Coleman Coliseum · at Alabama
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ALA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ALA 96–70 · win probability ALA 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 165.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ALA has more of the edges
KENN 1, ALA 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ALA offense vs KENN defense
Offense 2nd of 366 against a defense 193rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
KENN has played the 156th-hardest schedule, ALA the 1st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: KENN 50.4 and allows 48.3; ALA 55.2 and allows 49.2
KENN offense vs ALA defense
Offense 126th of 366 against a defense 54th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: KENN 35.2%, ALA 32.4%. Defensive: KENN 68.4%, ALA 67.2%
Three-pointers
KENN hits 33.4% and allows 33.5%; ALA hits 35.8% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 42.5% and 54.3% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: KENN 45.1, ALA 36.0. Allowed: KENN 47.1, ALA 32.0
Home court
ALA at home. This season: ALA 0-0 at home, KENN 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: KENN 32%, ALA 46%. Transfers in: KENN 5, ALA 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: KENN 16.8%, ALA 13.1%. Forced: KENN 16.0%, ALA 12.8%
Context
Tempo
About 74 possessions: KENN plays 72.4 a game (27th fastest), ALA 74.7 (7th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ALA -25.5 | — |
| Total | — | 165.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | KENN 70.1 · ALA 95.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ALA -15.1 | — |
| 1H total | 77.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | KENN 31.2 · ALA 46.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
KENN 0–1 ALAALA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · KENN 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2025-26 | KENN 81 vs ALA 92 | ALA -20.5 | KENN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kennesaw St
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-72 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 89-108 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-84 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 83-91 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 166.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 102-100 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 202 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-73 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 92-69 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 67-68 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 81-92 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 182.5 | U 173 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 73-81 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 52-67 | -8.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 90-80 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-86 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 175.5 | U 175 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-65 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 87-93 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 167.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 76-82 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-69 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-53 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-77 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 87-90 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 79-83 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-87 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 58-55 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 74-65 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 71-78 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 96-87 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-73 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 71-60 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-73 | +20.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
FAMU
W 92-72
+8.5
16
vs
USF
L 89-108
−11.5
24
vs
RICE
W 89-84
+0.5
25
vs
ORU
L 83-91
−16.5
26
@
FGCU
W 102-100
+3.5
2
vs
JKST
W 88-73
−0.5
6
vs
GAST
W 92-69
+8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 67-68
+2.5
21
vs
ALA
L 81-92
+9.5
2
@
LIB
L 73-81
−0.5
4
@
DEL
L 52-67
−23.5
7
vs
MOST
W 90-80
+3.5
10
vs
JXST
W 88-82
+0.5
14
vs
FIU
W 89-86
−2.5
17
@
WKU
W 81-65
+23.5
21
@
SHSU
L 87-93
−0.5
23
@
LT
L 76-82
−7.5
28
vs
WKU
W 72-69
−1.5
31
vs
NMSU
W 76-53
+19.5
7
@
JXST
L 58-77
−20.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
−6.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 79-83
−5.5
18
@
MOST
W 91-87
+5.5
21
vs
LT
W 58-55
