Fertitta Center · at Houston
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HOU 91–54 · win probability HOU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOU has more of the edges
CARK 2, HOU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
HOU offense vs CARK defense
Offense 10th of 366 against a defense 241st, on the model’s ratings
CARK offense vs HOU defense
Offense 231st of 366 against a defense 1st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CARK has played the 246th-hardest schedule, HOU the 17th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: CARK 31.2, HOU 26.3. Allowed: CARK 30.1, HOU 38.7
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: CARK plays 70.2 a game (105th fastest), HOU 65.0 (346th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: CARK 54.0 and allows 54.9; HOU 51.9 and allows 46.2
Three-pointers
CARK hits 35.5% and allows 35.2%; HOU hits 34.7% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 48.7% and 40.7% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CARK 62%, HOU 26%. Transfers in: CARK 2, HOU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CARK 15.4%, HOU 12.8%. Forced: CARK 19.1%, HOU 20.7%
Home court
HOU at home. This season: HOU 0-0 at home, CARK 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CARK 28.8%, HOU 35.7%. Defensive: CARK 72.6%, HOU 69.7%
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelHOU -36.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model145.6
Model edge—
Projected score
CARK 54.4 · HOU 91.1
Win probability
HOU 100%
1st half
Spread
HOU -21.7
Total
68.1
Projected score
CARK 23.2 · HOU 44.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Arkansas
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg +5.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 54-94 | +31.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-93 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-84 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 56-74 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 92-65 | +4.5 | W +31.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-60 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -3.5 | W +34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 72-83 | +36.5 | W +25.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-99 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 85-83 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 93-73 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 78-84 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-79 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 62-60 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 98-69 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 86-65 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 100-90 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-81 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-60 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-78 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 84-76 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 88-76 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-75 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 93-88 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-79 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 93-98 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−8.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−1.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
−0.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−1.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+31.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+15.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−10.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
+34.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−4.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
+25.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+7.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+4.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+8.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
−8.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−5.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−5.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+16.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
+17.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+15.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+4.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
+10.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+11.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
+0.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
−0.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
+6.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+2.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−5.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+9.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
+2.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+6.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
+5.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
−6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg +5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−9.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−9.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
+9.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−4.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+2.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+1.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−7.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
−6.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−2.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
−3.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+24.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+11.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+18.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
+7.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−2.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−14.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+2.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
−3.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+31.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+19.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
−6.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+8.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
−8.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
+9.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
−9.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+14.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−6.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+28.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
−0.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+4.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
−8.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
+33.5
over 16under 16avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Houston
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
19-18
51% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-57 | -36.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 65-48 | -26.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-45 | -30.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 73-72 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-45 | -40.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 78-74 | -14.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-76 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-56 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-67 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 80-38 | -40.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 99-57 | -32.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-85 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 69-60 | -25.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 67-60 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 69-65 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 77-55 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 77-48 | -13.5 | W +15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 103-73 | -18.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 86-90 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 79-70 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-54 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 79-55 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 77-66 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 66-52 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-64 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 67-70 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 56-69 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 102-62 | -20.5 | W +19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 77-64 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 82-75 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-47 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 78-47 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 88-57 | -10.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 55-65 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−18.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−9.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
+2.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
−6.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+5.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
−10.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
−5.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−1.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+2.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
+1.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+9.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+3.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−16.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
+2.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−3.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
+19.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
+15.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+11.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
−5.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+0.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
+8.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
+8.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
+9.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−2.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−8.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
−0.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−13.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−15.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+19.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
+0.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
−6.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−2.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
+16.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
−3.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
+6.5
21
vs
TA&M
W 88-57
+20.5
26
vs
ILL
L 55-65
−12.5
covered 19didn’t cover 18avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LEH
W 75-57
−4.5
8
vs
TOW
W 65-48
−17.5
12
vs
OAK
W 78-45
−15.5
16
vs
AUB
W 73-72
+4.5
20
vs
RID
W 91-45
+1.5
24
vs
SYR
W 78-74
+11.5
25
vs
TENN
L 73-76
+12.5
26
vs
ND
W 66-56
−10.5
6
vs
FSU
W 82-67
+0.5
10
vs
JKST
W 80-38
−19.5
13
vs
NOLA
W 99-57
+17.5
20
vs
ARK
W 94-85
+32.5
29
vs
MTSU
W 69-60
−9.5
3
@
CIN
W 67-60
−8.5
6
vs
TTU
W 69-65
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 77-55
−10.5
13
vs
WVU
W 77-48
−2.5
18
vs
ASU
W 103-73
+33.5
24
@
TTU
L 86-90
+34.5
28
@
TCU
W 79-70
+9.5
31
vs
CIN
W 76-54
−5.5
4
vs
UCF
W 79-55
−12.5
7
@
BYU
W 77-66
−8.5
10
@
UTAH
W 66-52
−24.5
14
vs
KSU
W 78-64
−2.5
16
@
ISU
L 67-70
+2.5
21
vs
ARIZ
L 66-73
−3.5
23
@
KU
L 56-69
−13.5
28
vs
COLO
W 102-62
+24.5
4
vs
BAY
W 77-64
−2.5
7
@
OKST
W 82-75
+5.5
12
vs
BYU
W 73-66
−7.5
13
vs
KU
W 69-47
−23.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 74-79
+14.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 78-47
−12.5
21
vs
TA&M
W 88-57
+2.5
26
vs
ILL
L 55-65
−21.5
over 15under 22avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Houston has the better starters
Position by position: C Arkansas 0, Houston 4, even 1
C ArkansasBetterHouston
G L. Moore9.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 28
→HOUBig
G C. Hadnot TR20.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 95
G T. Robinson14.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
=Even
G D. Thomas TR15.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 6.5 ast
Score 99
G C. McCormick9.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 44
→HOUBig
F D. Gillespie TR17.9 pts · 11.4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 94
G H. Beauchamp4.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 8
→HOUBig
F B. East TR12.8 pts · 9.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 92
F M. Marable3.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 3
→HOUBig
F J. Tugler8.4 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 96
C ArkansasBetterHouston
CARK offense231st of 366 · -7.1
→HOUBig
HOU defense1st of 366 · +13.2
CARK defense241st of 366 · -6.4
→HOUBig
HOU offense10th of 366 · +10.1
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
→HOUBig
Backcourt+10.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.0 · 1 player
→HOUBig
Frontcourt+11.5 · 3 players
Bench-1.8 · 4 players
→HOUBig
Bench+3.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCARK betterHOU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Moore30 minT. Robinson28 minC. McCormick23 minH. Beauchamp15 minO. Dehrmann3 minJ. Shulman3 min
Forwards
M. Marable21 minT. Anderson12 min · TRS. Saadi9 min · TRA. HoernerNew
Guards
C. Hadnot35 min · TRD. Thomas29 min · TRC. Weaver21 min · TRM. Miller12 minK. Jefferson4 minB. JacksonNew
Forwards
D. Gillespie33 min · TRB. East24 min · TRJ. Tugler24 minC. McCarty12 min
Centers
A. DianeNewD. SilimanaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.3 #77 | Points per game | 76.9 #119 |
| 1.13 #90 | Points per possession | 1.18 #36 |
| 70.2 #105 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #346 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.0 #68 | Effective FG% | 51.9 #150 |
| 35.5 #89 | 3-point % | 34.7 #134 |
| 48.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.7 #153 |
| 31.2 #278 | Free throw rate | 26.3 #355 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #92 | Turnover rate | 12.8 #3 |
| 28.8 #240 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.7 #32 |
| 16.0 #46 | Assists per game | 14.6 #111 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.0 #216 | Points allowed | 62.3 #1 |
| 1.08 #180 | Points allowed per possession | 0.96 #5 |
| 54.9 #328 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.2 #12 |
| 35.2 #262 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #49 |
| 19.1 #45 | Turnovers forced | 20.7 #14 |
| 72.6 #48 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #173 |
| 8.5 #18 | Steals per game | 7.5 #75 |
| 1.9 #351 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #96 |
C Arkansas
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals93–98
- Wvs FGCU73–63
- Wvs Bellarmine86–73
- Wvs Queens University Royals84–79
- W@ Austin Peay93–88
A week or more of rest.
Houston
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois55–65
- Wvs Texas A&M88–57
- Wvs Idaho78–47
- Lvs Arizona74–79
- Wvs Kansas69–47
A week or more of rest.