E.A. Diddle Arena · at Western KY
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WKU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WKU 78–78 · win probability WKU 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UAB has more of the edges
UAB 4, WKU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UAB 36.4, WKU 41.2. Allowed: UAB 28.6, WKU 46.8
UAB offense vs WKU defense
Offense 82nd of 366 against a defense 169th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UAB 10%, WKU 44%. Transfers in: UAB 6, WKU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UAB 32.5%, WKU 31.8%. Defensive: UAB 72.3%, WKU 70.5%
Home court
WKU at home. This season: WKU 0-0 at home, UAB 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: UAB 48.4 and allows 50.0; WKU 47.5 and allows 51.2
Context
Schedule so far
UAB has played the 129th-hardest schedule, WKU the 160th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
WKU offense vs UAB defense
Offense 115th of 366 against a defense 141st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
UAB hits 27.8% and allows 32.6%; WKU hits 33.4% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 30.5% and 39.5% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UAB 12.6%, WKU 14.5%. Forced: UAB 16.1%, WKU 17.2%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UAB plays 71.2 a game (61st fastest), WKU 71.5 (52nd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WKU -0.2 | — |
| Total | — | 155.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UAB 77.7 · WKU 77.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WKU -0.0 | — |
| 1H total | 72.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UAB 36.4 · WKU 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UAB 2–1 WKUUAB leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · UAB 1-1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022-23 | UAB 72 @ WKU 60 | WKU +6.5 | UAB W |
| Jan 11, 2022-23 | WKU 80 @ UAB 78 | UAB -10.5 | WKU W |
| Jan 27, 2021-22 | UAB 68 @ WKU 65 | WKU +3 | P |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UAB
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 106-55 | -34.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 70-94 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 74-77 | -19.5 | L −22.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 91-74 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 168.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-73 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 75-59 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 5 | @ | W 74-69 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 85-86 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 101-77 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 72-47 | -13.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 109-106 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 71-76 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-69 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 77-99 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 69-82 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 83-73 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 80-90 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 71-65 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 68-63 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 54-55 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-71 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 78-67 | +5.5 | W +16.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 58-62 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 80-74 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 90-83 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 78-83 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MVSU
W 106-55
+16.5
7
@
NCSU
L 70-94
−4.5
11
vs
ALST
L 74-77
−22.5
14
vs
HPU
W 91-74
+18.5
21
vs
USA
W 80-72
+0.5
24
vs
SIU
W 81-73
+5.5
25
vs
UTEP
W 75-59
+7.5
1
@
MTSU
L 61-76
−16.5
5
@
DRKE
W 74-69
+6.5
14
vs
TROY
L 85-86
−7.5
17
vs
CLE
W 101-77
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
W 72-47
+11.5
31
vs
WICH
L 70-75
−8.5
4
@
USF
W 109-106
+11.5
7
vs
FAU
L 71-76
−8.5
11
@
ECU
W 87-85
−5.5
14
@
TULN
W 82-69
+11.5
18
vs
TLSA
L 77-99
−23.5
22
vs
USF
L 69-82
−10.5
28
@
UTSA
W 83-73
−2.5
31
@
UNT
W 72-68
+5.5
5
vs
MEM
L 80-90
−11.5
8
vs
RICE
W 71-65
−2.5
11
@
TLSA
W 68-63
+15.5
15
vs
TULN
L 54-55
−7.5
18
@
TEM
W 76-71
+6.5
22
@
MEM
W 78-67
+16.5
1
vs
UNT
L 58-62
−8.5
4
@
CLT
W 80-74
+3.5
8
vs
ECU
W 90-83
−3.5
13
vs
CLT
L 78-83
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MVSU
W 106-55
+15.5
7
@
NCSU
L 70-94
+1.5
11
vs
ALST
L 74-77
−13.5
14
vs
HPU
W 91-74
−3.5
21
vs
USA
W 80-72
+2.5
24
vs
SIU
W 81-73
−7.5
25
vs
UTEP
W 75-59
−12.5
1
@
MTSU
L 61-76
−16.5
5
@
DRKE
W 74-69
−5.5
14
vs
TROY
L 85-86
+15.5
17
vs
CLE
W 101-77
+21.5
21
vs
UNCA
W 72-47
−32.5
31
vs
WICH
L 70-75
−4.5
4
@
USF
W 109-106
+51.5
7
vs
FAU
L 71-76
−15.5
11
@
ECU
W 87-85
+21.5
14
@
TULN
W 82-69
−2.5
18
vs
TLSA
L 77-99
+16.5
22
vs
USF
L 69-82
−17.5
28
@
UTSA
W 83-73
+0.5
31
@
UNT
W 72-68
−1.5
5
vs
MEM
L 80-90
+14.5
8
vs
RICE
W 71-65
−17.5
11
@
TLSA
W 68-63
−30.5
15
vs
TULN
L 54-55
−43.5
18
@
TEM
W 76-71
+3.5
22
@
MEM
W 78-67
−7.5
1
vs
UNT
L 58-62
−22.5
4
@
CLT
W 80-74
+7.5
8
vs
ECU
W 90-83
+21.5
13
vs
CLT
L 78-83
+13.5
over 14under 17avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Western KY
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-70 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 87-79 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 95-82 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 78-83 | +18.5 | W +13.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 91-97 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-79 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 61-77 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 81-82 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 102-91 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-61 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 64-80 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 68-56 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 65-81 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-76 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-73 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-72 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-60 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 66-71 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 88-87 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-73 | +7.5 | W +28.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 93-70 | -4.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 97-65 | -9.5 | W +22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-87 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 67-92 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 87-96 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−2.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+6.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+0.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
