Watsco Center · at Miami
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIA 92–55 · win probability MIA 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIA has more of the edges
RID 0, MIA 9 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
RID offense vs MIA defense
Offense 348th of 366 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
MIA offense vs RID defense
Offense 30th of 366 against a defense 315th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: RID 42.8 and allows 55.2; MIA 55.3 and allows 51.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: RID 32.6%, MIA 37.2%. Defensive: RID 67.2%, MIA 74.1%
Three-pointers
RID hits 27.6% and allows 38.0%; MIA hits 34.9% and allows 35.8%. Threes are 27.5% and 31.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
RID has played the 201st-hardest schedule, MIA the 75th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: RID 30.1, MIA 37.1. Allowed: RID 32.5, MIA 29.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: RID 16.9%, MIA 16.1%. Forced: RID 15.3%, MIA 18.3%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: RID 0%, MIA 52%. Transfers in: RID 6, MIA 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: RID plays 65.7 a game (323rd fastest), MIA 69.2 (170th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
MIA at home. This season: MIA 0-0 at home, RID 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MIA -37.4 | — |
| Total | — | 147.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | RID 54.8 · MIA 92.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MIA -22.1 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | RID 23.3 · MIA 45.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Rider
28 games played
Straight up
3-25
11% wins
Against the spread
9-19
32% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-19
32% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 53-87 | +26.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 53-81 | +18.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 65-99 | +30.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 45-91 | +40.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 65-68 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 66-68 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 58-72 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 38-51 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 89 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 57-65 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 129.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 79-100 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 71-74 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 65-74 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 62-68 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 49-71 | +10.5 | L −11.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 72-68 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 58-69 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 85-105 | +4.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 61-71 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 90-95 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 81-78 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 52-81 | +14.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 47-73 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 55-65 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 75-86 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 66-72 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 67-62 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-80 | +11.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 61-76 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UVA
L 53-87
−7.5
5
@
RUTG
L 53-81
−9.5
18
@
TEX
L 65-99
−3.5
20
@
HOU
L 45-91
−5.5
25
vs
COPP
L 65-68
−11.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-68
+7.5
7
@
QUIN
L 58-72
+0.5
9
vs
BUCK
L 38-51
−10.5
16
@
DEL
L 57-65
+0.5
22
@
VCU
L 79-100
+9.5
29
vs
MAN
L 71-74
−0.5
4
vs
SIE
L 65-74
−0.5
9
@
FAIR
L 62-68
+2.5
11
vs
MRST
L 49-71
−11.5
14
vs
IONA
W 72-68
+11.5
17
@
SPU
L 58-69
−0.5
19
vs
SHU
L 85-105
−15.5
24
@
MSM
L 61-71
−0.5
30
@
MAN
L 90-95
+0.5
1
vs
SPU
W 81-78
+10.5
5
@
MRST
L 52-81
−14.5
7
vs
MRMK
L 47-73
−17.5
13
vs
MSM
L 55-65
−4.5
15
@
SHU
L 75-86
−1.5
20
vs
CAN
L 66-72
−7.5
22
vs
NIA
W 67-62
+6.5
27
@
IONA
L 58-80
−10.5
1
@
SIE
L 61-76
−0.5
covered 9didn’t cover 19avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UVA
L 53-87
−8.5
5
@
RUTG
L 53-81
−5.5
18
@
TEX
L 65-99
+20.5
20
@
HOU
L 45-91
+1.5
25
vs
COPP
L 65-68
−6.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-68
−4.5
7
@
QUIN
L 58-72
−17.5
9
vs
BUCK
L 38-51
−46.5
16
@
DEL
L 57-65
−7.5
22
@
VCU
L 79-100
+33.5
29
vs
MAN
L 71-74
−2.5
4
vs
SIE
L 65-74
+3.5
9
@
FAIR
L 62-68
−15.5
11
vs
MRST
L 49-71
−11.5
14
vs
IONA
W 72-68
−1.5
17
@
SPU
L 58-69
−7.5
19
vs
SHU
L 85-105
+45.5
24
@
MSM
L 61-71
−7.5
30
@
MAN
L 90-95
+39.5
1
vs
SPU
W 81-78
+22.5
5
@
MRST
L 52-81
−2.5
7
vs
MRMK
L 47-73
−17.5
13
vs
MSM
L 55-65
−17.5
15
@
SHU
L 75-86
+14.5
20
vs
CAN
L 66-72
+6.5
22
vs
NIA
W 67-62
−2.5
27
@
IONA
L 58-80
−3.5
1
@
SIE
L 61-76
−0.5
over 9under 19avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Miami
35 games played
Straight up
26-9
74% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 86-69 | -18.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 101-61 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 102-61 | -34.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 68-82 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 171.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 99-72 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-41 | -34.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 62-72 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 78-65 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 75-66 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-64 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 104-79 | -35.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 98-81 | -22.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 105-67 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 76-69 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 81-77 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-81 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 81-69 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 59-69 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 63-65 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-76 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-70 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 85-86 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 74-68 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-66 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-76 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 67-66 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-86 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 83-73 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-54 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 89-92 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 80-66 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 69-79 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
