Sanford Coyote Sports Center · at South Dakota
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SDAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MTST 79–73 · win probability MTST 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MTST has more of the edges
MTST 5, SDAK 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MTST offense vs SDAK defense
Offense 190th of 366 against a defense 355th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MTST 53.6 and allows 51.6; SDAK 49.9 and allows 54.5
Free throws
Free throw rate: MTST 30.2, SDAK 45.2. Allowed: MTST 29.6, SDAK 31.0
Three-pointers
MTST hits 36.1% and allows 34.3%; SDAK hits 32.4% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 44.6% and 35.9% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MTST 89%, SDAK 26%. Transfers in: MTST 2, SDAK 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MTST plays 67.9 a game (233rd fastest), SDAK 72.6 (23rd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
SDAK at home. This season: SDAK 0-0 at home, MTST 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MTST 14.8%, SDAK 16.5%. Forced: MTST 15.6%, SDAK 15.9%
Even
SDAK offense vs MTST defense
Offense 197th of 366 against a defense 155th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MTST has played the 278th-hardest schedule, SDAK the 305th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MTST 27.0%, SDAK 28.7%. Defensive: MTST 71.8%, SDAK 69.7%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MTST -5.9 | — |
| Total | — | 151.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | MTST 78.8 · SDAK 72.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MTST -3.6 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | MTST 37.3 · SDAK 33.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Montana St
29 games played
Straight up
15-14
52% wins
Against the spread
17-12
59% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 78-84 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 73-75 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 68-77 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 58-62 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 78-72 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +17.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 82-74 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-72 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 57-67 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 83-80 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 89-75 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-68 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 68-64 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 89-92 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 76-67 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 73-68 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 74-62 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-88 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 80-83 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 54-63 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 73-66 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 71-72 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 82-71 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 79-82 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 76-91 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-69 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 76-65 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 74-78 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
COLO
L 78-84
+5.5
9
vs
DEN
L 73-75
−9.5
12
@
STAN
L 68-77
+5.5
15
@
BOIS
L 58-62
+12.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-72
+2.5
29
@
USU
L 81-84
+14.5
3
vs
STMN
W 82-74
+5.5
6
@
ORU
L 68-72
−10.5
13
@
ORST
L 57-67
−8.5
16
@
CP
W 83-80
+0.5
1
vs
UNCO
W 89-75
+11.5
3
vs
NAU
W 77-68
−1.5
8
@
EWU
W 68-64
+1.5
10
@
IDHO
L 89-92
−1.5
17
vs
MONT
W 76-67
+3.5
19
@
UNCO
W 73-68
+7.5
22
vs
IDST
W 74-62
+6.5
24
vs
WEB
W 91-88
−3.5
29
@
SAC
L 80-83
−7.5
31
@
PRST
L 54-63
−4.5
5
vs
IDHO
W 73-66
+4.5
7
vs
EWU
L 71-72
−6.5
14
@
MONT
W 82-71
+13.5
19
@
WEB
L 79-82
−1.5
21
@
IDST
L 76-91
−16.5
26
vs
PRST
W 84-69
+12.5
28
vs
SAC
W 82-61
+14.5
2
@
NAU
W 76-65
+5.5
8
vs
IDHO
L 74-78
−2.5
covered 17didn’t cover 12avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
COLO
L 78-84
+13.5
9
vs
DEN
L 73-75
+1.5
12
@
STAN
L 68-77
−3.5
15
@
BOIS
L 58-62
−27.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-72
+9.5
29
@
USU
L 81-84
+16.5
3
vs
STMN
W 82-74
+8.5
6
@
ORU
L 68-72
−10.5
13
@
ORST
L 57-67
−16.5
16
@
CP
W 83-80
+3.5
1
vs
UNCO
W 89-75
+9.5
3
vs
NAU
W 77-68
+1.5
8
@
EWU
W 68-64
−24.5
10
@
IDHO
L 89-92
+36.5
17
vs
MONT
W 76-67
−7.5
19
@
UNCO
W 73-68
−12.5
22
vs
IDST
W 74-62
−8.5
24
vs
WEB
W 91-88
+31.5
29
@
SAC
L 80-83
+9.5
31
@
PRST
L 54-63
−21.5
5
vs
IDHO
W 73-66
−8.5
7
vs
EWU
L 71-72
−5.5
14
@
MONT
W 82-71
+7.5
19
@
WEB
L 79-82
+12.5
21
@
IDST
L 76-91
+22.5
26
vs
PRST
W 84-69
+12.5
28
vs
SAC
W 82-61
−15.5
2
@
NAU
W 76-65
−1.5
8
vs
IDHO
L 74-78
+8.5
over 16under 13avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Dakota
