Gervin GameAbove Center · at E Michigan · Conference game
Closing line
BGSU -5.5✓ BGSU covered by 2.5
Closing total142.5Over by 3.5
| This season | EMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-13 | Record | 9-20 |
| 12-15 | ATS | 20-9 |
| 9-18 | O/U | 8-21 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BGSU 72–70 EMU · ✓ BGSU (57%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BGSU | 28 | 49 | 77 |
| EMU | 31 | 38 | 69 |
1st half: BGSU 28, EMU 31 (EMU by 3). The model had BGSU by 1.4 and a total of 66.3 (actual 59).
Team stats
| BGSU | EMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-66 39% | Field goals | 26-59 44% |
| 7-19 37% | 3-pointers | 3-16 19% |
| 18-26 69% | Free throws | 14-19 74% |
| 39 14 off | Rebounds | 36 8 off |
| 10 | Assists | 8 |
| 6 | Steals | 5 |
| 3 | Blocks | 6 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 15 | Fouls | 21 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 44 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 13 |
Players
| BGSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javontae Campbell G | 38 | 22 | 3 | 7 | 8-19 | 1-2 |
| Sam Towns F | 34 | 15 | 18 | 0 | 3-13 | 0-2 |
| Javon Ruffin G | 33 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 4-7 | 4-7 |
| Justin Thomas G | 30 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| Troy Glover II F | 25 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Josiah Shackelford G | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-2 |
| Mayar Wol F | 13 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-2 |
| Aiden Goins F | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Makhi Leach G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Camden Karel, Christian Dedivanaj, Jason Kimbrough, Alijah Adem, Preston Squire, Mohamed Maxamud, Greg Spurgin, Jaxon Pardon
| EMU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Lawson II G | 37 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Mohammad Habhab F | 34 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 4-11 | 0-0 |
| Addison Patterson F | 32 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 8-14 | 1-3 |
| Braelon Green G | 32 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 |
| Godslove Nwabude F | 20 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aidan Rubio G | 15 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-3 |
| Mehki Ellison G | 13 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Mak Manciel G | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| John Shanu II C | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Cooper Smith, Mbaye N'Diaye, Merritt Alderink, Jon Sanders II, Carlos Hart
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenBGSU -3.5
2 → BGSU
CloseBGSU -5.5
2 pts toward BGSU
Total
Open141.5
▲ 1
Close142.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
BGSU -225 · EMU +185
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened BGSU -3.5 · closed BGSU -5.5 · moved 2 toward BGSUmodel BGSU -2
model BGSU -2
Opened 141.5 · closed 142.5 · moved 1 upmodel 141.5
model 141.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | BGSU -5.5 | BGSU -2.1 | EMU +3.4 | L BGSU covered |
| Total | 142.5 | 141.6 | Under 0.9 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | BGSU 71.8 · EMU 69.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BGSU -1.4 | EMU -3.0 |
| 1H total | 66.3 | 59 |
| 1H projected score | BGSU 33.8 · EMU 32.4 | BGSU 28 · EMU 31 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | |
| 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
BGSU 6–2 EMUBGSU leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · BGSU has won the last 2 meetings · BGSU 4-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | EMU 79 @ BGSU 85 | BGSU -11.5 | EMU W |
| Feb 25, 2024-25 | BGSU 65 @ EMU 60 | EMU -4.5 | BGSU W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | EMU 68 @ BGSU 62 | BGSU -6.5 | EMU W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | BGSU 60 @ EMU 69 | EMU +5.5 | EMU W |
| Jan 2, 2023-24 | EMU 90 @ BGSU 92 | BGSU -10.5 | EMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bowling Green
27 games played
Straight up
14-13
52% wins
Against the spread
12-15
44% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-18
33% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-48 | -5.5 | W +29.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 83-60 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 87-91 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 74-82 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 167.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 71-66 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 81-48 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 1 | @ | W 82-66 | +12.5 | W +28.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 71-82 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 76-55 | -21.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 68-58 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 83-93 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 101-100 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 93-96 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 67-77 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 72-54 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 72-73 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 78-89 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 59-62 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 77-52 | -11.5 | W +13.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 54-91 | +2.5 | L −34.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 68-52 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 80-70 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 71-78 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 77-91 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 79-88 | -11.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 81-62 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TXST