−2.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-65
+10.5
28
vs
DEL
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
UTEP
L 71-78
−10.5
7
@
NMSU
L 76-79
−1.5
12
vs
WKU
W 96-87
+10.5
13
vs
SHSU
W 79-73
+8.5
14
vs
LT
W 71-60
+9.5
19
vs
GONZ
L 64-73
+11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
FAMU
W 92-72
−2.5
16
vs
USF
L 89-108
+19.5
24
vs
RICE
W 89-84
+13.5
25
vs
ORU
L 83-91
+7.5
26
@
FGCU
W 102-100
+41.5
2
vs
JKST
W 88-73
+3.5
6
vs
GAST
W 92-69
+2.5
17
@
MTSU
L 67-68
−25.5
21
vs
ALA
L 81-92
−9.5
2
@
LIB
L 73-81
−4.5
4
@
DEL
L 52-67
−29.5
7
vs
MOST
W 90-80
+17.5
10
vs
JXST
W 88-82
+20.5
14
vs
FIU
W 89-86
−0.5
17
@
WKU
W 81-65
−19.5
21
@
SHSU
L 87-93
+12.5
23
@
LT
L 76-82
+13.5
28
vs
WKU
W 72-69
−19.5
31
vs
NMSU
W 76-53
−30.5
7
@
JXST
L 58-77
−14.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
+28.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 79-83
−0.5
18
@
MOST
W 91-87
+25.5
21
vs
LT
W 58-55
−34.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-65
−13.5
28
vs
DEL
W 90-82
+28.5
5
@
UTEP
L 71-78
+0.5
7
@
NMSU
L 76-79
−2.5
12
vs
WKU
W 96-87
+23.5
13
vs
SHSU
W 79-73
−7.5
14
vs
LT
W 71-60
−11.5
19
vs
GONZ
L 64-73
−15.5
over 15under 17avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Alabama
35 games played
Straight up
25-10
71% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-62 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 170.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 103-96 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 13 | vs | L 80-87 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 90-86 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 180.5 | U 176 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 85-95 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 178.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 115-76 | -13.5 | W +25.5 | 181.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 105-72 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-84 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 97-55 | -33.5 | W +8.5 | 171.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 75-96 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 178.5 | U 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 104-93 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 92-81 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 182.5 | U 173 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 102-78 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 89-74 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 173.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 176.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 88-92 | -11.5 | L −15.5 | 177.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 97-82 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-81 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 177.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 90-64 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 77-100 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 176.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 100-97 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 180.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 96-92 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 175.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 93-74 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 89-75 | -17.5 | L −3.5 | 170.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 117-115 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 90-83 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 172.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 100-75 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 176.5 | U 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 88-98 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-84 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 175.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 79-80 | -12.5 | L −13.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 90-70 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 90-65 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 77-90 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UND
W 91-62
−7.5
8
@
SJU
W 103-96
+11.5
13
vs
PUR
L 80-87
−10.5
19
vs
ILL
W 90-86
+6.5
24
vs
GONZ
L 85-95
−5.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 115-76
+25.5
26
vs
MD
W 105-72
+18.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 90-84
−2.5
7
vs
UTSA
W 97-55
+8.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 75-96
−18.5
17
vs
USF
W 104-93
−3.5
21
vs
KENN
W 92-81
−9.5
29
vs
YALE
W 102-78
+8.5
3
vs
UK
W 89-74
+9.5
7
@
VAN
L 90-96
−2.5
10
vs
TEX
L 88-92
−15.5
13
@
MSST
W 97-82
+10.5
17
@
OU
W 83-81
−3.5
24
vs
TENN
L 73-79
−10.5
27
vs
MIZ
W 90-64
+15.5
1
