Le Moyne Dolphins at Nebraska Cornhuskers: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:30 PM ETPinnacle Bank Arena · at Nebraska

LineNEB -33.5moved 1 toward LEM

Total152.5down 1 from 153.5

Season records: Le Moyne and Nebraska
LEM	This season	NEB
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects NEB 89–56 · win probability NEB 100%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

NEB -33.5

moved 1 toward LEM

Total

152.5

model 145.5 · Under by 7

Model edge

Even

matches the market

Public on the spread

90% LEM

83% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: NEB has more of the edges

LEM 1, NEB 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

NEBBig

LEM offense vs NEB defense

Offense 333rd of 366 against a defense 23rd, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

LEM has played the 344th-hardest schedule, NEB the 59th. A record against a soft schedule means less

NEBBig

NEB offense vs LEM defense

Offense 43rd of 366 against a defense 308th, on the model’s ratings

NEBBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: LEM 19.1%, NEB 14.5%. Forced: LEM 15.0%, NEB 18.9%

NEBBig

Three-pointers

LEM hits 34.3% and allows 36.0%; NEB hits 35.5% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 40.8% and 51.1% of their shots

LEMSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: LEM 39.5, NEB 26.2. Allowed: LEM 32.7, NEB 25.1

NEBSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: LEM 52.6 and allows 49.3; NEB 55.5 and allows 48.1

NEBSmall

Home court

NEB at home. This season: NEB 0-0 at home, LEM 0-0 away

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: LEM plays 69.2 a game (168th fastest), NEB 67.3 (267th). Faster games mean more points

NEBSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: LEM 25.2%, NEB 26.7%. Defensive: LEM 71.0%, NEB 72.6%

NEBSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: LEM 24%, NEB 48%. Transfers in: LEM 7, NEB 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenNEB -34.5

1 → LEM

NowNEB -33.5

1 pt toward LEM

Total

Open153.5

▼ 1

Now152.5

Down 1 since the open

Moneyline

—

Line movement

Median of 5 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened NEB -34.5 · now NEB -33.5 · moved 1 toward LEMmodel NEB -33

model NEB -33

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

LEM +33.5Spread

NEB -33.5

Bets

90%10%

Money

83%17%

Over 152.5TotalUnder 152.5

Bets

16%84%

Money

16%84%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

5 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	LEM	NEB	Over	Under	LEM	NEB
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-33.5-110	+33.5-110	152-105	152-115	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-33.5-115	+33.5-110	153.5-114	153.5-112	—	—
BovadaBovada	-33.5-110	+33.5-110	152-105	152-115	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-33.5-110	+33.5-110	152.5-110	152.5-110	—	—
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-33.5-106	+33.5-106	152-103	152-113	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated Nov 1, 8:00 PM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	NEB -33.5	NEB -33.2	LEM +0.3
Total	152.5	145.5	Under 7.0
Projected score	—	LEM 56.2 · NEB 89.3

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	NEB -19.6	—
1H total	68.1	—
1H projected score	LEM 24.2 · NEB 43.8	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
LEM WLWLL	16-15	52%	10-7	9-5
NEB WLWWL	19-16	54%	8-10	14-13

Venue/role: LEM away, as underdog; NEB home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
LEM UOUUO	12-19	39%	14-17
NEB OUUUO	11-24	31%	28-7

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
LEM	4-6 40%	3-7 30%	4-6 40%
NEB	6-4 60%	5-5 50%	3-7 30%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Le Moyne

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ CREI	No recent meeting
Nov 14	vs MAN	W81–77WO
Nov 17	@ EVAN	No recent meeting

Nebraska

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs PROV	No recent meeting
Nov 11	vs LIN	W84–52WU
Nov 15	vs BOIS	W79–69WU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Le Moyne

31 games played

Straight up

14-17

45% wins

Against the spread

16-15

52% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

12-19

39% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

14-1745%

L L L W L W W L W L L L W L W L W W W W L L L W W W L L W L L

2 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

16-1552%

W L W W L W W L W L W W W L W L W W L W L L L L L W W L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

