Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCSD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SEA 70–69 · win probability SEA 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UCSD has more of the edges
SEA 2, UCSD 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SEA 23.7%, UCSD 26.1%. Defensive: SEA 68.2%, UCSD 73.0%
Context
Schedule so far
SEA has played the 114th-hardest schedule, UCSD the 205th. A record against a soft schedule means less
SEA offense vs UCSD defense
Offense 183rd of 366 against a defense 110th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SEA 16.7%, UCSD 16.5%. Forced: SEA 21.2%, UCSD 16.8%
UCSD offense vs SEA defense
Offense 145th of 366 against a defense 76th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SEA 49.8 and allows 48.4; UCSD 52.6 and allows 48.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SEA 50%, UCSD 68%. Transfers in: SEA 3, UCSD 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SEA plays 69.1 a game (175th fastest), UCSD 69.7 (130th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
SEA hits 33.7% and allows 32.1%; UCSD hits 32.8% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 39.4% and 42.3% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SEA 34.2, UCSD 31.2. Allowed: SEA 33.0, UCSD 29.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SEA -0.7 | — |
| Total | — | 138.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | SEA 69.6 · UCSD 68.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SEA -0.6 | — |
| 1H total | 64.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | SEA 32.7 · UCSD 32.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 1-9 10% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SEA 4–0 UCSDSEA leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · SEA has won the last 4 meetings · SEA 4-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2024-25 | SEA 84 @ UCSD 71 | UCSD -7.5 | SEA W |
| Nov 26, 2023-24 | UCSD 67 @ SEA 79 | SEA -8.5 | SEA W |
| Nov 7, 2022-23 | SEA 85 @ UCSD 71 | UCSD +3.5 | SEA W |
| Dec 12, 2021-22 | UCSD 51 @ SEA 73 | SEA -4 | SEA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Seattle U
33 games played
Straight up
19-14
58% wins
Against the spread
15-18
45% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-73 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 71-73 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-67 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 83-74 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 77-69 | +10.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 66-52 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 71-74 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 79-78 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 70-66 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 71-68 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 69-55 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 72-80 | +24.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 76-93 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 55-68 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 75-64 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 50-71 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 69-59 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 54-56 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-70 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 83-81 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 53-54 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 72-84 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 60-50 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 70-72 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-59 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 71-66 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 58-56 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 58-61 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 129.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 67-52 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 22 | @ | L 85-91 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DEN
W 84-73
−2.5
8
vs
CP
L 71-73
−12.5
12
vs
EWU
W 94-67
+18.5
15
vs
IDST
W 83-74
−2.5
21
@
STAN
W 77-69
+18.5
28
vs
TXST
W 66-52
+6.5
29
vs