+13.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+1.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
+9.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
−10.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−14.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+1.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
−13.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+5.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−4.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−13.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
+8.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+8.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−23.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−5.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−9.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
+1.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
+11.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−9.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
+5.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
−1.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
−3.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+28.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+18.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+22.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
−14.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−26.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−1.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+3.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+9.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
−7.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+20.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
−10.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
+11.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−21.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+4.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
+2.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+24.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−18.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−10.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
−20.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+10.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−19.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−3.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−25.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
−19.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
−15.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−3.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
−9.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
+16.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
+35.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+19.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+11.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+16.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
+8.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−1.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
+23.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: UAB 2, Western KY 2, even 1
UABBetterWestern KY
G J. Fernandez TR16.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 56
→WKUBig
G T. Moore19.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 99
G J. Elyzee TR11.1 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 61
←UABBig
G N. Norgaard TR7.8 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
G D. Jones TR16.4 pts · 4 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 91
←UABSmall
G A. Boone10.6 pts · 6.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 61
G E. Duval TR15.6 pts · 4 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 74
=Even
G L. Hackman8.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 64
G T. Caldwell TR9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 56
→WKUSmall
F E. Erkins-Ford TR8.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
UABBetterWestern KY
UAB offense82nd of 366 · +0.4
←UABSmall
WKU defense169th of 366 · -3.9
UAB defense141st of 366 · -3.1
=Even
WKU offense115th of 366 · -2.4
Backcourt+2.8 · 5 players
=Even
Backcourt+3.0 · 4 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+0.8 · 1 player
Bench-1.4 · 2 players
←UABSmall
Bench-3.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestUAB betterWKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Fernandez37 min · TRJ. Elyzee30 min · TRD. Jones29 min · TRE. Duval27 min · TRT. Caldwell20 min · TRS. London20 min
Forwards
A. Alston8 min · TRA. Sandlin-ElNew
Centers
M. MboleNewK. DavisNew
Guards
T. Moore30 minN. Norgaard25 min · TRA. Boone25 minL. Hackman22 minS. Young19 min · TRK. Unseld11 min
Forwards
E. Erkins-Ford22 min · TRE. Walker16 min · TRM. KonareNewG. WeisNewJ. AdebayoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.2 #92 | Points per game | 77.9 #95 |
| 1.10 #141 | Points per possession | 1.09 #163 |
| 71.2 #61 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #52 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.4 #305 | Effective FG% | 47.5 #327 |
| 27.8 #364 | 3-point % | 33.4 #205 |
| 30.5 #350 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.5 #184 |
| 36.4 #141 | Free throw rate | 41.2 #42 |
| Possessions | ||
| 12.6 #2 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #42 |
| 32.5 #104 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.8 #134 |
| 14.2 #135 | Assists per game | 12.9 #215 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.3 #168 | Points allowed | 77.0 #241 |
| 1.04 #79 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #155 |
| 50.0 #98 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #169 |
| 32.6 #95 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #205 |
| 16.1 #217 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #134 |
| 72.3 #53 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #135 |
| 7.5 #74 | Steals per game | 7.4 #90 |
| 3.5 #139 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #327 |
UAB
19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Charlotte78–83
- Wvs East Carolina90–83
- W@ Charlotte80–74
- Lvs North Texas58–62
- W@ Memphis78–67
A week or more of rest.
Western KY
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St87–96
- L@ FIU67–92
- L@ Missouri St74–87
- Wvs UTEP97–65
- Wvs New Mexico St93–70
A week or more of rest.