Bank of Colorado Arena · at N Colorado · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNCO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCO 80–76 · win probability UNCO 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCO has more of the edges
EWU 2, UNCO 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UNCO offense vs EWU defense
Offense 167th of 366 against a defense 322nd, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: EWU 53.7 and allows 54.9; UNCO 55.7 and allows 50.1
Free throws
Free throw rate: EWU 36.1, UNCO 27.5. Allowed: EWU 37.3, UNCO 38.8
EWU offense vs UNCO defense
Offense 189th of 366 against a defense 281st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
EWU has played the 213th-hardest schedule, UNCO the 303rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
EWU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%; UNCO hits 35.0% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 34.7% and 41.5% of their shots
Home court
UNCO at home. This season: UNCO 0-0 at home, EWU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: EWU plays 69.5 a game (149th fastest), UNCO 71.3 (60th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: EWU 31.3%, UNCO 27.2%. Defensive: EWU 69.2%, UNCO 75.8%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: EWU 17.6%, UNCO 15.5%. Forced: EWU 16.3%, UNCO 12.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: EWU 30%, UNCO 28%. Transfers in: EWU 1, UNCO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCO -4.5 | — |
| Total | — | 156.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | EWU 75.8 · UNCO 80.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCO -2.5 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | EWU 35.2 · UNCO 37.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
EWU 6–5 UNCOEWU leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · EWU 8-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2025-26 | UNCO 72 @ EWU 82 | EWU +1.5 | EWU W |
| Jan 31, 2025-26 | EWU 71 @ UNCO 74 | UNCO -6.5 | EWU W |
| Feb 20, 2024-25 | EWU 76 @ UNCO 95 | UNCO -8.5 | UNCO W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | UNCO 67 @ EWU 62 | EWU +5.5 | EWU W |
| Feb 24, 2023-24 | EWU 85 @ UNCO 76 | UNCO +1.5 | EWU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
E Washington
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-13
59% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-80 | +29.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 62-70 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 97-102 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-94 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 65-92 | -4.5 | L −31.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 71-79 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 89-93 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-66 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 12 | vs | L 83-88 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 63-78 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 77-101 | +10.5 | L −13.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 81-109 | +34.5 | W +6.5 | 168.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 81-84 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 64-68 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 66-65 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 80-91 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-66 | +6.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 61-65 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 75-67 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 86-92 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-74 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 82-74 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 72-71 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 88-75 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 84-66 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 102-94 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 67-55 | +6.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 88-57 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 81-85 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 84-79 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 68-81 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UCLA
