13.5
31
@
SLU
L 79-102
−3.5
3
vs
DAV
L 56-62
−4.5
7
vs
DUQ
W 97-90
+8.5
11
@
RICH
W 67-65
+9.5
14
vs
SBU
W 68-64
+5.5
19
@
VCU
L 72-79
+7.5
24
vs
DAY
W 81-74
+13.5
27
@
LUC
W 85-64
+19.5
31
@
LAS
W 67-58
+6.5
4
vs
GW
W 76-73
+4.5
7
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
10
vs
FOR
L 64-68
−7.5
18
@
SBU
W 71-65
+11.5
21
vs
LUC
W 75-61
+4.5
25
vs
GMU
W 81-63
+19.5
28
@
URI
W 61-55
+8.5
4
@
DAV
W 70-67
+4.5
7
vs
LAS
W 88-76
+0.5
13
vs
DAV
W 70-58
+9.5
14
vs
VCU
L 64-77
−6.5
18
@
CSU
W 69-64
+10.5
22
@
CAL
W 76-75
+6.5
24
@
UNM
L 69-84
−4.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LAF
W 85-76
+22.5
8
vs
DREX
W 76-65
+1.5
12
@
VT
L 59-94
−5.5
17
@
PENN
L 74-83
−6.5
20
@
UNLV
L 85-99
+22.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 60-58
−28.5
6
vs
TEM
W 70-69
−8.5
9
vs
COPP
W 87-65
+5.5
11
@
SYR
L 63-71
−12.5
18
vs
DSU
W 67-51
−19.5
22
vs
CCU
L 62-68
−14.5
31
@
SLU
L 79-102
+19.5
3
vs
DAV
L 56-62
−21.5
7
vs
DUQ
W 97-90
+37.5
11
@
RICH
W 67-65
−18.5
14
vs
SBU
W 68-64
−15.5
19
@
VCU
L 72-79
−0.5
24
vs
DAY
W 81-74
+15.5
27
@
LUC
W 85-64
+5.5
31
@
LAS
W 67-58
−17.5
4
vs
GW
W 76-73
−6.5
7
@
GMU
L 52-60
−27.5
10
vs
FOR
L 64-68
−3.5
18
@
SBU
W 71-65
−11.5
21
vs
LUC
W 75-61
−6.5
25
vs
GMU
W 81-63
+7.5
28
@
URI
W 61-55
−25.5
4
@
DAV
W 70-67
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 88-76
+21.5
13
vs
DAV
W 70-58
−5.5
14
vs
VCU
L 64-77
−4.5
18
@
CSU
W 69-64
−11.5
22
@
CAL
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
UNM
L 69-84
−2.5
over 11under 23avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Saint Joseph's has the better starters
Position by position: Lafayette 1, Saint Joseph's 3, even 1
LafayetteBetterSaint Joseph's
G P. D'Arcy TR1.1 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Glover-Toscano15.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 80
F S. Jackson10.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 67
←LAFSmall
G A. Williford7.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 46
F K. Murdock2.7 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 16
→JOESBig
G L. Carey TR9.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 60
F L. Bevilacqua2.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 13
→JOESBig
G K. Myers4.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 59
C M. Bednostin1.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 8
→JOESBig
F S. Logan TR3.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 58
LafayetteBetterSaint Joseph's
LAF offense331st of 366 · -10.8
→JOESBig
JOES defense91st of 366 · -0.3
LAF defense245th of 366 · -6.5
→JOESSmall
JOES offense134th of 366 · -3.9
Backcourt-0.7 · 1 player
→JOESSmall
Backcourt+0.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.4 · 4 players
→JOESSmall
Frontcourt+0.0 · 1 player
Bench-1.4 · 4 players
→JOESSmall
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestLAF betterJOES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
P. D'Arcy7 min · TRF. Fayemi6 minA. Wallace4 minB. CurrieNewC. KeslerNewS. HentonNew
Forwards
S. Jackson22 minK. Murdock10 minL. Bevilacqua9 minM. Rasul4 minL. Azzinaro2 minJ. GillNew
Centers
M. Bednostin10 min
Guards
J. Glover-Toscano32 minA. Williford26 minL. Carey26 min · TRK. Myers15 minM. Johnson4 minB. Rayer1 min
Forwards
S. Logan16 min · TRW. Lange1 minG. MarrsNewL. NonfonNewD. FlamerNewK. SaccoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.1 #297 | Points per game | 71.9 #245 |
| 1.03 #289 | Points per possession | 1.05 #244 |
| 67.2 #274 | Pace (possessions) | 68.4 #208 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #278 | Effective FG% | 49.2 #284 |
| 32.1 #273 | 3-point % | 30.8 #325 |
| 39.8 #173 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.1 #65 |
| 32.5 #249 | Free throw rate | 29.7 #318 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #89 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #187 |
| 25.8 #326 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.4 #147 |
| 13.6 #175 | Assists per game | 15.1 #84 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.4 #200 | Points allowed | 70.6 #68 |
| 1.12 #275 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #59 |
| 53.6 #286 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.6 #34 |
| 36.0 #298 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.7 #51 |
| 15.1 #273 | Turnovers forced | 15.0 #286 |
| 71.4 #88 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #185 |
| 5.3 #316 | Steals per game | 5.5 #290 |
| 2.3 #324 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #30 |
Lafayette
10-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Holy Cross77–82
- Wvs Army83–77
- W@ Colgate70–69
- Lvs American61–75
- W@ Holy Cross86–83
A week or more of rest.
Saint Joseph's
22-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico69–84
- W@ California76–75
- W@ Colorado St69–64
- Lvs VCU64–77
- Wvs Davidson70–58
A week or more of rest.