12-1939%

U U O O O U O O U U O U U U U U U O U O U U O O U U U O U U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 6	@XAV	L 69-74	+24.5	W +19.5	156.5	U 143
Nov 9	@BGSU	L 60-83	+11.5	L −11.5	154.5	U 143
Nov 13	@MASS	L 80-94	+16.5	W +2.5	153.5	O 174
Nov 17	vsNIA	W 74-68	-2.5	W +3.5	138.5	O 142
Nov 22	vsFAIR	L 83-97	+1.5	L −12.5	145.5	O 180
Nov 28	@LAF	W 76-63	+4.5	W +17.5	151.5	U 139
Nov 29	vsMONM	W 83-79	+6.5	W +10.5	145.5	O 162
Nov 30	vsBALL	L 85-96	-1.5	L −12.5	140.5	O 181
Dec 6	@BING	W 78-63	-2.5	W +12.5	144.5	U 141
Dec 16	@TEX	L 53-95	+29.5	L −12.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 20	@SBU	L 81-92	+21.5	W +10.5	151.5	O 173
Dec 28	@BC	L 64-72	+12.5	W +4.5	146.5	U 136
Jan 2	@SFPA	W 84-58	-5.5	W +20.5	151.5	U 142
Jan 4	@MERC	L 60-74	+2.5	L −11.5	141.5	U 134
Jan 8	vsNHVN	W 73-47	-5.5	W +20.5	137.5	U 120
Jan 10	vsCCSU	L 59-69	-1.5	L −11.5	146.5	U 128
Jan 17	@CHST	W 72-57	-6.5	W +8.5	146.5	U 129
Jan 19	vsLIU	W 83-77	+1.5	W +7.5	150.5	O 160
Jan 23	vsWAG	W 69-67	-7.5	L −5.5	143.5	U 136
Jan 26	@FDU	W 87-74	+1.5	W +14.5	139.5	O 161
Jan 29	@LIU	L 61-83	+8.5	L −13.5	147.5	U 144
Jan 31	vsSTO	L 54-65	-2.5	L −13.5	140.5	U 119
Feb 5	@WAG	L 78-79	-1.5	L −2.5	138.5	O 157
Feb 7	vsSFPA	W 86-84	-7.5	L −5.5	153.5	O 170
Feb 12	vsMERC	W 58-57	-2.5	L −1.5	138.5	U 115
Feb 14	vsCHST	W 81-63	-6.5	W +11.5	144.5	U 144
Feb 19	@CCSU	L 77-78	+8.5	W +7.5	165.5	U 155
Feb 21	@STO	L 68-77	-1.5	L −10.5	137.5	O 145
Feb 26	vsFDU	W 76-59	-4.5	W +12.5	139.5	U 135
Feb 28	@NHVN	L 59-66	-1.5	L −8.5	137.5	U 125
Mar 4	vsSTO	L 71-81	-4.5	L −14.5	140.5	O 152