UCSB
L 71-74
−5.5
7
vs
UTEP
W 75-68
−5.5
17
@
UCD
W 79-78
−1.5
19
vs
WASH
W 70-66
+11.5
22
@
UTSA
W 71-68
−7.5
28
vs
SF
L 59-67
−10.5
30
vs
WSU
W 69-55
+7.5
2
@
GONZ
L 72-80
+16.5
4
@
SMC
L 76-93
−5.5
8
@
ORST
L 55-68
−17.5
15
vs
USD
W 75-64
+1.5
17
vs
GONZ
L 50-71
−11.5
21
vs
LMU
W 69-59
+5.5
24
@
PAC
L 54-56
−0.5
28
@
WSU
L 58-70
−10.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 83-81
−10.5
7
@
PORT
L 53-54
−4.5
11
@
SCU
L 72-84
+0.5
15
vs
ORST
W 60-50
+3.5
18
vs
SMC
L 70-72
+7.5
21
vs
PORT
W 71-59
+4.5
25
@
PEPP
W 87-80
−0.5
28
@
LMU
W 71-66
+6.5
6
vs
USD
W 58-56
−6.5
7
vs
PAC
L 58-61
−1.5
17
vs
STMN
W 67-52
+12.5
22
@
AUB
L 85-91
+8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 18avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DEN
W 84-73
+20.5
8
vs
CP
L 71-73
−20.5
12
vs
EWU
W 94-67
+12.5
15
vs
IDST
W 83-74
+18.5
21
@
STAN
W 77-69
−6.5
28
vs
TXST
W 66-52
−18.5
29
vs
UCSB
L 71-74
+2.5
7
vs
UTEP
W 75-68
+6.5
17
@
UCD
W 79-78
+13.5
19
vs
WASH
W 70-66
−15.5
22
@
UTSA
W 71-68
−9.5
28
vs
SF
L 59-67
−20.5
30
vs
WSU
W 69-55
−20.5
2
@
GONZ
L 72-80
−3.5
4
@
SMC
L 76-93
+29.5
8
@
ORST
L 55-68
−16.5
15
vs
USD
W 75-64
−8.5
17
vs
GONZ
L 50-71
−29.5
21
vs
LMU
W 69-59
−13.5
24
@
PAC
L 54-56
−27.5
28
@
WSU
L 58-70
−14.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 83-81
+24.5
7
@
PORT
L 53-54
−36.5
11
@
SCU
L 72-84
+8.5
15
vs
ORST
W 60-50
−26.5
18
vs
SMC
L 70-72
+8.5
21
vs
PORT
W 71-59
−10.5
25
@
PEPP
W 87-80
+21.5
28
@
LMU
W 71-66
+0.5
6
vs
USD
W 58-56
−25.5
7
vs
PAC
L 58-61
−10.5
17
vs
STMN
W 67-52
−26.5
22
@
AUB
L 85-91
+30.5
over 13under 20avg −5 ptslonger = bigger margin
UC San Diego
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 78-60 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-67 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 91-76 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 87-77 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 87-73 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 70-76 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 80-74 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-67 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 67-57 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 80-82 | -12.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 65-67 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 174.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 83-73 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 71-88 | -13.5 | L −30.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 69-66 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 79-84 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-62 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 80-74 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 59-61 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 48-62 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 77-74 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-72 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 68-51 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 72-66 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-69 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-72 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 80-64 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 71-75 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-63 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 72-69 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-80 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
HCU
W 78-60
+10.5
12
@
FRES
W 78-73
+6.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 75-67
+2.5
24
vs
TEM
W 91-76
+16.5
25
vs
BRAD
W 87-77
+11.5
26
vs
TOW
W 87-73
+12.5
2
@
NEV
L 70-76
−0.5
6
@
LBSU
W 80-74
−2.5
13
vs
TULN
W 93-67
+20.5
16
@
LMU
W 67-57
+8.5
19
vs
USD
L 80-82
−14.5
1
@
CP
L 65-67
−10.5
3
vs
HAW
W 83-73
+7.5
8
vs
CSUF
L 71-88
−30.5
10
@
UCR
W 69-66
−7.5
15
vs
CSUN
L 79-84
−12.5
17
@
CSUB
W 83-62
+12.5
22
@
UCD
W 80-74
+4.5
24
vs
UCI
L 59-61
−4.5
29
vs
UCSB
L 48-62
−18.5
31
@
CSUN
L 64-81
−18.5
5
vs
LBSU
W 77-74
−7.5
7
@
HAW
L 67-72
+1.5
12
vs
UCD
W 68-51
+11.5
14
vs
UCR
W 72-66
−5.5
21
@
UCI
W 71-69
+5.5
26
vs
CSUB
W 84-72
−2.5
28
vs
CP
W 80-64
+8.5
5
@
CSUF
L 71-75
−6.5
7
@
UCSB
W 64-63
+3.5
11
vs
CP
W 72-69
−1.5
12
vs
CSUN
L 70-80
