Hard Rock Hotel Riviera Maya · Neutral site
#188EMUE Michigan
vs
#148KENNKennesaw St
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: E Michigan and Kennesaw St
EMUThis seasonKENN
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects KENN 76–73 · win probability KENN 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: KENN has more of the edges

EMU 0, KENN 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: EMU plays 68.9 a game (190th fastest), KENN 72.4 (27th). Faster games mean more points
KENNSmall
Free throws
Free throw rate: EMU 29.3, KENN 45.1. Allowed: EMU 35.5, KENN 47.1
KENNSmall
KENN offense vs EMU defense
Offense 126th of 366 against a defense 188th, on the model’s ratings
KENNSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: EMU 49.6 and allows 50.3; KENN 50.4 and allows 48.3
KENNSmall
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: EMU 27.8%, KENN 35.2%. Defensive: EMU 70.9%, KENN 68.4%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: EMU 17.5%, KENN 16.8%. Forced: EMU 15.5%, KENN 16.0%
Even
EMU offense vs KENN defense
Offense 206th of 366 against a defense 193rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: EMU 37%, KENN 32%. Transfers in: EMU 4, KENN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Three-pointers
EMU hits 32.4% and allows 32.9%; KENN hits 33.4% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 31.8% and 42.5% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
EMU has played the 157th-hardest schedule, KENN the 156th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—KENN -2.6—
Total—148.9—
Projected score—EMU 73.2 · KENN 75.7

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadKENN -1.4—
1H total69.6—
1H projected scoreEMU 34.1 · KENN 35.5—

E Michigan has the better starters

Position by position: E Michigan 2, Kennesaw St 1, even 2
E MichiganBetterKennesaw St
G J. Fitzpatrick TR15.4 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.6 ast Score 75
EMUSmall
G J. Hill TR10.1 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.6 ast Score 53
G E. Richards TR9.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 1 ast Score 32
Even
G K. Rickard5.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.9 ast Score 21
G B. Green4.4 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.4 ast Score 9
KENNSmall
F T. Simpson8 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.6 ast Score 38
F M. Habhab14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 3.1 ast Score 64
Even
F A. Thomas TR8.3 pts · 6.9 reb · 0.6 ast Score 61
F K. Brockhoff TR10.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 2 ast Score 44
EMUSmall
F A. Enoh TR4.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.8 ast Score 19
E MichiganBetterKennesaw St
EMU offense206th of 366 · -6.3
Even
KENN defense193rd of 366 · -4.6
EMU defense188th of 366 · -4.4
KENNSmall
KENN offense126th of 366 · -3.4
Backcourt-3.0 · 3 players
Even
Backcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.1 · 2 players
EMUSmall
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
Bench-0.3 · 2 players
Even
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestEMU betterKENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
E Michigan
Guards
J. Fitzpatrick36 min · TRE. Richards27 min · TRB. Green20 minG. Lawson18 minS. Harris17 min · TRD. PorterNew
Forwards
M. Habhab36 minK. Brockhoff22 min · TRK. JohnsonNewJ. WrightNewO. SuleimanNew
Kennesaw St
Guards
J. Hill31 min · TRK. Rickard20 minC. Beaumont9 min · TRK. Parker6 min · TRB. TousignautNewA. DanielsNew
Forwards
T. Simpson26 minA. Thomas25 min · TRA. Enoh23 min · TRA. Taylor17 minD. Onyirimba2 minK. BerryNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
EMUKENN
Scoring
70.2 #282Points per game80.0 #66
1.02 #298Points per possession1.11 #122
68.9 #190Pace (possessions)72.4 #27
Shooting
49.6 #264Effective FG%50.4 #224
32.4 #2593-point %33.4 #203
31.8 #3323-point attempt rate42.5 #127
29.3 #325Free throw rate45.1 #5
Possessions
17.5 #235Turnover rate16.8 #183
27.8 #273Offensive rebound rate35.2 #44
12.4 #261Assists per game13.3 #189
Defense
74.4 #169Points allowed78.3 #272
1.07 #142Points allowed per possession1.08 #159
50.3 #115Opponent effective FG%48.3 #43
32.9 #111Opponent 3-point %33.5 #154
15.5 #249Turnovers forced16.0 #223
70.9 #109Defensive rebound rate68.4 #234
5.7 #269Steals per game6.8 #146
4.1 #61Blocks per game5.3 #10

E Michigan

9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 4-14 in conference · Mid-American Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Bowling Green69–77
  • L@ Buffalo67–72
  • Lvs Miami OH64–74
  • L@ Toledo75–94
  • Wvs C Michigan66–54

A week or more of rest.

Kennesaw St

18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Conference USA

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Gonzaga64–73
  • Wvs Louisiana Tech71–60
  • Wvs Sam Houston79–73
  • Wvs Western KY96–87
  • L@ New Mexico St76–79

A week or more of rest.