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

XAV

L 69-74

+19.5

BGSU

L 60-83

−11.5

MASS

L 80-94

+2.5

NIA

W 74-68

+3.5

FAIR

L 83-97

−12.5

LAF

W 76-63

+17.5

MONM

W 83-79

+10.5

BALL

L 85-96

−12.5

BING

W 78-63

+12.5

TEX

L 53-95

−12.5

SBU

L 81-92

+10.5

L 64-72

+4.5

SFPA

W 84-58

+20.5

MERC

L 60-74

−11.5

NHVN

W 73-47

+20.5

CCSU

L 59-69

−11.5

CHST

W 72-57

+8.5

LIU

W 83-77

+7.5

WAG

W 69-67

−5.5

FDU

W 87-74

+14.5

LIU

L 61-83

−13.5

STO

L 54-65

−13.5

WAG

L 78-79

−2.5

SFPA

W 86-84

−5.5

MERC

W 58-57

−1.5

CHST

W 81-63

+11.5

CCSU

L 77-78

+7.5

STO

L 68-77

−10.5

FDU

W 76-59

+12.5

NHVN

L 59-66

−8.5

STO

L 71-81

−14.5

covered 16didn’t cover 15avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

XAV

L 69-74

−13.5

BGSU

L 60-83

−11.5

MASS

L 80-94

+20.5

NIA

W 74-68

+3.5

FAIR

L 83-97

+34.5

LAF

W 76-63

−12.5

MONM

W 83-79

+16.5

BALL

L 85-96

+40.5

BING

W 78-63

−3.5

TEX

L 53-95

−4.5

SBU

L 81-92

+21.5

L 64-72

−10.5

SFPA

W 84-58

−9.5

MERC

L 60-74

−7.5

NHVN

W 73-47

−17.5

CCSU

L 59-69

−18.5

CHST

W 72-57

−17.5

LIU

W 83-77

+9.5

WAG

W 69-67

−7.5

FDU

W 87-74

+21.5

LIU

L 61-83

−3.5

STO

L 54-65

−21.5

WAG

L 78-79

+18.5

SFPA

W 86-84

+16.5

MERC

W 58-57

−23.5

CHST

W 81-63

−0.5

CCSU

L 77-78

−10.5

STO

L 68-77

+7.5

FDU

W 76-59

−4.5

NHVN

L 59-66

−12.5

STO

L 71-81

+11.5

over 12under 19avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Nebraska

35 games played

Straight up

28-7

80% wins

Against the spread

19-16

54% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line

Over / Under

11-24

31% overs · avg −6.8 pts vs the total

Straight up

28-780%

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L L W L W L W W W L W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

19-1654%

W W L W W L L L W W W L L L W W W W L W W L L L W L W L W L W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

11-2431%

U O U O O O U U U U O U U U U O U U U U U U O O U U O U U U O U U U O

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsWGA	W 86-53	-24.5	W +8.5	153.5	U 139
Nov 8	vsFIU	W 96-66	-21.5	W +8.5	156.5	O 162
Nov 11	vsUMES	W 69-50	-35.5	L −16.5	146.5	U 119
Nov 15	vsOU	W 105-99	-1.5	W +4.5	163.5	O 204
Nov 20	vsUNM	W 84-72	-8.5	W +3.5	151.5	O 156
Nov 21	vsKSU	W 86-85	-1.5	L −0.5	168.5	O 171
Nov 25	vsWIN	W 80-73	-14.5	L −7.5	166.5	U 153
Nov 29	vsUPST	W 72-63	-25.5	L −16.5	157.5	U 135
Dec 7	vsCREI	W 71-50	-5.5	W +15.5	155.5	U 121
Dec 10	vsWIS	W 90-60	-1.5	W +28.5	158.5	U 150
Dec 13	@ILL	W 83-80	+9.5	W +12.5	156.5	O 163
Dec 21	vsUND	W 78-55	-29.5	L −6.5	151.5	U 133
Dec 30	vsUNH	W 86-55	-31.5	L −0.5	146.5	U 141
Jan 2	vsMSU	W 58-56	-2.5	L −0.5	146.5	U 114
Jan 5	@OSU	W 72-69	+2.5	W +5.5	155.5	U 141
Jan 10	@IU	W 83-77	+4.5	W +10.5	150.5	O 160
Jan 13	vsORE	W 90-55	-10.5	W +24.5	146.5	U 145
Jan 17	@NU	W 77-58	-4.5	W +14.5	149.5	U 135
Jan 21	vsWASH	W 76-66	-10.5	L −0.5	152.5	U 142
Jan 24	@MINN	W 76-57	-4.5	W +14.5	140.5	U 133
Jan 27	@MICH	L 72-75	+11.5	W +8.5	157.5	U 147
Feb 1	vsILL	L 69-78	-1.5	L −10.5	154.5	U 147
Feb 7	@RUTG	W 80-68	-12.5	L −0.5	145.5	O 148
Feb 10	vsPUR	L 77-80	-2.5	L −5.5	146.5	O 157
Feb 14	vsNU	W 68-49	-13.5	W +5.5	146.5	U 117
Feb 17	@IOWA	L 52-57	+1.5	L −3.5	139.5	U 109
Feb 21	vsPSU	W 87-64	-17.5	W +5.5	147.5	O 151
Feb 25	vsMD	W 74-61	-16.5	L −3.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 28	@USC	W 82-67	-5.5	W +9.5	149.5	U 149
Mar 3	@UCLA	L 52-72	+1.5	L −18.5	144.5	U 124
Mar 8	vsIOWA	W 84-75	-4.5	W +4.5	136.5	O 159
Mar 13	vsPUR	L 58-74	+4.5	L −11.5	145.5	U 132
Mar 19	vsTROY	W 76-47	-13.5	W +15.5	139.5	U 123
Mar 21	vsVAN	W 74-72	+1.5	W +3.5	146.5	U 146
Mar 26	vsIOWA	L 71-77	-1.5	L −7.5	131.5	O 148

