Eastern Washington Eagles at Stanford Cardinal: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 10:00 PM ETMaples Pavilion · at Stanford

LineSTAN -13.5moved 1 toward EWU

Total154.5up 1 from 153.5

Season records: E Washington and Stanford
EWU	This season	STAN
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects STAN 85–68 · win probability STAN 94%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

STAN -13.5

moved 1 toward EWU

Total

154.5

model 153.0 · Under by 1.5

Model edge

STAN by 4

model vs market

Public on the spread

97% EWU

58% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: STAN has more of the edges

EWU 0, STAN 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

STANBig

STAN offense vs EWU defense

Offense 88th of 366 against a defense 322nd, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

EWU has played the 213th-hardest schedule, STAN the 76th. A record against a soft schedule means less

STANBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: EWU 17.6%, STAN 15.5%. Forced: EWU 16.3%, STAN 18.0%

STANBig

EWU offense vs STAN defense

Offense 189th of 366 against a defense 79th, on the model’s ratings

STANSmall

Home court

STAN at home. This season: STAN 0-0 at home, EWU 0-0 away

STANSmall

Three-pointers

EWU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%; STAN hits 35.2% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 34.7% and 44.0% of their shots

STANSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: EWU 31.3%, STAN 32.5%. Defensive: EWU 69.2%, STAN 70.2%

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: EWU plays 69.5 a game (149th fastest), STAN 68.1 (225th). Faster games mean more points

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: EWU 36.1, STAN 35.5. Allowed: EWU 37.3, STAN 40.3

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: EWU 53.7 and allows 54.9; STAN 51.5 and allows 51.0

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: EWU 30%, STAN 27%. Transfers in: EWU 1, STAN 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 10 to 14.5	1928	88%	48%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	988	88%	50%	51%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenSTAN -14.5

1 → EWU

NowSTAN -13.5

1 pt toward EWU

Total

Open153.5

▲ 1

Now154.5

Up 1 since the open

Moneyline

EWU +625 · STAN -950

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened STAN -14.5 · now STAN -14 · moved 1 toward EWUmodel STAN -17.5

model STAN -17.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

EWU +13.5Spread

STAN -13.5

Bets

97%

Money

58%42%

Money is 39 pts ahead of bets on STAN -13.5

Over 154.5TotalUnder 154.5

Bets

79%21%

Money

80%20%

EWUWinner

STAN

Bets

98%

Money

97%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	EWU	STAN	Over	Under	EWU	STAN
BetMGMMGM	-14.5-118	+14.5-102	153.5-115	153.5-105	+750	-1200
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-13.5-105	+13.5-115	154-110	154-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-14.5-122	+14.5-105	154.5-115	154.5-110	+650	-1250
BetUSBetUS	-13.5-105	+13.5-115	154-110	154-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-14-115	+14-105	154-110	154-110	+700	-1200
DraftKingsDK	-14.5-112	+14.5-108	154.5-105	154.5-115	+700	-1100
FanDuelFD	-13.5-102	+13.5-120	153.5-110	153.5-110	+810	-1450
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-13.5-101	+13.5-111	154-108	154-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	STAN -13.5	STAN -17.5	STAN +4.0
Total	154.5	153.0	Under 1.5
Projected score	—	EWU 67.7 · STAN 85.2

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	STAN -10.3	—
1H total	71.5	—
1H projected score	EWU 30.6 · STAN 40.9	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
EWU WWLWL	19-13	59%	12-6	12-9
STAN WWWLL	17-16	52%	9-9	8-10

Venue/role: EWU away, as underdog; STAN home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
EWU UUOOO	19-13	59%	13-19
STAN OOOUO	15-18	45%	20-13

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
EWU	8-2 80%	8-2 80%	5-5 50%
STAN	6-4 60%	5-5 50%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

E Washington

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	@ ORE	No recent meeting
Nov 9	@ ORST	No recent meeting
Nov 17	@ UTAH	L77–101LO

Stanford

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs OAK	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs RICE	No recent meeting
Nov 13	@ UNLV	L74–75LU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

