J. Lawrence Walkup Skydome · at N Arizona · Conference game
#162MTSTMontana St
@
#321NAUN Arizona
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Montana St and N Arizona
MTSTThis seasonNAU
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects MTST 75–67 · win probability MTST 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: MTST has more of the edges

MTST 6, NAU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MTSTBig
NAU offense vs MTST defense
Offense 329th of 366 against a defense 155th, on the model’s ratings
MTSTBig
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MTST 27.0%, NAU 23.3%. Defensive: MTST 71.8%, NAU 66.6%
MTSTBig
Shooting
Effective FG%: MTST 53.6 and allows 51.6; NAU 51.7 and allows 56.9
MTSTSmall
MTST offense vs NAU defense
Offense 190th of 366 against a defense 292nd, on the model’s ratings
MTSTSmall
Three-pointers
MTST hits 36.1% and allows 34.3%; NAU hits 35.6% and allows 38.7%. Threes are 44.6% and 36.6% of their shots
MTSTSmall
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MTST 89%, NAU 40%. Transfers in: MTST 2, NAU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
NAUSmall
Home court
NAU at home. This season: NAU 0-0 at home, MTST 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: MTST plays 67.9 a game (233rd fastest), NAU 65.5 (330th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MTST 30.2, NAU 31.8. Allowed: MTST 29.6, NAU 32.7
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MTST 14.8%, NAU 16.0%. Forced: MTST 15.6%, NAU 16.6%
Context
Schedule so far
MTST has played the 278th-hardest schedule, NAU the 275th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—MTST -7.6—
Total—142.5—
Projected score—MTST 75.1 · NAU 67.4

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadMTST -4.7—
1H total66.7—
1H projected scoreMTST 35.7 · NAU 31—

Montana St has the better starters

Position by position: Montana St 3, N Arizona 0, even 2
Montana StBetterN Arizona
G J. Miller15.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 2.8 ast Score 82
MTSTBig
G R. Abelman10.9 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast Score 42
G C. Holden8.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast Not ranked
No call
G C. Komin8 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.3 ast Score 50
G J. Davis9.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast Score 59
MTSTBig
G B. Peterson4.4 pts · 0.7 reb · 2.1 ast Score 7
G S. Amunrud7.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.7 ast Score 53
No call
G M. Majerle TR0.7 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast Not ranked
F C. King12.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast Score 41
MTSTBig
F D. Anderson TR1.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.4 ast Score 6
Montana StBetterN Arizona
MTST offense190th of 366 · -5.8
MTSTSmall
NAU defense292nd of 366 · -7.4
MTST defense155th of 366 · -3.4
MTSTBig
NAU offense329th of 366 · -10.7
Backcourt-0.8 · 4 players
MTSTBig
Backcourt-5.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.9 · 1 player
Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
Bench-4.0 · 5 players
NAUBig
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestMTST betterNAU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Montana St
Guards
J. Miller36 minC. Holden28 minJ. Davis25 minS. Amunrud21 minH. Keene11 minD. Slater7 min · TR
Forwards
C. King29 minJ. Steppe15 minW. Mbatch11 minL. Praytor4 min · TRC. Rutherfurd1 minJ. StewardNew
N Arizona
Guards
R. Abelman33 minC. Komin27 minB. Peterson20 minM. Majerle5 min · TRC. Bennett3 min · TRJ. Amundsen1 min
Forwards
D. Anderson7 min · TRL. WieskampNewT. GreenNewL. ToukamNewZ. TannerNew
Centers
N. KeutchaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
MTSTNAU
Scoring
75.7 #151Points per game68.1 #311
1.12 #107Points per possession1.04 #271
67.9 #233Pace (possessions)65.5 #330
Shooting
53.6 #80Effective FG%51.7 #161
36.1 #523-point %35.6 #79
44.6 #763-point attempt rate36.6 #236
30.2 #303Free throw rate31.8 #260
Possessions
14.8 #53Turnover rate16.0 #140
27.0 #292Offensive rebound rate23.3 #348
10.6 #347Assists per game12.5 #251
Defense
73.5 #144Points allowed77.6 #257
1.08 #158Points allowed per possession1.18 #351
51.6 #193Opponent effective FG%56.9 #355
34.3 #198Opponent 3-point %38.7 #362
15.6 #242Turnovers forced16.6 #181
71.8 #75Defensive rebound rate66.6 #305
6.5 #171Steals per game6.3 #194
2.8 #263Blocks per game2.7 #287

Montana St

15-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Big Sky Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Idaho74–78
  • W@ N Arizona76–65
  • Wvs Sacramento St82–61
  • Wvs Portland St84–69
  • L@ Idaho St76–91

A week or more of rest.

N Arizona

7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Big Sky Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Idaho St65–73
  • Lvs Montana St65–76
  • L@ E Washington57–88
  • L@ Idaho58–78
  • L@ N Colorado77–78

A week or more of rest.