Rupp Arena · at Kentucky
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UK 88–59 · win probability UK 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UK has more of the edges
APP 1, UK 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
APP offense vs UK defense
Offense 328th of 366 against a defense 32nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
APP has played the 252nd-hardest schedule, UK the 5th. A record against a soft schedule means less
UK offense vs APP defense
Offense 13th of 366 against a defense 148th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: APP plays 64.3 a game (358th fastest), UK 69.9 (123rd). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
APP hits 30.4% and allows 32.2%; UK hits 34.2% and allows 31.8%. Threes are 45.9% and 39.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: APP 39.1, UK 37.4. Allowed: APP 31.2, UK 36.4
Shooting
Effective FG%: APP 49.9 and allows 47.5; UK 53.4 and allows 48.9
Home court
UK at home. This season: UK 0-0 at home, APP 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: APP 15.3%, UK 15.4%. Forced: APP 14.0%, UK 15.5%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: APP 32.0%, UK 33.2%. Defensive: APP 71.0%, UK 70.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: APP 25%, UK 26%. Transfers in: APP 2, UK 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UK -29.5 | — |
| Total | — | 146.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | APP 58.7 · UK 88.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UK -17.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | APP 25.6 · UK 43 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
App State
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-18
40% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-82 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 76-54 | -10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 53-75 | +23.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 85-77 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 65-63 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 53-88 | -5.5 | L −40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 67-75 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 55-67 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 67-54 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 130.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 86-78 | +12.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 67-49 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 137.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 63-70 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 81-73 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 81-88 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 52-50 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 62-67 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 80-65 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 73-75 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 72-58 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 124.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 59-43 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 70-63 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 66-44 | +7.5 | W +29.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 65-57 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-60 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 58-69 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 93-94 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-74 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 57-60 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 73-86 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CMU
L 66-82
−14.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 76-54
+11.5
11
@
OSU
L 53-75
+1.5
16
@
DART
W 85-77
+6.5
21
vs
CLT
W 65-63
+0.5
24
vs
ELON
L 53-88
−40.5
26
@
MER
L 67-75
−1.5
30
vs
UNCA
L 55-67
−10.5
11
@
ECU
W 67-54
+17.5
14
vs
HPU
W 86-78
+20.5
18
vs
CCU
W 67-49
+13.5
20
vs
GAST
L 63-70
−14.5
31
@
ODU
W 81-73
+9.5
3
@
MRSH
L 81-88
+0.5
8
@
GAST
W 52-50
+0.5
10
@
CCU
L 62-67
−6.5
15
vs
JMU
W 80-65
+12.5
17
vs
ODU
L 73-75
−9.5
22
vs
UL
W 72-58
+4.5
23
vs
ULM
W 59-43
−0.5
29
@
USM
W 70-63
+5.5
31
@
TROY
W 66-44
+29.5
4
vs
USA
W 65-57
+2.5
7
vs
EMU
W 65-60
−2.5
11
@
GASO
W 81-65
+14.5
14
@
JMU
L 58-69
−12.5
19
vs
MRSH
L 93-94
−4.5
21
vs
GASO
W 89-74