EWU 0–1 STANSTAN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · EWU 0-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 17, 2023-24	EWU 70 @ STAN 95	STAN -12.5	STAN W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

E Washington

32 games played

Straight up

13-19

41% wins

Against the spread

19-13

59% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-13

59% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

13-1941%

L L L L L L L W L L L L L L W L W L W L L W W W W W W W W L W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

19-1359%

W W W L L W L W L L L W W L L L W L W L W W W W W W W W W L W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

19-1359%

O U O O O O O O O U O O O U U O U U U O U O U O U O U U U O O O

3 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@UCLA	L 74-80	+29.5	W +23.5	149.5	O 154
Nov 5	@LMU	L 62-70	+9.5	W +1.5	153.5	U 132
Nov 8	@COLO	L 97-102	+16.5	W +11.5	152.5	O 199
Nov 12	@SEA	L 67-94	+8.5	L −18.5	148.5	O 161
Nov 23	@CARK	L 65-92	-4.5	L −31.5	154.5	O 157
Nov 25	@UNT	L 71-79	+12.5	W +4.5	141.5	O 150
Dec 3	@DEN	L 89-93	+1.5	L −2.5	155.5	O 182
Dec 6	vsKC	W 90-66	-9.5	W +14.5	151.5	O 156
Dec 12	vsCBU	L 83-88	+3.5	L −1.5	153.5	O 171
Dec 17	vsWSU	L 63-78	+6.5	L −8.5	153.5	U 141
Dec 20	@UTAH	L 77-101	+10.5	L −13.5	160.5	O 178
Dec 22	@BYU	L 81-109	+34.5	W +6.5	168.5	O 190
Jan 3	@IDHO	L 81-84	+6.5	W +3.5	158.5	O 165
Jan 8	vsMTST	L 64-68	+2.5	L −1.5	156.5	U 132
Jan 10	vsMONT	W 66-65	-1.5	L −0.5	161.5	U 131
Jan 15	@WEB	L 80-91	+3.5	L −7.5	158.5	O 171
Jan 17	@IDST	W 84-66	+6.5	W +24.5	152.5	U 150
Jan 22	vsPRST	L 61-65	+2.5	L −1.5	150.5	U 126
Jan 24	vsSAC	W 75-67	-5.5	W +2.5	163.5	U 142
Jan 29	@NAU	L 86-92	-2.5	L −8.5	145.5	O 178
Jan 31	@UNCO	L 71-74	+6.5	W +3.5	156.5	U 145
Feb 5	@MONT	W 82-74	+5.5	W +13.5	151.5	O 156
Feb 7	@MTST	W 72-71	+5.5	W +6.5	148.5	U 143
Feb 12	vsIDST	W 88-75	-2.5	W +10.5	147.5	O 163
Feb 14	vsWEB	W 84-66	-3.5	W +14.5	154.5	U 150
Feb 19	@SAC	W 102-94	-2.5	W +5.5	160.5	O 196
Feb 21	@PRST	W 67-55	+6.5	W +18.5	146.5	U 122
Feb 26	vsUNCO	W 82-72	+1.5	W +11.5	157.5	U 154
Feb 28	vsNAU	W 88-57	-9.5	W +21.5	146.5	U 145
Mar 2	vsIDHO	L 81-85	-3.5	L −7.5	151.5	O 166
Mar 9	vsWEB	W 84-79	-3.5	W +1.5	154.5	O 163
Mar 10	vsIDHO	L 68-81	+1.5	L −11.5	148.5	O 149