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

WGA

W 86-53

+8.5

FIU

W 96-66

+8.5

UMES

W 69-50

−16.5

W 105-99

+4.5

UNM

W 84-72

+3.5

KSU

W 86-85

−0.5

WIN

W 80-73

−7.5

UPST

W 72-63

−16.5

CREI

W 71-50

+15.5

WIS

W 90-60

+28.5

ILL

W 83-80

+12.5

UND

W 78-55

−6.5

UNH

W 86-55

−0.5

MSU

W 58-56

−0.5

OSU

W 72-69

+5.5

W 83-77

+10.5

ORE

W 90-55

+24.5

W 77-58

+14.5

WASH

W 76-66

−0.5

MINN

W 76-57

+14.5

MICH

L 72-75

+8.5

ILL

L 69-78

−10.5

RUTG

W 80-68

−0.5

PUR

L 77-80

−5.5

W 68-49

+5.5

IOWA

L 52-57

−3.5

PSU

W 87-64

+5.5

W 74-61

−3.5

USC

W 82-67

+9.5

UCLA

L 52-72

−18.5

IOWA

W 84-75

+4.5

PUR

L 58-74

−11.5

TROY

W 76-47

+15.5

VAN

W 74-72

+3.5

IOWA

L 71-77

−7.5

covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

WGA

W 86-53

−14.5

FIU

W 96-66

+5.5

UMES

W 69-50

−27.5

W 105-99

+40.5

UNM

W 84-72

+4.5

KSU

W 86-85

+2.5

WIN

W 80-73

−13.5

UPST

W 72-63

−22.5

CREI

W 71-50

−34.5

WIS

W 90-60

−8.5

ILL

W 83-80

+6.5

UND

W 78-55

−18.5

UNH

W 86-55

−5.5

MSU

W 58-56

−32.5

OSU

W 72-69

−14.5

W 83-77

+9.5

ORE

W 90-55

−1.5

W 77-58

−14.5

WASH

W 76-66

−10.5

MINN

W 76-57

−7.5

MICH

L 72-75

−10.5

ILL

L 69-78

−7.5

RUTG

W 80-68

+2.5

PUR

L 77-80

+10.5

W 68-49

−29.5

IOWA

L 52-57

−30.5

PSU

W 87-64

+3.5

W 74-61

−7.5

USC

W 82-67

−0.5

UCLA

L 52-72

−20.5

IOWA

W 84-75

+22.5

PUR

L 58-74

−13.5

TROY

W 76-47

−16.5

VAN

W 74-72

−0.5

IOWA

L 71-77

+16.5

over 11under 24avg −6.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Nebraska has the better starters

Position by position: Le Moyne 0, Nebraska 4, even 1

Le MoyneBetterNebraska

G A. Moss10 pts · 7 reb · 5 ast Not ranked

No call

G T. Leonhardt TR12 pts · 5.4 reb · 5.7 ast Score 83

G J. Clayville TR6.6 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.3 ast Score 11

NEBBig

F P. Sandfort18.1 pts · 4.9 reb · 2 ast Score 97

G D. King TR4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast Score 59

NEBSmall

F B. Kapke TR10.6 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.7 ast Score 77

F K. Stuckey TR4.4 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.5 ast Score 5