+7.5
27
@
TXST
L 57-60
−4.5
7
vs
USM
L 73-86
−17.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CMU
L 66-82
+5.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 76-54
−6.5
11
@
OSU
L 53-75
−19.5
16
@
DART
W 85-77
+21.5
21
vs
CLT
W 65-63
−4.5
24
vs
ELON
L 53-88
−2.5
26
@
MER
L 67-75
−0.5
30
vs
UNCA
L 55-67
−15.5
11
@
ECU
W 67-54
−9.5
14
vs
HPU
W 86-78
+19.5
18
vs
CCU
W 67-49
−21.5
20
vs
GAST
L 63-70
−4.5
31
@
ODU
W 81-73
+17.5
3
@
MRSH
L 81-88
+27.5
8
@
GAST
W 52-50
−38.5
10
@
CCU
L 62-67
−4.5
15
vs
JMU
W 80-65
+11.5
17
vs
ODU
L 73-75
+7.5
22
vs
UL
W 72-58
+5.5
23
vs
ULM
W 59-43
−42.5
29
@
USM
W 70-63
−1.5
31
@
TROY
W 66-44
−27.5
4
vs
USA
W 65-57
−9.5
7
vs
EMU
W 65-60
−6.5
11
@
GASO
W 81-65
+2.5
14
@
JMU
L 58-69
−7.5
19
vs
MRSH
L 93-94
+43.5
21
vs
GASO
W 89-74
+15.5
27
@
TXST
L 57-60
−18.5
7
vs
USM
L 73-86
+21.5
over 12under 18avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kentucky
36 games played
Straight up
22-14
61% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-18
50% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-51 | -31.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 107-59 | -32.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 88-96 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 173.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 99-53 | -35.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 66-83 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-46 | -35.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 104-54 | -37.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 64-67 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 59-94 | +5.5 | L −29.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 103-67 | -42.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 72-60 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 78-66 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 99-85 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-89 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 173.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-73 | -12.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-68 | -10.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 75-74 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-78 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 85-80 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 55-80 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 85-77 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 94-78 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 74-71 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 83-92 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 78-86 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-75 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 72-63 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-77 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 85-96 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-84 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 87-82 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-72 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 63-71 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 89-84 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 63-82 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NICH
W 77-51
−5.5
7
vs
VAL
W 107-59
+15.5
11
@
LOU
L 88-96
−2.5
14
vs
EIU
W 99-53
+10.5
18
vs
MSU
L 66-83
−20.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 88-46
+6.5
26
vs
TNTC
W 104-54
+12.5
2
vs
UNC
L 64-67
−10.5
5
vs
GONZ
L 59-94
−29.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 103-67
−6.5
13
vs
IU
W 72-60
+8.5
20
vs
SJU
W 78-66
+10.5
23
vs
BELL
W 99-85
−20.5
3
@
ALA
L 74-89
−9.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 68-73
−17.5
10
vs
MSST
W 92-68
+13.5
14
@
LSU
W 75-74
−2.5
17
@
TENN
W 80-78
+8.5
21
vs
TEX
W 85-80
−2.5
24
vs
MISS
W 72-63
−2.5
27
@
VAN
L 55-80
−19.5
31
@
ARK
W 85-77
+14.5
4
vs
OU
W 94-78
+7.5
7
vs
TENN
W 74-71
+1.5
14
@
FLA
L 83-92
+3.5
17
vs
UGA
L 78-86
−14.5
21
@
AUB
L 74-75
+2.5
24
@
SC
W 72-63
+1.5
28
vs
VAN
W 91-77
+12.5
3
@
TA&M
L 85-96
−9.5
7
vs
FLA
L 77-84
−1.5
11
vs
LSU
W 87-82
−3.5
12
vs
MIZ
W 78-72
+3.5
13
vs
FLA
L 63-71
+2.5
20
vs
SCU
W 89-84
+1.5
22
vs
ISU
L 63-82
−13.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NICH
W 77-51
−29.5
7
vs
VAL
W 107-59
+8.5
11
@
LOU
L 88-96
+10.5
14
vs
EIU
W 99-53
+4.5
18
vs
MSU
L 66-83