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

UCLA

L 74-80

+23.5

LMU

L 62-70

+1.5

COLO

L 97-102

+11.5

SEA

L 67-94

−18.5

CARK

L 65-92

−31.5

UNT

L 71-79

+4.5

DEN

L 89-93

−2.5

W 90-66

+14.5

CBU

L 83-88

−1.5

WSU

L 63-78

−8.5

UTAH

L 77-101

−13.5

BYU

L 81-109

+6.5

IDHO

L 81-84

+3.5

MTST

L 64-68

−1.5

MONT

W 66-65

−0.5

WEB

L 80-91

−7.5

IDST

W 84-66

+24.5

PRST

L 61-65

−1.5

SAC

W 75-67

+2.5

NAU

L 86-92

−8.5

UNCO

L 71-74

+3.5

MONT

W 82-74

+13.5

MTST

W 72-71

+6.5

IDST

W 88-75

+10.5

WEB

W 84-66

+14.5

SAC

W 102-94

+5.5

PRST

W 67-55

+18.5

UNCO

W 82-72

+11.5

NAU

W 88-57

+21.5

IDHO

L 81-85

−7.5

WEB

W 84-79

+1.5

IDHO

L 68-81

−11.5

covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

UCLA

L 74-80

+4.5

LMU

L 62-70

−21.5

COLO

L 97-102

+46.5

SEA

L 67-94

+12.5

CARK

L 65-92

+2.5

UNT

L 71-79

+8.5

DEN

L 89-93

+26.5

W 90-66

+4.5

CBU

L 83-88

+17.5

WSU

L 63-78

−12.5

UTAH

L 77-101

+17.5

BYU

L 81-109

+21.5

IDHO

L 81-84

+6.5

MTST

L 64-68

−24.5

MONT

W 66-65

−30.5

WEB

L 80-91

+12.5

IDST

W 84-66

−2.5

PRST

L 61-65

−24.5

SAC

W 75-67

−21.5

NAU

L 86-92

+32.5

UNCO

L 71-74

−11.5

MONT

W 82-74

+4.5

MTST

W 72-71

−5.5

IDST

W 88-75

+15.5

WEB

W 84-66

−4.5

SAC

W 102-94

+35.5

PRST

W 67-55

−24.5

UNCO

W 82-72

−3.5

NAU

W 88-57

−1.5

IDHO

L 81-85

+14.5

WEB

W 84-79

+8.5

IDHO

L 68-81

+0.5

over 19under 13avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Stanford

33 games played

Straight up

20-13

61% wins

Against the spread

17-16

52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-18

45% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total

Straight up

20-1361%

W W W W L W W W L W W W W L W W L W L L L L L W W L L W W W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

17-1652%

L W L W L W W W L L W W L L W W L W L L W L W W W L L L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1845%

O O U O U U U O U O U U O U U U U O U U O O U O U U U O O O O U O

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsPRST	W 89-79	-11.5	L −1.5	144.5	O 168
Nov 8	vsMONT	W 91-68	-12.5	W +10.5	150.5	O 159
Nov 12	vsMTST	W 77-68	-14.5	L −5.5	148.5	U 145
Nov 18	vsUL	W 93-66	-20.5	W +6.5	139.5	O 159
Nov 21	vsSEA	L 69-77	-10.5	L −18.5	152.5	U 146
Nov 27	vsMINN	W 72-68	-2.5	W +1.5	142.5	U 140
Nov 28	vsSLU	W 78-77	+1.5	W +2.5	160.5	U 155
Dec 1	vsPORT	W 94-72	-19.5	W +2.5	156.5	O 166
Dec 7	vsUNLV	L 74-75	-9.5	L −10.5	164.5	U 149
Dec 13	@SJSU	W 86-82	-8.5	L −4.5	145.5	O 168
Dec 17	vsUTA	W 76-60	-10.5	W +5.5	139.5	U 136
Dec 20	vsCOLO	W 77-68	+2.5	W +11.5	154.5	U 145
Dec 27	vsCSUN	W 88-80	-15.5	L −7.5	160.5	O 168
Dec 30	vsND	L 40-47	-6.5	L −13.5	143.5	U 87
Jan 2	vsLOU	W 80-76	+7.5	W +11.5	157.5	U 156
Jan 7	@VT	W 69-68	+3.5	W +4.5	148.5	U 137
Jan 10	@UVA	L 55-70	+12.5	L −2.5	143.5	U 125
Jan 14	vsUNC	W 95-90	+4.5	W +9.5	147.5	O 185
Jan 17	vsDUKE	L 50-80	+11.5	L −18.5	148.5	U 130
Jan 24	vsCAL	L 66-78	-4.5	L −16.5	146.5	U 144
Jan 28	@MIA	L 70-79	+9.5	W +0.5	147.5	O 149
Jan 31	@FSU	L 80-88	+3.5	L −4.5	152.5	O 168
Feb 4	vsCLEM	L 64-66	+3.5	W +1.5	138.5	U 130
Feb 7	vsGT	W 95-72	-9.5	W +13.5	151.5	O 167
Feb 11	@BC	W 70-64	-3.5	W +2.5	139.5	U 134
Feb 14	@WAKE	L 63-68	+4.5	L −0.5	150.5	U 131
Feb 21	@CAL	L 66-72	+1.5	L −4.5	149.5	U 138
Feb 25	vsPITT	W 75-67	-8.5	L −0.5	138.5	O 142
Feb 28	vsSMU	W 95-75	+1.5	W +21.5	155.5	O 170
Mar 4	@ND	W 86-78	-1.5	W +6.5	147.5	O 164
Mar 7	@NCSU	W 85-84	+9.5	W +10.5	152.5	O 169
Mar 10	vsPITT	L 63-64	-4.5	L −5.5	136.5	U 127
Apr 2	vsWVU	L 77-82	+2.5	L −2.5	135.5	O 159

