Gill Coliseum · at Oregon St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ORST 84–70 · win probability ORST 89%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ORST has more of the edges
EWU 1, ORST 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ORST offense vs EWU defense
Offense 95th of 366 against a defense 322nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: EWU 31.3%, ORST 26.8%. Defensive: EWU 69.2%, ORST 67.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: EWU 36.1, ORST 43.1. Allowed: EWU 37.3, ORST 35.1
Context
Schedule so far
EWU has played the 213th-hardest schedule, ORST the 120th. A record against a soft schedule means less
EWU offense vs ORST defense
Offense 189th of 366 against a defense 109th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: EWU plays 69.5 a game (149th fastest), ORST 67.2 (272nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ORST at home. This season: ORST 0-0 at home, EWU 0-0 away
Three-pointers
EWU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%; ORST hits 35.0% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 34.7% and 44.3% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: EWU 17.6%, ORST 17.7%. Forced: EWU 16.3%, ORST 15.3%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: EWU 53.7 and allows 54.9; ORST 50.5 and allows 50.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: EWU 30%, ORST 17%. Transfers in: EWU 1, ORST 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ORST -13.8 | — |
| Total | — | 153.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | EWU 69.8 · ORST 83.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ORST -8.1 | — |
| 1H total | 71.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | EWU 31.8 · ORST 39.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
E Washington
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-13
59% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-80 | +29.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 62-70 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 97-102 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-94 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 65-92 | -4.5 | L −31.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 71-79 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 89-93 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-66 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 12 | vs | L 83-88 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 63-78 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 77-101 | +10.5 | L −13.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 81-109 | +34.5 | W +6.5 | 168.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 81-84 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 64-68 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 66-65 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 80-91 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-66 | +6.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 61-65 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 75-67 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 86-92 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-74 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 82-74 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 72-71 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 88-75 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 84-66 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 102-94 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 67-55 | +6.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 88-57 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 81-85 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 84-79 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 68-81 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UCLA
L 74-80
+23.5
5
@
LMU
L 62-70
+1.5
8
@
COLO
L 97-102
+11.5
12
@
SEA
L 67-94
−18.5
23
@
CARK
L 65-92
−31.5
25
@
UNT
L 71-79
+4.5
3
@
DEN
L 89-93
−2.5
6
vs
KC
W 90-66
+14.5
12
vs
CBU
L 83-88
−1.5
17
vs
WSU
L 63-78
−8.5
20
@
UTAH
L 77-101
−13.5
22
@
BYU
L 81-109
+6.5
3
@
IDHO
L 81-84
+3.5
8
vs
MTST
L 64-68