−11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
HCU
W 78-60
−3.5
12
@
FRES
W 78-73
+2.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 75-67
−6.5
24
vs
TEM
W 91-76
+18.5
25
vs
BRAD
W 87-77
+18.5
26
vs
TOW
W 87-73
+21.5
2
@
NEV
L 70-76
−3.5
6
@
LBSU
W 80-74
+8.5
13
vs
TULN
W 93-67
+10.5
16
@
LMU
W 67-57
−26.5
19
vs
USD
L 80-82
+5.5
1
@
CP
L 65-67
−42.5
3
vs
HAW
W 83-73
+7.5
8
vs
CSUF
L 71-88
−7.5
10
@
UCR
W 69-66
−14.5
15
vs
CSUN
L 79-84
+3.5
17
@
CSUB
W 83-62
−2.5
22
@
UCD
W 80-74
+1.5
24
vs
UCI
L 59-61
−26.5
29
vs
UCSB
L 48-62
−35.5
31
@
CSUN
L 64-81
−15.5
5
vs
LBSU
W 77-74
+6.5
7
@
HAW
L 67-72
−10.5
12
vs
UCD
W 68-51
−31.5
14
vs
UCR
W 72-66
−9.5
21
@
UCI
W 71-69
−3.5
26
vs
CSUB
W 84-72
+7.5
28
vs
CP
W 80-64
−20.5
5
@
CSUF
L 71-75
−10.5
7
@
UCSB
W 64-63
−14.5
11
vs
CP
W 72-69
−21.5
12
vs
CSUN
L 70-80
−3.5
over 12under 20avg −6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Seattle U 1, UC San Diego 1, even 3
Seattle UBetterUC San Diego
G T. Boston TR14.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 76
←SEASmall
G R. Barno TR11.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 5 ast
Score 52
G M. Arington4.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 4 ast
Score 41
→UCSDSmall
G T. Beattie10.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 71
F J. Yeo12.3 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 45
=Even
G C. Wagner TR12 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 50
F W. Heimbrodt12.7 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 72
=Even
G T. Eaglestaff TR9.8 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 77
F T. Thrastarson TR9.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 54
=Even
F L. Beath11.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 51
Seattle UBetterUC San Diego
SEA offense183rd of 366 · -5.7
→UCSDSmall
UCSD defense110th of 366 · -1.3
SEA defense76th of 366 · +0.6
←SEASmall
UCSD offense145th of 366 · -4.4
Backcourt-0.2 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt+0.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
Bench+0.1 · 3 players
←SEABig
Bench-3.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSEA betterUCSD betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Boston33 min · TRM. Arington31 minK. HansenNewM. WilliamsNewJ. WhiteNewJ. HarshmanNew
Forwards
J. Yeo32 minW. Heimbrodt32 minT. Thrastarson23 min · TRY. Kawashima3 minR. Adams2 min
Centers
H. Dzellat8 min · TRL. CoulibalyNew
Guards
R. Barno32 min · TRT. Beattie32 minC. Wagner30 min · TRT. Eaglestaff29 min · TRK. Dotson27 min · TRA. Chaikin25 min
Forwards
L. Beath30 minO. Suutela18 min · TRJ. Vance13 minC. Pendleton8 minJ. HolmesNew
Centers
D. Vukicevic7 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.1 #283 | Points per game | 74.5 #179 |
| 1.01 #312 | Points per possession | 1.07 #211 |
| 69.1 #175 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #130 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.8 #249 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #124 |
| 33.7 #186 | 3-point % | 32.8 #241 |
| 39.4 #185 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.3 #131 |
| 34.2 #201 | Free throw rate | 31.2 #277 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #178 | Turnover rate | 16.5 #165 |
| 23.7 #347 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.1 #320 |
| 13.2 #201 | Assists per game | 14.9 #94 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.2 #34 | Points allowed | 70.5 #63 |
| 0.99 #20 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #35 |
| 48.4 #46 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.4 #45 |
| 32.1 #69 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #45 |
| 21.2 #9 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #165 |
| 68.2 #249 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.0 #38 |
| 7.8 #52 | Steals per game | 7.4 #94 |
| 4.9 #20 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #299 |
Seattle U
19-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Auburn85–91
- Wvs St Thomas67–52
- Lvs Pacific58–61
- Wvs San Diego58–56
- W@ LMU71–66
A week or more of rest.
UC San Diego
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs CSU Northridge70–80
- Wvs Cal Poly72–69
- W@ Santa Barbara64–63
- L@ Fullerton71–75
- Wvs Cal Poly80–64
A week or more of rest.