NEBBig

F S. Orme TR12.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast Score 86

F T. Francis TR4.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast Score 27

NEBBig

F D. Wilkinson TR14.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.2 ast Score 93

Le MoyneBetterNebraska

LEM offense333rd of 366 · -10.8

NEBBig

NEB defense23rd of 366 · +5.1

LEM defense308th of 366 · -8.0

NEBBig

NEB offense43rd of 366 · +4.6

Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players

NEBBig

Backcourt+2.0 · 1 player

Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players

NEBBig

Frontcourt+13.0 · 4 players

Bench-6.1 · 5 players

NEBBig

Bench+1.7 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestLEM betterNEB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Le Moyne

Guards

A. Moss37 minJ. Clayville20 min · TRD. King14 min · TRJ. Teat14 min · TRK. Williams12 min · TRJ. Lee4 min

Forwards

K. Stuckey19 min · TRT. Francis15 min · TRT. Roe7 minI. BrownNewC. SchreinerNewC. JohnsonNew

Centers

P. Hartman9 min · TR

Nebraska

Guards

T. Leonhardt35 min · TRC. Jacobsen20 minT. DeGourville19 min · TRC. Essegian14 minJ. LanierNewC. RiceNew

Forwards

P. Sandfort34 minB. Kapke27 min · TRS. Orme26 min · TRD. Wilkinson25 min · TRB. Frager24 minK. Betts6 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

LEM72.3 #234

NEB77.0 #116

Points per possession

LEM1.04 #265

NEB1.15 #61

Pace (possessions)

LEM69.2 #168

NEB67.3 #267

Shooting

Effective FG%

LEM52.6 #118

NEB55.5 #28

3-point %

LEM34.3 #152

NEB35.5 #91

3-point attempt rate

LEM40.8 #151

NEB51.1 #9

Free throw rate

LEM39.5 #68

NEB26.2 #356

Possessions

Turnover rate

LEM19.1 #323

NEB14.5 #44

Offensive rebound rate

LEM25.2 #337

NEB26.7 #306

Assists per game

LEM14.0 #149

NEB18.0 #10

Defense

Points allowed

LEM73.9 #154

NEB66.1 #14

Points allowed per possession

LEM1.07 #132

NEB0.98 #13

Opponent effective FG%

LEM49.3 #75

NEB48.1 #40

Opponent 3-point %

LEM36.0 #303

NEB30.5 #19

Turnovers forced

LEM15.0 #289

NEB18.9 #54

Defensive rebound rate

LEM71.0 #107

NEB72.6 #47

Steals per game

LEM5.5 #300

NEB7.1 #112

Blocks per game

LEM3.3 #177

NEB2.5 #303

LEM		NEB
Scoring
72.3 #234	Points per game	77.0 #116
1.04 #265	Points per possession	1.15 #61
69.2 #168	Pace (possessions)	67.3 #267
Shooting
52.6 #118	Effective FG%	55.5 #28
34.3 #152	3-point %	35.5 #91
40.8 #151	3-point attempt rate	51.1 #9
39.5 #68	Free throw rate	26.2 #356
Possessions
19.1 #323	Turnover rate	14.5 #44
25.2 #337	Offensive rebound rate	26.7 #306
14.0 #149	Assists per game	18.0 #10
Defense
73.9 #154	Points allowed	66.1 #14
1.07 #132	Points allowed per possession	0.98 #13
49.3 #75	Opponent effective FG%	48.1 #40
36.0 #303	Opponent 3-point %	30.5 #19
15.0 #289	Turnovers forced	18.9 #54
71.0 #107	Defensive rebound rate	72.6 #47
5.5 #300	Steals per game	7.1 #112
3.3 #177	Blocks per game	2.5 #303

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Le Moyne

14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Northeast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Stonehill71–81
L@ New Haven59–66
Wvs FDU76–59
L@ Stonehill68–77
L@ C Connecticut77–78

A week or more of rest.

Nebraska

28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Iowa71–77
Wvs Vanderbilt74–72
Wvs Troy76–47
Lvs Purdue58–74
Wvs Iowa84–75

A week or more of rest.