−1.5
10
vs
MONT
W 66-65
−0.5
15
@
WEB
L 80-91
−7.5
17
@
IDST
W 84-66
+24.5
22
vs
PRST
L 61-65
−1.5
24
vs
SAC
W 75-67
+2.5
29
@
NAU
L 86-92
−8.5
31
@
UNCO
L 71-74
+3.5
5
@
MONT
W 82-74
+13.5
7
@
MTST
W 72-71
+6.5
12
vs
IDST
W 88-75
+10.5
14
vs
WEB
W 84-66
+14.5
19
@
SAC
W 102-94
+5.5
21
@
PRST
W 67-55
+18.5
26
vs
UNCO
W 82-72
+11.5
28
vs
NAU
W 88-57
+21.5
2
vs
IDHO
L 81-85
−7.5
9
vs
WEB
W 84-79
+1.5
10
vs
IDHO
L 68-81
−11.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UCLA
L 74-80
+4.5
5
@
LMU
L 62-70
−21.5
8
@
COLO
L 97-102
+46.5
12
@
SEA
L 67-94
+12.5
23
@
CARK
L 65-92
+2.5
25
@
UNT
L 71-79
+8.5
3
@
DEN
L 89-93
+26.5
6
vs
KC
W 90-66
+4.5
12
vs
CBU
L 83-88
+17.5
17
vs
WSU
L 63-78
−12.5
20
@
UTAH
L 77-101
+17.5
22
@
BYU
L 81-109
+21.5
3
@
IDHO
L 81-84
+6.5
8
vs
MTST
L 64-68
−24.5
10
vs
MONT
W 66-65
−30.5
15
@
WEB
L 80-91
+12.5
17
@
IDST
W 84-66
−2.5
22
vs
PRST
L 61-65
−24.5
24
vs
SAC
W 75-67
−21.5
29
@
NAU
L 86-92
+32.5
31
@
UNCO
L 71-74
−11.5
5
@
MONT
W 82-74
+4.5
7
@
MTST
W 72-71
−5.5
12
vs
IDST
W 88-75
+15.5
14
vs
WEB
W 84-66
−4.5
19
@
SAC
W 102-94
+35.5
21
@
PRST
W 67-55
−24.5
26
vs
UNCO
W 82-72
−3.5
28
vs
NAU
W 88-57
−1.5
2
vs
IDHO
L 81-85
+14.5
9
vs
WEB
W 84-79
+8.5
10
vs
IDHO
L 68-81
+0.5
over 19under 13avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oregon St
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-65 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 76-73 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 75-87 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 69-73 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 84-91 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 69-75 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 80-58 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 81-70 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 67-57 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 78-75 | +12.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 64-102 | +7.5 | L −30.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 70-62 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 53-84 | +4.5 | L −26.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-81 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 68-55 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 76-82 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 64-81 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 51-81 | +19.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 72-69 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 78-76 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 74-64 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-81 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 90-63 | +8.5 | W +35.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 50-60 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-73 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 92-82 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 72-93 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-77 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 56-65 | +20.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NDSU
W 67-65
−7.5
7
vs
UIC
W 76-73
−3.5
12
vs
UNT
W 66-64
−1.5
17
@
ORE
L 75-87
+1.5
21
vs
EVAN
L 69-73
−10.5
22
vs
IONA
L 84-91
−10.5
24
vs
MASS
L 65-73
−11.5
29
vs
CBU
L 69-75
−7.5
3
vs
UVM
W 80-58
+18.5
6
vs
SUU
W 81-70
+0.5
13
vs
MTST
W 67-57
+8.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 75-85
−13.5
21
@
ASU
W 78-75
+15.5
28
vs
SCU
L 64-102
−30.5
30
vs
SF
W 70-62
+12.5
2
@
PAC
L 53-84
−26.5
4
@
WSU
L 67-81
−7.5
8
vs
SEA
W 68-55
+17.5
10
@
PORT
L 76-82
−3.5
14
vs
LMU
W 76-70
+7.5
17
vs
PAC
L 64-81
−18.5
21
@
SMC
L 51-81
−10.5
28
@
LMU
W 72-69
+8.5
31
@
USD
W 78-76
+5.5
4
vs
WSU
W 74-64
+11.5
7
vs
GONZ
L 61-81
−0.5
12
@
SF
W 90-63
+35.5
15
@
SEA
L 50-60
−3.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 83-73
+0.5
25
vs
USD
W 92-82
+3.5
28
@
SCU
L 72-93
−5.5
8
vs
SF
W 78-77
+4.5
9
vs
GONZ
L 56-65
+11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NDSU
W 67-65
−12.5
7
vs
UIC
W 76-73
+2.5
12
vs
UNT
W 66-64
−4.5
17
@
ORE
L 75-87
+20.5
21
vs
EVAN
L 69-73
+5.5
22
vs
IONA
L 84-91
+17.5
24
vs
MASS