−3.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 88-46
−25.5
26
vs
TNTC
W 104-54
+0.5
2
vs
UNC
L 64-67
−32.5
5
vs
GONZ
L 59-94
−6.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 103-67
+21.5
13
vs
IU
W 72-60
−24.5
20
vs
SJU
W 78-66
−10.5
23
vs
BELL
W 99-85
+31.5
3
@
ALA
L 74-89
−10.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 68-73
−9.5
10
vs
MSST
W 92-68
+7.5
14
@
LSU
W 75-74
−2.5
17
@
TENN
W 80-78
+12.5
21
vs
TEX
W 85-80
+12.5
24
vs
MISS
W 72-63
−10.5
27
@
VAN
L 55-80
−20.5
31
@
ARK
W 85-77
+2.5
4
vs
OU
W 94-78
+19.5
7
vs
TENN
W 74-71
−2.5
14
@
FLA
L 83-92
+20.5
17
vs
UGA
L 78-86
+2.5
21
@
AUB
L 74-75
−4.5
24
@
SC
W 72-63
−16.5
28
vs
VAN
W 91-77
+10.5
3
@
TA&M
L 85-96
+18.5
7
vs
FLA
L 77-84
−1.5
11
vs
LSU
W 87-82
+17.5
12
vs
MIZ
W 78-72
+1.5
13
vs
FLA
L 63-71
−27.5
20
vs
SCU
W 89-84
+15.5
22
vs
ISU
L 63-82
−1.5
over 18under 18avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kentucky has the better starters
Position by position: App State 0, Kentucky 4, even 1
App StateBetterKentucky
G H. Koffi TR12.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 30
→UKBig
G A. Wilkins TR18.2 pts · 2 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 81
G E. Banks6.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 15
→UKBig
G Z. Diallo TR15.7 pts · 3.9 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 96
F C. Moodie2.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 15
→UKSmall
G J. Morton TR7.8 pts · 1.8 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 48
F A. Njock2.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 37
→UKBig
F M. Momcilovic TR16.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 97
C R. Elezaj TR0 pts · 0.8 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. McBride TR15.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 87
App StateBetterKentucky
APP offense328th of 366 · -10.6
→UKBig
UK defense32nd of 366 · +3.5
APP defense148th of 366 · -3.2
→UKBig
UK offense13th of 366 · +9.5
Backcourt-5.2 · 2 players
→UKBig
Backcourt+4.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 3 players
→UKBig
Frontcourt+8.1 · 2 players
Bench+0.0 · 1 player
→UKBig
Bench+5.1 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestAPP betterUK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
H. Koffi36 min · TRE. Banks26 minC. O'Kelley1 minL. LedfordNewB. KopetzkiNewJ. ColonNew
Forwards
C. Moodie12 minA. Njock11 minD. LytchNewG. ClaytonNewT. NealNew
Centers
R. Elezaj1 min · TRB. ChretienNew
Guards
A. Wilkins30 min · TRZ. Diallo30 min · TRJ. Morton25 min · TRK. Williams19 minM. WilliamsNewZ. HawthorneNew
Forwards
M. Momcilovic30 min · TRJ. McBride27 min · TRT. Noah11 minR. PotterNewO. N'DiayeNewB. HawthorneNew
Centers
F. Kepnang23 min · TRM. Moreno23 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.3 #295 | Points per game | 80.5 #55 |
| 1.08 #187 | Points per possession | 1.15 #57 |
| 64.3 #358 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #123 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.9 #240 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #87 |
| 30.4 #335 | 3-point % | 34.2 #158 |
| 45.9 #48 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.7 #180 |
| 39.1 #77 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #119 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #87 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #98 |
| 32.0 #123 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.2 #84 |
| 11.4 #318 | Assists per game | 15.9 #50 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.4 #25 | Points allowed | 74.3 #167 |
| 1.05 #87 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #115 |
| 47.5 #33 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.9 #63 |
| 32.2 #71 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.8 #55 |
| 14.0 #336 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #248 |
| 71.0 #106 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #158 |
| 4.6 #351 | Steals per game | 7.0 #123 |
| 3.4 #155 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #33 |
App State
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss73–86
- L@ Texas St57–60
- Wvs GA Southern89–74
- Lvs Marshall93–94
- L@ James Madison58–69
A week or more of rest.
Kentucky
22-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa State63–82
- Wvs Santa Clara89–84
- Lvs Florida63–71
- Wvs Missouri78–72
- Wvs LSU87–82
A week or more of rest.