@
FLA
L 77-100
−13.5
4
vs
TA&M
W 100-97
−5.5
7
@
AUB
W 96-92
+6.5
11
@
MISS
W 93-74
+12.5
14
vs
SC
W 89-75
−3.5
18
vs
ARK
W 117-115
−1.5
21
@
LSU
W 90-83
−0.5
25
vs
MSST
W 100-75
+12.5
28
@
TENN
W 71-69
+7.5
3
@
UGA
L 88-98
−11.5
7
vs
AUB
W 96-84
+6.5
13
vs
MISS
L 79-80
−13.5
20
vs
HOF
W 90-70
+8.5
22
vs
TTU
W 90-65
+23.5
27
vs
MICH
L 77-90
−3.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UND
W 91-62
−17.5
8
@
SJU
W 103-96
+26.5
13
vs
PUR
L 80-87
−5.5
19
vs
ILL
W 90-86
−4.5
24
vs
GONZ
L 85-95
+1.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 115-76
+9.5
26
vs
MD
W 105-72
+10.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 90-84
+8.5
7
vs
UTSA
W 97-55
−19.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 75-96
−7.5
17
vs
USF
W 104-93
+18.5
21
vs
KENN
W 92-81
−9.5
29
vs
YALE
W 102-78
+8.5
3
vs
UK
W 89-74
−10.5
7
@
VAN
L 90-96
+9.5
10
vs
TEX
L 88-92
+2.5
13
@
MSST
W 97-82
+7.5
17
@
OU
W 83-81
−13.5
24
vs
TENN
L 73-79
−15.5
27
vs
MIZ
W 90-64
−13.5
1
@
FLA
L 77-100
+0.5
4
vs
TA&M
W 100-97
+16.5
7
@
AUB
W 96-92
+12.5
11
@
MISS
W 93-74
+2.5
14
vs
SC
W 89-75
−6.5
18
vs
ARK
W 117-115
+50.5
21
@
LSU
W 90-83
+0.5
25
vs
MSST
W 100-75
−1.5
28
@
TENN
W 71-69
−22.5
3
@
UGA
L 88-98
+6.5
7
vs
AUB
W 96-84
+4.5
13
vs
MISS
L 79-80
−7.5
20
vs
HOF
W 90-70
+1.5
22
vs
TTU
W 90-65
−9.5
27
vs
MICH
L 77-90
−5.5
over 19under 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Alabama has the better starters
Position by position: Kennesaw St 0, Alabama 4, even 1
Kennesaw StBetterAlabama
G J. Hill TR10.1 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 53
→ALABig
G A. Holloway16.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
G K. Rickard5.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 21
→ALABig
G A. Allen11.4 pts · 6.9 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 94
F T. Simpson8 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 38
→ALABig
F D. Fielder TR14.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 98
F A. Thomas TR8.3 pts · 6.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 61
=Even
F J. Davis-Fleming TR3.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
F A. Enoh TR4.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
→ALABig
F B. Garrison TR4.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
Kennesaw StBetterAlabama
KENN offense126th of 366 · -3.4
→ALASmall
ALA defense54th of 366 · +1.5
KENN defense193rd of 366 · -4.6
→ALABig
ALA offense2nd of 366 · +13.7
Backcourt-2.3 · 2 players
→ALABig
Backcourt+8.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
→ALABig
Frontcourt+5.2 · 3 players
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
=Even
Bench+0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestKENN betterALA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Hill31 min · TRK. Rickard20 minC. Beaumont9 min · TRK. Parker6 min · TRB. TousignautNewA. DanielsNew
Forwards
T. Simpson26 minA. Thomas25 min · TRA. Enoh23 min · TRA. Taylor17 minD. Onyirimba2 minK. BerryNew
Guards
A. Holloway28 minA. Allen28 minP. Murphy3 minC. CloerNewQ. SamuelsNewA. DiazNew
Forwards
D. Fielder24 min · TRJ. Davis-Fleming20 min · TRB. Garrison16 min · TRL. Jemison16 minK. Bristow13 minJ. RichardsonNew
Centers
C. Onyejiaka6 minT. St. LouisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.0 #66 | Points per game | 91.2 #1 |
| 1.11 #122 | Points per possession | 1.22 #5 |
| 72.4 #27 | Pace (possessions) | 74.7 #7 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #224 | Effective FG% | 55.2 #34 |
| 33.4 #203 | 3-point % | 35.8 #66 |
| 42.5 #127 | 3-point attempt rate | 54.3 #1 |
| 45.1 #5 | Free throw rate | 36.0 #150 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #183 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #10 |
| 35.2 #44 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.4 #111 |
| 13.3 #189 | Assists per game | 16.3 #39 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.3 #272 | Points allowed | 82.7 #343 |
| 1.08 #159 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #232 |
| 48.3 #43 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.2 #73 |
| 33.5 #154 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #170 |
| 16.0 #223 | Turnovers forced | 12.8 #361 |
| 68.4 #234 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #295 |
| 6.8 #146 | Steals per game | 6.4 #186 |
| 5.3 #10 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #17 |
Kennesaw St
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gonzaga64–73
- Wvs Louisiana Tech71–60
- Wvs Sam Houston79–73
- Wvs Western KY96–87
- L@ New Mexico St76–79
A week or more of rest.
Alabama
25-10 in 2025-26 overall · 13-6 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan77–90
- Wvs Texas Tech90–65
- Wvs Hofstra90–70
- Lvs Ole Miss79–80
- Wvs Auburn96–84
A week or more of rest.