Haas Pavilion · at California · Conference game
Closing line
CAL -6.5✓ PITT covered by 22.5
Closing total143.5Under by 15.5
| This season | CAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-18 | Record | 19-8 |
| 12-16 | ATS | 15-12 |
| 17-11 | O/U | 12-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PITT 70–74 CAL · ✗ CAL (64%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PITT | 34 | 38 | 72 |
| CAL | 26 | 30 | 56 |
1st half: PITT 34, CAL 26 (PITT by 8). The model had CAL by 2.4 and a total of 67.3 (actual 60).
Team stats
| PITT | CAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-56 46% | Field goals | 23-54 43% |
| 7-21 33% | 3-pointers | 5-22 23% |
| 13-16 81% | Free throws | 5-7 71% |
| 34 9 off | Rebounds | 29 7 off |
| 14 | Assists | 9 |
| 11 | Steals | 8 |
| 3 | Blocks | 3 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 14 | Fouls | 16 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 3 |
Players
| PITT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry Dunning Jr. G | 39 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 6-15 | 1-5 |
| Damarco Minor G | 37 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 3-6 | 2-4 |
| Cameron Corhen F | 34 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 7-10 | 0-2 |
| Omari Witherspoon G | 33 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 2-6 | 0-1 |
| Roman Siulepa F | 25 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nojus Indrusaitis G | 29 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 6-11 | 4-6 |
| Macari Moore G | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dishon Jackson, Kieran Mullen, Henry Lau, Amdy Ndiaye, Brandin Cummings, Jajuan Nelson, Benjamin Mayhew, Papa Amadou Kante
| CAL | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Pippen G | 34 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 3-11 | 1-4 |
| John Camden F | 33 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-6 |
| Dai Dai Ames G | 29 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 5-12 | 0-3 |
| Chris Bell F | 22 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| Lee Dort F | 19 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| DeJuan Campbell G | 24 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-4 |
| Milos Ilic C | 21 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
| Semetri Carr G | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Sammie Yeanay F | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Nolan Dorsey G | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Stephon Marbury II, Luke Butler, Jorell Clark, BJ Fisher, Mantas Kocanas, Rytis Petraitis, Dhiaukuei Manyiel Dut, Jovani Ruff
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCAL -7.5
1 → PITT
CloseCAL -6.5
1 pt toward PITT
Total
Open140.5
▲ 3
Close143.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
PITT +260 · CAL -325
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CAL -7.5 · closed CAL -6.5 · moved 1 toward PITTmodel CAL -4
model CAL -4
Opened 140.5 · closed 143.5 · moved 3 upmodel 143.5 matches the line
model 143.5 = line ✓
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CAL -6.5 | CAL -4.2 | PITT +2.3 | W PITT covered |
| Total | 143.5 | 143.7 | Over 0.2 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | PITT 69.8 · CAL 74 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CAL -2.4 | PITT -8.0 |
| 1H total | 67.3 | 60 |
| 1H projected score | PITT 32.5 · CAL 34.8 | PITT 34 · CAL 26 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PITT 1–0 CALPITT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · PITT 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2024-25 | CAL 74 @ PITT 86 | PITT -13.5 | CAL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Pitt
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-11
61% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 74-59 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 78-60 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 78-66 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 49-71 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-50 | -16.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 67-77 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 75-83 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 67-66 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 73-81 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 73-80 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-79 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 103-63 | -24.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 80-46 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 69-76 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-83 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 89-66 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-100 | +7.5 | L −33.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 62-65 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-81 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 80-76 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 52-63 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 47-67 | +12.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-86 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 54-70 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-79 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 67-75 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
