Great Southern Bank Arena · at Missouri St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MOST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DRKE 75–71 · win probability DRKE 62%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DRKE has more of the edges
DRKE 3, MOST 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MOST offense vs DRKE defense
Offense 275th of 366 against a defense 132nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MOST at home. This season: MOST 0-0 at home, DRKE 0-0 away
DRKE offense vs MOST defense
Offense 168th of 366 against a defense 219th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DRKE 51%, MOST 25%. Transfers in: DRKE 3, MOST 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DRKE 26.6%, MOST 32.0%. Defensive: DRKE 70.1%, MOST 68.0%
Context
Schedule so far
DRKE has played the 147th-hardest schedule, MOST the 180th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DRKE plays 68.4 a game (209th fastest), MOST 67.4 (261st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
DRKE hits 34.0% and allows 36.4%; MOST hits 33.0% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 45.7% and 41.3% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DRKE 15.0%, MOST 16.7%. Forced: DRKE 14.6%, MOST 16.9%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: DRKE 51.4 and allows 52.6; MOST 51.1 and allows 52.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DRKE 33.5, MOST 43.8. Allowed: DRKE 32.0, MOST 40.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DRKE -3.5 | — |
| Total | — | 146.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | DRKE 74.8 · MOST 71.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DRKE -2.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | DRKE 35.3 · MOST 33.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
DRKE 4–5 MOSTMOST leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · DRKE has won the last 2 meetings · DRKE 2-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2024-25 | MOST 60 @ DRKE 68 | DRKE -14.5 | MOST W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | DRKE 69 @ MOST 62 | MOST +8.5 | MOST W |
| Jan 24, 2023-24 | DRKE 80 @ MOST 83 | MOST +6.5 | MOST W |
| Dec 2, 2023-24 | MOST 57 @ DRKE 74 | DRKE -7.5 | DRKE W |
| Jan 18, 2022-23 | MOST 65 @ DRKE 62 | DRKE -6.5 | MOST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Drake
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 79-81 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-61 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 71-62 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 62-71 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-74 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 108-57 | -17.5 | W +33.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 94-99 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-81 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 66-65 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 56-73 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-72 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 66-93 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 76-73 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 101-90 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-62 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-87 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 90-103 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 76-86 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 76-81 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 62-86 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-74 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 53-75 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 67-63 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 100-79 | +12.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
−2.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
−9.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−9.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
+16.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
+2.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+14.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+33.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
−10.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−1.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
+3.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−12.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−4.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
−20.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+2.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+8.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+15.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
+17.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
−4.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
−11.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
−3.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+0.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
−8.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
−8.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
−15.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−3.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−0.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−17.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
+9.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+33.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
+3.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
+8.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−22.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
−20.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
−18.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+20.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+26.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−5.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
+47.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−3.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
−10.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−16.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−3.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
+14.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+5.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+4.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
+1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+34.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
−13.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
+16.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
+9.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
+38.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+17.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
+12.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
+3.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
+9.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−22.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−1.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−9.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
−10.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+26.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−21.5
over 18under 14avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Missouri St
31 games played
Straight up
13-18
42% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 85-86 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 49-67 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-67 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-75 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 74-98 | +7.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 57-75 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 63-62 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 61-43 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 79-55 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 89-82 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 80-90 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-71 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-87 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-90 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 84-75 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 62-57 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-67 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 78-79 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-91 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-72 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 81-86 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 87-74 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-75 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-69 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
−2.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−14.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
+3.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−18.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
−16.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
+0.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−3.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
+1.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
+16.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+20.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+5.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
−3.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
+5.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
−8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+2.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+15.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
+3.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+2.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+6.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
−4.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
−18.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
−5.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
+0.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+0.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+1.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+14.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−14.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
+1.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+12.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
+18.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−27.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
−8.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−9.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
+29.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
−19.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−21.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
−10.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
−27.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+2.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+36.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
+17.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
−3.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
+10.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+39.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+14.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
−20.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
+2.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+5.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+14.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
+20.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
+7.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
+25.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
−17.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+3.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+14.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+8.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−7.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
−5.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+3.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
+0.5
over 19under 12avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Drake has the better starters
Position by position: Drake 1, Missouri St 0, even 4
DrakeBetterMissouri St
G A. Alia6.8 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
=Even
G T. Williams9.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 34
G O. Larson10 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 42
=Even
G M. Cunningham3.1 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
G E. Shetlar9 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
←DRKEBig
F C. Boone1.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 19
F G. Oldham TR5.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
=No call
F M. Gray NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F J. Carroll TR10.7 pts · 8.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
=No call
F C. Thompson NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
DrakeBetterMissouri St
DRKE offense168th of 366 · -5.1
=Even
MOST defense219th of 366 · -5.7
DRKE defense132nd of 366 · -2.5
←DRKEBig
MOST offense275th of 366 · -8.4
Backcourt-3.7 · 3 players
→MOSTSmall
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestDRKE betterMOST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Alia32 minO. Larson29 minE. Shetlar28 minD. Kindell17 min · TRD. IjadimbolaNewL. RushNew
Forwards
G. Oldham26 min · TRJ. Carroll25 min · TRG. Goodbary13 minJ. BurnsNewM. FlemonsNew
Guards
T. Williams31 minM. Cunningham12 minK. StubblefieldNewJ. BlairNewD. RoweNew
Forwards
C. Boone8 minM. GrayNewC. ThompsonNewN. RueyNewL. RolleNewI. MedinaNew
Centers
A. AcimovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #200 | Points per game | 73.1 #223 |
| 1.08 #182 | Points per possession | 1.09 #169 |
| 68.4 #209 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #261 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #179 | Effective FG% | 51.1 #191 |
| 34.0 #172 | 3-point % | 33.0 #236 |
| 45.7 #53 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.3 #144 |
| 33.5 #223 | Free throw rate | 43.8 #12 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #64 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #180 |
| 26.6 #310 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.0 #124 |
| 13.1 #202 | Assists per game | 13.9 #155 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.3 #225 | Points allowed | 74.3 #166 |
| 1.12 #261 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #222 |
| 52.6 #246 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #217 |
| 36.4 #323 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #209 |
| 14.6 #315 | Turnovers forced | 16.9 #158 |
| 70.1 #155 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #261 |
| 5.2 #319 | Steals per game | 6.7 #152 |
| 2.9 #241 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #215 |
Drake
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UIC51–72
- Wvs Belmont100–79
- Wvs S Illinois67–63
- Lvs Northern Iowa53–75
- L@ Valparaiso71–74
A week or more of rest.
Missouri St
13-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech66–69
- Wvs Liberty77–69
- Wvs FIU75–72
- Lvs MTSU63–75
- Wvs Western KY87–74
A week or more of rest.