VyStar Arena · at Kennesaw St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KENN 77–68 · win probability KENN 79%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KENN has more of the edges
SELA 0, KENN 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: SELA 46.7 and allows 52.4; KENN 50.4 and allows 48.3
Three-pointers
SELA hits 28.4% and allows 36.0%; KENN hits 33.4% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 39.5% and 42.5% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SELA plays 65.9 a game (318th fastest), KENN 72.4 (27th). Faster games mean more points
SELA offense vs KENN defense
Offense 315th of 366 against a defense 193rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SELA has played the 276th-hardest schedule, KENN the 156th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SELA 28.6%, KENN 35.2%. Defensive: SELA 68.6%, KENN 68.4%
Home court
KENN at home. This season: KENN 0-0 at home, SELA 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SELA 4%, KENN 32%. Transfers in: SELA 10, KENN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
KENN offense vs SELA defense
Offense 126th of 366 against a defense 177th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SELA 18.4%, KENN 16.8%. Forced: SELA 19.1%, KENN 16.0%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SELA 40.3, KENN 45.1. Allowed: SELA 41.2, KENN 47.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KENN -9.4 | — |
| Total | — | 144.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | SELA 67.7 · KENN 77.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KENN -5.5 | — |
| 1H total | 67.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | SELA 31.2 · KENN 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SELA 0–1 KENNKENN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SELA 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2022-23 | SELA 68 vs KENN 72 | KENN -8 | SELA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SE Louisiana
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 58-88 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-58 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 60-70 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-75 | +27.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 57-70 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 76-68 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 69-65 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 68-76 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 74-71 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 132.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 65-78 | +24.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 70-79 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 60-52 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 56-68 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 65-68 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-61 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 66-76 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 58-85 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 54-73 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 55-47 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 102 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 74-62 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-69 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 53-70 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 136.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 23 | vs | L 68-73 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-68 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 82-78 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
−8.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−2.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
+4.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
+20.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−1.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+1.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
+7.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
−15.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+5.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
−5.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
+11.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
−2.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−6.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
+9.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
+4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
−5.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
19
@
RGV
L 65-68
+2.5
24
vs
NICH
W 67-61
+3.5
27
vs
MCN
L 66-76
+2.5
31
@
SFA
L 58-85
−17.5
2
@
LAM
L 54-73
−13.5
7
vs
HCU
W 55-47
+3.5
9
vs
UIW
W 74-62
+10.5
14
@
NWST
L 66-69
−1.5
16
@
ETAM
L 53-70
−14.5
21
vs
RGV
L 75-96
−16.5
23
vs
AMCC
L 68-73
−3.5
28
@
NICH
L 60-68
−3.5
2
@
NOLA
W 82-78
+10.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
+2.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−25.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
−3.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
−7.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−10.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+2.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
−2.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
+10.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+12.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
+1.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
−1.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
+13.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−1.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
−23.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
−4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
+12.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
19
@
RGV
L 65-68
−2.5
24
vs
NICH
W 67-61
−13.5
27
vs
MCN
L 66-76
+2.5
31
@
SFA
L 58-85
+7.5
2
@
LAM
L 54-73
−5.5
7
vs
HCU
W 55-47
−31.5
9
vs
UIW
W 74-62
−1.5
14
@
NWST
L 66-69
+3.5
16
@
ETAM
L 53-70
−13.5
21
vs
RGV
L 75-96
+32.5
23
vs
AMCC
L 68-73
+10.5
28
@
NICH
L 60-68
−11.5
2
@
NOLA
W 82-78
+16.5
over 13under 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kennesaw St