L 65-73
−11.5
29
vs
CBU
L 69-75
+6.5
3
vs
UVM
W 80-58
−5.5
6
vs
SUU
W 81-70
+4.5
13
vs
MTST
W 67-57
−16.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 75-85
+6.5
21
@
ASU
W 78-75
+5.5
28
vs
SCU
L 64-102
+15.5
30
vs
SF
W 70-62
−12.5
2
@
PAC
L 53-84
−0.5
4
@
WSU
L 67-81
+7.5
8
vs
SEA
W 68-55
−16.5
10
@
PORT
L 76-82
+12.5
14
vs
LMU
W 76-70
+5.5
17
vs
PAC
L 64-81
+5.5
21
@
SMC
L 51-81
−10.5
28
@
LMU
W 72-69
−0.5
31
@
USD
W 78-76
+3.5
4
vs
WSU
W 74-64
−9.5
7
vs
GONZ
L 61-81
−7.5
12
@
SF
W 90-63
+12.5
15
@
SEA
L 50-60
−26.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 83-73
+7.5
25
vs
USD
W 92-82
+29.5
28
@
SCU
L 72-93
+11.5
8
vs
SF
W 78-77
+10.5
9
vs
GONZ
L 56-65
−24.5
over 19under 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: E Washington 1, Oregon St 1, even 3
E WashingtonBetterOregon St
G J. Griffith TR11.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 75
=Even
G J. Lake13.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 87
G C. Scherer2.1 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 14
→ORSTBig
G D. Freitag TR20 pts · 4.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 93
F A. Hamilton13.6 pts · 5.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
←EWUSmall
G L. Smiley TR7.8 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 52
F E. Marquardt5.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 31
=Even
F J. Rasmussen TR13 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 43
F S. Ngoyi0.5 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Gory TR13.7 pts · 6.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 80
E WashingtonBetterOregon St
EWU offense189th of 366 · -5.8
→ORSTSmall
ORST defense109th of 366 · -1.1
EWU defense322nd of 366 · -8.3
→ORSTBig
ORST offense95th of 366 · -0.7
Backcourt-0.2 · 2 players
→ORSTBig
Backcourt+5.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt+1.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.3 · 1 player
→ORSTSmall
Bench+1.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestEWU betterORST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Griffith23 min · TRC. Scherer8 minM. Monson3 minA. CookNewT. JacksonNewI. HomeliusNew
Forwards
A. Hamilton28 minE. Marquardt16 minS. Ngoyi4 minJ. MillerNewA. HamiltonNewA. GballouNew
Centers
Z. TrezvantNew
Guards
J. Lake34 minD. Freitag34 min · TRL. Smiley21 min · TRC. Johnson16 min · TRS. Blakely Drummond1 min · TRJ. LakeNew
Forwards
J. Rasmussen32 min · TRD. Gory30 min · TRP. Pinnis4 min · TRK. TreacherNew
Centers
D. Evans9 min · TRX. Staton5 min · TRY. AklogNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.7 #102 | Points per game | 71.1 #264 |
| 1.11 #120 | Points per possession | 1.06 #232 |
| 69.5 #149 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #272 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.7 #75 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #216 |
| 35.9 #62 | 3-point % | 35.0 #115 |
| 34.7 #282 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #84 |
| 36.1 #148 | Free throw rate | 43.1 #20 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #241 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #254 |
| 31.3 #153 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #303 |
| 13.5 #181 | Assists per game | 13.8 #159 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.2 #304 | Points allowed | 74.2 #159 |
| 1.15 #320 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #223 |
| 54.9 #326 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #119 |
| 35.2 #261 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #116 |
| 16.3 #200 | Turnovers forced | 15.3 #264 |
| 69.2 #194 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #265 |
| 5.9 #249 | Steals per game | 5.5 #293 |
| 3.4 #161 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #115 |
E Washington
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Idaho68–81
- Wvs Weber St84–79
- Lvs Idaho81–85
- Wvs N Arizona88–57
- Wvs N Colorado82–72
A week or more of rest.
Oregon St
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gonzaga56–65
- Wvs San Francisco78–77
- L@ Santa Clara72–93
- Wvs San Diego92–82
- Wvs Pepperdine83–73
A week or more of rest.