L 74-80
+23.5
5
@
LMU
L 62-70
+1.5
8
@
COLO
L 97-102
+11.5
12
@
SEA
L 67-94
−18.5
23
@
CARK
L 65-92
−31.5
25
@
UNT
L 71-79
+4.5
3
@
DEN
L 89-93
−2.5
6
vs
KC
W 90-66
+14.5
12
vs
CBU
L 83-88
−1.5
17
vs
WSU
L 63-78
−8.5
20
@
UTAH
L 77-101
−13.5
22
@
BYU
L 81-109
+6.5
3
@
IDHO
L 81-84
+3.5
8
vs
MTST
L 64-68
−1.5
10
vs
MONT
W 66-65
−0.5
15
@
WEB
L 80-91
−7.5
17
@
IDST
W 84-66
+24.5
22
vs
PRST
L 61-65
−1.5
24
vs
SAC
W 75-67
+2.5
29
@
NAU
L 86-92
−8.5
31
@
UNCO
L 71-74
+3.5
5
@
MONT
W 82-74
+13.5
7
@
MTST
W 72-71
+6.5
12
vs
IDST
W 88-75
+10.5
14
vs
WEB
W 84-66
+14.5
19
@
SAC
W 102-94
+5.5
21
@
PRST
W 67-55
+18.5
26
vs
UNCO
W 82-72
+11.5
28
vs
NAU
W 88-57
+21.5
2
vs
IDHO
L 81-85
−7.5
9
vs
WEB
W 84-79
+1.5
10
vs
IDHO
L 68-81
−11.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UCLA
L 74-80
+4.5
5
@
LMU
L 62-70
−21.5
8
@
COLO
L 97-102
+46.5
12
@
SEA
L 67-94
+12.5
23
@
CARK
L 65-92
+2.5
25
@
UNT
L 71-79
+8.5
3
@
DEN
L 89-93
+26.5
6
vs
KC
W 90-66
+4.5
12
vs
CBU
L 83-88
+17.5
17
vs
WSU
L 63-78
−12.5
20
@
UTAH
L 77-101
+17.5
22
@
BYU
L 81-109
+21.5
3
@
IDHO
L 81-84
+6.5
8
vs
MTST
L 64-68
−24.5
10
vs
MONT
W 66-65
−30.5
15
@
WEB
L 80-91
+12.5
17
@
IDST
W 84-66
−2.5
22
vs
PRST
L 61-65
−24.5
24
vs
SAC
W 75-67
−21.5
29
@
NAU
L 86-92
+32.5
31
@
UNCO
L 71-74
−11.5
5
@
MONT
W 82-74
+4.5
7
@
MTST
W 72-71
−5.5
12
vs
IDST
W 88-75
+15.5
14
vs
WEB
W 84-66
−4.5
19
@
SAC
W 102-94
+35.5
21
@
PRST
W 67-55
−24.5
26
vs
UNCO
W 82-72
−3.5
28
vs
NAU
W 88-57
−1.5
2
vs
IDHO
L 81-85
+14.5
9
vs
WEB
W 84-79
+8.5
10
vs
IDHO
L 68-81
+0.5
over 19under 13avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Colorado
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | @ | W 88-81 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 72-73 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 86-80 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-93 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 71-53 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-70 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 89-87 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 90-101 | +25.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 79-86 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 86-81 | +15.5 | W +20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 75-89 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 79-88 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 85-72 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-76 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 73-76 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 89-93 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-81 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 91-83 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-71 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 69-61 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 95-79 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 76-67 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 85-57 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 89-95 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
15
@
PEPP
W 88-81
+5.5
21
vs
STMN
L 72-73
+3.5
22
@
PORT
W 86-80
+2.5
23
vs
CSUF
W 97-93
−4.5
26
@
AF
W 71-53
+13.5
3
@
OMA
W 75-70
+1.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 89-87
−6.5
16
@
TTU
L 90-101
+14.5
20
vs
DEN
L 79-86
−15.5
28
@
COLO
W 86-81
+20.5
1
@
MTST
L 75-89
−11.5
3
@
MONT
L 79-88
−10.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-72
+8.5
10
vs
WEB
L 71-76
−11.5
15
@
PRST
L 73-76
−0.5
17
@
SAC
L 89-93
−10.5
19
vs
MTST
L 68-73
−7.5
24
@
NAU
L 77-81
−10.5
29
vs
IDHO
W 91-83
+5.5
31
vs
EWU
W 74-71
−3.5
5
@
WEB
W 88-74
+12.5
7
@
IDST
W 69-61
+5.5
12
vs
SAC
W 95-79
+4.5
14
vs
PRST
W 77-65
+8.5
21
vs
NAU
W 78-77
−12.5
26
@
EWU
L 72-82
−11.5
28
@
IDHO
W 76-67
+11.5
2
vs
MONT
W 85-57
+22.5
9
vs
MONT
L 89-95
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
15
@
PEPP
W 88-81
+15.5
21