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-72 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 89-108 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-84 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 83-91 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 166.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 102-100 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 202 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-73 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 92-69 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 67-68 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 81-92 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 182.5 | U 173 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 73-81 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 52-67 | -8.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 90-80 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-86 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 175.5 | U 175 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-65 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 87-93 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 167.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 76-82 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-69 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-53 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-77 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 87-90 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 79-83 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-87 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 58-55 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 74-65 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 71-78 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 96-87 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-73 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 71-60 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-73 | +20.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
FAMU
W 92-72
+8.5
16
vs
USF
L 89-108
−11.5
24
vs
RICE
W 89-84
+0.5
25
vs
ORU
L 83-91
−16.5
26
@
FGCU
W 102-100
+3.5
2
vs
JKST
W 88-73
−0.5
6
vs
GAST
W 92-69
+8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 67-68
+2.5
21
vs
ALA
L 81-92
+9.5
2
@
LIB
L 73-81
−0.5
4
@
DEL
L 52-67
−23.5
7
vs
MOST
W 90-80
+3.5
10
vs
JXST
W 88-82
+0.5
14
vs
FIU
W 89-86
−2.5
17
@
WKU
W 81-65
+23.5
21
@
SHSU
L 87-93
−0.5
23
@
LT
L 76-82
−7.5
28
vs
WKU
W 72-69
−1.5
31
vs
NMSU
W 76-53
+19.5
7
@
JXST
L 58-77
−20.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
−6.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 79-83
−5.5
18
@
MOST
W 91-87
+5.5
21
vs
LT
W 58-55
−2.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-65
+10.5
28
vs
DEL
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
UTEP
L 71-78
−10.5
7
@
NMSU
L 76-79
−1.5
12
vs
WKU
W 96-87
+10.5
13
vs
SHSU
W 79-73
+8.5
14
vs
LT
W 71-60
+9.5
19
vs
GONZ
L 64-73
+11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
FAMU
W 92-72
−2.5
16
vs
USF
L 89-108
+19.5
24
vs
RICE
W 89-84
+13.5
25
vs
ORU
L 83-91
+7.5
26
@
FGCU
W 102-100
+41.5
2
vs
JKST
W 88-73
+3.5
6
vs
GAST
W 92-69
+2.5
17
@
MTSU
L 67-68
−25.5
21
vs
ALA
L 81-92
−9.5
2
@
LIB
L 73-81
−4.5
4
@
DEL
L 52-67
−29.5
7
vs
MOST
W 90-80
+17.5
10
vs
JXST
W 88-82
+20.5
14
vs
FIU
W 89-86
−0.5
17
@
WKU
W 81-65
−19.5
21
@
SHSU
L 87-93
+12.5
23
@
LT
L 76-82
+13.5
28
vs
WKU
W 72-69
−19.5
31
vs
NMSU
W 76-53
−30.5
7
@
JXST
L 58-77
−14.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
+28.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 79-83
−0.5
18
@
MOST
W 91-87
+25.5
21
vs
LT
W 58-55
−34.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-65
−13.5
28
vs
DEL
W 90-82
+28.5
5
@
UTEP
L 71-78
+0.5
7
@
NMSU
L 76-79
−2.5
12
vs
WKU
W 96-87
+23.5
13
vs
SHSU
W 79-73
−7.5
14
vs
LT
W 71-60
−11.5
19
vs
GONZ
L 64-73
−15.5
over 15under 17avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kennesaw St has the better starters
Position by position: SE Louisiana 0, Kennesaw St 1, even 4
SE LouisianaBetterKennesaw St
G Q. Allen TR9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 62
=Even
G J. Hill TR10.1 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 53
G J. Furman TR8.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 13
=Even
G K. Rickard5.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 21
G T. Bailey TR6.5 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 12
→KENNSmall
F T. Simpson8 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 38
G T. Rolison TR5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 58
=Even
F A. Thomas TR8.3 pts · 6.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 61
F A. Sims TR7.2 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 28
=Even
F A. Enoh TR4.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
SE LouisianaBetterKennesaw St
SELA offense315th of 366 · -10.2
→KENNSmall
KENN defense193rd of 366 · -4.6
SELA defense177th of 366 · -4.0
=Even
KENN offense126th of 366 · -3.4
Backcourt-5.3 · 4 players
→KENNBig
Backcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.9 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
Bench-3.3 · 5 players
→KENNSmall
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSELA betterKENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Q. Allen25 min · TRJ. Furman24 min · TRT. Bailey23 min · TRT. Rolison17 min · TRG. Sanford12 min · TRJ. Nyam1 min · TR
Forwards
A. Sims32 min · TRJ. Massaquoi17 min · TRY. Ndjonga10 min · TRG. Shoemaker7 min
Centers
D. Akoue12 min · TR
Guards
J. Hill31 min · TRK. Rickard20 minC. Beaumont9 min · TRK. Parker6 min · TRB. TousignautNewA. DanielsNew
Forwards
T. Simpson26 minA. Thomas25 min · TRA. Enoh23 min · TRA. Taylor17 minD. Onyirimba2 minK. BerryNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.8 #350 | Points per game | 80.0 #66 |
| 0.98 #339 | Points per possession | 1.11 #122 |
| 65.9 #318 | Pace (possessions) | 72.4 #27 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.7 #343 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #224 |
| 28.4 #362 | 3-point % | 33.4 #203 |
| 39.5 #183 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.5 #127 |
| 40.3 #56 | Free throw rate | 45.1 #5 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.4 #291 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #183 |
| 28.6 #245 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.2 #44 |
| 11.4 #319 | Assists per game | 13.3 #189 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.3 #86 | Points allowed | 78.3 #272 |
| 1.08 #172 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #159 |
| 52.4 #233 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.3 #43 |
| 36.0 #301 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #154 |
| 19.1 #47 | Turnovers forced | 16.0 #223 |
| 68.6 #225 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #234 |
| 6.8 #145 | Steals per game | 6.8 #146 |
| 2.7 #272 | Blocks per game | 5.3 #10 |
SE Louisiana
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 6-16 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ LSU N Orleans82–78
- L@ Nicholls60–68
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC68–73
- Lvs UT Rio Grande75–96
- L@ East Texas A&M53–70
A week or more of rest.
Kennesaw St
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gonzaga64–73
- Wvs Louisiana Tech71–60
- Wvs Sam Houston79–73
- Wvs Western KY96–87
- L@ New Mexico St76–79
A week or more of rest.