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

PRST

W 89-79

−1.5

MONT

W 91-68

+10.5

MTST

W 77-68

−5.5

W 93-66

+6.5

SEA

L 69-77

−18.5

MINN

W 72-68

+1.5

SLU

W 78-77

+2.5

PORT

W 94-72

+2.5

UNLV

L 74-75

−10.5

SJSU

W 86-82

−4.5

UTA

W 76-60

+5.5

COLO

W 77-68

+11.5

CSUN

W 88-80

−7.5

L 40-47

−13.5

LOU

W 80-76

+11.5

W 69-68

+4.5

UVA

L 55-70

−2.5

UNC

W 95-90

+9.5

DUKE

L 50-80

−18.5

CAL

L 66-78

−16.5

MIA

L 70-79

+0.5

FSU

L 80-88

−4.5

CLEM

L 64-66

+1.5

W 95-72

+13.5

W 70-64

+2.5

WAKE

L 63-68

−0.5

CAL

L 66-72

−4.5

PITT

W 75-67

−0.5

SMU

W 95-75

+21.5

W 86-78

+6.5

NCSU

W 85-84

+10.5

PITT

L 63-64

−5.5

WVU

L 77-82

−2.5

covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

PRST

W 89-79

+23.5

MONT

W 91-68

+8.5

MTST

W 77-68

−3.5

W 93-66

+19.5

SEA

L 69-77

−6.5

MINN

W 72-68

−2.5

SLU

W 78-77

−5.5

PORT

W 94-72

+9.5

UNLV

L 74-75

−15.5

SJSU

W 86-82

+22.5

UTA

W 76-60

−3.5

COLO

W 77-68

−9.5

CSUN

W 88-80

+7.5

L 40-47

−56.5

LOU

W 80-76

−1.5

W 69-68

−11.5

UVA

L 55-70

−18.5

UNC

W 95-90

+37.5

DUKE

L 50-80

−18.5

CAL

L 66-78

−2.5

MIA

L 70-79

+1.5

FSU

L 80-88

+15.5

CLEM

L 64-66

−8.5

W 95-72

+15.5

W 70-64

−5.5

WAKE

L 63-68

−19.5

CAL

L 66-72

−11.5

PITT

W 75-67

+3.5

SMU

W 95-75

+14.5

W 86-78

+16.5

NCSU

W 85-84

+16.5

PITT

L 63-64

−9.5

WVU

L 77-82

+23.5

over 15under 18avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

The starting fives are even

Position by position: E Washington 1, Stanford 1, even 3

E WashingtonBetterStanford

G J. Griffith TR11.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 3.4 ast Score 75

Even

G C. Bliss TR16.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 5.9 ast Score 84

G C. Scherer2.1 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast Score 14

STANBig

F N. Townsend TR16.6 pts · 7.3 reb · 4.4 ast Score 93

F A. Hamilton13.6 pts · 5.7 reb · 2.1 ast Score 83

EWUSmall

F A. Cammann6.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.4 ast Score 56