vs
STMN
L 72-73
−12.5
22
@
PORT
W 86-80
+8.5
23
vs
CSUF
W 97-93
+25.5
26
@
AF
W 71-53
−22.5
3
@
OMA
W 75-70
−12.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 89-87
+13.5
16
@
TTU
L 90-101
+38.5
20
vs
DEN
L 79-86
+5.5
28
@
COLO
W 86-81
+8.5
1
@
MTST
L 75-89
+9.5
3
@
MONT
L 79-88
+5.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-72
+1.5
10
vs
WEB
L 71-76
−15.5
15
@
PRST
L 73-76
−6.5
17
@
SAC
L 89-93
+18.5
19
vs
MTST
L 68-73
−12.5
24
@
NAU
L 77-81
+7.5
29
vs
IDHO
W 91-83
+18.5
31
vs
EWU
W 74-71
−11.5
5
@
WEB
W 88-74
−0.5
7
@
IDST
W 69-61
−20.5
12
vs
SAC
W 95-79
+9.5
14
vs
PRST
W 77-65
−7.5
21
vs
NAU
W 78-77
+3.5
26
@
EWU
L 72-82
−3.5
28
@
IDHO
W 76-67
−13.5
2
vs
MONT
W 85-57
−12.5
9
vs
MONT
L 89-95
+31.5
over 16under 13avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
E Washington has the better starters
Position by position: E Washington 1, N Colorado 0, even 4
E WashingtonBetterN Colorado
G J. Griffith TR11.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 75
=Even
G L. Reynolds TR11.6 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
G C. Scherer2.1 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 14
=Even
G V. Delano6.4 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
F A. Hamilton13.6 pts · 5.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
←EWUBig
G C. Tramble TR3.6 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 16
F E. Marquardt5.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 31
=Even
F K. Rayfield TR6.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 40
F S. Ngoyi0.5 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C E. Shields6.4 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 41
E WashingtonBetterN Colorado
EWU offense189th of 366 · -5.8
←EWUSmall
UNCO defense281st of 366 · -7.0
EWU defense322nd of 366 · -8.3
→UNCOBig
UNCO offense167th of 366 · -5.1
Backcourt-0.2 · 2 players
←EWUSmall
Backcourt-2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.6 · 3 players
←EWUSmall
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
Bench-0.3 · 1 player
←EWUSmall
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestEWU betterUNCO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Griffith23 min · TRC. Scherer8 minM. Monson3 minA. CookNewT. JacksonNewI. HomeliusNew
Forwards
A. Hamilton28 minE. Marquardt16 minS. Ngoyi4 minJ. MillerNewA. HamiltonNewA. GballouNew
Centers
Z. TrezvantNew
Guards
L. Reynolds33 min · TRV. Delano20 minC. Tramble12 min · TRA. Mawien8 minT. Braketa5 minC. BloggNew
Forwards
K. Rayfield20 min · TRA. Crawford5 min · TRM. ShareefNewD. PaineNew
Centers
E. Shields18 minH. Caldwell4 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.7 #102 | Points per game | 80.8 #51 |
| 1.11 #120 | Points per possession | 1.14 #75 |
| 69.5 #149 | Pace (possessions) | 71.3 #60 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.7 #75 | Effective FG% | 55.7 #24 |
| 35.9 #62 | 3-point % | 35.0 #121 |
| 34.7 #282 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.5 #140 |
| 36.1 #148 | Free throw rate | 27.5 #348 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #241 | Turnover rate | 15.5 #103 |
| 31.3 #153 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.2 #288 |
| 13.5 #181 | Assists per game | 15.8 #54 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.2 #304 | Points allowed | 78.1 #270 |
| 1.15 #320 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #209 |
| 54.9 #326 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.1 #106 |
| 35.2 #261 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #28 |
| 16.3 #200 | Turnovers forced | 12.4 #363 |
| 69.2 #194 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.8 #6 |
| 5.9 #249 | Steals per game | 4.0 #364 |
| 3.4 #161 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #273 |
E Washington
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Idaho68–81
- Wvs Weber St84–79
- Lvs Idaho81–85
- Wvs N Arizona88–57
- Wvs N Colorado82–72
A week or more of rest.
N Colorado
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Montana89–95
- Wvs Montana85–57
- W@ Idaho76–67
- L@ E Washington72–82
- Wvs N Arizona78–77
A week or more of rest.