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 79-81 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 76-92 | +29.5 | W +13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 89-74 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 83-78 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 172.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 68-102 | +24.5 | L −9.5 | 171.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 82-81 | -15.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-63 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 71-77 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 87-89 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-106 | +14.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 97-85 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 76-106 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 61-84 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 86-99 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 99-83 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-96 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-90 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 77-69 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-89 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 82-75 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 68-67 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 71-72 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-90 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-67 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-72 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 62-76 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UTU
L 79-81
−3.5
5
@
CREI
L 76-92
+13.5
12
vs
USI
W 89-74
+7.5
16
vs
WMU
W 83-78
+1.5
20
@
MIZ
L 68-102
−9.5
23
vs
SCST
W 82-81
−14.5
29
vs
AF
W 80-63
+13.5
3
vs
PRST
L 71-77
−3.5
6
@
UNCO
L 87-89
+6.5
9
@
WYO
L 79-106
−12.5
13
vs
PV
W 97-85
+5.5
20
@
KSU
L 76-106
−8.5
31
@
NDSU
L 61-84
−11.5
7
@
STMN
L 86-99
+1.5
10
vs
DEN
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
KC
W 99-83
+8.5
17
@
UND
L 80-96
−14.5
21
@
OMA
W 68-64
+10.5
24
vs
STMN
L 78-90
−1.5
29
vs
ORU
W 77-69
+4.5
31
vs
NDSU
L 84-89
+3.5
4
@
KC
W 82-75
+4.5
7
@
SDST
W 68-67
+12.5
11
vs
UND
L 71-72
−3.5
19
@
DEN
L 70-90
−14.5
21
@
ORU
L 62-67
−3.5
25
vs
OMA
W 89-72
+15.5
28
vs
SDST
W 75-70
+8.5
6
vs
OMA
L 62-76
−12.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UTU
L 79-81
−4.5
5
@
CREI
L 76-92
−1.5
12
vs
USI
W 89-74
−1.5
16
vs
WMU
W 83-78
−11.5
20
@
MIZ
L 68-102
−1.5
23
vs
SCST
W 82-81
+2.5
29
vs
AF
W 80-63
−4.5
3
vs
PRST
L 71-77
−10.5
6
@
UNCO
L 87-89
+13.5
9
@
WYO
L 79-106
+23.5
13
vs
PV
W 97-85
+13.5
20
@
KSU
L 76-106
+5.5
31
@
NDSU
L 61-84
−19.5
7
@
STMN
L 86-99
+22.5
10
vs
DEN
W 82-72
−15.5
15
vs
KC
W 99-83
+25.5
17
@
UND
L 80-96
+15.5
21
@
OMA
W 68-64
−28.5
24
vs
STMN
L 78-90
+6.5
29
vs
ORU
W 77-69
−8.5
31
vs
NDSU
L 84-89
+18.5
4
@
KC
W 82-75
+0.5
7
@
SDST
W 68-67
−24.5
11
vs
UND
L 71-72
−13.5
19
@
DEN
L 70-90
−3.5
21
@
ORU
L 62-67
−22.5
25
vs
OMA
W 89-72
+8.5
28
vs
SDST
W 75-70
−6.5
6
vs
OMA
L 62-76
−12.5
over 12under 17avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Montana St has the better starters
Position by position: Montana St 4, South Dakota 0, even 1
Montana StBetterSouth Dakota
G J. Miller15.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 82
←MTSTBig
G J. Summers TR9.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 22
G C. Holden8.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Sanchez TR9.7 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 34
G J. Davis9.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 59
←MTSTSmall
G V. Buzelis7.1 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
G S. Amunrud7.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 53
←MTSTSmall
G K. Kublickas TR5.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 19
F C. King12.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 41
←MTSTBig
F E. Kizer4 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 5
Montana StBetterSouth Dakota
MTST offense190th of 366 · -5.8
←MTSTBig
SDAK defense355th of 366 · -10.1
MTST defense155th of 366 · -3.4
=Even
SDAK offense197th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt-0.8 · 4 players
←MTSTBig
Backcourt-7.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.9 · 1 player
←MTSTSmall
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
Bench-4.0 · 5 players
→SDAKSmall
Bench-1.8 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestMTST betterSDAK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Miller36 minC. Holden28 minJ. Davis25 minS. Amunrud21 minH. Keene11 minD. Slater7 min · TR
Forwards
C. King29 minJ. Steppe15 minW. Mbatch11 minL. Praytor4 min · TRC. Rutherfurd1 minJ. StewardNew
Guards
J. Summers27 min · TRM. Sanchez25 min · TRV. Buzelis24 minK. Kublickas20 min · TRC. Kelderman4 min · TRE. WarrenNew
Forwards
E. Kizer15 minJ. Brack14 minJ. Townley-Thomas5 min · TRT. NetolickyNewB. DomschNew
Centers
S. van Bussel5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #151 | Points per game | 78.0 #94 |
| 1.12 #107 | Points per possession | 1.07 #207 |
| 67.9 #233 | Pace (possessions) | 72.6 #23 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #80 | Effective FG% | 49.9 #239 |
| 36.1 #52 | 3-point % | 32.4 #264 |
| 44.6 #76 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.9 #251 |
| 30.2 #303 | Free throw rate | 45.2 #4 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #53 | Turnover rate | 16.5 #168 |
| 27.0 #292 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.7 #242 |
| 10.6 #347 | Assists per game | 11.9 #295 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.5 #144 | Points allowed | 81.7 #337 |
| 1.08 #158 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #284 |
| 51.6 #193 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.5 #318 |
| 34.3 #198 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #219 |
| 15.6 #242 | Turnovers forced | 15.9 #225 |
| 71.8 #75 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #172 |
| 6.5 #171 | Steals per game | 6.1 #223 |
| 2.8 #263 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #293 |
Montana St
15-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Idaho74–78
- W@ N Arizona76–65
- Wvs Sacramento St82–61
- Wvs Portland St84–69
- L@ Idaho St76–91
A week or more of rest.
South Dakota
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Omaha62–76
- Wvs S Dakota St75–70
- Wvs Omaha89–72
- L@ Oral Roberts62–67
- L@ Denver70–90
A week or more of rest.