−1.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+23.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+6.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−3.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+7.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
+21.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−2.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
+7.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
+10.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+4.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
−10.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
−5.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
−2.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+5.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
−5.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−5.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−12.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+7.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
−0.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
−12.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
−2.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
+7.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+6.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−7.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+4.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+7.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
+6.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
+9.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
−4.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
+6.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−18.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+12.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
+12.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+7.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+1.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−21.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+6.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
−13.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−31.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
−8.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
−4.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+6.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
+29.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
+17.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
+0.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+0.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
+15.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−15.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−35.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+11.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
+1.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
+22.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
+0.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
−15.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
−4.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−15.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+23.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+3.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
−13.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
−10.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
+25.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
−2.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−0.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+1.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Miami has the better starters
Position by position: Rider 0, Miami 2, even 3
RiderBetterMiami
G M. Butler TR10.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 44
→MIASmall
G B. Bland TR13.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
G K. Farmer TR3.5 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 6
→MIABig
G A. Lewis TR12.2 pts · 3 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 92
G B. Baker TR1.6 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Goode TR15.7 pts · 8.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
G T. Bevins TR0.6 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F S. Henderson13.8 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
F H. Simmons TR1.7 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F M. Reneau18.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 98
RiderBetterMiami
RID offense348th of 366 · -12.2
→MIABig
MIA defense26th of 366 · +4.3
RID defense315th of 366 · -8.2
→MIABig
MIA offense30th of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt-5.5 · 4 players
→MIABig
Backcourt+4.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
→MIABig
Frontcourt+12.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.3 · 1 player
→MIABig
Bench+3.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestRID betterMIA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Butler34 min · TRK. Farmer14 min · TRB. Baker13 min · TRT. Bevins5 min · TRN. WashingtonNewR. RosaNew
Forwards
H. Simmons6 min · TRR. Brisco2 min · TRK. WylieNewS. Ezekiel ObeNew
Centers
S. Avegah SemeyNew
Guards
B. Bland34 min · TRA. Lewis31 min · TRD. Allen24 minN. Dorn23 min · TRL. Cason19 min · TRQ. Berger17 min · TR
Forwards
D. Goode31 min · TRS. Henderson31 minM. Reneau29 minR. Miller19 min · TRM. Allen19 minC. GaskinsNew
Centers
S. Cyril21 min · TRE. RyzhovNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.6 #359 | Points per game | 81.5 #39 |
| 0.95 #355 | Points per possession | 1.18 #38 |
| 65.7 #323 | Pace (possessions) | 69.2 #170 |
| Shooting | ||
| 42.8 #365 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #32 |
| 27.6 #365 | 3-point % | 34.9 #127 |
| 27.5 #361 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.9 #331 |
| 30.1 #307 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #125 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.9 #197 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #147 |
| 32.6 #101 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.2 #14 |
| 10.1 #356 | Assists per game | 16.2 #42 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.8 #236 | Points allowed | 71.2 #79 |
| 1.17 #341 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #60 |
| 55.2 #335 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #198 |
| 38.0 #356 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.8 #296 |
| 15.3 #266 | Turnovers forced | 18.3 #87 |
| 67.2 #294 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.1 #19 |
| 5.9 #247 | Steals per game | 7.9 #48 |
| 3.2 #188 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #174 |
Rider
3-25 in 2025-26 overall · 3-17 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Siena61–76
- L@ Iona58–80
- Wvs Niagara67–62
- Lvs Canisius66–72
- L@ Sacred Heart75–86
A week or more of rest.
Miami
26-9 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue69–79
- Wvs Missouri80–66
- Lvs Virginia62–84
- Wvs Louisville78–73
- Lvs Louisville89–92
A week or more of rest.