Knapp Center · at Drake
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DRKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DRKE 83–70 · win probability DRKE 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DRKE has more of the edges
SDAK 1, DRKE 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
DRKE offense vs SDAK defense
Offense 168th of 366 against a defense 355th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SDAK has played the 305th-hardest schedule, DRKE the 147th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: SDAK 45.2, DRKE 33.5. Allowed: SDAK 31.0, DRKE 32.0
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: SDAK plays 72.6 a game (23rd fastest), DRKE 68.4 (209th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: SDAK 49.9 and allows 54.5; DRKE 51.4 and allows 52.6
SDAK offense vs DRKE defense
Offense 197th of 366 against a defense 132nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
DRKE at home. This season: DRKE 0-0 at home, SDAK 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SDAK 26%, DRKE 51%. Transfers in: SDAK 6, DRKE 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SDAK 28.7%, DRKE 26.6%. Defensive: SDAK 69.7%, DRKE 70.1%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SDAK 16.5%, DRKE 15.0%. Forced: SDAK 15.9%, DRKE 14.6%
Even
Three-pointers
SDAK hits 32.4% and allows 34.5%; DRKE hits 34.0% and allows 36.4%. Threes are 35.9% and 45.7% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DRKE -12.1 | — |
| Total | — | 153.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | SDAK 70.4 · DRKE 82.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DRKE -7.1 | — |
| 1H total | 71.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | SDAK 32.2 · DRKE 39.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SDAK 0–1 DRKEDRKE leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SDAK 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2021-22 | SDAK 50 @ DRKE 99 | DRKE -17 | DRKE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
South Dakota
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 79-81 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 76-92 | +29.5 | W +13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 89-74 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 83-78 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 172.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 68-102 | +24.5 | L −9.5 | 171.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 82-81 | -15.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-63 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 71-77 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 87-89 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-106 | +14.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 97-85 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 76-106 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 61-84 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 86-99 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 99-83 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-96 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-90 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 77-69 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-89 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 82-75 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 68-67 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 71-72 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-90 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-67 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-72 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 62-76 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UTU
L 79-81
−3.5
5
@
CREI
L 76-92
+13.5
12
vs
USI
W 89-74
+7.5
16
vs
WMU
W 83-78
+1.5
20
@
MIZ
L 68-102
−9.5
23
vs
SCST
W 82-81
−14.5
29
vs
AF
W 80-63
+13.5
3
vs
PRST
L 71-77
−3.5
6
@
UNCO
L 87-89
+6.5
9
@
WYO
L 79-106
−12.5
13
vs
PV
W 97-85
+5.5
20
@
KSU
L 76-106
−8.5
31
@
NDSU
L 61-84
−11.5
7
@
STMN
L 86-99
+1.5
10
vs
DEN
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
KC
W 99-83
+8.5
17
@
UND
L 80-96
−14.5
21
@
OMA
W 68-64
+10.5
24
vs
STMN
L 78-90
−1.5
29
vs
ORU
W 77-69
+4.5
31
vs
NDSU
L 84-89
+3.5
4
@
KC
W 82-75
+4.5
7
@
SDST
W 68-67
+12.5
11
vs
UND
L 71-72
−3.5
19
@
DEN
L 70-90
−14.5
21
@
ORU
L 62-67
−3.5
25
vs
OMA
W 89-72
+15.5
28
vs
SDST
W 75-70
+8.5
6
vs
OMA
L 62-76
−12.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UTU
L 79-81
−4.5
5
@
CREI
L 76-92
−1.5
12
vs
USI
W 89-74
−1.5
16
vs
WMU
W 83-78
−11.5
20
@
MIZ
L 68-102
−1.5
23
vs
SCST
W 82-81
+2.5
29
vs
AF
W 80-63
−4.5
3
vs
PRST
L 71-77
−10.5
6
@
UNCO
L 87-89
+13.5
9
@
WYO
L 79-106
+23.5
13
vs
PV
W 97-85
+13.5
20
@
KSU
L 76-106
+5.5
31
@
NDSU
L 61-84
−19.5
7
@
STMN
L 86-99
+22.5
10
vs
DEN
W 82-72
−15.5
15
vs
KC
W 99-83
+25.5
17
@
UND
L 80-96
+15.5
21
@
OMA
W 68-64
−28.5
24
vs
STMN
L 78-90
+6.5
29
vs
ORU
W 77-69
−8.5
31
vs
NDSU
L 84-89
+18.5
4
@
KC
W 82-75
+0.5
7
@
SDST
W 68-67
−24.5
11
vs
UND
L 71-72
−13.5
19
@
DEN
L 70-90
−3.5
21
@
ORU
L 62-67
−22.5
25
vs
OMA
W 89-72
+8.5
28
vs
SDST
W 75-70
−6.5
6
vs
OMA
L 62-76
−12.5
over 12under 17avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Drake
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 79-81 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-61 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 71-62 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 62-71 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-74 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 108-57 | -17.5 | W +33.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 94-99 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-81 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 66-65 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 56-73 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-72 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 66-93 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 76-73 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 101-90 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-62 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-87 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 90-103 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 76-86 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 76-81 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 62-86 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-74 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 53-75 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 67-63 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 100-79 | +12.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
−2.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
