Hard Rock Hotel Riviera Maya · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNCO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCO 74–71 · win probability UNCO 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCO has more of the edges
SELA 2, UNCO 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
SELA hits 28.4% and allows 36.0%; UNCO hits 35.0% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 39.5% and 41.5% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: SELA 46.7 and allows 52.4; UNCO 55.7 and allows 50.1
Free throws
Free throw rate: SELA 40.3, UNCO 27.5. Allowed: SELA 41.2, UNCO 38.8
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SELA plays 65.9 a game (318th fastest), UNCO 71.3 (60th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SELA 28.6%, UNCO 27.2%. Defensive: SELA 68.6%, UNCO 75.8%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SELA 18.4%, UNCO 15.5%. Forced: SELA 19.1%, UNCO 12.4%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SELA 4%, UNCO 28%. Transfers in: SELA 10, UNCO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
SELA offense vs UNCO defense
Offense 315th of 366 against a defense 281st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SELA has played the 276th-hardest schedule, UNCO the 303rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
UNCO offense vs SELA defense
Offense 167th of 366 against a defense 177th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCO -3.2 | — |
| Total | — | 145.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | SELA 71.2 · UNCO 74.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCO -1.8 | — |
| 1H total | 68.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | SELA 33.2 · UNCO 35 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SE Louisiana
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 58-88 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-58 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 60-70 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-75 | +27.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 57-70 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 76-68 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 69-65 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 68-76 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 74-71 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 132.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 65-78 | +24.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 70-79 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 60-52 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 56-68 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 65-68 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-61 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 66-76 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 58-85 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 54-73 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 55-47 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 102 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 74-62 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-69 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 53-70 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 136.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 23 | vs | L 68-73 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-68 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 82-78 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
−8.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−2.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
+4.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
+20.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−1.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+1.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
+7.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
−15.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+5.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
−5.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
+11.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
−2.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−6.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
+9.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
+4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
−5.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
19
@
RGV
L 65-68
+2.5
24
vs
NICH
W 67-61
+3.5
27
vs
MCN
L 66-76
+2.5
31
@
SFA
L 58-85
−17.5
2
@
LAM
L 54-73
−13.5
7
vs
HCU
W 55-47
+3.5
9
vs
UIW
W 74-62
+10.5
14
@
NWST
L 66-69
−1.5
16
@
ETAM
L 53-70
−14.5
21
vs
RGV
L 75-96
−16.5
23
vs
AMCC
L 68-73
−3.5
28
@
NICH
L 60-68
−3.5
2
@
NOLA
W 82-78
+10.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
+2.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−25.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
−3.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
−7.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−10.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+2.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
−2.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
+10.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+12.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
+1.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
−1.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
+13.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−1.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
−23.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
−4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
+12.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
19
@
RGV
L 65-68
−2.5
24
vs
NICH
W 67-61
−13.5
27
vs
MCN
L 66-76
+2.5
31
@
SFA
L 58-85
+7.5
2
@
LAM
L 54-73
−5.5
7
vs
HCU
W 55-47
−31.5
9
vs
UIW
W 74-62
−1.5
14
@
NWST
L 66-69
+3.5
16
@
ETAM
L 53-70
−13.5
21
vs
RGV
L 75-96
+32.5
23
vs
AMCC
L 68-73
+10.5
28
@
NICH
L 60-68
−11.5
2
@
NOLA
W 82-78
+16.5
over 13under 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Colorado
