Gill Coliseum · at Oregon St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ORST 91–56 · win probability ORST 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ORST has more of the edges
MVSU 0, ORST 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ORST offense vs MVSU defense
Offense 95th of 366 against a defense 366th, on the model’s ratings
MVSU offense vs ORST defense
Offense 366th of 366 against a defense 109th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
MVSU hits 29.5% and allows 37.2%; ORST hits 35.0% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 30.2% and 44.3% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
MVSU has played the 327th-hardest schedule, ORST the 120th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: MVSU 33.9, ORST 43.1. Allowed: MVSU 50.8, ORST 35.1
Shooting
Effective FG%: MVSU 45.2 and allows 55.5; ORST 50.5 and allows 50.3
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: MVSU plays 70.2 a game (111th fastest), ORST 67.2 (272nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ORST at home. This season: ORST 0-0 at home, MVSU 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MVSU 26.4%, ORST 26.8%. Defensive: MVSU 64.5%, ORST 67.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MVSU 0%, ORST 17%. Transfers in: MVSU 2, ORST 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MVSU 21.9%, ORST 17.7%. Forced: MVSU 17.1%, ORST 15.3%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ORST -34.4 | — |
| Total | — | 146.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | MVSU 56.2 · ORST 90.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ORST -20.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | MVSU 24.2 · ORST 44.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Miss Valley St
32 games played
Straight up
2-30
6% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-106 | +34.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-108 | +38.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 56-88 | +41.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 75-81 | +26.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-80 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 70-86 | +21.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 84-120 | +42.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 52-66 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 49-108 | +38.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 64-88 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 49-96 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-86 | +42.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 69-93 | +44.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 69-89 | +13.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 51-71 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 51-84 | +12.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-79 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 48-62 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-80 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-78 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 81-97 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 66-74 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-72 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 55-92 | +16.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 72-71 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 62-83 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 70-69 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 64-67 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-85 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 52-77 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
−16.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
−9.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
+9.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+20.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
+13.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+5.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+6.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−4.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−20.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
−6.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−6.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
+7.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+20.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
−6.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−9.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
+17.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−20.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
+0.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−2.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+9.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+2.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
−7.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−2.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
+8.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
−20.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−1.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
+12.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
−4.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
+15.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
+6.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
+15.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
+8.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
−7.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+10.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
−1.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+17.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+49.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−31.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−3.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
+9.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−19.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
−0.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+8.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
+13.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−13.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
−13.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−7.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
−2.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−29.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+7.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+4.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
+34.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−0.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−1.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
+4.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−19.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
−0.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
+8.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
−8.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
−8.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+17.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−6.5