−9.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−9.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
+16.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
+2.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+14.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+33.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
−10.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−1.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
+3.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−12.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−4.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
−20.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+2.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+8.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+15.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
+17.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
−4.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
−11.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
−3.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+0.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
−8.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
−8.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
−15.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−3.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−0.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−17.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
+9.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+33.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
+3.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
+8.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−22.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
−20.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
−18.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+20.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+26.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−5.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
+47.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−3.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
−10.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−16.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−3.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
+14.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+5.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+4.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
+1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+34.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
−13.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
+16.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
+9.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
+38.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+17.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
+12.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
+3.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
+9.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−22.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−1.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−9.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
−10.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+26.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−21.5
over 18under 14avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Drake has the better starters
Position by position: South Dakota 0, Drake 2, even 3
South DakotaBetterDrake
G J. Summers TR9.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 22
=Even
G A. Alia6.8 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
G M. Sanchez TR9.7 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 34
=Even
G O. Larson10 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 42
G V. Buzelis7.1 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
→DRKESmall
G E. Shetlar9 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
G K. Kublickas TR5.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 19
=Even
F G. Oldham TR5.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
F E. Kizer4 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 5
→DRKEBig
F J. Carroll TR10.7 pts · 8.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
South DakotaBetterDrake
SDAK offense197th of 366 · -6.1
→DRKESmall
DRKE defense132nd of 366 · -2.5
SDAK defense355th of 366 · -10.1
→DRKEBig
DRKE offense168th of 366 · -5.1
Backcourt-7.3 · 4 players
→DRKEBig
Backcourt-3.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
→DRKESmall
Frontcourt-0.5 · 2 players
Bench-1.8 · 4 players
→DRKESmall
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestSDAK betterDRKE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Summers27 min · TRM. Sanchez25 min · TRV. Buzelis24 minK. Kublickas20 min · TRC. Kelderman4 min · TRE. WarrenNew
Forwards
E. Kizer15 minJ. Brack14 minJ. Townley-Thomas5 min · TRT. NetolickyNewB. DomschNew
Centers
S. van Bussel5 min · TR
Guards
A. Alia32 minO. Larson29 minE. Shetlar28 minD. Kindell17 min · TRD. IjadimbolaNewL. RushNew
Forwards
G. Oldham26 min · TRJ. Carroll25 min · TRG. Goodbary13 minJ. BurnsNewM. FlemonsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.0 #94 | Points per game | 73.9 #200 |
| 1.07 #207 | Points per possession | 1.08 #182 |
| 72.6 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 68.4 #209 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.9 #239 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #179 |
| 32.4 #264 | 3-point % | 34.0 #172 |
| 35.9 #251 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #53 |
| 45.2 #4 | Free throw rate | 33.5 #223 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.5 #168 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #64 |
| 28.7 #242 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.6 #310 |
| 11.9 #295 | Assists per game | 13.1 #202 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.7 #337 | Points allowed | 76.3 #225 |
| 1.13 #284 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #261 |
| 54.5 #318 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #246 |
| 34.5 #219 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.4 #323 |
| 15.9 #225 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #315 |
| 69.7 #172 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #155 |
| 6.1 #223 | Steals per game | 5.2 #319 |
| 2.6 #293 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #241 |
South Dakota
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Omaha62–76
- Wvs S Dakota St75–70
- Wvs Omaha89–72
- L@ Oral Roberts62–67
- L@ Denver70–90
A week or more of rest.
Drake
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UIC51–72
- Wvs Belmont100–79
- Wvs S Illinois67–63
- Lvs Northern Iowa53–75
- L@ Valparaiso71–74
A week or more of rest.