Ford Center · at Evansville
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | EVAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WKU 77–72 · win probability WKU 67%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WKU has more of the edges
WKU 6, EVAN 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WKU 14.5%, EVAN 19.1%. Forced: WKU 17.2%, EVAN 15.4%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WKU 31.8%, EVAN 22.0%. Defensive: WKU 70.5%, EVAN 69.8%
EVAN offense vs WKU defense
Offense 277th of 366 against a defense 169th, on the model’s ratings
WKU offense vs EVAN defense
Offense 115th of 366 against a defense 220th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
WKU hits 33.4% and allows 34.3%; EVAN hits 32.3% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 39.5% and 43.1% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: WKU plays 71.5 a game (52nd fastest), EVAN 67.9 (232nd). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: WKU 47.5 and allows 51.2; EVAN 49.3 and allows 55.1
Home court
EVAN at home. This season: EVAN 0-0 at home, WKU 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
WKU has played the 160th-hardest schedule, EVAN the 127th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WKU 44%, EVAN 35%. Transfers in: WKU 4, EVAN 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: WKU 41.2, EVAN 29.8. Allowed: WKU 46.8, EVAN 31.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WKU -5.2 | — |
| Total | — | 149.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | WKU 77.3 · EVAN 72.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WKU -3.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | WKU 36.5 · EVAN 33.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WKU 2–0 EVANWKU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · WKU has won the last 2 meetings · WKU 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | EVAN 79 @ WKU 80 | WKU -11.5 | EVAN W |
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | WKU 79 @ EVAN 65 | EVAN +6.5 | WKU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Western KY
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-70 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 87-79 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 95-82 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 78-83 | +18.5 | W +13.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 91-97 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-79 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 61-77 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 81-82 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 102-91 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-61 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 64-80 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 68-56 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 65-81 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-76 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-73 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-72 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-60 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 66-71 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 88-87 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-73 | +7.5 | W +28.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 93-70 | -4.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 97-65 | -9.5 | W +22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-87 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 67-92 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 87-96 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−2.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+6.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+0.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
+13.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+1.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
+9.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
−10.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−14.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+1.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
−13.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+5.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−4.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−13.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
+8.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+8.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−23.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−5.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−9.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
+1.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
+11.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−9.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
+5.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
−1.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
−3.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+28.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+18.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+22.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
−14.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−26.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−1.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+3.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+9.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
−7.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+20.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
−10.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
+11.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−21.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+4.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
+2.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+24.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−18.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−10.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
−20.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+10.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−19.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−3.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−25.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
−19.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
−15.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−3.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
−9.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
+16.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
+35.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+19.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+11.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+16.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
+8.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−1.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