over 14under 18avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oregon St
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-65 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 76-73 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 75-87 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 69-73 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 84-91 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 69-75 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 80-58 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 81-70 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 67-57 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 78-75 | +12.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 64-102 | +7.5 | L −30.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 70-62 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 53-84 | +4.5 | L −26.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-81 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 68-55 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 76-82 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 64-81 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 51-81 | +19.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 72-69 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 78-76 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 74-64 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-81 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 90-63 | +8.5 | W +35.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 50-60 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-73 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 92-82 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 72-93 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-77 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 56-65 | +20.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NDSU
W 67-65
−7.5
7
vs
UIC
W 76-73
−3.5
12
vs
UNT
W 66-64
−1.5
17
@
ORE
L 75-87
+1.5
21
vs
EVAN
L 69-73
−10.5
22
vs
IONA
L 84-91
−10.5
24
vs
MASS
L 65-73
−11.5
29
vs
CBU
L 69-75
−7.5
3
vs
UVM
W 80-58
+18.5
6
vs
SUU
W 81-70
+0.5
13
vs
MTST
W 67-57
+8.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 75-85
−13.5
21
@
ASU
W 78-75
+15.5
28
vs
SCU
L 64-102
−30.5
30
vs
SF
W 70-62
+12.5
2
@
PAC
L 53-84
−26.5
4
@
WSU
L 67-81
−7.5
8
vs
SEA
W 68-55
+17.5
10
@
PORT
L 76-82
−3.5
14
vs
LMU
W 76-70
+7.5
17
vs
PAC
L 64-81
−18.5
21
@
SMC
L 51-81
−10.5
28
@
LMU
W 72-69
+8.5
31
@
USD
W 78-76
+5.5
4
vs
WSU
W 74-64
+11.5
7
vs
GONZ
L 61-81
−0.5
12
@
SF
W 90-63
+35.5
15
@
SEA
L 50-60
−3.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 83-73
+0.5
25
vs
USD
W 92-82
+3.5
28
@
SCU
L 72-93
−5.5
8
vs
SF
W 78-77
+4.5
9
vs
GONZ
L 56-65
+11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NDSU
W 67-65
−12.5
7
vs
UIC
W 76-73
+2.5
12
vs
UNT
W 66-64
−4.5
17
@
ORE
L 75-87
+20.5
21
vs
EVAN
L 69-73
+5.5
22
vs
IONA
L 84-91
+17.5
24
vs
MASS
L 65-73
−11.5
29
vs
CBU
L 69-75
+6.5
3
vs
UVM
W 80-58
−5.5
6
vs
SUU
W 81-70
+4.5
13
vs
MTST
W 67-57
−16.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 75-85
+6.5
21
@
ASU
W 78-75
+5.5
28
vs
SCU
L 64-102
+15.5
30
vs
SF
W 70-62
−12.5
2
@
PAC
L 53-84
−0.5
4
@
WSU
L 67-81
+7.5
8
vs
SEA
W 68-55
−16.5
10
@
PORT
L 76-82
+12.5
14
vs
LMU
W 76-70
+5.5
17
vs
PAC
L 64-81
+5.5
21
@
SMC
L 51-81
−10.5
28
@
LMU
W 72-69
−0.5
31
@
USD
W 78-76
+3.5
4
vs
WSU
W 74-64
−9.5
7
vs
GONZ
L 61-81
−7.5
12
@
SF
W 90-63
+12.5
15
@
SEA
L 50-60
−26.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 83-73
+7.5
25
vs
USD
W 92-82
+29.5
28
@
SCU
L 72-93
+11.5
8
vs
SF
W 78-77
+10.5
9
vs
GONZ
L 56-65
−24.5
over 19under 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Oregon St has the better starters
Position by position: Miss Valley St 0, Oregon St 1, even 4
Miss Valley StBetterOregon St
G T. Foster TR5.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
→ORSTBig
G J. Lake13.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 87
G T. James TR0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Freitag TR20 pts · 4.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 93
G E. Pippins NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Smiley TR7.8 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 52
G A. Abrams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Rasmussen TR13 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 43
F T. Williams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Gory TR13.7 pts · 6.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 80
Miss Valley StBetterOregon St
MVSU offense366th of 366 · -17.5
→ORSTBig
ORST defense109th of 366 · -1.1
MVSU defense366th of 366 · -14.3
→ORSTBig
ORST offense95th of 366 · -0.7
Backcourt-2.1 · 4 players
→ORSTBig
Backcourt+5.7 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+1.1 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+1.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMVSU betterORST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Foster20 min · TRT. James3 min · TRE. PippinsNewA. AbramsNewM. AngloNewC. CameronNew
Forwards
T. WilliamsNewQ. PangNewG. MartinezNewH. WilsonNewM. McCoyNew
Centers
T. WuNew
Guards
J. Lake34 minD. Freitag34 min · TRL. Smiley21 min · TRC. Johnson16 min · TRS. Blakely Drummond1 min · TRJ. LakeNew
Forwards
J. Rasmussen32 min · TRD. Gory30 min · TRP. Pinnis4 min · TRK. TreacherNew
Centers
D. Evans9 min · TRX. Staton5 min · TRY. AklogNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.2 #356 | Points per game | 71.1 #264 |
| 0.90 #364 | Points per possession | 1.06 #232 |
| 70.2 #111 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #272 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.2 #359 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #216 |
| 29.5 #346 | 3-point % | 35.0 #115 |
| 30.2 #351 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #84 |
| 33.9 #215 | Free throw rate | 43.1 #20 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.9 #361 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #254 |
| 26.4 #313 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #303 |
| 11.9 #296 | Assists per game | 13.8 #159 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.7 #353 | Points allowed | 74.2 #159 |
| 1.20 #355 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #223 |
| 55.5 #341 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #119 |
| 37.2 #346 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #116 |
| 17.1 #142 | Turnovers forced | 15.3 #264 |
| 64.5 #346 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #265 |
| 7.1 #119 | Steals per game | 5.5 #293 |
| 2.6 #300 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #115 |
Miss Valley St
2-30 in 2025-26 overall · 2-17 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Grambling52–77
- L@ Jackson St77–85
- L@ Alcorn St64–67
- W@ AR-Pine Bluff70–69
- L@ Grambling62–83
A week or more of rest.
Oregon St
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gonzaga56–65
- Wvs San Francisco78–77
- L@ Santa Clara72–93
- Wvs San Diego92–82
- Wvs Pepperdine83–73
A week or more of rest.