YSU
W 74-59
+0.5
7
vs
LONG
W 78-60
+3.5
10
vs
EMU
W 78-66
−3.5
13
@
WVU
L 49-71
−16.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 84-50
+17.5
20
vs
UCF
L 67-77
−11.5
23
vs
QUIN
L 75-83
−20.5
28
vs
OSU
W 67-66
+6.5
2
vs
TA&M
L 73-81
−4.5
7
vs
HOF
L 73-80
−15.5
13
@
VILL
L 61-79
−7.5
17
vs
BING
W 103-63
+15.5
21
vs
PSU
W 80-46
+35.5
30
@
MIA
L 69-76
+2.5
3
vs
CLEM
L 68-73
−1.5
10
vs
SYR
L 72-83
−12.5
14
@
GT
W 89-66
+21.5
17
vs
LOU
L 59-100
−33.5
21
@
BC
L 62-65
−5.5
24
vs
NCSU
L 72-81
−2.5
27
vs
WAKE
W 80-76
+2.5
31
@
CLEM
L 52-63
−0.5
3
@
UVA
L 47-67
−7.5
7
vs
SMU
L 67-86
−14.5
10
vs
DUKE
L 54-70
+1.5
14
@
UNC
L 65-79
−2.5
21
vs
ND
W 73-68
+1.5
25
@
STAN
L 67-75
+0.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
YSU
W 74-59
−12.5
7
vs
LONG
W 78-60
−7.5
10
vs
EMU
W 78-66
+2.5
13
@
WVU
L 49-71
−14.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 84-50
−7.5
20
vs
UCF
L 67-77
−5.5
23
vs
QUIN
L 75-83
+17.5
28
vs
OSU
W 67-66
−15.5
2
vs
TA&M
L 73-81
+1.5
7
vs
HOF
L 73-80
+18.5
13
@
VILL
L 61-79
+1.5
17
vs
BING
W 103-63
+31.5
21
vs
PSU
W 80-46
−20.5
30
@
MIA
L 69-76
+0.5
3
vs
CLEM
L 68-73
+5.5
10
vs
SYR
L 72-83
+12.5
14
@
GT
W 89-66
+9.5
17
vs
LOU
L 59-100
+6.5
21
@
BC
L 62-65
−10.5
24
vs
NCSU
L 72-81
+8.5
27
vs
WAKE
W 80-76
+5.5
31
@
CLEM
L 52-63
−20.5
3
@
UVA
L 47-67
−28.5
7
vs
SMU
L 67-86
+5.5
10
vs
DUKE
L 54-70
−12.5
14
@
UNC
L 65-79
+1.5
21
vs
ND
W 73-68
+0.5
25
@
STAN
L 67-75
+3.5
over 17under 11avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
California
27 games played
Straight up
19-8
70% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-15
44% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-60 | -15.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 77-67 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 93-65 | -22.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 96-99 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 67-57 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 91-67 | -21.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-72 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 79-72 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 67-61 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-70 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 97-50 | -26.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-56 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 70-90 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 72-71 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 60-84 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 56-71 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-78 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 78-66 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 61-63 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 86-85 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 90-85 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 55-77 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 100-107 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 207 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 86-75 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 72-66 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 73-69 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CSUB
W 87-60
+11.5
6
vs
WRST
W 77-67
−4.5
10
vs
CSUF
W 93-65
+5.5
13
@
KSU
L 96-99
+3.5
18
vs
PRES
W 67-57
−0.5
21
vs
SAC
W 91-67
+2.5
25
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+15.5
2
vs
UTAH
W 79-72
−0.5
6
vs
PAC
W 67-61
−1.5
13
vs
NWST
W 79-70
−10.5
19
vs
MORG
W 97-50
+20.5
21
vs
COLU
W 74-56
+9.5
30
vs
LOU
L 70-90
−12.5
2
vs
ND
W 72-71
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 60-84
−9.5
10
@
VT
L 75-78
+2.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 56-71
−0.5
17
vs
UNC
W 84-78
+13.5
24
@
STAN
W 78-66
+16.5
28
@
FSU
L 61-63
+1.5
31
@
MIA
W 86-85
+12.5
4
vs
GT
W 90-85
−2.5
7
vs
CLEM
L 55-77
−17.5
11
@
SYR
L 100-107
−0.5
14
@
BC
W 86-75
+7.5
21
vs
STAN
W 72-66
+4.5
25
vs
SMU
W 73-69
+8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CSUB
W 87-60
−0.5
6
vs
WRST
W 77-67
−4.5
10
vs
CSUF
W 93-65
−4.5
13
@
KSU
L 96-99
+30.5
18
vs
PRES
W 67-57
−0.5
21
vs
SAC
W 91-67
+3.5
25
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+8.5
2
vs
UTAH
W 79-72
−1.5
6
vs
PAC
W 67-61
−16.5
13
vs
NWST
W 79-70
+3.5
19
vs
MORG
W 97-50
−4.5
21
vs
COLU
W 74-56
−23.5
30
vs
LOU
L 70-90
+0.5
2
vs
ND
W 72-71
+4.5
7
@
UVA
L 60-84
−4.5
10
@
VT
L 75-78
+4.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 56-71
−22.5
17
vs
UNC
W 84-78
+10.5
24
@
STAN
W 78-66
−2.5
28
@
FSU
L 61-63
−33.5
31
@
MIA
W 86-85
+22.5
4
vs
GT
W 90-85
+22.5
7
vs
CLEM
L 55-77
−7.5
11
@
SYR
L 100-107
+58.5
14
@
BC
W 86-75
+16.5
21
vs
STAN
W 72-66
−11.5
25
vs
SMU
W 73-69
−21.5
over 12under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Pitt
10-18 overall · 3-12 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Stanford67–75
- Wvs Notre Dame73–68
- L@ North Carolina65–79
- Lvs Duke54–70
- Lvs SMU67–86
3 days since their last game.
California
19-8 overall · 8-7 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs SMU73–69
- Wvs Stanford72–66
- W@ Boston College86–75
- L@ Syracuse100–107
- Lvs Clemson55–77
3 days since their last game.