+23.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Evansville
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −3.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 51-82 | +33.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 72-77 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 76-84 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-69 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-97 | +11.5 | L −26.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 59-78 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 64-52 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 79-80 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 58-82 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 78-83 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 65-66 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 68-76 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 47-73 | +12.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 48-62 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 69-79 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 72-69 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 90-94 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 49-76 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 78-82 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-71 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 128.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 63-84 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 63-70 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 88-80 | +10.5 | W +18.5 | 137.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 60-86 | +12.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 46-84 | +8.5 | L −29.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-88 | +15.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 64-98 | +18.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 80-79 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 67-81 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 59-68 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
PUR
L 51-82
+2.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 72-77
−7.5
18
vs
UTA
L 76-84
−10.5
21
vs
ORST
W 73-69
+10.5
23
vs
AKR
L 59-97
−26.5
24
vs
COFC
L 59-78
−14.5
3
vs
BALL
W 64-52
+5.5
6
@
WKU
L 79-80
+10.5
13
@
ND
L 58-82
−9.5
16
vs
BEL
L 78-83
+3.5
21
vs
DRKE
L 65-66
−3.5
29
@
BRAD
L 68-76
+3.5
1
@
ILST
L 47-73
−13.5
4
vs
UNI
L 48-62
−9.5
7
vs
MUR
L 69-79
−1.5
10
@
INST
W 72-69
+10.5
13
vs
BRAD
L 90-94
+3.5
20
@
UIC
L 49-76
−18.5
28
@
DRKE
L 78-82
+4.5
31
@
UNI
L 55-71
−4.5
3
vs
INST
L 63-84
−19.5
6
@
VAL
L 63-70
+1.5
9
vs
ILST
W 88-80
+18.5
12
@
SIU
L 60-86
−13.5
18
vs
UIC
L 46-84
−29.5
21
@
MUR
L 75-88
+2.5
25
@
BEL
L 64-98
−15.5
28
vs
VAL
W 80-79
+6.5
1
vs
SIU
L 67-81
−4.5
5
vs
UNI
L 59-68
+4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
PUR
L 51-82
−17.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 72-77
+8.5
18
vs
UTA
L 76-84
+21.5
21
vs
ORST
W 73-69
+5.5
23
vs
AKR
L 59-97
−0.5
24
vs
COFC
L 59-78
−4.5
3
vs
BALL
W 64-52
−20.5
6
@
WKU
L 79-80
+11.5
13
@
ND
L 58-82
+3.5
16
vs
BEL
L 78-83
+13.5
21
vs
DRKE
L 65-66
−10.5
29
@
BRAD
L 68-76
−0.5
1
@
ILST
L 47-73
−24.5
4
vs
UNI
L 48-62
−21.5
7
vs
MUR
L 69-79
−5.5
10
@
INST
W 72-69
−4.5
13
vs
BRAD
L 90-94
+41.5
20
@
UIC
L 49-76
−14.5
28
@
DRKE
L 78-82
+16.5
31
@
UNI
L 55-71
−2.5
3
vs
INST
L 63-84
+1.5
6
@
VAL
L 63-70
−3.5
9
vs
ILST
W 88-80
+30.5
12
@
SIU
L 60-86
+3.5
18
vs
UIC
L 46-84
−10.5
21
@
MUR
L 75-88
+9.5
25
@
BEL
L 64-98
+9.5
28
vs
VAL
W 80-79
+21.5
1
vs
SIU
L 67-81
+8.5
5
vs
UNI
L 59-68
−0.5
over 15under 15avg +2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Western KY has the better starters
Position by position: Western KY 2, Evansville 1, even 2
Western KYBetterEvansville
G T. Moore19.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 99
←WKUBig
G B. Quinet8.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
G N. Norgaard TR7.8 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
=No call
G M. Langenfeld TR2.6 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
G A. Boone10.6 pts · 6.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 61
→EVANSmall
F A. Casey13.9 pts · 6 reb · 2 ast
Score 86
G L. Hackman8.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 64
=Even
F G. Winther TR7.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 51
F E. Erkins-Ford TR8.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
←WKUBig
F J. Dyson-Merwe2.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 8
Western KYBetterEvansville
WKU offense115th of 366 · -2.4
←WKUSmall
EVAN defense220th of 366 · -5.7
WKU defense169th of 366 · -3.9
←WKUSmall
EVAN offense277th of 366 · -8.5
Backcourt+3.0 · 4 players
←WKUBig
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.8 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt+0.8 · 3 players
Bench-3.8 · 3 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestWKU betterEVAN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Moore30 minN. Norgaard25 min · TRA. Boone25 minL. Hackman22 minS. Young19 min · TRK. Unseld11 min
Forwards
E. Erkins-Ford22 min · TRE. Walker16 min · TRM. KonareNewG. WeisNewJ. AdebayoNew
Guards
B. Quinet27 minM. Langenfeld7 min · TRM. RiekNewL. EllspermannNewA. GutmanNewR. MasumyanNew
Forwards
A. Casey30 minG. Winther22 min · TRJ. Dyson-Merwe13 minD. NejezchlebNewY. PinasNewJ. GenschawNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.9 #95 | Points per game | 65.8 #347 |
| 1.09 #163 | Points per possession | 0.97 #344 |
| 71.5 #52 | Pace (possessions) | 67.9 #232 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.5 #327 | Effective FG% | 49.3 #280 |
| 33.4 #205 | 3-point % | 32.3 #268 |
| 39.5 #184 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #109 |
| 41.2 #42 | Free throw rate | 29.8 #315 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.5 #42 | Turnover rate | 19.1 #324 |
| 31.8 #134 | Offensive rebound rate | 22.0 #355 |
| 12.9 #215 | Assists per game | 12.6 #245 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #241 | Points allowed | 78.3 #275 |
| 1.08 #155 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #329 |
| 51.2 #169 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.1 #332 |
| 34.3 #205 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #351 |
| 17.2 #134 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #258 |
| 70.5 #135 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #170 |
| 7.4 #90 | Steals per game | 5.0 #335 |
| 2.3 #327 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #171 |
Western KY
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St87–96
- L@ FIU67–92
- L@ Missouri St74–87
- Wvs UTEP97–65
- Wvs New Mexico St93–70
A week or more of rest.
Evansville
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 3-18 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Northern Iowa59–68
- Lvs S Illinois67–81
- Wvs Valparaiso80–79
- L@ Belmont64–98
- L@ Murray St75–88
A week or more of rest.