W 83-48
+29.5
9
vs
LEM
W 83-60
+11.5
15
@
DAV
L 87-91
+0.5
19
vs
W&M
L 74-82
−16.5
24
vs
BUCK
W 71-66
−5.5
26
vs
VMI
W 81-48
+21.5
1
@
KSU
W 82-66
+28.5
6
vs
UVU
L 71-82
−9.5
16
vs
CHST
W 76-55
−0.5
20
@
OHIO
W 68-58
+8.5
30
vs
M-OH
L 83-93
−16.5
3
@
MASS
W 101-100
−0.5
6
@
KENT
L 93-96
+0.5
9
vs
AKR
L 67-77
−5.5
17
vs
EMU
W 85-79
−5.5
20
@
WMU
W 72-54
+11.5
24
@
TOL
L 72-73
−2.5
27
vs
BUF
L 78-89
−18.5
31
@
CMU
L 59-62
−11.5
3
vs
BALL
W 77-52
+13.5
7
@
ARST
L 54-91
−34.5
11
@
NIU
W 68-52
+8.5
14
vs
TOL
W 80-70
+6.5
17
vs
KENT
L 71-78
−8.5
20
@
M-OH
L 77-91
−5.5
24
vs
WMU
L 79-88
−20.5
28
vs
MASS
W 81-62
+15.5
covered 12didn’t cover 15avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TXST
W 83-48
−15.5
9
vs
LEM
W 83-60
−11.5
15
@
DAV
L 87-91
+33.5
19
vs
W&M
L 74-82
−11.5
24
vs
BUCK
W 71-66
−7.5
26
vs
VMI
W 81-48
−19.5
1
@
KSU
W 82-66
−11.5
6
vs
UVU
L 71-82
+8.5
16
vs
CHST
W 76-55
−17.5
20
@
OHIO
W 68-58
−27.5
30
vs
M-OH
L 83-93
+25.5
3
@
MASS
W 101-100
+48.5
6
@
KENT
L 93-96
+33.5
9
vs
AKR
L 67-77
−19.5
17
vs
EMU
W 85-79
+22.5
20
@
WMU
W 72-54
−26.5
24
@
TOL
L 72-73
−10.5
27
vs
BUF
L 78-89
+16.5
31
@
CMU
L 59-62
−28.5
3
vs
BALL
W 77-52
−8.5
7
@
ARST
L 54-91
−9.5
11
@
NIU
W 68-52
−24.5
14
vs
TOL
W 80-70
−0.5
17
vs
KENT
L 71-78
−2.5
20
@
M-OH
L 77-91
+13.5
24
vs
WMU
L 79-88
+17.5
28
vs
MASS
W 81-62
−7.5
over 9under 18avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
E Michigan
29 games played
Straight up
9-20
31% wins
Against the spread
20-9
69% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-21
28% overs · avg −3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 71-49 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 66-78 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 83-90 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 186.5 | U 173 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 72-62 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 97-91 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 46-87 | +33.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 64-56 | +22.5 | W +30.5 | 146.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 73-55 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 68-84 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 65-80 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 72-93 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 64-70 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-74 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-68 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 74-52 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 62-79 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 77-59 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 79-85 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 75-76 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 65-100 | -2.5 | L −37.5 | 139.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-70 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 64-66 | +12.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-65 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 131.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 91-95 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 62-76 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 66-54 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-94 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 64-74 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 67-72 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GAST
W 71-49
+18.5
10
@
PITT
L 66-78
+3.5
14
vs
IUIN
L 83-90
−11.5
18
@
DETM
W 72-62
+11.5
21
vs
OAK
W 97-91
+7.5
24
@
LOU
L 46-87
−7.5
26
@
CIN
W 64-56
+30.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 73-55
+3.5
2
@
BTLR
L 68-84
+1.5
10
@
PFW
L 65-80
−11.5
19
@
AKR
L 72-93
−5.5
22
@
WRST
L 64-70
+4.5
30
vs
MASS
W 80-74
+8.5
3
vs
OHIO
L 67-68
+1.5
6
@
BALL
W 74-52
+23.5
10
@
WMU
L 62-79
−18.5
13
vs
NIU
W 77-59
+10.5
17
@
BGSU
L 79-85
+5.5
24
vs
KENT
L 75-76
+3.5
27
@
CMU
L 65-100
−37.5
31
@
MASS
L 67-70
+5.5
3
vs
AKR
L 64-66
+10.5
7
@
APP
L 60-65
+2.5
11
@
KENT
L 91-95
+6.5
14
vs
WMU
L 62-76
−20.5
17
vs
CMU
W 66-54
+7.5
21
@
TOL
L 75-94
−10.5
24
vs
M-OH
L 64-74
−1.5
3
@
BUF
L 67-72
+0.5
covered 20didn’t cover 9avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GAST
W 71-49
−29.5
10
@
PITT
L 66-78
+2.5
14
vs
IUIN
L 83-90
−13.5
18
@
DETM
W 72-62
−23.5
21
vs
OAK
W 97-91
+34.5
24
@
LOU
L 46-87
−29.5
26
@
CIN
W 64-56
−26.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 73-55
−13.5
2
@
BTLR
L 68-84
−1.5
10
@
PFW
L 65-80
−2.5
19
@
AKR
L 72-93
+9.5
22
@
WRST
L 64-70
−8.5
30
vs
MASS
W 80-74
+5.5
3
vs
OHIO
L 67-68
−15.5
6
@
BALL
W 74-52
−11.5
10
@
WMU
L 62-79
−4.5
13
vs
NIU
W 77-59
−5.5
17
@
BGSU
L 79-85
+22.5
24
vs
KENT
L 75-76
−3.5
27
@
CMU
L 65-100
+25.5
31
@
MASS
L 67-70
−11.5
3
vs
AKR
L 64-66
−23.5
7
@
APP
L 60-65
−6.5
11
@
KENT
L 91-95
+40.5
14
vs
WMU
L 62-76
−5.5
17
vs
CMU
W 66-54
−20.5
21
@
TOL
L 75-94
+23.5
24
vs
M-OH
L 64-74
−13.5
3
@
BUF
L 67-72
−4.5
over 8under 21avg −3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Bowling Green
14-13 overall · 8-9 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UMass81–62
- Lvs W Michigan79–88
- L@ Miami OH77–91
- Lvs Kent State71–78
- Wvs Toledo80–70
6 days since their last game.
E Michigan
9-20 overall · 4-13 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Buffalo67–72
- Lvs Miami OH64–74
- L@ Toledo75–94
- Wvs C Michigan66–54
- Lvs W Michigan62–76
3 days since their last game.