F E. Marquardt5.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 31

Even

F D. Young2.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.7 ast Score 26

F S. Ngoyi0.5 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.1 ast Not ranked

No call

C A. Maurer TR7.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.5 ast Score 70

E WashingtonBetterStanford

EWU offense189th of 366 · -5.8

STANSmall

STAN defense79th of 366 · +0.4

EWU defense322nd of 366 · -8.3

STANBig

STAN offense88th of 366 · +0.2

Backcourt-0.2 · 2 players

STANSmall

Backcourt+2.6 · 1 player

Frontcourt+0.6 · 3 players

STANBig

Frontcourt+4.6 · 4 players

Bench-0.3 · 1 player

Even

Bench-0.1 · 4 players

Score, worst to bestEWU betterSTAN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

E Washington

Guards

J. Griffith23 min · TRC. Scherer8 minM. Monson3 minA. CookNewT. JacksonNewI. HomeliusNew

Forwards

A. Hamilton28 minE. Marquardt16 minS. Ngoyi4 minJ. MillerNewA. HamiltonNewA. GballouNew

Centers

Z. TrezvantNew

Stanford

Guards

C. Bliss40 min · TRE. Kitch1 minA. BatsonNewM. JonesNewJ. PriceNewI. RogersNew

Forwards

N. Townsend34 min · TRA. Cammann22 minD. Young15 minK. Skrinda6 minE. Stinson5 minT. Toure4 min

Centers

A. Maurer18 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

EWU77.7 #102

STAN76.0 #142

Points per possession

EWU1.11 #120

STAN1.12 #108

Pace (possessions)

EWU69.5 #149

STAN68.1 #225

Shooting

Effective FG%

EWU53.7 #75

STAN51.5 #173

3-point %

EWU35.9 #62

STAN35.2 #103

3-point attempt rate

EWU34.7 #282

STAN44.0 #89

Free throw rate

EWU36.1 #148

STAN35.5 #165

Possessions

Turnover rate

EWU17.6 #241

STAN15.5 #105

Offensive rebound rate

EWU31.3 #153

STAN32.5 #109

Assists per game

EWU13.5 #181

STAN11.8 #299

Defense

Points allowed

EWU79.2 #304

STAN73.0 #132

Points allowed per possession

EWU1.15 #320

STAN1.07 #136

Opponent effective FG%

EWU54.9 #326

STAN51.0 #158

Opponent 3-point %

EWU35.2 #261

STAN33.0 #118

Turnovers forced

EWU16.3 #200

STAN18.0 #99

Defensive rebound rate

EWU69.2 #194

STAN70.2 #149

Steals per game

EWU5.9 #249

STAN7.8 #53

Blocks per game

EWU3.4 #161

STAN3.9 #93

EWU		STAN
Scoring
77.7 #102	Points per game	76.0 #142
1.11 #120	Points per possession	1.12 #108
69.5 #149	Pace (possessions)	68.1 #225
Shooting
53.7 #75	Effective FG%	51.5 #173
35.9 #62	3-point %	35.2 #103
34.7 #282	3-point attempt rate	44.0 #89
36.1 #148	Free throw rate	35.5 #165
Possessions
17.6 #241	Turnover rate	15.5 #105
31.3 #153	Offensive rebound rate	32.5 #109
13.5 #181	Assists per game	11.8 #299
Defense
79.2 #304	Points allowed	73.0 #132
1.15 #320	Points allowed per possession	1.07 #136
54.9 #326	Opponent effective FG%	51.0 #158
35.2 #261	Opponent 3-point %	33.0 #118
16.3 #200	Turnovers forced	18.0 #99
69.2 #194	Defensive rebound rate	70.2 #149
5.9 #249	Steals per game	7.8 #53
3.4 #161	Blocks per game	3.9 #93

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

E Washington

13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Big Sky Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Idaho68–81
Wvs Weber St84–79
Lvs Idaho81–85
Wvs N Arizona88–57
Wvs N Colorado82–72

A week or more of rest.

Stanford

20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs West Virginia77–82
Lvs Pitt63–64
W@ NC State85–84
W@ Notre Dame86–78
Wvs SMU95–75

A week or more of rest.