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | @ | W 88-81 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 72-73 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 86-80 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-93 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 71-53 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-70 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 89-87 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 90-101 | +25.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 79-86 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 86-81 | +15.5 | W +20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 75-89 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 79-88 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 85-72 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-76 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 73-76 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 89-93 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-81 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 91-83 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-71 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 69-61 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 95-79 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 76-67 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 85-57 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 89-95 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
15
@
PEPP
W 88-81
+5.5
21
vs
STMN
L 72-73
+3.5
22
@
PORT
W 86-80
+2.5
23
vs
CSUF
W 97-93
−4.5
26
@
AF
W 71-53
+13.5
3
@
OMA
W 75-70
+1.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 89-87
−6.5
16
@
TTU
L 90-101
+14.5
20
vs
DEN
L 79-86
−15.5
28
@
COLO
W 86-81
+20.5
1
@
MTST
L 75-89
−11.5
3
@
MONT
L 79-88
−10.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-72
+8.5
10
vs
WEB
L 71-76
−11.5
15
@
PRST
L 73-76
−0.5
17
@
SAC
L 89-93
−10.5
19
vs
MTST
L 68-73
−7.5
24
@
NAU
L 77-81
−10.5
29
vs
IDHO
W 91-83
+5.5
31
vs
EWU
W 74-71
−3.5
5
@
WEB
W 88-74
+12.5
7
@
IDST
W 69-61
+5.5
12
vs
SAC
W 95-79
+4.5
14
vs
PRST
W 77-65
+8.5
21
vs
NAU
W 78-77
−12.5
26
@
EWU
L 72-82
−11.5
28
@
IDHO
W 76-67
+11.5
2
vs
MONT
W 85-57
+22.5
9
vs
MONT
L 89-95
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
15
@
PEPP
W 88-81
+15.5
21
vs
STMN
L 72-73
−12.5
22
@
PORT
W 86-80
+8.5
23
vs
CSUF
W 97-93
+25.5
26
@
AF
W 71-53
−22.5
3
@
OMA
W 75-70
−12.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 89-87
+13.5
16
@
TTU
L 90-101
+38.5
20
vs
DEN
L 79-86
+5.5
28
@
COLO
W 86-81
+8.5
1
@
MTST
L 75-89
+9.5
3
@
MONT
L 79-88
+5.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-72
+1.5
10
vs
WEB
L 71-76
−15.5
15
@
PRST
L 73-76
−6.5
17
@
SAC
L 89-93
+18.5
19
vs
MTST
L 68-73
−12.5
24
@
NAU
L 77-81
+7.5
29
vs
IDHO
W 91-83
+18.5
31
vs
EWU
W 74-71
−11.5
5
@
WEB
W 88-74
−0.5
7
@
IDST
W 69-61
−20.5
12
vs
SAC
W 95-79
+9.5
14
vs
PRST
W 77-65
−7.5
21
vs
NAU
W 78-77
+3.5
26
@
EWU
L 72-82
−3.5
28
@
IDHO
W 76-67
−13.5
2
vs
MONT
W 85-57
−12.5
9
vs
MONT
L 89-95
+31.5
over 16under 13avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: SE Louisiana 1, N Colorado 1, even 3
SE LouisianaBetterN Colorado
G Q. Allen TR9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 62
→UNCOSmall
G L. Reynolds TR11.6 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
G J. Furman TR8.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 13
=Even
G V. Delano6.4 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
G T. Bailey TR6.5 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 12
=Even
G C. Tramble TR3.6 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 16
G T. Rolison TR5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 58
←SELASmall
F K. Rayfield TR6.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 40
F A. Sims TR7.2 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 28
=Even
C E. Shields6.4 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 41
SE LouisianaBetterN Colorado
SELA offense315th of 366 · -10.2
=Even
UNCO defense281st of 366 · -7.0
SELA defense177th of 366 · -4.0
=Even
UNCO offense167th of 366 · -5.1
Backcourt-5.3 · 4 players
→UNCOBig
Backcourt-2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.9 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
Bench-3.3 · 5 players
→UNCOSmall
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSELA betterUNCO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Q. Allen25 min · TRJ. Furman24 min · TRT. Bailey23 min · TRT. Rolison17 min · TRG. Sanford12 min · TRJ. Nyam1 min · TR
Forwards
A. Sims32 min · TRJ. Massaquoi17 min · TRY. Ndjonga10 min · TRG. Shoemaker7 min
Centers
D. Akoue12 min · TR
Guards
L. Reynolds33 min · TRV. Delano20 minC. Tramble12 min · TRA. Mawien8 minT. Braketa5 minC. BloggNew
Forwards
K. Rayfield20 min · TRA. Crawford5 min · TRM. ShareefNewD. PaineNew
Centers
E. Shields18 minH. Caldwell4 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.8 #350 | Points per game | 80.8 #51 |
| 0.98 #339 | Points per possession | 1.14 #75 |
| 65.9 #318 | Pace (possessions) | 71.3 #60 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.7 #343 | Effective FG% | 55.7 #24 |
| 28.4 #362 | 3-point % | 35.0 #121 |
| 39.5 #183 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.5 #140 |
| 40.3 #56 | Free throw rate | 27.5 #348 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.4 #291 | Turnover rate | 15.5 #103 |
| 28.6 #245 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.2 #288 |
| 11.4 #319 | Assists per game | 15.8 #54 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.3 #86 | Points allowed | 78.1 #270 |
| 1.08 #172 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #209 |
| 52.4 #233 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.1 #106 |
| 36.0 #301 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #28 |
| 19.1 #47 | Turnovers forced | 12.4 #363 |
| 68.6 #225 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.8 #6 |
| 6.8 #145 | Steals per game | 4.0 #364 |
| 2.7 #272 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #273 |
SE Louisiana
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 6-16 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ LSU N Orleans82–78
- L@ Nicholls60–68
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC68–73
- Lvs UT Rio Grande75–96
- L@ East Texas A&M53–70
A week or more of rest.
N Colorado
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Montana89–95
- Wvs Montana85–57
- W@ Idaho76–67
- L@ E Washington72–82
- Wvs N Arizona78–77
A week or more of rest.